2015-02-19 12:11:22 -05:00
|
|
|
page_title: FAQ page_description: Most frequently asked questions.
|
2014-04-15 20:53:12 -04:00
|
|
|
page_keywords: faq, questions, documentation, docker
|
|
|
|
|
2015-02-19 12:11:22 -05:00
|
|
|
# Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you don't see your question here, feel free to submit new ones to
|
|
|
|
<docs@docker.com>. Or, you can fork [the
|
|
|
|
repo](https://github.com/docker/docker) and contribute them yourself by editing
|
|
|
|
the documentation sources.
|
2014-04-15 20:53:12 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### How much does Docker cost?
|
|
|
|
|
2015-02-19 12:11:22 -05:00
|
|
|
Docker is 100% free. It is open source, so you can use it without paying.
|
2014-04-15 20:53:12 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### What open source license are you using?
|
|
|
|
|
2014-04-23 16:48:28 -04:00
|
|
|
We are using the Apache License Version 2.0, see it here:
|
2014-07-24 18:19:50 -04:00
|
|
|
[https://github.com/docker/docker/blob/master/LICENSE](
|
|
|
|
https://github.com/docker/docker/blob/master/LICENSE)
|
2014-04-15 20:53:12 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Does Docker run on Mac OS X or Windows?
|
|
|
|
|
2015-02-19 12:11:22 -05:00
|
|
|
Docker currently runs only on Linux, but you can use VirtualBox to run Docker in
|
|
|
|
a virtual machine on your box, and get the best of both worlds. Check out the
|
|
|
|
[*Mac OS X*](../installation/mac/#macosx) and [*Microsoft
|
|
|
|
Windows*](../installation/windows/#windows) installation guides. The small Linux
|
|
|
|
distribution boot2docker can be run inside virtual machines on these two
|
|
|
|
operating systems.
|
2014-04-15 20:53:12 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2014-12-29 03:19:42 -05:00
|
|
|
{{ include "no-remote-sudo.md" }}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-04-15 20:53:12 -04:00
|
|
|
### How do containers compare to virtual machines?
|
|
|
|
|
2015-02-19 12:11:22 -05:00
|
|
|
They are complementary. VMs are best used to allocate chunks of hardware
|
|
|
|
resources. Containers operate at the process level, which makes them very
|
|
|
|
lightweight and perfect as a unit of software delivery.
|
2014-04-15 20:53:12 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### What does Docker add to just plain LXC?
|
|
|
|
|
2015-02-19 12:11:22 -05:00
|
|
|
Docker is not a replacement for LXC. "LXC" refers to capabilities of the Linux
|
|
|
|
kernel (specifically namespaces and control groups) which allow sandboxing
|
|
|
|
processes from one another, and controlling their resource allocations. On top
|
|
|
|
of this low-level foundation of kernel features, Docker offers a high-level tool
|
|
|
|
with several powerful functionalities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- *Portable deployment across machines.* Docker defines a format for bundling
|
|
|
|
an application and all its dependencies into a single object which can be
|
|
|
|
transferred to any Docker-enabled machine, and executed there with the
|
|
|
|
guarantee that the execution environment exposed to the application will be the
|
|
|
|
same. LXC implements process sandboxing, which is an important pre-requisite
|
|
|
|
for portable deployment, but that alone is not enough for portable deployment.
