Path-specific rules were removed, so this is no longer used.
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
(cherry picked from commit 530e63c1a61b105a6f7fc143c5acb9b5cd87f958)
Signed-off-by: Tibor Vass <tibor@docker.com>
Commit 77b8465d7e added a secret update
endpoint to allow updating labels on existing secrets. However, when
implementing the endpoint, the DebugRequestMiddleware was not updated
to scrub the Data field (as is being done when creating a secret).
When updating a secret (to set labels), the Data field should be either
`nil` (not set), or contain the same value as the existing secret. In
situations where the Data field is set, and the `dockerd` daemon is
running with debugging enabled / log-level debug, the base64-encoded
value of the secret is printed to the daemon logs.
The docker cli does not have a `docker secret update` command, but
when using `docker stack deploy`, the docker cli sends the secret
data both when _creating_ a stack, and when _updating_ a stack, thus
leaking the secret data if the daemon runs with debug enabled:
1. Start the daemon in debug-mode
dockerd --debug
2. Initialize swarm
docker swarm init
3. Create a file containing a secret
echo secret > my_secret.txt
4. Create a docker-compose file using that secret
cat > docker-compose.yml <<'EOF'
version: "3.3"
services:
web:
image: nginx:alpine
secrets:
- my_secret
secrets:
my_secret:
file: ./my_secret.txt
EOF
5. Deploy the stack
docker stack deploy -c docker-compose.yml test
6. Verify that the secret is scrubbed in the daemon logs
DEBU[2019-07-01T22:36:08.170617400Z] Calling POST /v1.30/secrets/create
DEBU[2019-07-01T22:36:08.171364900Z] form data: {"Data":"*****","Labels":{"com.docker.stack.namespace":"test"},"Name":"test_my_secret"}
7. Re-deploy the stack to trigger an "update"
docker stack deploy -c docker-compose.yml test
8. Notice that this time, the Data field is not scrubbed, and the base64-encoded secret is logged
DEBU[2019-07-01T22:37:35.828819400Z] Calling POST /v1.30/secrets/w3hgvwpzl8yooq5ctnyp71v52/update?version=34
DEBU[2019-07-01T22:37:35.829993700Z] form data: {"Data":"c2VjcmV0Cg==","Labels":{"com.docker.stack.namespace":"test"},"Name":"test_my_secret"}
This patch modifies `maskSecretKeys` to unconditionally scrub `Data` fields.
Currently, only the `secrets` and `configs` endpoints use a field with this
name, and no other POST API endpoints use a data field, so scrubbing this
field unconditionally will only scrub requests for those endpoints.
If a new endpoint is added in future where this field should not be scrubbed,
we can re-introduce more fine-grained (path-specific) handling.
This patch introduces some change in behavior:
- In addition to secrets, requests to create or update _configs_ will
now have their `Data` field scrubbed. Generally, the actual data should
not be interesting for debugging, so likely will not be problematic.
In addition, scrubbing this data for configs may actually be desirable,
because (even though they are not explicitely designed for this purpose)
configs may contain sensitive data (credentials inside a configuration
file, e.g.).
- Requests that send key/value pairs as a "map" and that contain a
key named "data", will see the value of that field scrubbed. This
means that (e.g.) setting a `label` named `data` on a config, will
scrub/mask the value of that label.
- Note that this is already the case for any label named `jointoken`,
`password`, `secret`, `signingcakey`, or `unlockkey`.
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
(cherry picked from commit c7ce4be93ae8edd2da62a588e01c67313a4aba0c)
Signed-off-by: Tibor Vass <tibor@docker.com>
Since Go 1.7, context is a standard package. Since Go 1.9, everything
that is provided by "x/net/context" is a couple of type aliases to
types in "context".
Many vendored packages still use x/net/context, so vendor entry remains
for now.
Signed-off-by: Kir Kolyshkin <kolyshkin@gmail.com>
With debug logging turned on, we currently log the base64-encoded secret
payload.
Change the middleware code to redact this. Since the field is called
"Data", it requires some context-sensitivity. The URI path is examined
to see which route is being invoked.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lehmann <aaron.lehmann@docker.com>
- Neither swarm init or swarm update should take an unlock key
- Add an autolock flag to turn on autolock
- Make the necessary docker api changes
- Add SwarmGetUnlockKey API call and use it when turning on autolock
- Add swarm unlock-key subcommand
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lehmann <aaron.lehmann@docker.com>
This makes separating middlewares from the core api easier.
As an example, the authorization middleware is moved to
it's own package.
Initialize all static middlewares when the server is created, reducing
allocations every time a route is wrapper with the middlewares.
Signed-off-by: David Calavera <david.calavera@gmail.com>
