I noticed that we're using a homegrown package for assertions. The
functions are extremely similar to testify, but with enough slight
differences to be confusing (for example, Equal takes its arguments in a
different order). We already vendor testify, and it's used in a few
places by tests.
I also found some problems with pkg/testutil/assert. For example, the
NotNil function seems to be broken. It checks the argument against
"nil", which only works for an interface. If you pass in a nil map or
slice, the equality check will fail.
In the interest of avoiding NIH, I'm proposing replacing
pkg/testutil/assert with testify. The test code looks almost the same,
but we avoid the confusion of having two similar but slightly different
assertion packages, and having to maintain our own package instead of
using a commonly-used one.
In the process, I found a few places where the tests should halt if an
assertion fails, so I've made those cases (that I noticed) use "require"
instead of "assert", and I've vendored the "require" package from
testify alongside the already-present "assert" package.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lehmann <aaron.lehmann@docker.com>
Signed-off-by: Ke Li <kel@splunk.com>
Add missing changes
Signed-off-by: Ke Li <kel@splunk.com>
User errors.New to create error
Signed-off-by: Ke Li <kel@splunk.com>
This reverts 26103. 26103 was trying to make it so that if someone did:
docker build --build-arg FOO .
and FOO wasn't set as an env var then it would pick-up FOO from the
Dockerfile's ARG cmd. However, it went too far and removed the ability
to specify a build arg w/o any value. Meaning it required the --build-arg
param to always be in the form "name=value", and not just "name".
This PR does the right fix - it allows just "name" and it'll grab the value
from the env vars if set. If "name" isn't set in the env then it still needs
to send "name" to the server so that a warning can be printed about an
unused --build-arg. And this is why buildArgs in the options is now a
*string instead of just a string - 'nil' == mentioned but no value.
Closes#29084
Signed-off-by: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
The error message suggests you need one argument even when you
have provided one. Suggest having another argument.
Signed-off-by: Justin Cormack <justin.cormack@docker.com>