|
|
|
|
If you sent me a copy of your application installed in a custom LXC
|
|
|
|
configuration, it would almost certainly not run on my machine the way it does
|
|
|
|
on yours, because it is tied to your machine's specific configuration:
|
|
|
|
networking, storage, logging, distro, etc. Docker defines an abstraction for
|
|
|
|
these machine-specific settings, so that the exact same Docker container can
|
|
|
|
run - unchanged - on many different machines, with many different
|
|
|
|
configurations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- *Application-centric.* Docker is optimized for the deployment of
|
|
|
|
applications, as opposed to machines. This is reflected in its API, user
|
|
|
|
interface, design philosophy and documentation. By contrast, the `lxc` helper
|
|
|
|
scripts focus on containers as lightweight machines - basically servers that
|
|
|
|
boot faster and need less RAM. We think there's more to containers than just
|
|
|
|
that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- *Automatic build.* Docker includes [*a tool for developers to automatically
|
|
|
|
assemble a container from their source
|
|
|
|
code*](../reference/builder/#dockerbuilder), with full control over application
|
|
|
|
dependencies, build tools, packaging etc. They are free to use `make`, `maven`,
|
|
|
|
`chef`, `puppet`, `salt,` Debian packages, RPMs, source tarballs, or any
|
|
|
|
combination of the above, regardless of the configuration of the machines.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- *Versioning.* Docker includes git-like capabilities for tracking successive
|
|
|
|
versions of a container, inspecting the diff between versions, committing new
|
|
|
|
versions, rolling back etc. The history also includes how a container was
|
|
|
|
assembled and by whom, so you get full traceability from the production server
|
|
|
|
all the way back to the upstream developer. Docker also implements incremental
|
|
|
|
uploads and downloads, similar to `git pull`, so new versions of a container
|
|
|
|
can be transferred by only sending diffs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- *Component re-use.* Any container can be used as a [*"base image"*](
|
|
|
|
../terms/image/#base-image-def) to create more specialized components. This can
|
|
|
|
be done manually or as part of an automated build. For example you can prepare
|
|
|
|
the ideal Python environment, and use it as a base for 10 different
|
|
|
|
applications. Your ideal Postgresql setup can be re-used for all your future
|
|
|
|
projects. And so on.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- *Sharing.* Docker has access to a [public registry](https://hub.docker.com)
|
|
|
|
where thousands of people have uploaded useful containers: anything from Redis,
|
|
|
|
CouchDB, Postgres to IRC bouncers to Rails app servers to Hadoop to base images
|
|
|
|
for various Linux distros. The
|
|
|
|
[*registry*](../reference/api/registry_index_spec/#registryindexspec) also
|
|
|
|
includes an official "standard library" of useful containers maintained by the
|
|
|
|
Docker team. The registry itself is open-source, so anyone can deploy their own
|
|
|
|
registry to store and transfer private containers, for internal server
|
|
|
|
deployments for example.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- *Tool ecosystem.* Docker defines an API for automating and customizing the
|
|
|
|
creation and deployment of containers. There are a huge number of tools
|
|
|
|
integrating with Docker to extend its capabilities. PaaS-like deployment
|
|
|
|
(Dokku, Deis, Flynn), multi-node orchestration (Maestro, Salt, Mesos, Openstack
|
|
|
|
Nova), management dashboards (docker-ui, Openstack Horizon, Shipyard),
|
|
|
|
configuration management (Chef, Puppet), continuous integration (Jenkins,
|
|
|
|
Strider, Travis), etc. Docker is rapidly establishing itself as the standard
|
|
|
|
for container-based tooling.
|
2014-04-23 16:48:28 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2014-04-15 20:53:12 -04:00
|
|
|
### What is different between a Docker container and a VM?
|
|
|
|
|
2014-04-23 16:48:28 -04:00
|
|
|
There's a great StackOverflow answer [showing the differences](
|
2015-02-20 18:01:08 -05:00
|
|
|
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16047306/how-is-docker-io-different-from-a-normal-virtual-machine).
|
2014-04-15 20:53:12 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Do I lose my data when the container exits?
|
|
|
|
|
2015-02-19 12:11:22 -05:00
|
|
|
Not at all! Any data that your application writes to disk gets preserved in its
|
|
|
|
container until you explicitly delete the container. The file system for the
|
|
|
|
container persists even after the container halts.
|
2014-04-15 20:53:12 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### How far do Docker containers scale?
|
|
|
|
|
2015-02-19 12:11:22 -05:00
|
|
|
Some of the largest server farms in the world today are based on containers.
|
|
|
|
Large web deployments like Google and Twitter, and platform providers such as
|
|
|
|
Heroku and dotCloud all run on container technology, at a scale of hundreds of
|
|
|
|
thousands or even millions of containers running in parallel.
|
2014-04-15 20:53:12 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### How do I connect Docker containers?
|
|
|
|
|
2015-02-19 12:11:22 -05:00
|
|
|
Currently the recommended way to link containers is via the link primitive. You
|
|
|
|
can see details of how to [work with links here](/userguide/dockerlinks).
