The automatic installation of AppArmor policies prevents the
management of custom, site-specific apparmor policies for the
default container profile. Furthermore, this change will allow
a future policy for the engine itself to be written without demanding
the engine be able to arbitrarily create and manage AppArmor policies.
- Add deb package suggests for apparmor.
- Ubuntu postinst use aa-status & fix policy path
- Add the policies to the debian packages.
- Add apparmor tests for writing proc files
Additional restrictions against modifying files in proc
are enforced by AppArmor. Ensure that AppArmor is preventing
access to these files, not simply Docker's configuration of proc.
- Remove /proc/k?mem from AA policy
The path to mem and kmem are in /dev, not /proc
and cannot be restricted successfully through AppArmor.
The device cgroup will need to be sufficient here.
- Load contrib/apparmor during integration tests
Note that this is somewhat dirty because we
cannot restore the host to its original configuration.
However, it should be noted that prior to this patch
series, the Docker daemon itself was loading apparmor
policy from within the tests, so this is no dirtier or
uglier than the status-quo.
Signed-off-by: Eric Windisch <eric@windisch.us>
Ubuntu Precise has a number of warts that made it non-trivial to add initially, but I've managed to work through some of them and come up with a working build. Two important parts to note are that it has neither the `btrfs` nor the `devicemapper` graphdriver backends since `btrfs-tools` and `libdevmapper-dev` in the precise repositories are too ancient for them to even compile.
Signed-off-by: Andrew "Tianon" Page <admwiggin@gmail.com>
Also, `curl` is smart enough to see when the consumer of the pipe is going slow that it should slow down the transfer, so this gives a reasonable indication of extraction progress too.
Signed-off-by: Andrew "Tianon" Page <admwiggin@gmail.com>
Alexander Morozov