It is wrong to pass an arbitrary string to a function expecting
%-style formatting. One solution would be to replace any % with %%,
but it's easier to just do what this patch does.
Generated with:
for f in $(git grep -l 'check.Commentf(out)'); do \
sed -i -e 's/check\.Commentf(out)/check.Commentf("%s", out)/g' $f; \
done
Signed-off-by: Kir Kolyshkin <kolyshkin@gmail.com>
This fix migrates some secret create tests to api tests,
and remove redundant TestConfigCreate.
Signed-off-by: Yong Tang <yong.tang.github@outlook.com>
This fix is a follow up for comment:
https://github.com/docker/docker/pull/28896#issuecomment-265392703
Currently secret name or ID prefix resolving is done at the client
side, which means different behavior of API and CMD.
This fix moves the resolving from client to daemon, with exactly the
same rule:
- Full ID
- Full Name
- Partial ID (prefix)
All existing tests should pass.
This fix is related to #288896, #28884 and may be related to #29125.
Signed-off-by: Yong Tang <yong.tang.github@outlook.com>
This test checks for the substring "foo" in the "secret ls" output. This
is a valid base36 substring and can sometimes show up by chance:
docker_cli_secret_create_test.go:86:
c.Assert(out, checker.Not(checker.Contains), name)
... obtained string = "" +
... "ID NAME CREATED UPDATED\n" +
... "ob8y4t4feuz8pn5h6vla9oxoz stefoo7e268ozqfupi9s4se9q Less than a second ago Less than a second ago\n"
... substring string = "foo"
Change the secret name to test_secret, matching other tests. Underscores
can't appear in base36 so this name is safe to grep for.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lehmann <aaron.lehmann@docker.com>
This fix tries to address the issue raised in 28581 and 28927
where it is not possible to create a secret from a file (only
through STDIN).
This fix add a flag `--file` to `docker secret create` so that
it is possible to create a secret from a file with:
```
docker secret create --file secret.in secret.name
```
or
```
echo TEST | docker secret create --file - secret.name
```
Related docs has been updated.
An integration test has been added to cover the changes.
This fix fixes 28581.
This fix is related to 28927.
Signed-off-by: Yong Tang <yong.tang.github@outlook.com>
This fix tries to address the issue in 28884 where
it is possible to mask the secret ID by name.
The reason was that searching a secret is based on name.
However, searching a secret should be done based on:
- Full ID
- Full Name
- Partial ID (prefix)
This fix addresses the issue by changing related implementation
in `getCliRequestedSecretIDs()`
An integration test has been added to cover the changes.
This fix fixes 28884
Signed-off-by: Yong Tang <yong.tang.github@outlook.com>
