1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/rails/rails.git synced 2022-11-09 12:12:34 -05:00
rails--rails/activerecord/lib/active_record/enum.rb

292 lines
10 KiB
Ruby
Raw Normal View History

# frozen_string_literal: true
require "active_support/core_ext/object/deep_dup"
module ActiveRecord
# Declare an enum attribute where the values map to integers in the database,
# but can be queried by name. Example:
#
# class Conversation < ActiveRecord::Base
2013-11-02 21:32:08 -04:00
# enum status: [ :active, :archived ]
# end
#
# # conversation.update! status: 0
# conversation.active!
# conversation.active? # => true
# conversation.status # => "active"
#
# # conversation.update! status: 1
# conversation.archived!
# conversation.archived? # => true
# conversation.status # => "archived"
#
# # conversation.status = 1
# conversation.status = "archived"
#
# conversation.status = nil
# conversation.status.nil? # => true
# conversation.status # => nil
#
# Scopes based on the allowed values of the enum field will be provided
# as well. With the above example:
#
# Conversation.active
# Conversation.not_active
# Conversation.archived
# Conversation.not_archived
#
# Of course, you can also query them directly if the scopes don't fit your
# needs:
#
# Conversation.where(status: [:active, :archived])
# Conversation.where.not(status: :active)
#
# Defining scopes can be disabled by setting +:_scopes+ to +false+.
#
# class Conversation < ActiveRecord::Base
# enum status: [ :active, :archived ], _scopes: false
# end
#
# You can set the default enum value by setting +:_default+, like:
#
# class Conversation < ActiveRecord::Base
# enum status: [ :active, :archived ], _default: "active"
# end
#
# conversation = Conversation.new
# conversation.status # => "active"
2013-11-02 21:32:08 -04:00
#
# Finally, it's also possible to explicitly map the relation between attribute and
# database integer with a hash:
2013-11-02 21:32:08 -04:00
#
# class Conversation < ActiveRecord::Base
# enum status: { active: 0, archived: 1 }
# end
#
# Note that when an array is used, the implicit mapping from the values to database
# integers is derived from the order the values appear in the array. In the example,
2013-12-06 14:21:12 -05:00
# <tt>:active</tt> is mapped to +0+ as it's the first element, and <tt>:archived</tt>
# is mapped to +1+. In general, the +i+-th element is mapped to <tt>i-1</tt> in the
# database.
#
# Therefore, once a value is added to the enum array, its position in the array must
# be maintained, and new values should only be added to the end of the array. To
# remove unused values, the explicit hash syntax should be used.
#
# In rare circumstances you might need to access the mapping directly.
# The mappings are exposed through a class method with the pluralized attribute
# name, which return the mapping in a +HashWithIndifferentAccess+:
#
# Conversation.statuses[:active] # => 0
# Conversation.statuses["archived"] # => 1
#
# Use that class method when you need to know the ordinal value of an enum.
# For example, you can use that when manually building SQL strings:
#
# Conversation.where("status <> ?", Conversation.statuses[:archived])
#
# You can use the +:_prefix+ or +:_suffix+ options when you need to define
# multiple enums with same values. If the passed value is +true+, the methods
# are prefixed/suffixed with the name of the enum. It is also possible to
# supply a custom value:
#
# class Conversation < ActiveRecord::Base
# enum status: [:active, :archived], _suffix: true
# enum comments_status: [:active, :inactive], _prefix: :comments
# end
#
# With the above example, the bang and predicate methods along with the
# associated scopes are now prefixed and/or suffixed accordingly:
#
# conversation.active_status!
# conversation.archived_status? # => false
#
# conversation.comments_inactive!
# conversation.comments_active? # => false
module Enum
2014-07-16 13:44:41 -04:00
def self.extended(base) # :nodoc:
base.class_attribute(:defined_enums, instance_writer: false, default: {})
2014-04-07 10:01:03 -04:00
end
2014-07-16 13:44:41 -04:00
def inherited(base) # :nodoc:
base.defined_enums = defined_enums.deep_dup
super
end
class EnumType < Type::Value # :nodoc:
2016-06-24 04:43:25 -04:00
delegate :type, to: :subtype
def initialize(name, mapping, subtype)
@name = name
@mapping = mapping
@subtype = subtype
end
2015-02-17 15:39:42 -05:00
def cast(value)
if mapping.has_key?(value)
value.to_s
elsif mapping.has_value?(value)
mapping.key(value)
elsif value.blank?
