1a9998ce91
Replace #26761 It's better to keep children elements simple, and let parent containers layout the necessary padding/margin. The old `not(:last-child)` and `.flex-item + .flex-item` are not easy to maintain (for example, what if the developer would like to use a "tiny height" item?) The old approach also makes some UI look strange because the first item doesn't have proper padding-top. In this PR, we just simply use `.flex-item { padding: ... }`: * Developers could manually set the item height they want easily * It's easier to make it work with various containers -- with padding (`ui segment`) and without padding (`div`) And added more samples/examples.  Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| flex-list.css | ||
| milestone.css | ||
| repoorg.css | ||
| settings.css | ||