|
2014-04-15 20:53:12 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2015-02-19 12:11:22 -05:00
|
|
|
Also useful for more flexible service portability is the [Ambassador linking
|
|
|
|
pattern](/articles/ambassador_pattern_linking/).
|
2014-04-15 20:53:12 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### How do I run more than one process in a Docker container?
|
|
|
|
|
2014-04-23 16:48:28 -04:00
|
|
|
Any capable process supervisor such as [http://supervisord.org/](
|
2015-02-19 12:11:22 -05:00
|
|
|
http://supervisord.org/), runit, s6, or daemontools can do the trick. Docker
|
|
|
|
will start up the process management daemon which will then fork to run
|
|
|
|
additional processes. As long as the processor manager daemon continues to run,
|
|
|
|
the container will continue to as well. You can see a more substantial example
|
|
|
|
[that uses supervisord here](/articles/using_supervisord/).
|
2014-04-15 20:53:12 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### What platforms does Docker run on?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Linux:
|
|
|
|
|
2015-02-19 12:11:22 -05:00
|
|
|
- Ubuntu 12.04, 13.04 et al
|
|
|
|
- Fedora 19/20+
|
|
|
|
- RHEL 6.5+
|
2015-03-16 06:50:52 -04:00
|
|
|
- CentOS 6+
|
2015-02-19 12:11:22 -05:00
|
|
|
- Gentoo
|
|
|
|
- ArchLinux
|
|
|
|
- openSUSE 12.3+
|
2014-04-23 16:48:28 -04:00
|
|
|
- CRUX 3.0+
|
2014-04-15 20:53:12 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cloud:
|
|
|
|
|
2015-02-19 12:11:22 -05:00
|
|
|
- Amazon EC2
|
|
|
|
- Google Compute Engine
|
2014-04-23 16:48:28 -04:00
|
|
|
- Rackspace
|
2014-04-15 20:53:12 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### How do I report a security issue with Docker?
|
|
|
|
|
2014-04-23 16:48:28 -04:00
|
|
|
You can learn about the project's security policy
|
2015-02-19 12:11:22 -05:00
|
|
|
[here](https://www.docker.com/security/) and report security issues to this
|
|
|
|
[mailbox](mailto:security@docker.com).
|
2014-04-15 20:53:12 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Why do I need to sign my commits to Docker with the DCO?
|
|
|
|
|
2014-04-23 16:48:28 -04:00
|
|
|
Please read [our blog post](
|
2015-02-20 18:01:08 -05:00
|
|
|
http://blog.docker.com/2014/01/docker-code-contributions-require-developer-certificate-of-origin/) on the introduction of the DCO.
|
2014-04-15 20:53:12 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2014-07-01 10:47:59 -04:00
|
|
|
### When building an image, should I prefer system libraries or bundled ones?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*This is a summary of a discussion on the [docker-dev mailing list](
|
|
|
|
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/docker-dev/L2RBSPDu1L0).*
|
|
|
|
|
2015-02-19 12:11:22 -05:00
|
|
|
Virtually all programs depend on third-party libraries. Most frequently, they
|
|
|
|
will use dynamic linking and some kind of package dependency, so that when
|
|
|
|
multiple programs need the same library, it is installed only once.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Some programs, however, will bundle their third-party libraries, because they
|
|
|
|
rely on very specific versions of those libraries. For instance, Node.js bundles
|
|
|
|
OpenSSL; MongoDB bundles V8 and Boost (among others).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When creating a Docker image, is it better to use the bundled libraries, or
|
|
|
|
should you build those programs so that they use the default system libraries
|
|
|
|
instead?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The key point about system libraries is not about saving disk or memory space.
|
|
|
|
It is about security. All major distributions handle security seriously, by
|
|
|
|
having dedicated security teams, following up closely with published
|
|
|
|
vulnerabilities, and disclosing advisories themselves. (Look at the [Debian
|
|
|
|
Security Information](https://www.debian.org/security/) for an example of those
|
|
|
|
procedures.) Upstream developers, however, do not always implement similar
|
|
|
|
practices.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before setting up a Docker image to compile a program from source, if you want
|
|
|
|
to use bundled libraries, you should check if the upstream authors provide a
|
|
|
|
convenient way to announce security vulnerabilities, and if they update their
|
|
|
|
bundled libraries in a timely manner. If they don't, you are exposing yourself
|
|
|
|
(and the users of your image) to security vulnerabilities.
