1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/rails/rails.git synced 2022-11-09 12:12:34 -05:00

Merge pull request #7024 from bogdan/strict_validation_custom_exception

AM::Validation#validates: custom exception for :strict option

Conflicts:
	activemodel/CHANGELOG.md
This commit is contained in:
Rafael Mendonça França 2012-08-16 16:59:04 -03:00
commit cfd7f4e9a0
5 changed files with 40 additions and 5 deletions

View file

@ -1,6 +1,15 @@
## Rails 4.0.0 (unreleased) ##
* Changed `ActiveModel::Serializers::Xml::Serializer#add_associations` to by default propagate `:skip_types, :dasherize, :camelize` keys to included associations. It can be overriden on each association by explicitly specifying the option on one or more associations *Anthony Alberto*
* `AM::Validation#validates` ability to pass custom exception to `:strict` option.
*Bogdan Gusiev*
* Changed `ActiveModel::Serializers::Xml::Serializer#add_associations` to by default
propagate `:skip_types, :dasherize, :camelize` keys to included associations.
It can be overriden on each association by explicitly specifying the option on one
or more associations
*Anthony Alberto*
* Changed `AM::Serializers::JSON.include_root_in_json' default value to false.
Now, AM Serializers and AR objects have the same default behaviour. Fixes #6578.

View file

@ -283,15 +283,19 @@ module ActiveModel
#
# If the <tt>:strict</tt> option is set to true will raise
# ActiveModel::StrictValidationFailed instead of adding the error.
# <tt>:strict</tt> option can also be set to any other exception.
#
# person.errors.add(:name, nil, strict: true)
# # => ActiveModel::StrictValidationFailed: name is invalid
# person.errors.add(:name, nil, strict: NameIsInvalid)
# # => NameIsInvalid: name is invalid
#
# person.errors.messages # => {}
def add(attribute, message = nil, options = {})
message = normalize_message(attribute, message, options)
if options[:strict]
raise ActiveModel::StrictValidationFailed, full_message(attribute, message)
if exception = options[:strict]
exception = ActiveModel::StrictValidationFailed if exception == true
raise exception, full_message(attribute, message)
end
self[attribute] << message

View file

@ -84,12 +84,15 @@ module ActiveModel
# or <tt>unless: Proc.new { |user| user.signup_step <= 2 }</tt>). The
# method, proc or string should return or evaluate to a +true+ or
# +false+ value.
# * <tt>:strict</tt> - Specifies whether validation should be strict.
# See <tt>ActiveModel::Validation#validates!</tt> for more information.
# * <tt>:strict</tt> - if the <tt>:strict</tt> option is set to true
# will raise ActiveModel::StrictValidationFailed instead of adding the error.
# <tt>:strict</tt> option can also be set to any other exception.
#
# Example:
#
# validates :password, presence: true, confirmation: true, if: :password_required?
# validates :token, uniqueness: true, strict: TokenGenerationException
#
#
# Finally, the options +:if+, +:unless+, +:on+, +:allow_blank+, +:allow_nil+
# and +:strict+ can be given to one specific validator, as a hash:

View file

@ -11,6 +11,8 @@ require 'active_support/xml_mini'
class ValidationsTest < ActiveModel::TestCase
class CustomStrictValidationException < StandardError; end
def setup
Topic._validators.clear
end
@ -323,6 +325,13 @@ class ValidationsTest < ActiveModel::TestCase
end
end
def test_strict_validation_custom_exception
Topic.validates_presence_of :title, :strict => CustomStrictValidationException
assert_raises CustomStrictValidationException do
Topic.new.valid?
end
end
def test_validates_with_bang
Topic.validates! :title, :presence => true
assert_raises ActiveModel::StrictValidationFailed do

View file

@ -532,6 +532,16 @@ end
Person.new.valid? => ActiveModel::StrictValidationFailed: Name can't be blank
</ruby>
There is also an ability to pass custom exception to +:strict+ option
<ruby>
class Person < ActiveRecord::Base
validates :token, :presence => true, :uniqueness => true, :strict => TokenGenerationException
end
Person.new.valid? => TokenGenerationException: Token can't be blank
</ruby>
h3. Conditional Validation
Sometimes it will make sense to validate an object just when a given predicate is satisfied. You can do that by using the +:if+ and +:unless+ options, which can take a symbol, a string, a +Proc+ or an +Array+. You may use the +:if+ option when you want to specify when the validation *should* happen. If you want to specify when the validation *should not* happen, then you may use the +:unless+ option.