nil
else
assert_valid_value(value)
end
end
def deserialize(value)
mapping.key(subtype.deserialize(value))
end
Perf: Improve performance of where when using an array of values A coworker at GitHub found a few months back that if we used `santitize_sql` over `where` when we knew the values going into `where` it was a lot faster than `where`. This PR adds a new Arel node type called `HomogenousIn` that will be used when Rails knows the values are all homogenous and can therefore pick a faster codepath. This new codepath skips some of the required processing by `where` to make `wheres` with homogenous arrays faster without requiring the application author to know when to use which query type. Using our benchmark code: ```ruby ids = (1..1000).each.map do |n| Post.create!.id end Benchmark.ips do |x| x.report("where with ids") do Post.where(id: ids).to_a end x.report("where with sanitize") do Post.where(ActiveRecord::Base.sanitize_sql(["id IN (?)", ids])).to_a end x.compare! end ``` Before this PR comparing where with a list of IDs to santitize sql: ``` Warming up -------------------------------------- where with ids 11.000 i/100ms where with sanitize 17.000 i/100ms Calculating ------------------------------------- where with ids 115.733 (± 4.3%) i/s - 583.000 in 5.045828s where with sanitize 174.231 (± 4.0%) i/s - 884.000 in 5.081495s Comparison: where with sanitize: 174.2 i/s where with ids: 115.7 i/s - 1.51x slower ``` After this PR comparing where with a list of IDs to santitize sql: ``` Warming up -------------------------------------- where with ids 16.000 i/100ms where with sanitize 19.000 i/100ms Calculating ------------------------------------- where with ids 158.293 (± 6.3%) i/s - 800.000 in 5.072208s where with sanitize 169.141 (± 3.5%) i/s - 855.000 in 5.060878s Comparison: where with sanitize: 169.1 i/s where with ids: 158.3 i/s - same-ish: difference falls within error ``` Co-authored-by: Aaron Patterson <aaron.patterson@gmail.com>
2020-01-14 16:14:39 -05:00
def serializable?(value)
(value.blank? || mapping.has_key?(value) || mapping.has_value?(value)) && super
end
def serialize(value)
mapping.fetch(value, value)
end
def assert_valid_value(value)
Perf: Improve performance of where when using an array of values A coworker at GitHub found a few months back that if we used `santitize_sql` over `where` when we knew the values going into `where` it was a lot faster than `where`. This PR adds a new Arel node type called `HomogenousIn` that will be used when Rails knows the values are all homogenous and can therefore pick a faster codepath. This new codepath skips some of the required processing by `where` to make `wheres` with homogenous arrays faster without requiring the application author to know when to use which query type. Using our benchmark code: ```ruby ids = (1..1000).each.map do |n| Post.create!.id end Benchmark.ips do |x| x.report("where with ids") do Post.where(id: ids).to_a end x.report("where with sanitize") do Post.where(ActiveRecord::Base.sanitize_sql(["id IN (?)", ids])).to_a end x.compare! end ``` Before this PR comparing where with a list of IDs to santitize sql: ``` Warming up -------------------------------------- where with ids 11.000 i/100ms where with sanitize 17.000 i/100ms Calculating ------------------------------------- where with ids 115.733 (± 4.3%) i/s - 583.000 in 5.045828s where with sanitize 174.231 (± 4.0%) i/s - 884.000 in 5.081495s Comparison: where with sanitize: 174.2 i/s where with ids: 115.7 i/s - 1.51x slower ``` After this PR comparing where with a list of IDs to santitize sql: ``` Warming up -------------------------------------- where with ids 16.000 i/100ms where with sanitize 19.000 i/100ms Calculating ------------------------------------- where with ids 158.293 (± 6.3%) i/s - 800.000 in 5.072208s where with sanitize 169.141 (± 3.5%) i/s - 855.000 in 5.060878s Comparison: where with sanitize: 169.1 i/s where with ids: 158.3 i/s - same-ish: difference falls within error ``` Co-authored-by: Aaron Patterson <aaron.patterson@gmail.com>
2020-01-14 16:14:39 -05:00
unless serializable?(value)
raise ArgumentError, "'#{value}' is not a valid #{name}"
end
end
2018-02-16 20:14:27 -05:00
private
attr_reader :name, :mapping, :subtype
