The error type libnetwork.ErrNoSuchNetwork is used in the controller
to retry the network creation as a managed network though the manager.
The change of the type was breaking the logic causing the network to
not being created anymore so that no new container on that network
was able to be launched
Added unit test
Signed-off-by: Flavio Crisciani <flavio.crisciani@docker.com>
Commit ebcb7d6b40 removed string checking
for error messages, in favor of typed errors.
In this change, the status code for conflicting container names
changed from 409 to 400 (validationError).
This patch add a `nameConflictError`, changing the status code to
409 as it was in older versions.
With this change applied, the correct 409 status is returned:
```bash
$ docker create --name c1 busybox
```
```bash
$ curl --unix-socket /var/run/docker.sock -v -XPOST -H"Content-Type: application/json" -d'{"Image":"busybox"}' http://localhost/containers/create?name=c1
Note: Unnecessary use of -X or --request, POST is already inferred.
* Trying /var/run/docker.sock...
* Connected to localhost (/var/run/docker.sock) port 80 (#0)
> POST /containers/create?name=c1 HTTP/1.1
> Host: localhost
> User-Agent: curl/7.52.1
> Accept: */*
> Content-Type: application/json
> Content-Length: 19
>
* upload completely sent off: 19 out of 19 bytes
< HTTP/1.1 409 Conflict
< Api-Version: 1.33
< Content-Type: application/json
< Docker-Experimental: false
< Ostype: linux
< Server: Docker/17.06.0-dev (linux)
< Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 15:07:23 GMT
< Content-Length: 229
<
{"message":"Conflict. The container name \"/c1\" is already in use by container \"ed2efdc806c1883954e677eb9ab8cbc7e286c9c5934ef6724fd5d93c56744923\". You have to remove (or rename) that container to be able to reuse that name."}
* Curl_http_done: called premature == 0
* Connection #0 to host localhost left intact
```
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
Use strongly typed errors to set HTTP status codes.
Error interfaces are defined in the api/errors package and errors
returned from controllers are checked against these interfaces.
Errors can be wraeped in a pkg/errors.Causer, as long as somewhere in the
line of causes one of the interfaces is implemented. The special error
interfaces take precedence over Causer, meaning if both Causer and one
of the new error interfaces are implemented, the Causer is not
traversed.
Signed-off-by: Brian Goff <cpuguy83@gmail.com>
If we get "container not found" error from containerd, it's possibly
because that this container has already been stopped. It will be ok to
ignore this error and just return an empty stats.
Signed-off-by: Yuanhong Peng <pengyuanhong@huawei.com>
Remove forked reference package. Use normalized named values
everywhere and familiar functions to convert back to familiar
strings for UX and storage compatibility.
Enforce that the source repository in the distribution metadata
is always a normalized string, ignore invalid values which are not.
Update distribution tests to use normalized values.
Signed-off-by: Derek McGowan <derek@mcgstyle.net> (github: dmcgowan)
Moving all strings to the errors package wasn't a good idea after all.
Our custom implementation of Go errors predates everything that's nice
and good about working with errors in Go. Take as an example what we
have to do to get an error message:
```go
func GetErrorMessage(err error) string {
switch err.(type) {
case errcode.Error:
e, _ := err.(errcode.Error)
return e.Message
case errcode.ErrorCode:
ec, _ := err.(errcode.ErrorCode)
return ec.Message()
default:
return err.Error()
}
}
```
This goes against every good practice for Go development. The language already provides a simple, intuitive and standard way to get error messages, that is calling the `Error()` method from an error. Reinventing the error interface is a mistake.
Our custom implementation also makes very hard to reason about errors, another nice thing about Go. I found several (>10) error declarations that we don't use anywhere. This is a clear sign about how little we know about the errors we return. I also found several error usages where the number of arguments was different than the parameters declared in the error, another clear example of how difficult is to reason about errors.
Moreover, our custom implementation didn't really make easier for people to return custom HTTP status code depending on the errors. Again, it's hard to reason about when to set custom codes and how. Take an example what we have to do to extract the message and status code from an error before returning a response from the API:
```go
switch err.(type) {
case errcode.ErrorCode:
daError, _ := err.(errcode.ErrorCode)
statusCode = daError.Descriptor().HTTPStatusCode
errMsg = daError.Message()
case errcode.Error:
// For reference, if you're looking for a particular error
// then you can do something like :
// import ( derr "github.com/docker/docker/errors" )
// if daError.ErrorCode() == derr.ErrorCodeNoSuchContainer { ... }
daError, _ := err.(errcode.Error)
statusCode = daError.ErrorCode().Descriptor().HTTPStatusCode
errMsg = daError.Message
default:
// This part of will be removed once we've
// converted everything over to use the errcode package
// FIXME: this is brittle and should not be necessary.
// If we need to differentiate between different possible error types,
// we should create appropriate error types with clearly defined meaning
errStr := strings.ToLower(err.Error())
for keyword, status := range map[string]int{
"not found": http.StatusNotFound,
"no such": http.StatusNotFound,
"bad parameter": http.StatusBadRequest,
"conflict": http.StatusConflict,
"impossible": http.StatusNotAcceptable,
"wrong login/password": http.StatusUnauthorized,
"hasn't been activated": http.StatusForbidden,
} {
if strings.Contains(errStr, keyword) {
statusCode = status
break
}
}
}
```
You can notice two things in that code:
1. We have to explain how errors work, because our implementation goes against how easy to use Go errors are.
2. At no moment we arrived to remove that `switch` statement that was the original reason to use our custom implementation.
This change removes all our status errors from the errors package and puts them back in their specific contexts.
IT puts the messages back with their contexts. That way, we know right away when errors used and how to generate their messages.
It uses custom interfaces to reason about errors. Errors that need to response with a custom status code MUST implementent this simple interface:
```go
type errorWithStatus interface {
HTTPErrorStatusCode() int
}
```
This interface is very straightforward to implement. It also preserves Go errors real behavior, getting the message is as simple as using the `Error()` method.
I included helper functions to generate errors that use custom status code in `errors/errors.go`.
By doing this, we remove the hard dependency we have eeverywhere to our custom errors package. Yes, you can use it as a helper to generate error, but it's still very easy to generate errors without it.
Please, read this fantastic blog post about errors in Go: http://dave.cheney.net/2014/12/24/inspecting-errors
Signed-off-by: David Calavera <david.calavera@gmail.com>
Add distribution package for managing pulls and pushes. This is based on
the old code in the graph package, with major changes to work with the
new image/layer model.
Add v1 migration code.
Update registry, api/*, and daemon packages to use the reference
package's types where applicable.
Update daemon package to use image/layer/tag stores instead of the graph
package
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lehmann <aaron.lehmann@docker.com>
Signed-off-by: Tonis Tiigi <tonistiigi@gmail.com>
