2022-12-09 01:35:56 -05:00
|
|
|
// Copyright 2021 The Gitea Authors. All rights reserved.
|
|
|
|
// Use of this source code is governed by a MIT-style
|
|
|
|
// license that can be found in the LICENSE file.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
package integration
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
|
|
"bytes"
|
|
|
|
"fmt"
|
|
|
|
"io"
|
|
|
|
"mime/multipart"
|
|
|
|
"net/http"
|
|
|
|
"testing"
|
[FEAT] allow setting the update date on issues and comments
This field adds the possibility to set the update date when modifying
an issue through the API.
A 'NoAutoDate' in-memory field is added in the Issue struct.
If the update_at field is set, NoAutoDate is set to true and the
Issue's UpdatedUnix field is filled.
That information is passed down to the functions that actually updates
the database, which have been modified to not auto update dates if
requested.
A guard is added to the 'EditIssue' API call, to checks that the
udpate_at date is between the issue's creation date and the current
date (to avoid 'malicious' changes). It also limits the new feature
to project's owners and admins.
(cherry picked from commit c524d33402c76bc4cccea2806f289e08a009baae)
Add a SetIssueUpdateDate() function in services/issue.go
That function is used by some API calls to set the NoAutoDate and
UpdatedUnix fields of an Issue if an updated_at date is provided.
(cherry picked from commit f061caa6555e0c9e922ee1e73dd2e4337360e9fe)
Add an updated_at field to the API calls related to Issue's Labels.
The update date is applied to the issue's comment created to inform
about the modification of the issue's labels.
(cherry picked from commit ea36cf80f58f0ab20c565a8f5d063b90fd741f97)
Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's attachment creation
The update date is applied to the issue's comment created to inform
about the modification of the issue's content, and is set as the
asset creation date.
(cherry picked from commit 96150971ca31b97e97e84d5f5eb95a177cc44e2e)
Checking Issue changes, with and without providing an updated_at date
Those unit tests are added:
- TestAPIEditIssueWithAutoDate
- TestAPIEditIssueWithNoAutoDate
- TestAPIAddIssueLabelsWithAutoDate
- TestAPIAddIssueLabelsWithNoAutoDate
- TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentWithAutoDate
- TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentWithNoAutoDate
(cherry picked from commit 4926a5d7a28581003545256632213bf4136b193d)
Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's comment creation
The update date is used as the comment creation date, and is applied to
the issue as the update creation date.
(cherry picked from commit 76c8faecdc6cba48ca4fe07d1a916d1f1a4b37b4)
Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's comment edition
The update date is used as the comment update date, and is applied to
the issue as an update date.
(cherry picked from commit cf787ad7fdb8e6273fdc35d7b5cc164b400207e9)
Add an updated_at field to the API call for comment's attachment creation
The update date is applied to the comment, and is set as the asset
creation date.
(cherry picked from commit 1e4ff424d39db7a4256cd9abf9c58b8d3e1b5c14)
Checking Comment changes, with and without providing an updated_at date
Those unit tests are added:
- TestAPICreateCommentWithAutoDate
- TestAPICreateCommentWithNoAutoDate
- TestAPIEditCommentWithAutoDate
- TestAPIEditCommentWithNoAutoDate
- TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentWithAutoDate
- TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentWithNoAutoDate
(cherry picked from commit da932152f1deb3039a399516a51c8b6757059c91)
Pettier code to set the update time of comments
Now uses sess.AllCols().NoAutoToime().SetExpr("updated_unix", ...)
XORM is smart enough to compose one single SQL UPDATE which all
columns + updated_unix.
(cherry picked from commit 1f6a42808dd739c0c2e49e6b7ae2967f120f43c2)
Issue edition: Keep the max of the milestone and issue update dates.
When editing an issue via the API, an updated_at date can be provided.
If the EditIssue call changes the issue's milestone, the milestone's
update date is to be changed accordingly, but only with a greater
value.
This ensures that a milestone's update date is the max of all issue's
update dates.
(cherry picked from commit 8f22ea182e6b49e933dc6534040160dd739ff18a)
Rewrite the 'AutoDate' tests using subtests
Also add a test to check the permissions to set a date, and a test
to check update dates on milestones.
