1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/rails/rails.git synced 2022-11-09 12:12:34 -05:00
rails--rails/guides/source/active_record_multiple_databases.md

529 lines
22 KiB
Markdown
Raw Normal View History

**DO NOT READ THIS FILE ON GITHUB, GUIDES ARE PUBLISHED ON https://guides.rubyonrails.org.**
Multiple Databases with Active Record
=====================================
This guide covers using multiple databases with your Rails application.
After reading this guide you will know:
2019-08-09 17:30:15 -04:00
* How to set up your application for multiple databases.
* How automatic connection switching works.
* How to use horizontal sharding for multiple databases.
* How to migrate from `legacy_connection_handling` to the new connection handling.
* What features are supported and what's still a work in progress.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As an application grows in popularity and usage you'll need to scale the application
to support your new users and their data. One way in which your application may need
to scale is on the database level. Rails now has support for multiple databases
so you don't have to store your data all in one place.
At this time the following features are supported:
Default db_config should be primary or first The handling for single database applications has always set a schema.rb or structure.sql files for loading the database schema. When we first implemented multiple database support we intended to keep this for the original, default database. Afterall Rails _has_ to connect to something on boot. In development only one connection is connected on boot since we don't eager load the app. Originally we had thought that all applications should be required to add a `primary` entry in the database configurations file. However, this hasn't worked in practice and we have some code now that does not assume there's a primary. The schema dumping/loading code however, still assumed there was a "primary" in the configurations file. We want the "default" database in any application to use the original files even when converted to a multiple database application as this reduces the need to make changes when implementing this functionality on an existing application. The changes here update Rails to ensure that we treat either "primary" or the first database configuration for an environment as "default". If there is a "primary" that will be used as the default configuration. If there is no primary the configuration that is first for an environment will be used as the default. For schema dump/load this means that the default configuration (primary or first) will use `schema.rb` as the filename and other configurations will use `[CONFIGURATION_NAME]_schema.rb`. This should also help us finish the pull request to infer migrations paths since now we can say the first configuration is the default. This is a natural assumption for application developers. Followup to #39536
2020-09-02 14:15:20 -04:00
* Multiple writer databases and a replica for each
* Automatic connection switching for the model you're working with
Default db_config should be primary or first The handling for single database applications has always set a schema.rb or structure.sql files for loading the database schema. When we first implemented multiple database support we intended to keep this for the original, default database. Afterall Rails _has_ to connect to something on boot. In development only one connection is connected on boot since we don't eager load the app. Originally we had thought that all applications should be required to add a `primary` entry in the database configurations file. However, this hasn't worked in practice and we have some code now that does not assume there's a primary. The schema dumping/loading code however, still assumed there was a "primary" in the configurations file. We want the "default" database in any application to use the original files even when converted to a multiple database application as this reduces the need to make changes when implementing this functionality on an existing application. The changes here update Rails to ensure that we treat either "primary" or the first database configuration for an environment as "default". If there is a "primary" that will be used as the default configuration. If there is no primary the configuration that is first for an environment will be used as the default. For schema dump/load this means that the default configuration (primary or first) will use `schema.rb` as the filename and other configurations will use `[CONFIGURATION_NAME]_schema.rb`. This should also help us finish the pull request to infer migrations paths since now we can say the first configuration is the default. This is a natural assumption for application developers. Followup to #39536
2020-09-02 14:15:20 -04:00
* Automatic swapping between the writer and replica depending on the HTTP verb
and recent writes
* Rails tasks for creating, dropping, migrating, and interacting with the multiple
databases
The following features are not (yet) supported:
* Automatic swapping for horizontal sharding
* Load balancing replicas
* Dumping schema caches for multiple databases
## Setting up your application
While Rails tries to do most of the work for you there are still some steps you'll
need to do to get your application ready for multiple databases.
Default db_config should be primary or first The handling for single database applications has always set a schema.rb or structure.sql files for loading the database schema. When we first implemented multiple database support we intended to keep this for the original, default database. Afterall Rails _has_ to connect to something on boot. In development only one connection is connected on boot since we don't eager load the app. Originally we had thought that all applications should be required to add a `primary` entry in the database configurations file. However, this hasn't worked in practice and we have some code now that does not assume there's a primary. The schema dumping/loading code however, still assumed there was a "primary" in the configurations file. We want the "default" database in any application to use the original files even when converted to a multiple database application as this reduces the need to make changes when implementing this functionality on an existing application. The changes here update Rails to ensure that we treat either "primary" or the first database configuration for an environment as "default". If there is a "primary" that will be used as the default configuration. If there is no primary the configuration that is first for an environment will be used as the default. For schema dump/load this means that the default configuration (primary or first) will use `schema.rb` as the filename and other configurations will use `[CONFIGURATION_NAME]_schema.rb`. This should also help us finish the pull request to infer migrations paths since now we can say the first configuration is the default. This is a natural assumption for application developers. Followup to #39536
2020-09-02 14:15:20 -04:00
Let's say we have an application with a single writer database and we need to add a
new database for some new tables we're adding. The name of the new database will be
"animals".
