Wraps the engine itself with an AppArmor policy.
This restricts what may be done by applications
we call out to, such as 'xz'.
Significantly, this policy also restricts the policies
to which a container may be spawned into. By default,
users will be able to transition to an unconfined
policy or any policy prefaced with 'docker-'.
Local operators may add new local policies prefaced
with 'docker-' without needing to modify this policy.
Operators choosing to disable privileged containers
will need to modify this policy to remove access
to change_policy to unconfined.
Signed-off-by: Eric Windisch <eric@windisch.us>
The automatic installation of AppArmor policies prevents the
management of custom, site-specific apparmor policies for the
default container profile. Furthermore, this change will allow
a future policy for the engine itself to be written without demanding
the engine be able to arbitrarily create and manage AppArmor policies.
- Add deb package suggests for apparmor.
- Ubuntu postinst use aa-status & fix policy path
- Add the policies to the debian packages.
- Add apparmor tests for writing proc files
Additional restrictions against modifying files in proc
are enforced by AppArmor. Ensure that AppArmor is preventing
access to these files, not simply Docker's configuration of proc.
- Remove /proc/k?mem from AA policy
The path to mem and kmem are in /dev, not /proc
and cannot be restricted successfully through AppArmor.
The device cgroup will need to be sufficient here.
- Load contrib/apparmor during integration tests
Note that this is somewhat dirty because we
cannot restore the host to its original configuration.
However, it should be noted that prior to this patch
series, the Docker daemon itself was loading apparmor
policy from within the tests, so this is no dirtier or
uglier than the status-quo.
Signed-off-by: Eric Windisch <eric@windisch.us>
Adding in other areas per comments
Updating with comments; equalizing generating man page info
Updating with duglin's comments
Doug is right here again;fixing.
Signed-off-by: Mary Anthony <mary@docker.com>
Ubuntu Precise has a number of warts that made it non-trivial to add initially, but I've managed to work through some of them and come up with a working build. Two important parts to note are that it has neither the `btrfs` nor the `devicemapper` graphdriver backends since `btrfs-tools` and `libdevmapper-dev` in the precise repositories are too ancient for them to even compile.
Signed-off-by: Andrew "Tianon" Page <admwiggin@gmail.com>
This fixes the part of #12996 that I forgot. 👼
This also fixes a minor path issue (there's no `libexec` in Debian), and fixes a minor bug with the `debVersion` parsing.
Signed-off-by: Andrew "Tianon" Page <admwiggin@gmail.com>