The tests related to 'AutoDate' are:
- TestAPIEditIssueAutoDate
- TestAPIAddIssueLabelsAutoDate
- TestAPIEditIssueMilestoneAutoDate
- TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentAutoDate
- TestAPICreateCommentAutoDate
- TestAPIEditCommentWithDate
- TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentAutoDate
(cherry picked from commit 961fd13c551b3e50040acb7c914a00ead92de63f)
(cherry picked from commit d52f4eea44692ee773010cb66a69a603663947d5)
(cherry picked from commit 3540ea2a43155ca8cf5ab1a4a246babfb829db16)
Conflicts:
services/issue/issue.go
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1415
(cherry picked from commit 56720ade008c09122d825959171aa5346d645987)
Conflicts:
routers/api/v1/repo/issue_label.go
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1462
(cherry picked from commit 47c78927d6c7e7a50298fa67efad1e73723a0981)
(cherry picked from commit 2030f3b965cde401976821083c3250b404954ecc)
(cherry picked from commit f02aeb76981cd688ceaf6613f142a8a725be1437)
Conflicts:
routers/api/v1/repo/issue_attachment.go
routers/api/v1/repo/issue_comment_attachment.go
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1575
(cherry picked from commit d072525b35e44faf7ff87143c0e52b8ba8a625c8)
(cherry picked from commit 8424d0ab3df75ac3ffa30f42d398e22995ada5e7)
(cherry picked from commit 5cc62caec788b54afd9da5b9193ce06ee8ec562b)
(cherry picked from commit d6300d5dcd01c7ddc65d8b0f326f9c19cb53b58e)
[FEAT] allow setting the update date on issues and comments (squash) apply the 'update_at' value to the cross-ref comments (#1676)
[this is a follow-up to PR #764]
When a comment of issue A referencing issue B is added with a forced 'updated_at' date, that date has to be applied to the comment created in issue B.
-----
Comment:
While trying my 'RoundUp migration script', I found that this case was forgotten in PR #764 - my apologies...
I'll try to write a functional test, base on models/issues/issue_xref_test.go
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1676
Co-authored-by: fluzz <fluzz@freedroid.org>
Co-committed-by: fluzz <fluzz@freedroid.org>
(cherry picked from commit ac4f727f63a2dd746dd84a31ebf7f70d5b5d7c52)
(cherry picked from commit 5110476ee9010ba8cdca0e0f37f765f8800e9fe1)
(cherry picked from commit 77ba6be1dab4f6f3678d79a394da56e6447ebbe1)
(cherry picked from commit 9c8337b5c442cfd72d97597c2089e776f42828b7)
(cherry picked from commit 1d689eb686f0f7df09c7861b3faf9d8683cb933b)
2023-10-09 13:07:47 -04:00
|
|
|
"time"
|
2022-12-09 01:35:56 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2023-01-17 16:46:03 -05:00
|
|
|
auth_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/auth"
|
2022-12-09 01:35:56 -05:00
|
|
|
issues_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/issues"
|
|
|
|
repo_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/repo"
|
|
|
|
"code.gitea.io/gitea/models/unittest"
|
|
|
|
user_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/user"
|
|
|
|
api "code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/structs"
|
|
|
|
"code.gitea.io/gitea/tests"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func TestAPIGetIssueAttachment(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
attachment := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Attachment{ID: 1})
|
|
|
|
repo := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{ID: attachment.RepoID})
|
|
|
|
issue := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Issue{RepoID: attachment.IssueID})
|
|
|
|
repoOwner := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: repo.OwnerID})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
session := loginUser(t, repoOwner.Name)
|
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767)
## Changes
- Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and
`write` levels:
- `activitypub`
- `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin)
- `misc`
- `notification`
- `organization`
- `package`
- `issue`
- `repository`
- `user`
- Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to
`reqToken()`
- `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section
- _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is
included based on the section and HTTP method
- `reqToken()` is used for individual routes
- checks that required authentication is present (but does not check
scope levels as this will already have been handled by
`tokenRequiresScopes()`
- Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of
scopes
- Updates the user interface for scope selection
### User interface example
<img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3">
<img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c">
## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision
- `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes.
For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category
(say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say
`DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include
`delete:organization`.
