2014-03-14 00:31:24 -04:00
|
|
|
require_relative '../helper'
|
2013-12-07 19:05:48 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
describe "Command::ShellCommand" do
|
|
|
|
describe 'cd' do
|
|
|
|
before do
|
|
|
|
@o = Object.new
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@t = pry_tester(@o) do
|
|
|
|
def command_state
|
|
|
|
pry.command_state[Pry::Command::ShellCommand.match]
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
describe ".cd" do
|
|
|
|
before do
|
Switch test suite to RSpec
Removes Bacon and Mocha
Reasoning explained in this comment: https://github.com/pry/pry/issues/277#issuecomment-51708712
Mostly this went smoothly. There were a few errors that I fixed along
the way, e.g. tests that were failing but for various reasons still
passed. Should have documented them, but didn't think about it until
very near the end. But generaly, I remember 2 reasons this would happen:
`lambda { raise "omg" }.should.raise(RuntimeError, /not-omg/)` will pass
because the second argument is ignored by Bacon. And `1.should == 2`
will return false instead of raising an error when it is not in an it
block (e.g. if stuck in a describe block, that would just return false)
The only one that I felt unsure about was spec/helpers/table_spec.rb
`Pry::Helpers.tablify_or_one_line('head', %w(ing)).should == 'head: ing'`
This is wrong, but was not failing because it was in a describe block
instead of an it block. In reality, it returns `"head: ing\n"`,
I updated the test to reflect this, though I don't know for sure
this is the right thing to do
This will fail on master until https://github.com/pry/pry/pull/1281 is merged.
This makes https://github.com/pry/pry/pull/1278 unnecessary.
2014-08-10 18:26:47 -04:00
|
|
|
allow(Dir).to receive(:chdir)
|
2013-12-07 19:05:48 -05:00
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it "saves the current working directory" do
|
Switch test suite to RSpec
Removes Bacon and Mocha
Reasoning explained in this comment: https://github.com/pry/pry/issues/277#issuecomment-51708712
Mostly this went smoothly. There were a few errors that I fixed along
the way, e.g. tests that were failing but for various reasons still
passed. Should have documented them, but didn't think about it until
very near the end. But generaly, I remember 2 reasons this would happen:
`lambda { raise "omg" }.should.raise(RuntimeError, /not-omg/)` will pass
because the second argument is ignored by Bacon. And `1.should == 2`
will return false instead of raising an error when it is not in an it
block (e.g. if stuck in a describe block, that would just return false)
The only one that I felt unsure about was spec/helpers/table_spec.rb
`Pry::Helpers.tablify_or_one_line('head', %w(ing)).should == 'head: ing'`
This is wrong, but was not failing because it was in a describe block
instead of an it block. In reality, it returns `"head: ing\n"`,
I updated the test to reflect this, though I don't know for sure
this is the right thing to do
This will fail on master until https://github.com/pry/pry/pull/1281 is merged.
This makes https://github.com/pry/pry/pull/1278 unnecessary.
2014-08-10 18:26:47 -04:00
|
|
|
expect(Dir).to receive(:pwd).at_least(:once).and_return("initial_path") # called once in MRI, 2x in RBX
|
2013-12-07 19:05:48 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@t.eval ".cd new_path"
|
|
|
|
@t.command_state.old_pwd.should == "initial_path"
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
describe "given a path" do
|
|
|
|
it "sends the path to File.expand_path" do
|
Switch test suite to RSpec
Removes Bacon and Mocha
Reasoning explained in this comment: https://github.com/pry/pry/issues/277#issuecomment-51708712
Mostly this went smoothly. There were a few errors that I fixed along
the way, e.g. tests that were failing but for various reasons still
passed. Should have documented them, but didn't think about it until
very near the end. But generaly, I remember 2 reasons this would happen:
`lambda { raise "omg" }.should.raise(RuntimeError, /not-omg/)` will pass
because the second argument is ignored by Bacon. And `1.should == 2`
will return false instead of raising an error when it is not in an it
block (e.g. if stuck in a describe block, that would just return false)
The only one that I felt unsure about was spec/helpers/table_spec.rb
`Pry::Helpers.tablify_or_one_line('head', %w(ing)).should == 'head: ing'`
This is wrong, but was not failing because it was in a describe block
instead of an it block. In reality, it returns `"head: ing\n"`,
I updated the test to reflect this, though I don't know for sure
this is the right thing to do
This will fail on master until https://github.com/pry/pry/pull/1281 is merged.