The `database.yml` looks like this:
```yaml
production:
database: my_primary_database
adapter: mysql2
username: root
password: <%= ENV['ROOT_PASSWORD'] %>
```
Default db_config should be primary or first The handling for single database applications has always set a schema.rb or structure.sql files for loading the database schema. When we first implemented multiple database support we intended to keep this for the original, default database. Afterall Rails _has_ to connect to something on boot. In development only one connection is connected on boot since we don't eager load the app. Originally we had thought that all applications should be required to add a `primary` entry in the database configurations file. However, this hasn't worked in practice and we have some code now that does not assume there's a primary. The schema dumping/loading code however, still assumed there was a "primary" in the configurations file. We want the "default" database in any application to use the original files even when converted to a multiple database application as this reduces the need to make changes when implementing this functionality on an existing application. The changes here update Rails to ensure that we treat either "primary" or the first database configuration for an environment as "default". If there is a "primary" that will be used as the default configuration. If there is no primary the configuration that is first for an environment will be used as the default. For schema dump/load this means that the default configuration (primary or first) will use `schema.rb` as the filename and other configurations will use `[CONFIGURATION_NAME]_schema.rb`. This should also help us finish the pull request to infer migrations paths since now we can say the first configuration is the default. This is a natural assumption for application developers. Followup to #39536
2020-09-02 14:15:20 -04:00
Let's add a replica for the first configuration, and a second database called animals and a
replica for that as well. To do this we need to change our `database.yml` from a 2-tier
to a 3-tier config.
If a primary configuration is provided, it will be used as the "default" configuration. If
there is no configuration named `"primary"`, Rails will use the first configuration as default
for each environment. The default configurations will use the default Rails filenames. For example,
primary configurations will use `schema.rb` for the schema file, whereas all the other entries
Default db_config should be primary or first The handling for single database applications has always set a schema.rb or structure.sql files for loading the database schema. When we first implemented multiple database support we intended to keep this for the original, default database. Afterall Rails _has_ to connect to something on boot. In development only one connection is connected on boot since we don't eager load the app. Originally we had thought that all applications should be required to add a `primary` entry in the database configurations file. However, this hasn't worked in practice and we have some code now that does not assume there's a primary. The schema dumping/loading code however, still assumed there was a "primary" in the configurations file. We want the "default" database in any application to use the original files even when converted to a multiple database application as this reduces the need to make changes when implementing this functionality on an existing application. The changes here update Rails to ensure that we treat either "primary" or the first database configuration for an environment as "default". If there is a "primary" that will be used as the default configuration. If there is no primary the configuration that is first for an environment will be used as the default. For schema dump/load this means that the default configuration (primary or first) will use `schema.rb` as the filename and other configurations will use `[CONFIGURATION_NAME]_schema.rb`. This should also help us finish the pull request to infer migrations paths since now we can say the first configuration is the default. This is a natural assumption for application developers. Followup to #39536
2020-09-02 14:15:20 -04:00
will use `[CONFIGURATION_NAMESPACE]_schema.rb` for the filename.
```yaml
production:
primary:
database: my_primary_database
username: root
password: <%= ENV['ROOT_PASSWORD'] %>
adapter: mysql2
primary_replica:
database: my_primary_database
username: root_readonly
password: <%= ENV['ROOT_READONLY_PASSWORD'] %>
adapter: mysql2
replica: true
animals:
database: my_animals_database
username: animals_root
password: <%= ENV['ANIMALS_ROOT_PASSWORD'] %>
adapter: mysql2
migrations_paths: db/animals_migrate
animals_replica:
database: my_animals_database
username: animals_readonly
password: <%= ENV['ANIMALS_READONLY_PASSWORD'] %>
adapter: mysql2
replica: true
```
When using multiple databases, there are a few important settings.
Default db_config should be primary or first The handling for single database applications has always set a schema.rb or structure.sql files for loading the database schema. When we first implemented multiple database support we intended to keep this for the original, default database. Afterall Rails _has_ to connect to something on boot. In development only one connection is connected on boot since we don't eager load the app. Originally we had thought that all applications should be required to add a `primary` entry in the database configurations file. However, this hasn't worked in practice and we have some code now that does not assume there's a primary. The schema dumping/loading code however, still assumed there was a "primary" in the configurations file. We want the "default" database in any application to use the original files even when converted to a multiple database application as this reduces the need to make changes when implementing this functionality on an existing application. The changes here update Rails to ensure that we treat either "primary" or the first database configuration for an environment as "default". If there is a "primary" that will be used as the default configuration. If there is no primary the configuration that is first for an environment will be used as the default. For schema dump/load this means that the default configuration (primary or first) will use `schema.rb` as the filename and other configurations will use `[CONFIGURATION_NAME]_schema.rb`. This should also help us finish the pull request to infer migrations paths since now we can say the first configuration is the default. This is a natural assumption for application developers. Followup to #39536
2020-09-02 14:15:20 -04:00
First, the database name for the `primary` and `primary_replica` should be the same because they contain
the same data. This is also the case for `animals` and `animals_replica`.
Second, the username for the writers and replicas should be different, and the
replica user's permissions should be set to only read and not write.
When using a replica database, you need to add a `replica: true` entry to the replica in the
`database.yml`. This is because Rails otherwise has no way of knowing which one is a replica
Default db_config should be primary or first The handling for single database applications has always set a schema.rb or structure.sql files for loading the database schema. When we first implemented multiple database support we intended to keep this for the original, default database. Afterall Rails _has_ to connect to something on boot. In development only one connection is connected on boot since we don't eager load the app. Originally we had thought that all applications should be required to add a `primary` entry in the database configurations file. However, this hasn't worked in practice and we have some code now that does not assume there's a primary. The schema dumping/loading code however, still assumed there was a "primary" in the configurations file. We want the "default" database in any application to use the original files even when converted to a multiple database application as this reduces the need to make changes when implementing this functionality on an existing application. The changes here update Rails to ensure that we treat either "primary" or the first database configuration for an environment as "default". If there is a "primary" that will be used as the default configuration. If there is no primary the configuration that is first for an environment will be used as the default. For schema dump/load this means that the default configuration (primary or first) will use `schema.rb` as the filename and other configurations will use `[CONFIGURATION_NAME]_schema.rb`. This should also help us finish the pull request to infer migrations paths since now we can say the first configuration is the default. This is a natural assumption for application developers. Followup to #39536
2020-09-02 14:15:20 -04:00
and which one is the writer.
