John Hawthorn dd9991bac5 Deprecate rendering templates with . in the name ... Allowing templates with "." introduces some ambiguity. Is index.html.erb a template named "index" with format "html", or is it a template named "index.html" without a format? We know it's probably the former, but if we asked ActionView to render "index.html" we would currently get some combination of the two: a Template with index.html as the name and virtual path, but with html as the format. This deprecates having "." anywhere in the template's name, we should reserve this character for specifying formats. I think in 99% of cases this will be people specifying `index.html` instead of simply `index`. This was actually once deprecated in the 3.x series (removed in 6c57177f2c) but I don't think we can rely on nobody having introduced this in the past 8 years.		2020-05-05 23:21:17 -07:00
..
handlers	Raise errors on correct line with annotations enabled	2020-04-14 15:26:26 -06:00
sources	Add ActionView::Template::Sources::File	2019-04-04 15:07:14 -07:00
error.rb	Encode template source before extracting lines	2019-12-21 07:30:52 +00:00
handlers.rb	active_support/deprecation has to be already required via active_support/rails.rb	2019-07-12 18:34:07 +09:00
html.rb	active_support/deprecation has to be already required via active_support/rails.rb	2019-07-12 18:34:07 +09:00
inline.rb	Add a finalizer to inline templates	2019-02-22 17:59:55 -08:00
raw_file.rb	[ci skip] Updated the doc after renaming Template::File -> Template::RawFile in #35826	2019-04-02 14:03:43 +05:30
resolver.rb	Deprecate rendering templates with . in the name	2020-05-05 23:21:17 -07:00
sources.rb	Add ActionView::Template::Sources::File	2019-04-04 15:07:14 -07:00
text.rb	Templates have one format	2019-02-25 13:18:44 -08:00
types.rb	Fix broken doc layout for action_view [ci skip]	2017-08-27 09:12:19 +09:00