1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/rails/rails.git synced 2022-11-09 12:12:34 -05:00
Commit graph

13 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Rizwan Reza
de12b5e616 Revised naming.rb and lint.rb 2010-06-14 13:44:49 +04:30
Rizwan Reza
c5db6450ec Added headings and revised active_model.rb/lint.rb grammatically 2010-06-14 13:43:06 +04:30
José Valim
32afcdcb88 ActiveModel::Lint should not require our models to respond to id. 2010-02-28 11:39:39 +01:00
José Valim
250c809246 Require persisted? in ActiveModel::Lint and remove new_record? and destroyed? methods. ActionPack does not care if the resource is new or if it was destroyed, it cares only if it's persisted somewhere or not. 2010-02-21 11:12:14 +01:00
snusnu
f81c6bc040 AMo #key is now #to_key and CI is probably happy
Obviously #key is a too common name to be included
in the AMo interface, #to_key fits better and also
relates nicely to #to_param. Thx wycats, koz and
josevalim for the suggestion.

AR's #to_key implementation now takes customized
primary keys into account and there's a testcase
for that too.

The #to_param AMo lint makes no assumptions on how
the method behaves in the presence of composite
primary keys. It leaves the decision wether to
provide a default, or to raise and thus signal to
the user that implementing this method will need
his special attention, up to the implementers. All
AMo cares about is that #to_param is implemented
and returns nil in case of a new_record?.

The default CompliantObject used in lint_test
provides a naive default implementation that just
joins all key attributes with '-'.

The #to_key default implementation in lint_test's
CompliantObject now returns [id] instead of [1].
This was previously causing the (wrong) tests I
added for AR's #to_key implementation to pass. The
#to_key tests added with this patch should be
better.

The CI failure was caused by my lack of knowledge
about the test:isolated task. The tests for the
record_identifier code in action_controller are
using fake non AR models and I forgot to stub the
#to_key method over there. This issue didn't come
up when running the test task, only test:isolated
revealed it. This patch fixes that.

All tests pass isolated or not, well, apart from
one previously unpended test in action_controller
that is unrelated to my patch.
2010-02-20 20:17:29 -08:00
snusnu
9acd686753 Adds #key and #to_param to the AMo interface
This commit introduces two new methods that every
AMo compliant object must implement. Below are the
default implementations along with the implied
interface contract.

  # Returns an Enumerable of all (primary) key
  # attributes or nil if new_record? is true
  def key
    new_record? ? nil : [1]
  end

  # Returns a string representing the object's key
  # suitable for use in URLs, or nil if new_record?
  # is true
  def to_param
    key ? key.first.to_s : nil
  end

1) The #key method

Previously rails' record_identifier code, which is
used in the #dom_id helper, relied on calling #id
on the record to provide a reasonable DOM id. Now
with rails3 being all ORM agnostic, it's not safe
anymore to assume that every record ever will have
an #id as its primary key attribute.

Having a #key method available on every AMo object
means that #dom_id can be implemented using

  record.to_model.key # instead of
  record.id

Using this we're able to take composite primary
keys into account (e.g. available in datamapper)
by implementing #dom_id using a newly added

  record_key_for_dom_id(record)

method. The user can overwrite this method to
provide customized versions of the object's key
used in #dom_id.

Also, dealing with more complex keys that can
contain arbitrary strings, means that we need to
make sure that we only provide DOM ids that are
valid according to the spec. For this reason, this
patch sends the key provided through a newly added

  sanitize_dom_id(candidate_id)

method, that makes sure we only produce valid HTML

The reason to not just add #dom_id to the AMo
interface was that it feels like providing a DOM
id should not be a model concern. Adding #dom_id
to the AMo interface would force these concern on
the model, while it's better left to be implemented
in a helper.

Now one could say the same is true for #to_param,
and actually I think that it doesn't really fit
into the model either, but it's used in AR and it's
a main part of integrating into the rails router.

This is different from #dom_id which is only used
in view helpers and can be implemented on top of a
semantically more meaningful method like #key.

2) The #to_param method

Since the rails router relies on #to_param to be
present, AR::Base implements it and returns the
id by default, allowing the user to overwrite the
method if desired.

Now with different ORMs integrating into rails,
every ORM railtie needs to implement it's own
#to_param implementation while already providing
code to be AMo compliant. Since the whole point of
AMo compliance seems to be to integrate any ORM
seamlessly into rails, it seems fair that all we
really need to do as another ORM, is to be AMo
compliant. By including #to_param into the official
interface, we can make sure that this code can be
centralized in the various AMo compliance layers,
and not be added separately by every ORM railtie.

3) All specs pass
2010-02-19 23:31:25 -08:00
Mikel Lindsaar
a07d0f8786 Full update on ActiveModel documentation 2010-02-01 10:08:20 +11:00
Yehuda Katz
1a50d2e66a Stop overriding LoadError.new to return a MissingSourceError (and sometimes nil!) 2010-01-19 22:35:26 -08:00
José Valim
653fa4c10c Add naming to AMo::Lint 2010-01-02 22:27:02 +01:00
Joshua Peek
ff56f3d5e1 Rewrite ActiveModel::Lint as a simple TU mixin 2009-10-07 09:24:51 -05:00
Jeremy Kemper
38e056ee2a Use ActiveModel::TestCase base class 2009-09-24 22:56:30 -07:00
lakshan
e2d0b0ee61 fixed ActiveModel::Lint typos [#3236 state:resolved]
Signed-off-by: Joshua Peek <josh@joshpeek.com>
2009-09-21 09:49:43 -05:00
Yehuda Katz
dbf20c2dbb Initial AMo Lint implementation 2009-08-29 01:49:18 -05:00