Lastly, for new writer databases, you need to set the `migrations_paths` to the directory
where you will store migrations for that database. We'll look more at `migrations_paths`
later on in this guide.
Now that we have a new database, let's set up the connection model. In order to use the
new database we need to create a new abstract class and connect to the animals databases.
```ruby
class AnimalsRecord < ApplicationRecord
self.abstract_class = true
connects_to database: { writing: :animals, reading: :animals_replica }
end
```
Then we need to update `ApplicationRecord` to be aware of our new replica.
```ruby
class ApplicationRecord < ActiveRecord::Base
self.abstract_class = true
connects_to database: { writing: :primary, reading: :primary_replica }
end
```
If you use a differently named class for your application record you need to
set `primary_abstract_class` instead, so that Rails knows which class `ActiveRecord::Base`
should share a connection with.
```
class PrimaryApplicationRecord < ActiveRecord::Base
self.primary_abstract_class
end
```
Classes that connect to primary/primary_replica can inherit from your primary abstract
class like standard Rails applications:
```ruby
class Person < ApplicationRecord
end
```
By default Rails expects the database roles to be `writing` and `reading` for the primary
and replica respectively. If you have a legacy system you may already have roles set up that
you don't want to change. In that case you can set a new role name in your application config.
```ruby
config.active_record.writing_role = :default
config.active_record.reading_role = :readonly
```
It's important to connect to your database in a single model and then inherit from that model
for the tables rather than connect multiple individual models to the same database. Database
clients have a limit to the number of open connections there can be and if you do this it will
multiply the number of connections you have since Rails uses the model class name for the
connection specification name.
Now that we have the `database.yml` and the new model set up, it's time to create the databases.
Rails 6.0 ships with all the rails tasks you need to use multiple databases in Rails.
You can run `bin/rails -T` to see all the commands you're able to run. You should see the following:
```bash
$ bin/rails -T
rails db:create # Creates the database from DATABASE_URL or config/database.yml for the ...
rails db:create:animals # Create animals database for current environment
rails db:create:primary # Create primary database for current environment
rails db:drop # Drops the database from DATABASE_URL or config/database.yml for the cu...
rails db:drop:animals # Drop animals database for current environment
rails db:drop:primary # Drop primary database for current environment
rails db:migrate # Migrate the database (options: VERSION=x, VERBOSE=false, SCOPE=blog)
rails db:migrate:animals # Migrate animals database for current environment
rails db:migrate:primary # Migrate primary database for current environment
rails db:migrate:status # Display status of migrations
rails db:migrate:status:animals # Display status of migrations for animals database
rails db:migrate:status:primary # Display status of migrations for primary database
rails db:rollback # Rolls the schema back to the previous version (specify steps w/ STEP=n)
rails db:rollback:animals # Rollback animals database for current environment (specify steps w/ STEP=n)
rails db:rollback:primary # Rollback primary database for current environment (specify steps w/ STEP=n)
rails db:schema:dump # Creates a database schema file (either db/schema.rb or db/structure.sql ...
rails db:schema:dump:animals # Creates a database schema file (either db/schema.rb or db/structure.sql ...
rails db:schema:dump:primary # Creates a db/schema.rb file that is portable against any DB supported ...
rails db:schema:load # Loads a database schema file (either db/schema.rb or db/structure.sql ...
rails db:schema:load:animals # Loads a database schema file (either db/schema.rb or db/structure.sql ...
rails db:schema:load:primary # Loads a database schema file (either db/schema.rb or db/structure.sql ...
```
Running a command like `bin/rails db:create` will create both the primary and animals databases.
Note that there is no command for creating the database users, and you'll need to do that manually
to support the readonly users for your replicas. If you want to create just the animals
database you can run `bin/rails db:create:animals`.
## Generators and Migrations
Migrations for multiple databases should live in their own folders prefixed with the
name of the database key in the configuration.
You also need to set the `migrations_paths` in the database configurations to tell Rails
where to find the migrations.
For example the `animals` database would look for migrations in the `db/animals_migrate` directory and
`primary` would look in `db/migrate`. Rails generators now take a `--database` option
so that the file is generated in the correct directory. The command can be run like so:
```bash
$ bin/rails generate migration CreateDogs name:string --database animals
```
If you are using Rails generators, the scaffold and model generators will create the abstract
class for you. Simply pass the database key to the command line.
```bash
$ bin/rails generate scaffold Dog name:string --database animals
```
A class with the database name and `Record` will be created. In this example
the database is `Animals` so we end up with `AnimalsRecord`:
```ruby
class AnimalsRecord < ApplicationRecord
self.abstract_class = true
connects_to database: { writing: :animals }
end
```
The generated model will automatically inherit from `AnimalsRecord`.
```ruby
class Dog < AnimalsRecord
end
```
Note: Since Rails doesn't know which database is the replica for your writer you will need to
add this to the abstract class after you're done.
