mirror of
https://github.com/DatabaseCleaner/database_cleaner
synced 2023-03-27 23:22:03 -04:00
update links to https where available.
This commit is contained in:
parent
3d207e429f
commit
b1046de59e
6 changed files with 10 additions and 10 deletions
|
@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ Neo4j
|
|||
|
||||
More details on available configuration options can be found in the README for the specific adapter gem that you're using.
|
||||
|
||||
For support or to discuss development please use the [Google Group](http://groups.google.com/group/database_cleaner).
|
||||
For support or to discuss development please use the [Google Group](https://groups.google.com/group/database_cleaner).
|
||||
|
||||
## How to use
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ Another approach is to have the transactions rolled back in the application's pr
|
|||
|
||||
An easier, but slower, solution is to use the `:truncation` or `:deletion` strategy.
|
||||
|
||||
So what is fastest out of `:deletion` and `:truncation`? Well, it depends on your table structure and what percentage of tables you populate in an average test. The reasoning is out of the scope of this README but here is a [good SO answer on this topic for Postgres](http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11419536/postgresql-truncation-speed/11423886#11423886).
|
||||
So what is fastest out of `:deletion` and `:truncation`? Well, it depends on your table structure and what percentage of tables you populate in an average test. The reasoning is out of the scope of this README but here is a [good SO answer on this topic for Postgres](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11419536/postgresql-truncation-speed/11423886#11423886).
|
||||
|
||||
Some people report much faster speeds with `:deletion` while others say `:truncation` is faster for them. The best approach therefore is it try all options on your test suite and see what is faster.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ Here is an overview of the supported strategies:
|
|||
|
||||
(Default strategy is denoted in bold)
|
||||
|
||||
For support or to discuss development please use the [Google Group](http://groups.google.com/group/database_cleaner).
|
||||
For support or to discuss development please use the [Google Group](https://groups.google.com/group/database_cleaner).
|
||||
|
||||
## What strategy is fastest?
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ Another approach is to have the transactions rolled back in the application's pr
|
|||
|
||||
An easier, but slower, solution is to use the `:truncation` or `:deletion` strategy.
|
||||
|
||||
So what is fastest out of `:deletion` and `:truncation`? Well, it depends on your table structure and what percentage of tables you populate in an average test. The reasoning is out of the scope of this README but here is a [good SO answer on this topic for Postgres](http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11419536/postgresql-truncation-speed/11423886#11423886).
|
||||
So what is fastest out of `:deletion` and `:truncation`? Well, it depends on your table structure and what percentage of tables you populate in an average test. The reasoning is out of the scope of this README but here is a [good SO answer on this topic for Postgres](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11419536/postgresql-truncation-speed/11423886#11423886).
|
||||
|
||||
Some people report much faster speeds with `:deletion` while others say `:truncation` is faster for them. The best approach therefore is it try all options on your test suite and see what is faster.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ module DataMapper
|
|||
|
||||
class MysqlAdapter < DataObjectsAdapter
|
||||
|
||||
# taken from http://github.com/godfat/dm-mapping/tree/master
|
||||
# taken from https://github.com/godfat/dm-mapping/tree/master
|
||||
def storage_names(repository = :default)
|
||||
select 'SHOW TABLES'
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ module DataMapper
|
|||
|
||||
module SqliteAdapterMethods
|
||||
|
||||
# taken from http://github.com/godfat/dm-mapping/tree/master
|
||||
# taken from https://github.com/godfat/dm-mapping/tree/master
|
||||
def storage_names(repository = :default)
|
||||
# activerecord-2.1.0/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/sqlite_adapter.rb: 177
|
||||
sql = <<-SQL
|
||||
|
@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ module DataMapper
|
|||
# maybe codes below gets some postgres/datamapper user going, though.
|
||||
class PostgresAdapter < DataObjectsAdapter
|
||||
|
||||
# taken from http://github.com/godfat/dm-mapping/tree/master
|
||||
# taken from https://github.com/godfat/dm-mapping/tree/master
|
||||
def storage_names(repository = :default)
|
||||
sql = <<-SQL
|
||||
SELECT table_name FROM "information_schema"."tables"
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ end
|
|||
|
||||
## Configuration options
|
||||
|
||||
`:only` and `:except` take a list of strings to be passed to [`keys`](http://redis.io/commands/keys)).
|
||||
`:only` and `:except` take a list of strings to be passed to [`keys`](https://redis.io/commands/keys)).
|
||||
|
||||
<table>
|
||||
<tbody>
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ end
|
|||
|
||||
## Configuration options
|
||||
|
||||
`:only` and `:except` take a list of strings to be passed to [`keys`](http://redis.io/commands/keys)).
|
||||
`:only` and `:except` take a list of strings to be passed to [`keys`](https://redis.io/commands/keys)).
|
||||
|
||||
<table>
|
||||
<tbody>
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ Gem::Specification.new do |s|
|
|||
s.files += Dir['lib/**/*.rb']
|
||||
s.files += Dir['adapters/**/lib/**/*.rb']
|
||||
|
||||
s.homepage = "http://github.com/DatabaseCleaner/database_cleaner"
|
||||
s.homepage = "https://github.com/DatabaseCleaner/database_cleaner"
|
||||
s.license = 'MIT'
|
||||
|
||||
s.rubygems_version = "2.4.5"
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue