Relates to a82fff6377/docs/packages.md (proxies)
> (..) the first four of these are the standard built-in build-arg options
> available for `docker build`
> (..) The last, `all_proxy`, is a standard var used for socks proxying. Since
> it is not built into `docker build`, if you want to use it, you will need to
> add the following line to the dockerfile:
>
> ARG all_proxy
Given the we support all other commonly known proxy env-vars by default, it makes
sense to add this one as well.
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
Extract a common function for builder.createContainer
Extract imageCache for doing cache probes
Removes the cacheBuested field from Builder
Create a new containerManager class which reduces the interface between the
builder and managing containers to 3 functions (from 6)
Signed-off-by: Daniel Nephin <dnephin@docker.com>
I noticed that we're using a homegrown package for assertions. The
functions are extremely similar to testify, but with enough slight
differences to be confusing (for example, Equal takes its arguments in a
different order). We already vendor testify, and it's used in a few
places by tests.
I also found some problems with pkg/testutil/assert. For example, the
NotNil function seems to be broken. It checks the argument against
"nil", which only works for an interface. If you pass in a nil map or
slice, the equality check will fail.
In the interest of avoiding NIH, I'm proposing replacing
pkg/testutil/assert with testify. The test code looks almost the same,
but we avoid the confusion of having two similar but slightly different
assertion packages, and having to maintain our own package instead of
using a commonly-used one.
In the process, I found a few places where the tests should halt if an
assertion fails, so I've made those cases (that I noticed) use "require"
instead of "assert", and I've vendored the "require" package from
testify alongside the already-present "assert" package.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lehmann <aaron.lehmann@docker.com>
