1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/rails/rails.git synced 2022-11-09 12:12:34 -05:00
rails--rails/activemodel/lib/active_model/validations/clusivity.rb
Ryuta Kamizono c81af6ae72 Enable Layout/EmptyLinesAroundAccessModifier cop
We sometimes say "✂️ newline after `private`" in a code review (e.g.
https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/18546#discussion_r23188776,
https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/34832#discussion_r244847195).

Now `Layout/EmptyLinesAroundAccessModifier` cop have new enforced style
`EnforcedStyle: only_before` (https://github.com/rubocop-hq/rubocop/pull/7059).

That cop and enforced style will reduce the our code review cost.
2019-06-13 12:00:45 +09:00

53 lines
1.6 KiB
Ruby

# frozen_string_literal: true
require "active_support/core_ext/range"
module ActiveModel
module Validations
module Clusivity #:nodoc:
ERROR_MESSAGE = "An object with the method #include? or a proc, lambda or symbol is required, " \
"and must be supplied as the :in (or :within) option of the configuration hash"
def check_validity!
unless delimiter.respond_to?(:include?) || delimiter.respond_to?(:call) || delimiter.respond_to?(:to_sym)
raise ArgumentError, ERROR_MESSAGE
end
end
private
def include?(record, value)
members = if delimiter.respond_to?(:call)
delimiter.call(record)
elsif delimiter.respond_to?(:to_sym)
record.send(delimiter)
else
delimiter
end
members.send(inclusion_method(members), value)
end
def delimiter
@delimiter ||= options[:in] || options[:within]
end
# After Ruby 2.2, <tt>Range#include?</tt> on non-number-or-time-ish ranges checks all
# possible values in the range for equality, which is slower but more accurate.
# <tt>Range#cover?</tt> uses the previous logic of comparing a value with the range
# endpoints, which is fast but is only accurate on Numeric, Time, Date,
# or DateTime ranges.
def inclusion_method(enumerable)
if enumerable.is_a? Range
case enumerable.first
when Numeric, Time, DateTime, Date
:cover?
else
:include?
end
else
:include?
end
end
end
end
end