kotovalexarian-likes-github/moby--moby
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/moby/moby.git synced 2022-11-09 12:21:53 -05:00
Code Releases Activity

Update the Roadmap

Browse source 
As part of the Moby transition (see #35115), update the Roadmap to
reflect the new priorities. Also just update it as it was written
a while back, and we made some progress in areas such as `containerd`.

Signed-off-by: Justin Cormack <justin.cormack@docker.com>
This commit is contained in:
Justin Cormack 2017-10-11 16:47:17 +01:00
parent eee2df1083
commit de86d33b4a
1 changed files with 36 additions and 86 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

122
ROADMAP.md
View file

@ -1,118 +1,68 @@
Docker Engine Roadmap Moby Project Roadmap
===================== ====================
### How should I use this document? ### How should I use this document?
This document provides description of items that the project decided to prioritize. This should This document provides description of items that the project decided to prioritize. This should
serve as a reference point for Docker contributors to understand where the project is going, and serve as a reference point for Moby contributors to understand where the project is going, and
help determine if a contribution could be conflicting with some longer terms plans. help determine if a contribution could be conflicting with some longer term plans.
The fact that a feature isn't listed here doesn't mean that a patch for it will automatically be The fact that a feature isn't listed here doesn't mean that a patch for it will automatically be
refused (except for those mentioned as "frozen features" below)! We are always happy to receive refused! We are always happy to receive patches for new cool features we haven't thought about,
patches for new cool features we haven't thought about, or didn't judge priority. Please however or didn't judge to be a priority. Please however understand that such patches might take longer
understand that such patches might take longer for us to review. for us to review.
### How can I help? ### How can I help?
Short term objectives are listed in the [wiki](https://github.com/docker/docker/wiki) and described Short term objectives are listed in
in [Issues](https://github.com/docker/docker/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3Aroadmap). Our [Issues](https://github.com/moby/moby/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3Aroadmap). Our
goal is to split down the workload in such way that anybody can jump in and help. Please comment on goal is to split down the workload in such way that anybody can jump in and help. Please comment on
issues if you want to take it to avoid duplicating effort! Similarly, if a maintainer is already issues if you want to work on it to avoid duplicating effort! Similarly, if a maintainer is already
assigned on an issue you'd like to participate in, pinging him on IRC or GitHub to offer your help is assigned on an issue you'd like to participate in, pinging him on GitHub to offer your help is
the best way to go. the best way to go.
### How can I add something to the roadmap? ### How can I add something to the roadmap?
The roadmap process is new to the Docker Engine: we are only beginning to structure and document the The roadmap process is new to the Moby Project: we are only beginning to structure and document the
project objectives. Our immediate goal is to be more transparent, and work with our community to project objectives. Our immediate goal is to be more transparent, and work with our community to
focus our efforts on fewer prioritized topics. focus our efforts on fewer prioritized topics.
We hope to offer in the near future a process allowing anyone to propose a topic to the roadmap, but We hope to offer in the near future a process allowing anyone to propose a topic to the roadmap, but
we are not quite there yet. For the time being, the BDFL remains the keeper of the roadmap, and we we are not quite there yet. For the time being, it is best to discuss with the maintainers on an
won't be accepting pull requests adding or removing items from this file. issue, in the Slack channel, or in person at the Moby Summits that happen every few months.
# 1. Features and refactoring # 1. Features and refactoring
## 1.1 Runtime improvements ## 1.1 Runtime improvements
We recently introduced [`runC`](https://runc.io) as a standalone low-level tool for container We introduced [`runC`](https://runc.io) as a standalone low-level tool for container
execution. The initial goal was to integrate runC as a replacement in the Engine for the traditional execution in 2015, the first stage in spinning out parts of the Engine into standalone tools.
default libcontainer `execdriver`, but the Engine internals were not ready for this.
As runC continued evolving, and the OCI specification along with it, we created As runC continued evolving, and the OCI specification along with it, we created
[`containerd`](https://containerd.tools/), a daemon to control and monitor multiple `runC`. This is [`containerd`](https://github.com/containerd/containerd), a daemon to control and monitor `runC`.
the new target for Engine integration, as it can entirely replace the whole `execdriver` In late 2016 this was relaunched as the `containerd` 1.0 track, aiming to provide a common runtime
