John Hawthorn f84773a587 Deprecate rendering templates with . in the name ... Allowing templates with "." introduces some ambiguity. Is index.html.erb a template named "index" with format "html", or is it a template named "index.html" without a format? We know it's probably the former, but if we asked ActionView to render "index.html" we would currently get some combination of the two: a Template with index.html as the name and virtual path, but with html as the format. This deprecates having "." anywhere in the template's name, we should reserve this character for specifying formats. I think in 99% of cases this will be people specifying `index.html` instead of simply `index`. This was actually once deprecated in the 3.x series (removed in 6c57177f2c) but I don't think we can rely on nobody having introduced this in the past 8 years.		2020-03-31 21:55:19 -07:00
..
actionpack	.annotate_template_file_names annotates HTML output with template file names	2020-03-30 14:50:01 -06:00
activerecord	pull preloading behavior in to the collection renderer	2020-02-28 09:23:22 -08:00
fixtures	Add a regression test that ActionText caught	2020-02-27 16:47:22 -08:00
lib	Document view components support (#38656)	2020-03-13 23:52:49 +01:00
template	Deprecate rendering templates with . in the name	2020-03-31 21:55:19 -07:00
ujs	update from PR #36222	2020-02-12 13:31:43 -05:00
abstract_unit.rb	Merge pull request #25214 from maclover7/jm-av-tests	2019-12-18 12:23:11 -03:00
active_record_unit.rb	Run actionview tests in parallel	2019-06-05 18:40:08 -07:00