- `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that
require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request,
`tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error
## TODO
- [x] Alphabetize scope categories
- [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public).
Also expand this to organizations
- [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show
warning
- [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api.
`tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct
scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other
auth) is present.
- _This should be addressed in this PR_
- [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to
minimize access changes to existing user tokens.
- _This should be addressed in this PR_
- [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what
read/write/delete levels correspond to
- [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly
deviates from the api definition.
- _This should be addressed in this PR_
- For example:
```go
m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() {
m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs)
m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions)
}, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser,
auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization),
context_service.UserAssignmentAPI())
```
## Future improvements
- [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation
- [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in
- [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository`
- [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display
text instead of an empty bullet point
- [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read
categories be selected by default
Closes #24501
Closes #24799
Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io>
Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-04 14:57:16 -04:00
|
|
|
token := getTokenForLoggedInUser(t, session, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeReadIssue)
|
2022-12-09 01:35:56 -05:00
|
|
|
urlStr := fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/issues/%d/assets/%d?token=%s",
|
|
|
|
repoOwner.Name, repo.Name, issue.Index, attachment.ID, token)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
req := NewRequest(t, "GET", urlStr)
|
|
|
|
resp := session.MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
|
|
|
|
apiAttachment := new(api.Attachment)
|
|
|
|
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &apiAttachment)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Attachment{ID: apiAttachment.ID, IssueID: issue.ID})
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func TestAPIListIssueAttachments(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
attachment := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Attachment{ID: 1})
|
|
|
|
repo := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{ID: attachment.RepoID})
|
|
|
|
issue := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Issue{RepoID: attachment.IssueID})
|
|
|
|
repoOwner := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: repo.OwnerID})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
session := loginUser(t, repoOwner.Name)
|
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767)
## Changes
- Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and
`write` levels:
- `activitypub`
- `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin)
- `misc`
- `notification`
- `organization`
- `package`
- `issue`
- `repository`
- `user`
- Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to
`reqToken()`
- `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section
- _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is
included based on the section and HTTP method
- `reqToken()` is used for individual routes
- checks that required authentication is present (but does not check
scope levels as this will already have been handled by
`tokenRequiresScopes()`
- Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of
scopes
- Updates the user interface for scope selection
### User interface example
<img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3">
<img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c">
## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision
- `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes.
For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category
(say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say
`DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include
`delete:organization`.
- `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that
require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request,
`tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error
## TODO
- [x] Alphabetize scope categories
- [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public).
Also expand this to organizations
- [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show
warning
- [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api.
`tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct
scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other
auth) is present.
- _This should be addressed in this PR_
- [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to
minimize access changes to existing user tokens.
- _This should be addressed in this PR_
- [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what
read/write/delete levels correspond to
- [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly
deviates from the api definition.
- _This should be addressed in this PR_
- For example:
```go
m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() {
m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs)
m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions)
}, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser,
auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization),
context_service.UserAssignmentAPI())
```
## Future improvements
- [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation
- [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in
- [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository`
- [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display
text instead of an empty bullet point
- [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read
categories be selected by default
Closes #24501
Closes #24799
Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io>
Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-04 14:57:16 -04:00
|
|
|
token := getTokenForLoggedInUser(t, session, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeReadIssue)
|
2022-12-09 01:35:56 -05:00
|
|
|
urlStr := fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/issues/%d/assets?token=%s",
|
|
|
|
repoOwner.Name, repo.Name, issue.Index, token)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
req := NewRequest(t, "GET", urlStr)
|
|
|
|
resp := session.MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
|
|
|
|
apiAttachment := new([]api.Attachment)
|
|
|
|
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &apiAttachment)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Attachment{ID: (*apiAttachment)[0].ID, IssueID: issue.ID})
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func TestAPICreateIssueAttachment(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
repo := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{ID: 1})
|
|
|
|
issue := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Issue{RepoID: repo.ID})
|
|
|
|
repoOwner := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: repo.OwnerID})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
session := loginUser(t, repoOwner.Name)
|
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767)
## Changes
- Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and
`write` levels:
- `activitypub`
- `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin)
- `misc`
- `notification`
- `organization`
- `package`
- `issue`
- `repository`
- `user`
- Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to
`reqToken()`
- `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section
- _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is
included based on the section and HTTP method
- `reqToken()` is used for individual routes
- checks that required authentication is present (but does not check
scope levels as this will already have been handled by
`tokenRequiresScopes()`
- Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of
scopes
- Updates the user interface for scope selection
### User interface example
<img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3">
<img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c">
## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision
- `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes.