architecture, and container monitoring along with it. for the whole spectrum of container systems, including Kubernetes, with wide community support.
This change meant that there was an increased scope for `containerd`, including image management
and storage drivers.
Docker Engine will rely on a long-running `containerd` companion daemon for all container execution Moby will rely on a long-running `containerd` companion daemon for all container execution
related operations. This could open the door in the future for Engine restarts without interrupting related operations. This could open the door in the future for Engine restarts without interrupting
running containers. running containers. The switch over to containerd 1.0 is an important goal for the project, and
will result in a significant simplification of the functions implemented in this repository.
## 1.2 Plugins improvements ## 1.2 Internal decoupling
Docker Engine 1.7.0 introduced plugin support, initially for the use cases of volumes and networks A lot of work has been done in trying to decouple Moby internals. This process of creating
extensions. The plugin infrastructure was kept minimal as we were collecting use cases and real standalone projects with a well defined function that attract a dedicated community should continue.
world feedback before optimizing for any particular workflow. As well as integrating `containerd` we would like to integrate [BuildKit](https://github.com/moby/buildkit)
as the next standalone component.
In the future, we'd like plugins to become first class citizens, and encourage an ecosystem of We see gRPC as the natural communication layer between decoupled components.
plugins. This implies in particular making it trivially easy to distribute plugins as containers
through any Registry instance, as well as solving the commonly heard pain points of plugins needing
to be treated as somewhat special (being active at all time, started before any other user
containers, and not as easily dismissed).
## 1.3 Internal decoupling ## 1.3 Custom assembly tooling
A lot of work has been done in trying to decouple the Docker Engine's internals. In particular, the We have been prototyping the Moby [assembly tool](https://github.com/moby/tool) which was originally
API implementation has been refactored, and the Builder side of the daemon is now developed for LinuxKit and intend to turn it into a more generic packaging and assembly mechanism
[fully independent](https://github.com/docker/docker/tree/master/builder) while still residing in that can build not only the default version of Moby, as distribution packages or other useful forms,
the same repository. but can also build very different container systems, themselves built of cooperating daemons built in
and running in containers. We intend to merge this functionality into this repo.
We are exploring ways to go further with that decoupling, capitalizing on the work introduced by the
runtime renovation and plugins improvement efforts. Indeed, the combination of `containerd` support
with the concept of "special" containers opens the door for bootstrapping more Engine internals
using the same facilities.
## 1.4 Cluster capable Engine
The community has been pushing for a more cluster capable Docker Engine, and a huge effort was spent
adding features such as multihost networking, and node discovery down at the Engine level. Yet, the
Engine is currently incapable of taking scheduling decisions alone, and continues relying on Swarm
for that.
We plan to complete this effort and make Engine fully cluster capable. Multiple instances of the
Docker Engine being already capable of discovering each other and establish overlay networking for
their container to communicate, the next step is for a given Engine to gain ability to dispatch work
to another node in the cluster. This will be introduced in a backward compatible way, such that a
`docker run` invocation on a particular node remains fully deterministic.
# 2. Frozen features
## 2.1 Docker exec
We won't accept patches expanding the surface of `docker exec`, which we intend to keep as a
*debugging* feature, as well as being strongly dependent on the Runtime ingredient effort.
## 2.2 Remote Registry Operations
A large amount of work is ongoing in the area of image distribution and provenance. This includes
moving to the V2 Registry API and heavily refactoring the code that powers these features. The
desired result is more secure, reliable and easier to use image distribution.
Part of the problem with this part of the code base is the lack of a stable and flexible interface.
If new features are added that access the registry without solidifying these interfaces, achieving
feature parity will continue to be elusive. While we get a handle on this situation, we are imposing
a moratorium on new code that accesses the Registry API in commands that don't already make remote
calls.
Currently, only the following commands cause interaction with a remote registry:
- push
- pull
- run
- build
- search
- login
In the interest of stabilizing the registry access model during this ongoing work, we are not
accepting additions to other commands that will cause remote interaction with the Registry API. This
moratorium will lift when the goals of the distribution project have been met.