awesome/falsehood
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/kdeldycke/awesome-falsehood.git synced 2024-12-11 11:57:59 -05:00
Code Activity

Promote TL;DR as canonical intro.

Browse source 
Move fancier falsehood article description to contribution guide. Refs #105
This commit is contained in:
Kevin Deldycke 2021-11-01 12:12:39 +04:00
parent b5dcc807f1
commit c77087f8aa
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: C572BB01B1ED5A3A
2 changed files with 16 additions and 25 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

25
.github/contributing.md vendored
View file

@ -12,23 +12,24 @@ in this awesome list.
### Falsehood Articles
Articles following the *falsehood* scheme are prime candidates for inclusion in
Articles following the *falsehood* schema are prime candidates for inclusion in
this awesome list.
These articles starts with the hypothesis that developers have a naive, simple
view of the subject at hand. Then proceed to list a set of candid assumptions
that might be held by the programmers. Each one is intentionally false, and
in their best form illustrated by a counter-example.
These articles starts with the hypothesis that developers have a naive and
simple view of a domain. Then proceed to list a set of candid assumptions that
might be held by programmers. Each one is intentionally false, and in their
best form are illustrated with a counter-example.
A list of falsehood is crafted as a progression that is designed to refine
concepts. Having read the whole list of falsehood, the reader should possess a
global, if not complete, overview of the domain being targeted by the article,
including most, if not all, its pitfalls, edges-cases and inconsistencies.
better overview of a domain while dispelling its myths, point out common
pitfalls and demonstrate its subtleties.
Sometimes, these kind of articles might provoke an emotional reaction and cause
flipping table. `(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻` Because, the world is messy. Discovering the
complexity of a domain that is simple in appearance will lead to
frustrations. This is the sign of a great candidate for that list!
*falsehood* articles are, in a sense, a suite of wordy unit-tests covering
extensive edge-cases provided by real-world usage. The world is messy.
Discovering a domain to be much more complex than anticipated will lead to
frustrations. And cause flipping tables `(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻`. This is the sign of a
great candidate for that list!
Articles featuring items that are applicable to one product (or a service) and
one only can't be considered as generic enough and should be avoided.
@ -36,7 +37,7 @@ one only can't be considered as generic enough and should be avoided.
### Libraries
Programming libraries or modules are good candidates too, if they solve or
reduce the complexities pointed to by the *falsehood* articles above.
reduce the complexities pointed to by *falsehood* articles above.
That way we can put back tables in place. `┬─┬ ノ( ゜-゜ノ)`

16
readme.md
View file

@ -13,21 +13,11 @@
— Ludwig Wittgenstein<sup id="intro-quote-ref"><a href="#intro-quote-def">[1]</a></sup>
</p>
*Falsehood* articles are a form of commentary on a particular subject, and are appreciated by the developer community at large for their effectiveness and terseness. They're a convenient written form to approach an unfamiliar domain by dispelling myths, point out common pitfalls, show inconsistencies and subtleties.
A *falsehood* is an ***idea* that you initially believe was true**, but in-reality it is **proven to be false**.
In a sense, *Falsehood* articles are a suite of wordy unit-tests covering extensive edge-cases provided by real-world usage.
E.g. of an *idea*: valid email address exactly has one `@` character. So, you will use this rule to implement your email-field validation logic. Right? Wrong! The *reality* is: emails [can have multiple `@` chars](#emails). Therefore youy implementation should allow this. The initial *idea* is the a falsehood you believed in.
<details>
<summary>
<strong>TL;DR version</strong> <sub>(Click To Expand)</sub>
</summary>
> A "falsehood" is an **"idea" that you initially believe was true**, but in-reality it is **proven to be false**.
>
> E.g. "**Idea:** Valid email address exactly has one `@` character, right? I will use this rule to implement my email-field validation logic. **Reality:** False! Emails [can have multiple `@` chars](#emails), therefore my implementation should allow this.".
>
> These listed articles will have a comprehensive list of those false-beliefs that you should be aware of, to help you become a better programmer.
</details>
The *falsehood* articles listed below will have a comprehensive list of those false-beliefs that you should be aware of, to help you become a better programmer.
## Contents