Rails will only generate the new class once. It will not be overwritten by new scaffolds
or deleted if the scaffold is deleted.
If you already have an abstract class and its name differs from `AnimalsRecord`, you can pass
the `--parent` option to indicate you want a different abstract class:
```bash
$ bin/rails generate scaffold Dog name:string --database animals --parent Animals::Record
```
This will skip generating `AnimalsRecord` since you've indicated to Rails that you want to
use a different parent class.
## Activating automatic connection switching
Finally, in order to use the read-only replica in your application, you'll need to activate
the middleware for automatic switching.
Default db_config should be primary or first The handling for single database applications has always set a schema.rb or structure.sql files for loading the database schema. When we first implemented multiple database support we intended to keep this for the original, default database. Afterall Rails _has_ to connect to something on boot. In development only one connection is connected on boot since we don't eager load the app. Originally we had thought that all applications should be required to add a `primary` entry in the database configurations file. However, this hasn't worked in practice and we have some code now that does not assume there's a primary. The schema dumping/loading code however, still assumed there was a "primary" in the configurations file. We want the "default" database in any application to use the original files even when converted to a multiple database application as this reduces the need to make changes when implementing this functionality on an existing application. The changes here update Rails to ensure that we treat either "primary" or the first database configuration for an environment as "default". If there is a "primary" that will be used as the default configuration. If there is no primary the configuration that is first for an environment will be used as the default. For schema dump/load this means that the default configuration (primary or first) will use `schema.rb` as the filename and other configurations will use `[CONFIGURATION_NAME]_schema.rb`. This should also help us finish the pull request to infer migrations paths since now we can say the first configuration is the default. This is a natural assumption for application developers. Followup to #39536
2020-09-02 14:15:20 -04:00
Automatic switching allows the application to switch from the writer to replica or replica
to writer based on the HTTP verb and whether there was a recent write by the requesting user.
If the application is receiving a POST, PUT, DELETE, or PATCH request the application will
Default db_config should be primary or first The handling for single database applications has always set a schema.rb or structure.sql files for loading the database schema. When we first implemented multiple database support we intended to keep this for the original, default database. Afterall Rails _has_ to connect to something on boot. In development only one connection is connected on boot since we don't eager load the app. Originally we had thought that all applications should be required to add a `primary` entry in the database configurations file. However, this hasn't worked in practice and we have some code now that does not assume there's a primary. The schema dumping/loading code however, still assumed there was a "primary" in the configurations file. We want the "default" database in any application to use the original files even when converted to a multiple database application as this reduces the need to make changes when implementing this functionality on an existing application. The changes here update Rails to ensure that we treat either "primary" or the first database configuration for an environment as "default". If there is a "primary" that will be used as the default configuration. If there is no primary the configuration that is first for an environment will be used as the default. For schema dump/load this means that the default configuration (primary or first) will use `schema.rb` as the filename and other configurations will use `[CONFIGURATION_NAME]_schema.rb`. This should also help us finish the pull request to infer migrations paths since now we can say the first configuration is the default. This is a natural assumption for application developers. Followup to #39536
2020-09-02 14:15:20 -04:00
automatically write to the writer database. For the specified time after the write, the
application will read from the primary. For a GET or HEAD request the application will read
from the replica unless there was a recent write.
To activate the automatic connection switching middleware, add or uncomment the following
lines in your application config.
```ruby
config.active_record.database_selector = { delay: 2.seconds }
config.active_record.database_resolver = ActiveRecord::Middleware::DatabaseSelector::Resolver
config.active_record.database_resolver_context = ActiveRecord::Middleware::DatabaseSelector::Resolver::Session
```
Rails guarantees "read your own write" and will send your GET or HEAD request to the
Default db_config should be primary or first The handling for single database applications has always set a schema.rb or structure.sql files for loading the database schema. When we first implemented multiple database support we intended to keep this for the original, default database. Afterall Rails _has_ to connect to something on boot. In development only one connection is connected on boot since we don't eager load the app. Originally we had thought that all applications should be required to add a `primary` entry in the database configurations file. However, this hasn't worked in practice and we have some code now that does not assume there's a primary. The schema dumping/loading code however, still assumed there was a "primary" in the configurations file. We want the "default" database in any application to use the original files even when converted to a multiple database application as this reduces the need to make changes when implementing this functionality on an existing application. The changes here update Rails to ensure that we treat either "primary" or the first database configuration for an environment as "default". If there is a "primary" that will be used as the default configuration. If there is no primary the configuration that is first for an environment will be used as the default. For schema dump/load this means that the default configuration (primary or first) will use `schema.rb` as the filename and other configurations will use `[CONFIGURATION_NAME]_schema.rb`. This should also help us finish the pull request to infer migrations paths since now we can say the first configuration is the default. This is a natural assumption for application developers. Followup to #39536
2020-09-02 14:15:20 -04:00
writer if it's within the `delay` window. By default the delay is set to 2 seconds. You
should change this based on your database infrastructure. Rails doesn't guarantee "read
a recent write" for other users within the delay window and will send GET and HEAD requests
to the replicas unless they wrote recently.
The automatic connection switching in Rails is relatively primitive and deliberately doesn't
do a whole lot. The goal is a system that demonstrates how to do automatic connection
switching that was flexible enough to be customizable by app developers.