|
2014-07-01 10:47:59 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Likewise, before using packages built by others, you should check if the
|
|
|
|
channels providing those packages implement similar security best practices.
|
|
|
|
Downloading and installing an "all-in-one" .deb or .rpm sounds great at first,
|
2015-02-19 12:11:22 -05:00
|
|
|
except if you have no way to figure out that it contains a copy of the OpenSSL
|
|
|
|
library vulnerable to the [Heartbleed](http://heartbleed.com/) bug.
|
2014-07-01 10:47:59 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2014-08-10 14:09:46 -04:00
|
|
|
### Why is `DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive` discouraged in Dockerfiles?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When building Docker images on Debian and Ubuntu you may have seen errors like:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unable to initialize frontend: Dialog
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These errors don't stop the image from being built but inform you that the
|
2015-02-19 12:11:22 -05:00
|
|
|
installation process tried to open a dialog box, but was unable to. Generally,
|
|
|
|
these errors are safe to ignore.
|
2014-08-10 14:09:46 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2015-02-19 12:11:22 -05:00
|
|
|
Some people circumvent these errors by changing the `DEBIAN_FRONTEND`
|
2014-08-10 14:09:46 -04:00
|
|
|
environment variable inside the Dockerfile using:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ENV DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive
|
|
|
|
|
2015-02-19 12:11:22 -05:00
|
|
|
This prevents the installer from opening dialog boxes during installation which
|
|
|
|
stops the errors.
|
2014-08-10 14:09:46 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2015-02-19 12:11:22 -05:00
|
|
|
While this may sound like a good idea, it *may* have side effects. The
|
|
|
|
`DEBIAN_FRONTEND` environment variable will be inherited by all images and
|
|
|
|
containers built from your image, effectively changing their behavior. People
|
|
|
|
using those images will run into problems when installing software
|
|
|
|
interactively, because installers will not show any dialog boxes.
|
2014-08-10 14:09:46 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Because of this, and because setting `DEBIAN_FRONTEND` to `noninteractive` is
|
|
|
|
mainly a 'cosmetic' change, we *discourage* changing it.
|
|
|
|
|
2015-02-19 12:11:22 -05:00
|
|
|
If you *really* need to change its setting, make sure to change it back to its
|
|
|
|
[default value](https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/ch05s03.html.en)
|
2014-08-10 14:09:46 -04:00
|
|
|
afterwards.
|
|
|
|
|
2015-02-19 12:11:22 -05:00
|
|
|
### Why do I get `Connection reset by peer` when making a request to a service running in a container?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Typically, this message is returned if the service is already bound to your
|
|
|
|
localhost. As a result, requests coming to the container from outside are
|
|
|
|
dropped. To correct this problem, change the service's configuration on your
|
2015-02-19 20:29:46 -05:00
|
|
|
localhost so that the service accepts requests from all IPs. If you aren't sure
|
|
|
|
how to do this, check the documentation for your OS.
|
2014-04-15 20:53:12 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Where can I find more answers?
|
|
|
|
|
2014-04-18 16:21:55 -04:00
|
|
|
You can find more answers on:
|
|
|
|
|
2015-02-19 12:11:22 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- [Docker user mailinglist](https://groups.google.com/d/forum/docker-user)
|
|
|
|
- [Docker developer mailinglist](https://groups.google.com/d/forum/docker-dev)
|
|
|
|
- [IRC, docker on freenode](irc://chat.freenode.net#docker)
|
|
|
|
- [GitHub](https://github.com/docker/docker)
|
|
|
|
- [Ask questions on Stackoverflow](http://stackoverflow.com/search?q=docker)
|
2014-04-18 16:21:55 -04:00
|
|
|
- [Join the conversation on Twitter](http://twitter.com/docker)
|
2014-04-15 20:53:12 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2015-02-19 12:11:22 -05:00
|
|
|
Looking for something else to read? Checkout the [User Guide](/userguide/).
|