Due to the importance of path safety, the internal sanitisation wrappers
for volumes and containers should be exposed so other parts of Docker
can benefit from proper path sanitisation.
Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com> (github: cyphar)
If .dockerignore mentions either then the client will send them to the
daemon but the daemon will erase them after the Dockerfile has been parsed
to simulate them never being sent in the first place.
an events test kept failing for me so I tried to fix that too
Closes#8330
Signed-off-by: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
Fixes#1992
Right now when you `docker cp` a path which is in a volume, the cp
itself works, however you end up getting files that are in the
container's fs rather than the files in the volume (which is not in the
container's fs).
This makes it so when you `docker cp` a path that is in a volume it
follows the volume to the real path on the host.
archive.go has been modified so that when you do `docker cp mydata:/foo
.`, and /foo is the volume, the outputed folder is called "foo" instead
of the volume ID (because we are telling it to tar up
`/var/lib/docker/vfs/dir/<some id>` and not "foo", but the user would be
expecting "foo", not the ID
Signed-off-by: Brian Goff <cpuguy83@gmail.com>
Also wrap access in mutex.
Makes sure we don't have any pontential for races in accessing this.
It also doesn't really need to be/shouldn't be in the config.json anyway
Docker-DCO-1.1-Signed-off-by: Brian Goff <bgoff@cpuguy83-mbp.home> (github: cpuguy83)
Brian Goff