For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category
(say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say
`DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include
`delete:organization`.
- `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that
require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request,
`tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error
## TODO
- [x] Alphabetize scope categories
- [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public).
Also expand this to organizations
- [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show
warning
- [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api.
`tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct
scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other
auth) is present.
- _This should be addressed in this PR_
- [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to
minimize access changes to existing user tokens.
- _This should be addressed in this PR_
- [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what
read/write/delete levels correspond to
- [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly
deviates from the api definition.
- _This should be addressed in this PR_
- For example:
```go
m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() {
m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs)
m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions)
}, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser,
auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization),
context_service.UserAssignmentAPI())
```
## Future improvements
- [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation
- [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in
- [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository`
- [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display
text instead of an empty bullet point
- [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read
categories be selected by default
Closes #24501
Closes #24799
Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io>
Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-04 14:57:16 -04:00
|
|
|
token := getTokenForLoggedInUser(t, session, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteIssue)
|
2022-12-09 01:35:56 -05:00
|
|
|
urlStr := fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/issues/%d/assets?token=%s",
|
|
|
|
repoOwner.Name, repo.Name, issue.Index, token)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
filename := "image.png"
|
|
|
|
buff := generateImg()
|
|
|
|
body := &bytes.Buffer{}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Setup multi-part
|
|
|
|
writer := multipart.NewWriter(body)
|
|
|
|
part, err := writer.CreateFormFile("attachment", filename)
|
|
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
_, err = io.Copy(part, &buff)
|
|
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
err = writer.Close()
|
|
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
req := NewRequestWithBody(t, "POST", urlStr, body)
|
|
|
|
req.Header.Add("Content-Type", writer.FormDataContentType())
|
|
|
|
resp := session.MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusCreated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
apiAttachment := new(api.Attachment)
|
|
|
|
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &apiAttachment)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Attachment{ID: apiAttachment.ID, IssueID: issue.ID})
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
[FEAT] allow setting the update date on issues and comments
This field adds the possibility to set the update date when modifying
an issue through the API.
A 'NoAutoDate' in-memory field is added in the Issue struct.
If the update_at field is set, NoAutoDate is set to true and the
Issue's UpdatedUnix field is filled.
That information is passed down to the functions that actually updates
the database, which have been modified to not auto update dates if
requested.
A guard is added to the 'EditIssue' API call, to checks that the
udpate_at date is between the issue's creation date and the current
date (to avoid 'malicious' changes). It also limits the new feature
to project's owners and admins.
(cherry picked from commit c524d33402c76bc4cccea2806f289e08a009baae)
Add a SetIssueUpdateDate() function in services/issue.go
That function is used by some API calls to set the NoAutoDate and
UpdatedUnix fields of an Issue if an updated_at date is provided.
(cherry picked from commit f061caa6555e0c9e922ee1e73dd2e4337360e9fe)
Add an updated_at field to the API calls related to Issue's Labels.
The update date is applied to the issue's comment created to inform
about the modification of the issue's labels.
(cherry picked from commit ea36cf80f58f0ab20c565a8f5d063b90fd741f97)
Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's attachment creation
The update date is applied to the issue's comment created to inform
about the modification of the issue's content, and is set as the
asset creation date.
(cherry picked from commit 96150971ca31b97e97e84d5f5eb95a177cc44e2e)
Checking Issue changes, with and without providing an updated_at date
Those unit tests are added:
- TestAPIEditIssueWithAutoDate
- TestAPIEditIssueWithNoAutoDate
- TestAPIAddIssueLabelsWithAutoDate
- TestAPIAddIssueLabelsWithNoAutoDate
- TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentWithAutoDate
- TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentWithNoAutoDate
(cherry picked from commit 4926a5d7a28581003545256632213bf4136b193d)
Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's comment creation
The update date is used as the comment creation date, and is applied to
the issue as the update creation date.