The setup in Rails allows you to easily change how the switching is done and what
parameters it's based on. Let's say you want to use a cookie instead of a session to
decide when to swap connections. You can write your own class:
```ruby
class MyCookieResolver
# code for your cookie class
end
```
And then pass it to the middleware:
```ruby
config.active_record.database_selector = { delay: 2.seconds }
config.active_record.database_resolver = ActiveRecord::Middleware::DatabaseSelector::Resolver
config.active_record.database_resolver_context = MyCookieResolver
```
## Using manual connection switching
Default db_config should be primary or first The handling for single database applications has always set a schema.rb or structure.sql files for loading the database schema. When we first implemented multiple database support we intended to keep this for the original, default database. Afterall Rails _has_ to connect to something on boot. In development only one connection is connected on boot since we don't eager load the app. Originally we had thought that all applications should be required to add a `primary` entry in the database configurations file. However, this hasn't worked in practice and we have some code now that does not assume there's a primary. The schema dumping/loading code however, still assumed there was a "primary" in the configurations file. We want the "default" database in any application to use the original files even when converted to a multiple database application as this reduces the need to make changes when implementing this functionality on an existing application. The changes here update Rails to ensure that we treat either "primary" or the first database configuration for an environment as "default". If there is a "primary" that will be used as the default configuration. If there is no primary the configuration that is first for an environment will be used as the default. For schema dump/load this means that the default configuration (primary or first) will use `schema.rb` as the filename and other configurations will use `[CONFIGURATION_NAME]_schema.rb`. This should also help us finish the pull request to infer migrations paths since now we can say the first configuration is the default. This is a natural assumption for application developers. Followup to #39536
2020-09-02 14:15:20 -04:00
There are some cases where you may want your application to connect to a writer or a replica
and the automatic connection switching isn't adequate. For example, you may know that for a
particular request you always want to send the request to a replica, even when you are in a
POST request path.
To do this Rails provides a `connected_to` method that will switch to the connection you
need.
```ruby
ActiveRecord::Base.connected_to(role: :reading) do
# all code in this block will be connected to the reading role
end
```
The "role" in the `connected_to` call looks up the connections that are connected on that
connection handler (or role). The `reading` connection handler will hold all the connections
that were connected via `connects_to` with the role name of `reading`.
Note that `connected_to` with a role will look up an existing connection and switch
using the connection specification name. This means that if you pass an unknown role
like `connected_to(role: :nonexistent)` you will get an error that says
`ActiveRecord::ConnectionNotEstablished (No connection pool for 'ActiveRecord::Base' found for the 'nonexistent' role.)`
## Horizontal sharding
Horizontal sharding is when you split up your database to reduce the number of rows on each
database server, but maintain the same schema across "shards". This is commonly called "multi-tenant"
sharding.
The API for supporting horizontal sharding in Rails is similar to the multiple database / vertical
sharding API that's existed since Rails 6.0.
Shards are declared in the three-tier config like this:
```yaml
production:
primary:
database: my_primary_database
adapter: mysql2
primary_replica:
database: my_primary_database
adapter: mysql2
replica: true
primary_shard_one:
database: my_primary_shard_one
adapter: mysql2
primary_shard_one_replica:
database: my_primary_shard_one
adapter: mysql2
replica: true
```
Models are then connected with the `connects_to` API via the `shards` key:
```ruby
class ApplicationRecord < ActiveRecord::Base
self.abstract_class = true
connects_to shards: {
default: { writing: :primary, reading: :primary_replica },
shard_one: { writing: :primary_shard_one, reading: :primary_shard_one_replica }
}
end
2020-04-18 17:57:43 -04:00
```
Then models can swap connections manually via the `connected_to` API. If
using sharding, both a `role` and a `shard` must be passed:
```ruby
ActiveRecord::Base.connected_to(role: :writing, shard: :default) do
@id = Person.create! # Creates a record in shard default
end
ActiveRecord::Base.connected_to(role: :writing, shard: :shard_one) do
Person.find(@id) # Can't find record, doesn't exist because it was created
# in the default shard
end
```
The horizontal sharding API also supports read replicas. You can swap the
role and the shard with the `connected_to` API.
```ruby
ActiveRecord::Base.connected_to(role: :reading, shard: :shard_one) do
Person.first # Lookup record from read replica of shard one
end
```
## Migrate to the new connection handling
In Rails 6.1+, Active Record provides a new internal API for connection management.
In most cases applications will not need to make any changes except to opt-in to the
new behavior (if upgrading from 6.0 and below) by setting
`config.active_record.legacy_connection_handling = false`. If you have a single database
application, no other changes will be required. If you have a multiple database application
the following changes are required if you application is using these methods:
* `connection_handlers` and `connection_handlers=` no longer works in the new connection
handling. If you were calling a method on one of the connection handlers, for example,
`connection_handlers[:reading].retrieve_connection_pool("ActiveRecord::Base")`
you will now need to update that call to be
`connection_handlers.retrieve_connection_pool("ActiveRecord::Base", role: :reading)`.
* Calls to `ActiveRecord::Base.connection_handler.prevent_writes` will need to be updated
to `ActiveRecord::Base.connection.preventing_writes?`.
* If you need all the pools, including writing and reading, a new method has been provided on
the handler. Call `connection_handler.all_connection_pools` to use this. In most cases though
you'll want writing or reading pools with `connection_handler.connection_pool_list(:writing)` or
`connection_handler.connection_pool_list(:reading)`.
* If you turn off `legacy_connection_handling` in your application, any method that's unsupported
will raise an error (i.e. `connection_handlers=`).
