I noticed that we're using a homegrown package for assertions. The
functions are extremely similar to testify, but with enough slight
differences to be confusing (for example, Equal takes its arguments in a
different order). We already vendor testify, and it's used in a few
places by tests.
I also found some problems with pkg/testutil/assert. For example, the
NotNil function seems to be broken. It checks the argument against
"nil", which only works for an interface. If you pass in a nil map or
slice, the equality check will fail.
In the interest of avoiding NIH, I'm proposing replacing
pkg/testutil/assert with testify. The test code looks almost the same,
but we avoid the confusion of having two similar but slightly different
assertion packages, and having to maintain our own package instead of
using a commonly-used one.
In the process, I found a few places where the tests should halt if an
assertion fails, so I've made those cases (that I noticed) use "require"
instead of "assert", and I've vendored the "require" package from
testify alongside the already-present "assert" package.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lehmann <aaron.lehmann@docker.com>
Return dockerfile from parseDockerfile and pass the dockerfile nodes
as an arg
Strip unused arg from builder.NewBuilder.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Nephin <dnephin@docker.com>
This fix tries to fix the issue in 29619 where
labels passed from `build --labels` are not sorted.
As a result, if multiple labels have been passed,
each `docker build --labels A=A --labels B=B --labels C=C`
will generate different layers.
This fix fixes the issue by sort the Labels before
they are concatenated to `LABEL ...`.
A unit test has been added to cover the changes
This fix fixes 29619.
Signed-off-by: Yong Tang <yong.tang.github@outlook.com>
Aaron Lehmann