end
def enum(definitions)
klass = self
enum_prefix = definitions.delete(:_prefix)
enum_suffix = definitions.delete(:_suffix)
enum_scopes = definitions.delete(:_scopes)
default = {}
default[:default] = definitions.delete(:_default) if definitions.key?(:_default)
definitions.each do |name, values|
assert_valid_enum_definition_values(values)
# statuses = { }
enum_values = ActiveSupport::HashWithIndifferentAccess.new
name = name.to_s
2016-03-05 22:15:12 -05:00
# def self.statuses() statuses end
detect_enum_conflict!(name, name.pluralize, true)
singleton_class.define_method(name.pluralize) { enum_values }
defined_enums[name] = enum_values
detect_enum_conflict!(name, name)
detect_enum_conflict!(name, "#{name}=")
attr = attribute_alias?(name) ? attribute_alias(name) : name
2020-07-22 04:14:28 -04:00
decorate_attribute_type(attr, **default) do |subtype|
EnumType.new(attr, enum_values, subtype)
end
_enum_methods_module.module_eval do
pairs = values.respond_to?(:each_pair) ? values.each_pair : values.each_with_index
pairs.each do |label, value|
if enum_prefix == true
prefix = "#{name}_"
elsif enum_prefix
prefix = "#{enum_prefix}_"
end
if enum_suffix == true
suffix = "_#{name}"
elsif enum_suffix
suffix = "_#{enum_suffix}"
end
method_friendly_label = label.to_s.gsub(/\W+/, "_")
value_method_name = "#{prefix}#{method_friendly_label}#{suffix}"
enum_values[label] = value
label = label.to_s
# def active?() status == "active" end
klass.send(:detect_enum_conflict!, name, "#{value_method_name}?")
define_method("#{value_method_name}?") { self[attr] == label }
# def active!() update!(status: 0) end
klass.send(:detect_enum_conflict!, name, "#{value_method_name}!")
define_method("#{value_method_name}!") { update!(attr => value) }
# scope :active, -> { where(status: 0) }
# scope :not_active, -> { where.not(status: 0) }
if enum_scopes != false
klass.send(:detect_negative_condition!, value_method_name)
klass.send(:detect_enum_conflict!, name, value_method_name, true)
klass.scope value_method_name, -> { where(attr => value) }
klass.send(:detect_enum_conflict!, name, "not_#{value_method_name}", true)
klass.scope "not_#{value_method_name}", -> { where.not(attr => value) }
end
end
end
enum_values.freeze
end
end
private
def _enum_methods_module
@_enum_methods_module ||= begin
mod = Module.new
include mod
mod
end
end
def assert_valid_enum_definition_values(values)
unless values.is_a?(Hash) || values.all? { |v| v.is_a?(Symbol) } || values.all? { |v| v.is_a?(String) }
error_message = <<~MSG
Enum values #{values} must be either a hash, an array of symbols, or an array of strings.
MSG
raise ArgumentError, error_message
end
if values.is_a?(Hash) && values.keys.any?(&:blank?) || values.is_a?(Array) && values.any?(&:blank?)
raise ArgumentError, "Enum label name must not be blank."
end
end
ENUM_CONFLICT_MESSAGE = \
"You tried to define an enum named \"%{enum}\" on the model \"%{klass}\", but " \
"this will generate a %{type} method \"%{method}\", which is already defined " \
"by %{source}."
private_constant :ENUM_CONFLICT_MESSAGE
def detect_enum_conflict!(enum_name, method_name, klass_method = false)
if klass_method && dangerous_class_method?(method_name)
raise_conflict_error(enum_name, method_name, type: "class")
elsif klass_method && method_defined_within?(method_name, Relation)
raise_conflict_error(enum_name, method_name, type: "class", source: Relation.name)
elsif !klass_method && dangerous_attribute_method?(method_name)
2015-09-18 11:46:11 -04:00
raise_conflict_error(enum_name, method_name)
elsif !klass_method && method_defined_within?(method_name, _enum_methods_module, Module)
raise_conflict_error(enum_name, method_name, source: "another enum")
end
end
2015-09-18 11:46:11 -04:00
def raise_conflict_error(enum_name, method_name, type: "instance", source: "Active Record")
2015-09-18 11:46:11 -04:00
raise ArgumentError, ENUM_CONFLICT_MESSAGE % {
enum: enum_name,
klass: name,
2015-09-18 11:46:11 -04:00
type: type,
method: method_name,
source: source
}
end
def detect_negative_condition!(method_name)
if method_name.start_with?("not_") && logger
logger.warn "An enum element in #{self.name} uses the prefix 'not_'." \
" This will cause a conflict with auto generated negative scopes."
end
end
end
end