(cherry picked from commit 76c8faecdc6cba48ca4fe07d1a916d1f1a4b37b4)
Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's comment edition
The update date is used as the comment update date, and is applied to
the issue as an update date.
(cherry picked from commit cf787ad7fdb8e6273fdc35d7b5cc164b400207e9)
Add an updated_at field to the API call for comment's attachment creation
The update date is applied to the comment, and is set as the asset
creation date.
(cherry picked from commit 1e4ff424d39db7a4256cd9abf9c58b8d3e1b5c14)
Checking Comment changes, with and without providing an updated_at date
Those unit tests are added:
- TestAPICreateCommentWithAutoDate
- TestAPICreateCommentWithNoAutoDate
- TestAPIEditCommentWithAutoDate
- TestAPIEditCommentWithNoAutoDate
- TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentWithAutoDate
- TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentWithNoAutoDate
(cherry picked from commit da932152f1deb3039a399516a51c8b6757059c91)
Pettier code to set the update time of comments
Now uses sess.AllCols().NoAutoToime().SetExpr("updated_unix", ...)
XORM is smart enough to compose one single SQL UPDATE which all
columns + updated_unix.
(cherry picked from commit 1f6a42808dd739c0c2e49e6b7ae2967f120f43c2)
Issue edition: Keep the max of the milestone and issue update dates.
When editing an issue via the API, an updated_at date can be provided.
If the EditIssue call changes the issue's milestone, the milestone's
update date is to be changed accordingly, but only with a greater
value.
This ensures that a milestone's update date is the max of all issue's
update dates.
(cherry picked from commit 8f22ea182e6b49e933dc6534040160dd739ff18a)
Rewrite the 'AutoDate' tests using subtests
Also add a test to check the permissions to set a date, and a test
to check update dates on milestones.
The tests related to 'AutoDate' are:
- TestAPIEditIssueAutoDate
- TestAPIAddIssueLabelsAutoDate
- TestAPIEditIssueMilestoneAutoDate
- TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentAutoDate
- TestAPICreateCommentAutoDate
- TestAPIEditCommentWithDate
- TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentAutoDate
(cherry picked from commit 961fd13c551b3e50040acb7c914a00ead92de63f)
(cherry picked from commit d52f4eea44692ee773010cb66a69a603663947d5)
(cherry picked from commit 3540ea2a43155ca8cf5ab1a4a246babfb829db16)
Conflicts:
services/issue/issue.go
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1415
(cherry picked from commit 56720ade008c09122d825959171aa5346d645987)
Conflicts:
routers/api/v1/repo/issue_label.go
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1462
(cherry picked from commit 47c78927d6c7e7a50298fa67efad1e73723a0981)
(cherry picked from commit 2030f3b965cde401976821083c3250b404954ecc)
(cherry picked from commit f02aeb76981cd688ceaf6613f142a8a725be1437)
Conflicts:
routers/api/v1/repo/issue_attachment.go
routers/api/v1/repo/issue_comment_attachment.go
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1575
(cherry picked from commit d072525b35e44faf7ff87143c0e52b8ba8a625c8)
(cherry picked from commit 8424d0ab3df75ac3ffa30f42d398e22995ada5e7)
(cherry picked from commit 5cc62caec788b54afd9da5b9193ce06ee8ec562b)
(cherry picked from commit d6300d5dcd01c7ddc65d8b0f326f9c19cb53b58e)
[FEAT] allow setting the update date on issues and comments (squash) apply the 'update_at' value to the cross-ref comments (#1676)
[this is a follow-up to PR #764]
When a comment of issue A referencing issue B is added with a forced 'updated_at' date, that date has to be applied to the comment created in issue B.
-----
Comment:
While trying my 'RoundUp migration script', I found that this case was forgotten in PR #764 - my apologies...
I'll try to write a functional test, base on models/issues/issue_xref_test.go
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1676
Co-authored-by: fluzz <fluzz@freedroid.org>
Co-committed-by: fluzz <fluzz@freedroid.org>
(cherry picked from commit ac4f727f63a2dd746dd84a31ebf7f70d5b5d7c52)
(cherry picked from commit 5110476ee9010ba8cdca0e0f37f765f8800e9fe1)
(cherry picked from commit 77ba6be1dab4f6f3678d79a394da56e6447ebbe1)
(cherry picked from commit 9c8337b5c442cfd72d97597c2089e776f42828b7)
(cherry picked from commit 1d689eb686f0f7df09c7861b3faf9d8683cb933b)
2023-10-09 13:07:47 -04:00
|
|
|
func TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentAutoDate(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
repo := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{ID: 1})
|
|
|
|
issue := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Issue{RepoID: repo.ID})
|
|
|
|
repoOwner := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: repo.OwnerID})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
session := loginUser(t, repoOwner.Name)
|
|
|
|
token := getTokenForLoggedInUser(t, session, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteIssue)
|
|
|
|
urlStr := fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/issues/%d/assets?token=%s",
|
|
|
|
repoOwner.Name, repo.Name, issue.Index, token)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
filename := "image.png"
|
|
|
|
buff := generateImg()
|
|
|
|
body := &bytes.Buffer{}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
t.Run("WithAutoDate", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
defer tests.PrintCurrentTest(t)()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Setup multi-part
|
|
|
|
writer := multipart.NewWriter(body)
|
|
|
|
part, err := writer.CreateFormFile("attachment", filename)
|
|
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
_, err = io.Copy(part, &buff)
|
|
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
err = writer.Close()
|
|
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
req := NewRequestWithBody(t, "POST", urlStr, body)
|
|
|
|
req.Header.Add("Content-Type", writer.FormDataContentType())
|
|
|
|
resp := session.MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusCreated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
apiAttachment := new(api.Attachment)
|
|
|
|
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &apiAttachment)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Attachment{ID: apiAttachment.ID, IssueID: issue.ID})
|
|
|
|
// the execution of the API call supposedly lasted less than one minute
|
|
|
|
updatedSince := time.Since(apiAttachment.Created)
|
|
|
|
assert.LessOrEqual(t, updatedSince, time.Minute)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
issueAfter := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Issue{ID: issue.Index})
|
|
|
|
updatedSince = time.Since(issueAfter.UpdatedUnix.AsTime())
|
|
|
|
assert.LessOrEqual(t, updatedSince, time.Minute)
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
t.Run("WithUpdateDate", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
defer tests.PrintCurrentTest(t)()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
updatedAt := time.Now().Add(-time.Hour).Truncate(time.Second)
|
|
|
|
urlStr += fmt.Sprintf("&updated_at=%s", updatedAt.UTC().Format(time.RFC3339))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Setup multi-part
|
|
|
|
writer := multipart.NewWriter(body)
|
|
|
|
part, err := writer.CreateFormFile("attachment", filename)
|
|
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
_, err = io.Copy(part, &buff)
|
|
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
err = writer.Close()
|
|
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
req := NewRequestWithBody(t, "POST", urlStr, body)
|
|
|
|
req.Header.Add("Content-Type", writer.FormDataContentType())
|
|
|
|
resp := session.MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusCreated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
apiAttachment := new(api.Attachment)
|
|
|
|
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &apiAttachment)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// dates will be converted into the same tz, in order to compare them
|
|
|
|
utcTZ, _ := time.LoadLocation("UTC")
|
|
|
|
unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Attachment{ID: apiAttachment.ID, IssueID: issue.ID})
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(t, updatedAt.In(utcTZ), apiAttachment.Created.In(utcTZ))
|
|
|
|
issueAfter := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Issue{ID: issue.ID})
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(t, updatedAt.In(utcTZ), issueAfter.UpdatedUnix.AsTime().In(utcTZ))
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2022-12-09 01:35:56 -05:00
|
|
|
func TestAPIEditIssueAttachment(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const newAttachmentName = "newAttachmentName"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
attachment := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Attachment{ID: 1})
|
|
|
|
repo := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{ID: attachment.RepoID})
|
|
|
|
issue := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Issue{RepoID: attachment.IssueID})
|
|
|
|
repoOwner := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: repo.OwnerID})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
session := loginUser(t, repoOwner.Name)
|
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767)
## Changes
- Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and
`write` levels:
- `activitypub`
- `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin)
- `misc`
- `notification`
- `organization`
- `package`
- `issue`
- `repository`
- `user`
- Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to
`reqToken()`
- `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section
- _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is
included based on the section and HTTP method
- `reqToken()` is used for individual routes
- checks that required authentication is present (but does not check
scope levels as this will already have been handled by
`tokenRequiresScopes()`
- Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of
scopes
- Updates the user interface for scope selection
### User interface example
<img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3">
<img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c">
## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision
- `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes.
