removing special rule from rewriter for naked functions in arrays

lib/lexer.js

@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@
       // The remainder of the source code.
       this.i = 0;
       // Current character position we're parsing.
-      this.line = 1;
+      this.line = 0;
       // The current line.
       this.indent = 0;
       // The current indent level.

lib/rewriter.js

@@ -252,7 +252,7 @@
             idx += 1;
             tok = this.tokens[idx];
             pre = this.tokens[idx - 1];
-            if ((!tok || (SINGLE_CLOSERS.indexOf(tok[0]) >= 0 && tok[1] !== ';') || (pre[0] === ',' && tok[0] === 'PARAM_START') || (tok[0] === ')' && parens === 0)) && !(starter === 'ELSE' && tok[0] === 'ELSE')) {
+            if ((!tok || (SINGLE_CLOSERS.indexOf(tok[0]) >= 0 && tok[1] !== ';') || (tok[0] === ')' && parens === 0)) && !(starter === 'ELSE' && tok[0] === 'ELSE')) {
               insertion = pre[0] === "," ? idx - 1 : idx;
               this.tokens.splice(insertion, 0, ['OUTDENT', 2, token[2]]);
               break;

src/lexer.coffee

@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ exports.Lexer: class Lexer
   tokenize: (code) ->
     @code    : code  # The remainder of the source code.
     @i       : 0     # Current character position we're parsing.
-    @line    : 1     # The current line.
+    @line    : 0     # The current line.
     @indent  : 0     # The current indent level.
     @indents : []    # The stack of all indent levels we are currently within.
     @tokens  : []    # Collection of all parsed tokens in the form ['TOKEN_TYPE', value, line]

src/rewriter.coffee

@@ -180,7 +180,6 @@ exports.Rewriter: class Rewriter
         pre: @tokens[idx - 1]
         if (not tok or
             (SINGLE_CLOSERS.indexOf(tok[0]) >= 0 and tok[1] isnt ';') or
-            (pre[0] is ',' and tok[0] is 'PARAM_START') or
             (tok[0] is ')' && parens is 0)) and
             not (starter is 'ELSE' and tok[0] is 'ELSE')
           insertion: if pre[0] is "," then idx - 1 else idx

test/test_functions.coffee

@@ -14,6 +14,11 @@ ok y.x.name is 'x'
 () ->
 
 
+# Multiple nested function declarations mixed with implicit calls should not
+# cause a syntax error.
+(one) -> (two) -> three four, (five) -> six seven, eight, (nine) ->
+
+
 obj: {
   name: "Fred"
 
@@ -70,7 +75,7 @@ ok result is 10
 
 # And even with strange things like this:
 
-funcs:  [(x) -> x, (x) -> x * x]
+funcs:  [((x) -> x), ((x) -> x * x)]
 result: funcs[1] 5
 
 ok result is 25

test/test_literals.coffee

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-a: [(x) -> x, (x) -> x * x]
+a: [((x) -> x), ((x) -> x * x)]
 
 ok a.length is 2