This makes https://github.com/pry/pry/pull/1278 unnecessary.
2014-08-10 18:26:47 -04:00
|
|
|
expect(Dir).to receive(:chdir).with(File.expand_path("new_path"))
|
2013-12-07 19:05:48 -05:00
|
|
|
@t.eval ".cd new_path"
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
2013-12-08 21:48:52 -05:00
|
|
|
describe "given an empty string" do
|
|
|
|
it "sends ~ to File.expand_path" do
|
Switch test suite to RSpec
Removes Bacon and Mocha
Reasoning explained in this comment: https://github.com/pry/pry/issues/277#issuecomment-51708712
Mostly this went smoothly. There were a few errors that I fixed along
the way, e.g. tests that were failing but for various reasons still
passed. Should have documented them, but didn't think about it until
very near the end. But generaly, I remember 2 reasons this would happen:
`lambda { raise "omg" }.should.raise(RuntimeError, /not-omg/)` will pass
because the second argument is ignored by Bacon. And `1.should == 2`
will return false instead of raising an error when it is not in an it
block (e.g. if stuck in a describe block, that would just return false)
The only one that I felt unsure about was spec/helpers/table_spec.rb
`Pry::Helpers.tablify_or_one_line('head', %w(ing)).should == 'head: ing'`
This is wrong, but was not failing because it was in a describe block
instead of an it block. In reality, it returns `"head: ing\n"`,
I updated the test to reflect this, though I don't know for sure
this is the right thing to do
This will fail on master until https://github.com/pry/pry/pull/1281 is merged.
This makes https://github.com/pry/pry/pull/1278 unnecessary.
2014-08-10 18:26:47 -04:00
|
|
|
expect(Dir).to receive(:chdir).with(File.expand_path("~"))
|
2013-12-08 21:48:52 -05:00
|
|
|
@t.eval ".cd "
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
2013-12-07 19:05:48 -05:00
|
|
|
describe "given a dash" do
|
|
|
|
describe "given no prior directory" do
|
|
|
|
it "raises the correct error" do
|
Switch test suite to RSpec
Removes Bacon and Mocha
Reasoning explained in this comment: https://github.com/pry/pry/issues/277#issuecomment-51708712
Mostly this went smoothly. There were a few errors that I fixed along
the way, e.g. tests that were failing but for various reasons still
passed. Should have documented them, but didn't think about it until
very near the end. But generaly, I remember 2 reasons this would happen:
`lambda { raise "omg" }.should.raise(RuntimeError, /not-omg/)` will pass
because the second argument is ignored by Bacon. And `1.should == 2`
will return false instead of raising an error when it is not in an it
block (e.g. if stuck in a describe block, that would just return false)
The only one that I felt unsure about was spec/helpers/table_spec.rb
`Pry::Helpers.tablify_or_one_line('head', %w(ing)).should == 'head: ing'`
This is wrong, but was not failing because it was in a describe block
instead of an it block. In reality, it returns `"head: ing\n"`,
I updated the test to reflect this, though I don't know for sure
this is the right thing to do
This will fail on master until https://github.com/pry/pry/pull/1281 is merged.
This makes https://github.com/pry/pry/pull/1278 unnecessary.
2014-08-10 18:26:47 -04:00
|
|
|
expect { @t.eval ".cd -" }.to raise_error(StandardError, "No prior directory available")
|
2013-12-07 19:05:48 -05:00
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
describe "given a prior directory" do
|
|
|
|
it "sends the user's last pry working directory to File.expand_path" do
|
Switch test suite to RSpec
Removes Bacon and Mocha
Reasoning explained in this comment: https://github.com/pry/pry/issues/277#issuecomment-51708712
Mostly this went smoothly. There were a few errors that I fixed along
the way, e.g. tests that were failing but for various reasons still
passed. Should have documented them, but didn't think about it until
very near the end. But generaly, I remember 2 reasons this would happen:
`lambda { raise "omg" }.should.raise(RuntimeError, /not-omg/)` will pass
because the second argument is ignored by Bacon. And `1.should == 2`
will return false instead of raising an error when it is not in an it
block (e.g. if stuck in a describe block, that would just return false)
The only one that I felt unsure about was spec/helpers/table_spec.rb
`Pry::Helpers.tablify_or_one_line('head', %w(ing)).should == 'head: ing'`
This is wrong, but was not failing because it was in a describe block
instead of an it block. In reality, it returns `"head: ing\n"`,
I updated the test to reflect this, though I don't know for sure
this is the right thing to do
This will fail on master until https://github.com/pry/pry/pull/1281 is merged.
This makes https://github.com/pry/pry/pull/1278 unnecessary.
2014-08-10 18:26:47 -04:00
|
|
|
expect(Dir).to receive(:pwd).at_least(:twice).and_return("initial_path") # called 2x in MRI, 3x in RBX
|
2013-12-07 19:05:48 -05:00
|
|
|
|
Switch test suite to RSpec
Removes Bacon and Mocha
Reasoning explained in this comment: https://github.com/pry/pry/issues/277#issuecomment-51708712
Mostly this went smoothly. There were a few errors that I fixed along
the way, e.g. tests that were failing but for various reasons still
passed. Should have documented them, but didn't think about it until
very near the end. But generaly, I remember 2 reasons this would happen:
`lambda { raise "omg" }.should.raise(RuntimeError, /not-omg/)` will pass
because the second argument is ignored by Bacon. And `1.should == 2`
will return false instead of raising an error when it is not in an it
block (e.g. if stuck in a describe block, that would just return false)
The only one that I felt unsure about was spec/helpers/table_spec.rb
`Pry::Helpers.tablify_or_one_line('head', %w(ing)).should == 'head: ing'`
This is wrong, but was not failing because it was in a describe block
instead of an it block. In reality, it returns `"head: ing\n"`,
I updated the test to reflect this, though I don't know for sure
this is the right thing to do
This will fail on master until https://github.com/pry/pry/pull/1281 is merged.
This makes https://github.com/pry/pry/pull/1278 unnecessary.
2014-08-10 18:26:47 -04:00
|
|
|
expect(Dir).to receive(:chdir).with(File.expand_path("new_path"))
|
2013-12-07 19:05:48 -05:00
|
|
|
@t.eval ".cd new_path"
|
|
|
|
|
Switch test suite to RSpec
Removes Bacon and Mocha
Reasoning explained in this comment: https://github.com/pry/pry/issues/277#issuecomment-51708712
Mostly this went smoothly. There were a few errors that I fixed along
the way, e.g. tests that were failing but for various reasons still
passed. Should have documented them, but didn't think about it until
very near the end. But generaly, I remember 2 reasons this would happen:
`lambda { raise "omg" }.should.raise(RuntimeError, /not-omg/)` will pass
because the second argument is ignored by Bacon. And `1.should == 2`
will return false instead of raising an error when it is not in an it
block (e.g. if stuck in a describe block, that would just return false)
The only one that I felt unsure about was spec/helpers/table_spec.rb
`Pry::Helpers.tablify_or_one_line('head', %w(ing)).should == 'head: ing'`
This is wrong, but was not failing because it was in a describe block
instead of an it block. In reality, it returns `"head: ing\n"`,
I updated the test to reflect this, though I don't know for sure
this is the right thing to do
This will fail on master until https://github.com/pry/pry/pull/1281 is merged.
This makes https://github.com/pry/pry/pull/1278 unnecessary.
2014-08-10 18:26:47 -04:00
|
|
|
expect(Dir).to receive(:chdir).with(File.expand_path("initial_path"))
|
2013-12-07 19:05:48 -05:00
|
|
|
@t.eval ".cd -"
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|