For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category
(say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say
`DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include
`delete:organization`.
- `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that
require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request,
`tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error
## TODO
- [x] Alphabetize scope categories
- [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public).
Also expand this to organizations
- [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show
warning
- [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api.
`tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct
scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other
auth) is present.
- _This should be addressed in this PR_
- [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to
minimize access changes to existing user tokens.
- _This should be addressed in this PR_
- [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what
read/write/delete levels correspond to
- [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly
deviates from the api definition.
- _This should be addressed in this PR_
- For example:
```go
m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() {
m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs)
m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions)
}, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser,
auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization),
context_service.UserAssignmentAPI())
```
## Future improvements
- [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation
- [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in
- [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository`
- [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display
text instead of an empty bullet point
- [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read
categories be selected by default
Closes #24501
Closes #24799
Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io>
Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-04 14:57:16 -04:00
|
|
|
token := getTokenForLoggedInUser(t, session, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteIssue)
|
2022-12-09 01:35:56 -05:00
|
|
|
urlStr := fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/issues/%d/assets/%d?token=%s",
|
|
|
|
repoOwner.Name, repo.Name, issue.Index, attachment.ID, token)
|
|
|
|
req := NewRequestWithValues(t, "PATCH", urlStr, map[string]string{
|
|
|
|
"name": newAttachmentName,
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
resp := session.MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusCreated)
|
|
|
|
apiAttachment := new(api.Attachment)
|
|
|
|
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &apiAttachment)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Attachment{ID: apiAttachment.ID, IssueID: issue.ID, Name: apiAttachment.Name})
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func TestAPIDeleteIssueAttachment(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
attachment := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Attachment{ID: 1})
|
|
|
|
repo := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{ID: attachment.RepoID})
|
|
|
|
issue := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Issue{RepoID: attachment.IssueID})
|
|
|
|
repoOwner := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: repo.OwnerID})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
session := loginUser(t, repoOwner.Name)
|
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767)
## Changes
- Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and
`write` levels:
- `activitypub`
- `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin)
- `misc`
- `notification`
- `organization`
- `package`
- `issue`
- `repository`
- `user`
- Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to
`reqToken()`
- `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section
- _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is
included based on the section and HTTP method
- `reqToken()` is used for individual routes
- checks that required authentication is present (but does not check
scope levels as this will already have been handled by
`tokenRequiresScopes()`
- Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of
scopes
- Updates the user interface for scope selection
### User interface example
<img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3">
<img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c">
## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision
- `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes.
For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category
(say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say
`DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include
`delete:organization`.
- `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that
require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request,
`tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error
## TODO
- [x] Alphabetize scope categories
- [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public).
Also expand this to organizations
- [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show
warning
- [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api.
`tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct
scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other
auth) is present.
- _This should be addressed in this PR_
- [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to
minimize access changes to existing user tokens.
- _This should be addressed in this PR_
- [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what
read/write/delete levels correspond to
- [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly
deviates from the api definition.
- _This should be addressed in this PR_
- For example:
```go
m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() {
m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs)
m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions)
}, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser,
auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization),
context_service.UserAssignmentAPI())
```
## Future improvements
- [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation
- [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in
- [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository`
- [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display
text instead of an empty bullet point
- [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read
categories be selected by default
Closes #24501
Closes #24799
Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io>
Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-04 14:57:16 -04:00
|
|
|
token := getTokenForLoggedInUser(t, session, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteIssue)
|
2022-12-09 01:35:56 -05:00
|
|
|
urlStr := fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/issues/%d/assets/%d?token=%s",
|
|
|
|
repoOwner.Name, repo.Name, issue.Index, attachment.ID, token)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
req := NewRequest(t, "DELETE", urlStr)
|
|
|
|
session.MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusNoContent)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unittest.AssertNotExistsBean(t, &repo_model.Attachment{ID: attachment.ID, IssueID: issue.ID})
|
|
|
|
}
|