mirror of
https://github.com/rails/rails.git
synced 2022-11-09 12:12:34 -05:00
7f938cacba
The commit replaces the `Man` model used in tests with a `Human` model. It also replaces the existing `Human` model with a `SuperHuman` model inheriting from `Human`. While this may seem like a cosmetic change, I see it as more of an inclusivity change. I think it makes sense for a number of reasons: * Prior to this commit the `Human` model inherited from `Man`. At best this makes no sense (it should be the other way around). At worst it is offensive and harmful to the community. * It doesn't seem inclusive to me to have exclusively male-gendered examples in the codebase. * There is no particular reason for these examples to be gendered. * `man` is hard to grep for, since it also matches `many, manager, manual, etc` For the most part this is a simple search and replace. The one exception to that is that I had to add the table name to the model so we could use "humans" instead of "humen".
16 lines
584 B
Ruby
16 lines
584 B
Ruby
# frozen_string_literal: true
|
|
|
|
class Interest < ActiveRecord::Base
|
|
belongs_to :human, inverse_of: :interests
|
|
belongs_to :human_with_callbacks,
|
|
class_name: "Human",
|
|
foreign_key: :human_id,
|
|
inverse_of: :interests_with_callbacks
|
|
belongs_to :polymorphic_human, polymorphic: true, inverse_of: :polymorphic_interests
|
|
belongs_to :polymorphic_human_with_callbacks,
|
|
foreign_key: :polymorphic_human_id,
|
|
foreign_type: :polymorphic_human_type,
|
|
polymorphic: true,
|
|
inverse_of: :polymorphic_interests_with_callbacks
|
|
belongs_to :zine, inverse_of: :interests
|
|
end
|