From 012e588a744ce3000d58a7562a1a8291a7fe10ae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 07:30:51 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Add a 'docker create' + 'docker rm' testcase Per @thaJeztah's
 comment here:
 https://github.com/docker/docker/pull/13367#issuecomment-104286651 I couldn't
 find an existing test that covered this.

Signed-off-by: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
---
 integration-cli/docker_cli_create_test.go | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)

diff --git a/integration-cli/docker_cli_create_test.go b/integration-cli/docker_cli_create_test.go
index 646a8eafe0..14d320d851 100644
--- a/integration-cli/docker_cli_create_test.go
+++ b/integration-cli/docker_cli_create_test.go
@@ -290,3 +290,36 @@ func (s *DockerSuite) TestCreateHostnameWithNumber(c *check.C) {
 		c.Fatalf("hostname not set, expected `web.0`, got: %s", out)
 	}
 }
+
+func (s *DockerSuite) TestCreateRM(c *check.C) {
+	// Test to make sure we can 'rm' a new container that is in
+	// "Created" state, and has ever been run. Test "rm -f" too.
+
+	// create a container
+	createCmd := exec.Command(dockerBinary, "create", "busybox")
+	out, _, err := runCommandWithOutput(createCmd)
+	if err != nil {
+		c.Fatalf("Failed to create container:%s\n%s", out, err)
+	}
+	cID := strings.TrimSpace(out)
+
+	rmCmd := exec.Command(dockerBinary, "rm", cID)
+	out, _, err = runCommandWithOutput(rmCmd)
+	if err != nil {
+		c.Fatalf("Failed to rm container:%s\n%s", out, err)
+	}
+
+	// Now do it again so we can "rm -f" this time
+	createCmd = exec.Command(dockerBinary, "create", "busybox")
+	out, _, err = runCommandWithOutput(createCmd)
+	if err != nil {
+		c.Fatalf("Failed to create 2nd container:%s\n%s", out, err)
+	}
+
+	cID = strings.TrimSpace(out)
+	rmCmd = exec.Command(dockerBinary, "rm", "-f", cID)
+	out, _, err = runCommandWithOutput(rmCmd)
+	if err != nil {
+		c.Fatalf("Failed to rm -f container:%s\n%s", out, err)
+	}
+}