mirror of
https://github.com/Raymo111/i3lock-color.git
synced 2024-11-11 13:50:52 -05:00
revert shift lock handling (broke uppercase letters)
With some layouts, this broke uppercase letters in your passwords. I think that explicit shiftlock handling is unnecessary. X11 seems to do it on its own. Here is what leads me to that conclusion: $ setxkbmap de $ xmodmap -e 'keycode 66 = Shift_Lock' $ xev Now enter a character, say "a", then press CapsLk (which is now Shift_Lock), then press "a" again. The event state is 0x1, thereby undistinguishable from normal shift.
This commit is contained in:
parent
9b29ae7afd
commit
dd02dff44a
1 changed files with 7 additions and 16 deletions
23
i3lock.c
23
i3lock.c
|
@ -53,7 +53,6 @@ static bool modeswitch_active = false;
|
|||
static bool iso_level3_shift_active = false;
|
||||
static bool iso_level5_shift_active = false;
|
||||
static int numlockmask;
|
||||
static int shiftlockmask;
|
||||
static int capslockmask;
|
||||
static bool beep = false;
|
||||
bool debug_mode = false;
|
||||
|
@ -289,18 +288,12 @@ static void handle_key_press(xcb_key_press_event_t *event) {
|
|||
* their uppercase variant) is active at the moment. */
|
||||
bool capslock = (event->state & capslockmask);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Whether Shift Lock (shift state is reversed) is active at the moment. */
|
||||
bool shiftlock = (event->state & shiftlockmask);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Whether Caps Lock or Shift Lock is active at the moment. */
|
||||
bool lock = (capslock || shiftlock);
|
||||
|
||||
DEBUG("shift = %d, lock = %d, capslock = %d, shiftlock = %d\n",
|
||||
shift, lock, capslock, shiftlock);
|
||||
DEBUG("shift = %d, capslock = %d\n",
|
||||
shift, capslock);
|
||||
|
||||
if ((event->state & numlockmask) && xcb_is_keypad_key(sym1)) {
|
||||
/* this key was a keypad key */
|
||||
if (shift || shiftlock)
|
||||
if (shift)
|
||||
sym = sym0;
|
||||
else sym = sym1;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
|
@ -313,16 +306,15 @@ static void handle_key_press(xcb_key_press_event_t *event) {
|
|||
* for alphabetic keys, unlike Shift Lock. */
|
||||
if (lower == upper) {
|
||||
capslock = false;
|
||||
lock = (capslock || shiftlock);
|
||||
DEBUG("lower == upper, now shift = %d, lock = %d, capslock = %d, shiftlock = %d\n",
|
||||
shift, lock, capslock, shiftlock);
|
||||
DEBUG("lower == upper, now shift = %d, capslock = %d\n",
|
||||
shift, capslock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* In two different cases we need to use the uppercase keysym:
|
||||
* 1) The user holds shift, no lock is active.
|
||||
* 2) Any of the two locks is active.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if ((shift && !lock) || (!shift && lock))
|
||||
if ((shift && !capslock) || (!shift && capslock))
|
||||
sym = sym1;
|
||||
else sym = sym0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -716,10 +708,9 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
|
|||
|
||||
symbols = xcb_key_symbols_alloc(conn);
|
||||
numlockmask = get_mod_mask(conn, symbols, XK_Num_Lock);
|
||||
shiftlockmask = get_mod_mask(conn, symbols, XK_Shift_Lock);
|
||||
capslockmask = get_mod_mask(conn, symbols, XK_Caps_Lock);
|
||||
|
||||
DEBUG("shift lock mask = %d\n", shiftlockmask);
|
||||
DEBUG("numlock mask = %d\n", numlockmask);
|
||||
DEBUG("caps lock mask = %d\n", capslockmask);
|
||||
|
||||
if (dpms)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue