Daniel Colson 7f938cacba Replace test Man with Human ... The commit replaces the `Man` model used in tests with a `Human` model. It also replaces the existing `Human` model with a `SuperHuman` model inheriting from `Human`. While this may seem like a cosmetic change, I see it as more of an inclusivity change. I think it makes sense for a number of reasons: * Prior to this commit the `Human` model inherited from `Man`. At best this makes no sense (it should be the other way around). At worst it is offensive and harmful to the community. * It doesn't seem inclusive to me to have exclusively male-gendered examples in the codebase. * There is no particular reason for these examples to be gendered. * `man` is hard to grep for, since it also matches `many, manager, manual, etc` For the most part this is a simple search and replace. The one exception to that is that I had to add the table name to the model so we could use "humans" instead of "humen".		2020-08-14 11:37:09 -04:00
..
absence_validation_test.rb	Replace test Man with Human	2020-08-14 11:37:09 -04:00
association_validation_test.rb	Replace test Man with Human	2020-08-14 11:37:09 -04:00
i18n_generate_message_validation_test.rb
i18n_validation_test.rb	Move the ActiveModel:Errors#full_message method to the Error class:	2019-07-16 14:28:38 +02:00
length_validation_test.rb
numericality_validation_test.rb	Add scale support to ActiveRecord::Validations::NumericalityValidator	2020-01-13 11:00:22 -05:00
presence_validation_test.rb	Replace test Man with Human	2020-08-14 11:37:09 -04:00
uniqueness_validation_test.rb	Allow attribute aliases for validates_uniqueness_of	2020-06-01 22:44:39 +09:00