## Granular Database Connection Switching
In Rails 6.1 it's possible to switch connections for one database instead of
all databases globally. To use this feature you must first set
`config.active_record.legacy_connection_handling` to `false` in your application
configuration. The majority of applications should not need to make any other
changes since the public APIs have the same behavior. See the above section for
how to enable and migrate away from `legacy_connection_handling`.
With `legacy_connection_handling` set to `false`, any abstract connection class
will be able to switch connections without affecting other connections. This
is useful for switching your `AnimalsRecord` queries to read from the replica
while ensuring your `ApplicationRecord` queries go to the primary.
```ruby
AnimalsRecord.connected_to(role: :reading) do
Dog.first # Reads from animals_replica
Person.first # Reads from primary
end
```
It's also possible to swap connections granularly for shards.
```ruby
AnimalsRecord.connected_to(role: :reading, shard: :shard_one) do
Dog.first # Will read from shard_one_replica. If no connection exists for shard_one_replica,
# a ConnectionNotEstablished error will be raised
Person.first # Will read from primary writer
end
```
To switch only the primary database cluster use `ApplicationRecord`:
```ruby
ApplicationRecord.connected_to(role: :reading, shard: :shard_one) do
Person.first # Reads from primary_shard_one_replica
Dog.first # Reads from animals_primary
end
```
`ActiveRecord::Base.connected_to` maintains the ability to switch
connections globally.
Add option to skip joins for associations. In a multiple database application, associations can't join across databases. When set, this option tells Rails to make 2 or more queries rather than using joins for associations. Set the option on a has many through association: ```ruby class Dog has_many :treats, through: :humans, disable_joins: true has_many :humans end ``` Then instead of generating join SQL, two queries are used for `@dog.treats`: ``` SELECT "humans"."id" FROM "humans" WHERE "humans"."dog_id" = ? [["dog_id", 1]] SELECT "treats".* FROM "treats" WHERE "treats"."human_id" IN (?, ?, ?) [["human_id", 1], ["human_id", 2], ["human_id", 3]] ``` This code is extracted from a gem we use internally at GitHub which means the implementation here is used in production daily and isn't experimental. I often get the question "why can't Rails do this automatically" so I figured I'd include the answer in the commit. Rails can't do this automatically because associations are lazily loaded. `dog.treats` needs to load `Dog`, then `Human` and then `Treats`. When `dog.treats` is called Rails pre-generates the SQL that will be run and puts that information into a reflection object. Because the SQL parts are pre-generated, as soon as `dog.treats` is loaded it's too late to skip a join. The join is already available on the object and that join is what's run to load `treats` from `dog` through `humans`. I think the only way to avoid setting an option on the association is to rewrite how and when the SQL is generated for associations which is a large undertaking. Basically the way that Active Record associations are designed, it is currently impossible to have Rails figure out to not join (loading the association will cause the join to occur, and that join will raise an error if the models don't live in the same db). The original implementation was written by me and Aaron. Lee helped port over tests, and I refactored the extraction to better match Rails style. Co-authored-by: Lee Quarella <leequarella@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Aaron Patterson <aaron@rubyonrails.org>
2020-11-03 13:01:41 -05:00
### Handling associations with joins across databases
As of Rails 7.0+, Active Record has an option for handling associations that would perform
a join across multiple databases. If you have a has many through or a has one through association
that you want to disable joining and perform 2 or more queries, pass the `disable_joins: true` option.
Add option to skip joins for associations. In a multiple database application, associations can't join across databases. When set, this option tells Rails to make 2 or more queries rather than using joins for associations. Set the option on a has many through association: ```ruby class Dog has_many :treats, through: :humans, disable_joins: true has_many :humans end ``` Then instead of generating join SQL, two queries are used for `@dog.treats`: ``` SELECT "humans"."id" FROM "humans" WHERE "humans"."dog_id" = ? [["dog_id", 1]] SELECT "treats".* FROM "treats" WHERE "treats"."human_id" IN (?, ?, ?) [["human_id", 1], ["human_id", 2], ["human_id", 3]] ``` This code is extracted from a gem we use internally at GitHub which means the implementation here is used in production daily and isn't experimental. I often get the question "why can't Rails do this automatically" so I figured I'd include the answer in the commit. Rails can't do this automatically because associations are lazily loaded. `dog.treats` needs to load `Dog`, then `Human` and then `Treats`. When `dog.treats` is called Rails pre-generates the SQL that will be run and puts that information into a reflection object. Because the SQL parts are pre-generated, as soon as `dog.treats` is loaded it's too late to skip a join. The join is already available on the object and that join is what's run to load `treats` from `dog` through `humans`. I think the only way to avoid setting an option on the association is to rewrite how and when the SQL is generated for associations which is a large undertaking. Basically the way that Active Record associations are designed, it is currently impossible to have Rails figure out to not join (loading the association will cause the join to occur, and that join will raise an error if the models don't live in the same db). The original implementation was written by me and Aaron. Lee helped port over tests, and I refactored the extraction to better match Rails style. Co-authored-by: Lee Quarella <leequarella@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Aaron Patterson <aaron@rubyonrails.org>
2020-11-03 13:01:41 -05:00
For example:
```ruby
class Dog < AnimalsRecord
has_many :treats, through: :humans, disable_joins: true
has_many :humans
belongs_to :home
has_one :yard, through: :home, disable_joins: true
