1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/rails/rails.git synced 2022-11-09 12:12:34 -05:00
rails--rails/actionpack/lib/action_dispatch/testing
Sean Griffin 03d3f036a7 Override respond_to_missing? instead of respond_to? when possible
This was almost every case where we are overriding `respond_to?` in a
way that mirrors a parallel implementation of `method_missing`. There is
one remaining case in Active Model that should probably do the same
thing, but had a sufficiently strange implementation that I want to
investigate it separately.

Fixes #26333.
2016-08-31 11:50:53 -04:00
..
assertions Add three new rubocop rules 2016-08-16 04:30:11 -03:00
assertion_response.rb normalizes indentation and whitespace across the project 2016-08-06 20:16:27 +02:00
assertions.rb applies new string literal convention in actionpack/lib 2016-08-06 18:51:43 +02:00
integration.rb Override respond_to_missing? instead of respond_to? when possible 2016-08-31 11:50:53 -04:00
request_encoder.rb Let TestResponse assign a parser. 2016-07-10 22:02:12 +02:00
test_process.rb applies new string literal convention in actionpack/lib 2016-08-06 18:51:43 +02:00
test_request.rb applies new string literal convention in actionpack/lib 2016-08-06 18:51:43 +02:00
test_response.rb applies new string literal convention in actionpack/lib 2016-08-06 18:51:43 +02:00