This implements chown support on Windows. Built-in accounts as well
as accounts included in the SAM database of the container are supported.
NOTE: IDPair is now named Identity and IDMappings is now named
IdentityMapping.
The following are valid examples:
ADD --chown=Guest . <some directory>
COPY --chown=Administrator . <some directory>
COPY --chown=Guests . <some directory>
COPY --chown=ContainerUser . <some directory>
On Windows an owner is only granted the permission to read the security
descriptor and read/write the discretionary access control list. This
fix also grants read/write and execute permissions to the owner.
Signed-off-by: Salahuddin Khan <salah@docker.com>
A recent optimization in getSourceMount() made it return an error
in case when the found mount point is "/". This prevented bind-mounted
volumes from working in such cases.
A (rather trivial but adeqate) unit test case is added.
Fixes: 871c957242 ("getSourceMount(): simplify")
Signed-off-by: Kir Kolyshkin <kolyshkin@gmail.com>
The test case checks that in case of IpcMode: private and
ReadonlyRootfs: true (as in "docker run --ipc private --read-only")
the resulting /dev/shm mount is NOT made read-only.
Signed-off-by: Kir Kolyshkin <kolyshkin@gmail.com>
This is a fix to the following issue:
$ docker run --tmpfs /dev/shm busybox sh
docker: Error response from daemon: linux mounts: Duplicate mount point '/dev/shm'.
In current code (daemon.createSpec()), tmpfs mount from --tmpfs is added
to list of mounts (`ms`), when the mount from IpcMounts() is added.
While IpcMounts() is checking for existing mounts first, it does that
by using container.HasMountFor() function which only checks container.Mounts
but not container.Tmpfs.
Ultimately, the solution is to get rid of container.Tmpfs (moving its
data to container.Mounts). Current workaround is to add checking
of container.Tmpfs into container.HasMountFor().
A unit test case is included.
Unfortunately we can't call daemon.createSpec() from a unit test,
as the code relies a lot on various daemon structures to be initialized
properly, and it is hard to achieve. Therefore, we minimally mimick
the code flow of daemon.createSpec() -- barely enough to reproduce
the issue.
https://github.com/moby/moby/issues/35455
Signed-off-by: Kir Kolyshkin <kolyshkin@gmail.com>
Lihua Tang