Add option to skip joins for associations. In a multiple database application, associations can't join across databases. When set, this option tells Rails to make 2 or more queries rather than using joins for associations. Set the option on a has many through association: ```ruby class Dog has_many :treats, through: :humans, disable_joins: true has_many :humans end ``` Then instead of generating join SQL, two queries are used for `@dog.treats`: ``` SELECT "humans"."id" FROM "humans" WHERE "humans"."dog_id" = ? [["dog_id", 1]] SELECT "treats".* FROM "treats" WHERE "treats"."human_id" IN (?, ?, ?) [["human_id", 1], ["human_id", 2], ["human_id", 3]] ``` This code is extracted from a gem we use internally at GitHub which means the implementation here is used in production daily and isn't experimental. I often get the question "why can't Rails do this automatically" so I figured I'd include the answer in the commit. Rails can't do this automatically because associations are lazily loaded. `dog.treats` needs to load `Dog`, then `Human` and then `Treats`. When `dog.treats` is called Rails pre-generates the SQL that will be run and puts that information into a reflection object. Because the SQL parts are pre-generated, as soon as `dog.treats` is loaded it's too late to skip a join. The join is already available on the object and that join is what's run to load `treats` from `dog` through `humans`. I think the only way to avoid setting an option on the association is to rewrite how and when the SQL is generated for associations which is a large undertaking. Basically the way that Active Record associations are designed, it is currently impossible to have Rails figure out to not join (loading the association will cause the join to occur, and that join will raise an error if the models don't live in the same db). The original implementation was written by me and Aaron. Lee helped port over tests, and I refactored the extraction to better match Rails style. Co-authored-by: Lee Quarella <leequarella@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Aaron Patterson <aaron@rubyonrails.org>
2020-11-03 13:01:41 -05:00
end
```
Previously calling `@dog.treats` without `disable_joins` or `@dog.yard` without `disable_joins`
would raise an error because databases are unable to handle joins across clusters. With the
`disable_joins` option, Rails will generate multiple select queries
to avoid attempting joining across clusters. For the above association, `@dog.treats` would generate the
Add option to skip joins for associations. In a multiple database application, associations can't join across databases. When set, this option tells Rails to make 2 or more queries rather than using joins for associations. Set the option on a has many through association: ```ruby class Dog has_many :treats, through: :humans, disable_joins: true has_many :humans end ``` Then instead of generating join SQL, two queries are used for `@dog.treats`: ``` SELECT "humans"."id" FROM "humans" WHERE "humans"."dog_id" = ? [["dog_id", 1]] SELECT "treats".* FROM "treats" WHERE "treats"."human_id" IN (?, ?, ?) [["human_id", 1], ["human_id", 2], ["human_id", 3]] ``` This code is extracted from a gem we use internally at GitHub which means the implementation here is used in production daily and isn't experimental. I often get the question "why can't Rails do this automatically" so I figured I'd include the answer in the commit. Rails can't do this automatically because associations are lazily loaded. `dog.treats` needs to load `Dog`, then `Human` and then `Treats`. When `dog.treats` is called Rails pre-generates the SQL that will be run and puts that information into a reflection object. Because the SQL parts are pre-generated, as soon as `dog.treats` is loaded it's too late to skip a join. The join is already available on the object and that join is what's run to load `treats` from `dog` through `humans`. I think the only way to avoid setting an option on the association is to rewrite how and when the SQL is generated for associations which is a large undertaking. Basically the way that Active Record associations are designed, it is currently impossible to have Rails figure out to not join (loading the association will cause the join to occur, and that join will raise an error if the models don't live in the same db). The original implementation was written by me and Aaron. Lee helped port over tests, and I refactored the extraction to better match Rails style. Co-authored-by: Lee Quarella <leequarella@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Aaron Patterson <aaron@rubyonrails.org>
2020-11-03 13:01:41 -05:00
following SQL:
```sql
SELECT "humans"."id" FROM "humans" WHERE "humans"."dog_id" = ? [["dog_id", 1]]
SELECT "treats".* FROM "treats" WHERE "treats"."human_id" IN (?, ?, ?) [["human_id", 1], ["human_id", 2], ["human_id", 3]]
```
While `@dog.yard` would generate the following SQL:
```sql
SELECT "home"."id" FROM "homes" WHERE "homes"."dog_id" = ? [["dog_id", 1]]
SELECT "yards".* FROM "yards" WHERE "yards"."home_id" = ? [["home_id", 1]]
```
Add option to skip joins for associations. In a multiple database application, associations can't join across databases. When set, this option tells Rails to make 2 or more queries rather than using joins for associations. Set the option on a has many through association: ```ruby class Dog has_many :treats, through: :humans, disable_joins: true has_many :humans end ``` Then instead of generating join SQL, two queries are used for `@dog.treats`: ``` SELECT "humans"."id" FROM "humans" WHERE "humans"."dog_id" = ? [["dog_id", 1]] SELECT "treats".* FROM "treats" WHERE "treats"."human_id" IN (?, ?, ?) [["human_id", 1], ["human_id", 2], ["human_id", 3]] ``` This code is extracted from a gem we use internally at GitHub which means the implementation here is used in production daily and isn't experimental. I often get the question "why can't Rails do this automatically" so I figured I'd include the answer in the commit. Rails can't do this automatically because associations are lazily loaded. `dog.treats` needs to load `Dog`, then `Human` and then `Treats`. When `dog.treats` is called Rails pre-generates the SQL that will be run and puts that information into a reflection object. Because the SQL parts are pre-generated, as soon as `dog.treats` is loaded it's too late to skip a join. The join is already available on the object and that join is what's run to load `treats` from `dog` through `humans`. I think the only way to avoid setting an option on the association is to rewrite how and when the SQL is generated for associations which is a large undertaking. Basically the way that Active Record associations are designed, it is currently impossible to have Rails figure out to not join (loading the association will cause the join to occur, and that join will raise an error if the models don't live in the same db). The original implementation was written by me and Aaron. Lee helped port over tests, and I refactored the extraction to better match Rails style. Co-authored-by: Lee Quarella <leequarella@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Aaron Patterson <aaron@rubyonrails.org>
2020-11-03 13:01:41 -05:00
There are some important things to be aware of with this option:
1) There may be performance implications since now two or more queries will be performed (depending
on the association) rather than a join. If the select for `humans` returned a high number of IDs
the select for `treats` may send too many IDs.
