1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/rails/rails.git synced 2022-11-09 12:12:34 -05:00
rails--rails/activerecord/test/models/hotel.rb

14 lines
514 B
Ruby
Raw Normal View History

# frozen_string_literal: true
class Hotel < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :departments
has_many :chefs, through: :departments
has_many :cake_designers, source_type: "CakeDesigner", source: :employable, through: :chefs
has_many :drink_designers, source_type: "DrinkDesigner", source: :employable, through: :chefs
has_many :chef_lists, as: :employable_list
2016-08-06 13:37:57 -04:00
has_many :mocktail_designers, through: :chef_lists, source: :employable, source_type: "MocktailDesigner"
Fix leaky chain on polymorphic association If there was a polymorphic hm:t association with a scope AND second non-scoped hm:t association on a model the polymorphic scope would leak through into the call for the non-polymorhic hm:t association. This would only break if `hotel.drink_designers` was called before `hotel.recipes`. If `hotel.recipes` was called first there would be no problem with the SQL. Before (employable_type should not be here): ``` SELECT COUNT(*) FROM "drink_designers" INNER JOIN "chefs" ON "drink_designers"."id" = "chefs"."employable_id" INNER JOIN "departments" ON "chefs"."department_id" = "departments"."id" WHERE "departments"."hotel_id" = ? AND "chefs"."employable_type" = ? [["hotel_id", 1], ["employable_type", "DrinkDesigner"]] ``` After: ``` SELECT COUNT(*) FROM "recipes" INNER JOIN "chefs" ON "recipes"."chef_id" = "chefs"."id" INNER JOIN "departments" ON "chefs"."department_id" = "departments"."id" WHERE "departments"."hotel_id" = ? [["hotel_id", 1]] ``` From the SQL you can see that `employable_type` was leaking through when calling recipes. The solution is to dup the chain of the polymorphic association so it doesn't get cached. Additionally, this follows `scope_chain` which dup's the `source_reflection`'s `scope_chain`. This required another model/table/relationship because the leak only happens on a hm:t polymorphic that's called before another hm:t on the same model. I am specifically testing the SQL here instead of the number of records becasue the test could pass if there was 1 drink designer recipe for the drink designer chef even though the `employable_type` was leaking through. This needs to specifically check that `employable_type` is not in the SQL statement.
2015-03-15 10:33:29 -04:00
has_many :recipes, through: :chefs
end