2) Since we are no longer performing joins, a query with an order or limit is now sorted in-memory since
Add option to skip joins for associations. In a multiple database application, associations can't join across databases. When set, this option tells Rails to make 2 or more queries rather than using joins for associations. Set the option on a has many through association: ```ruby class Dog has_many :treats, through: :humans, disable_joins: true has_many :humans end ``` Then instead of generating join SQL, two queries are used for `@dog.treats`: ``` SELECT "humans"."id" FROM "humans" WHERE "humans"."dog_id" = ? [["dog_id", 1]] SELECT "treats".* FROM "treats" WHERE "treats"."human_id" IN (?, ?, ?) [["human_id", 1], ["human_id", 2], ["human_id", 3]] ``` This code is extracted from a gem we use internally at GitHub which means the implementation here is used in production daily and isn't experimental. I often get the question "why can't Rails do this automatically" so I figured I'd include the answer in the commit. Rails can't do this automatically because associations are lazily loaded. `dog.treats` needs to load `Dog`, then `Human` and then `Treats`. When `dog.treats` is called Rails pre-generates the SQL that will be run and puts that information into a reflection object. Because the SQL parts are pre-generated, as soon as `dog.treats` is loaded it's too late to skip a join. The join is already available on the object and that join is what's run to load `treats` from `dog` through `humans`. I think the only way to avoid setting an option on the association is to rewrite how and when the SQL is generated for associations which is a large undertaking. Basically the way that Active Record associations are designed, it is currently impossible to have Rails figure out to not join (loading the association will cause the join to occur, and that join will raise an error if the models don't live in the same db). The original implementation was written by me and Aaron. Lee helped port over tests, and I refactored the extraction to better match Rails style. Co-authored-by: Lee Quarella <leequarella@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Aaron Patterson <aaron@rubyonrails.org>
2020-11-03 13:01:41 -05:00
order from one table cannot be applied to another table.
3) This setting must be added to all associations where you want joining to be disabled.
Add option to skip joins for associations. In a multiple database application, associations can't join across databases. When set, this option tells Rails to make 2 or more queries rather than using joins for associations. Set the option on a has many through association: ```ruby class Dog has_many :treats, through: :humans, disable_joins: true has_many :humans end ``` Then instead of generating join SQL, two queries are used for `@dog.treats`: ``` SELECT "humans"."id" FROM "humans" WHERE "humans"."dog_id" = ? [["dog_id", 1]] SELECT "treats".* FROM "treats" WHERE "treats"."human_id" IN (?, ?, ?) [["human_id", 1], ["human_id", 2], ["human_id", 3]] ``` This code is extracted from a gem we use internally at GitHub which means the implementation here is used in production daily and isn't experimental. I often get the question "why can't Rails do this automatically" so I figured I'd include the answer in the commit. Rails can't do this automatically because associations are lazily loaded. `dog.treats` needs to load `Dog`, then `Human` and then `Treats`. When `dog.treats` is called Rails pre-generates the SQL that will be run and puts that information into a reflection object. Because the SQL parts are pre-generated, as soon as `dog.treats` is loaded it's too late to skip a join. The join is already available on the object and that join is what's run to load `treats` from `dog` through `humans`. I think the only way to avoid setting an option on the association is to rewrite how and when the SQL is generated for associations which is a large undertaking. Basically the way that Active Record associations are designed, it is currently impossible to have Rails figure out to not join (loading the association will cause the join to occur, and that join will raise an error if the models don't live in the same db). The original implementation was written by me and Aaron. Lee helped port over tests, and I refactored the extraction to better match Rails style. Co-authored-by: Lee Quarella <leequarella@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Aaron Patterson <aaron@rubyonrails.org>
2020-11-03 13:01:41 -05:00
Rails can't guess this for you because association loading is lazy, to load `treats` in `@dog.treats`
Rails already needs to know what SQL should be generated.
## Caveats
### Automatic swapping for horizontal sharding
While Rails now supports an API for connecting to and swapping connections of shards, it does
not yet support an automatic swapping strategy. Any shard swapping will need to be done manually
in your app via a middleware or `around_action`.
### Load Balancing Replicas
Rails also doesn't support automatic load balancing of replicas. This is very
dependent on your infrastructure. We may implement basic, primitive load balancing
in the future, but for an application at scale this should be something your application
handles outside of Rails.
### Schema Cache
If you use a schema cache and multiple databases, you'll need to write an initializer
that loads the schema cache from your app. This wasn't an issue we could resolve in
time for Rails 6.0 but hope to have it in a future version soon.