mirror of
https://github.com/rails/rails.git
synced 2022-11-09 12:12:34 -05:00
bddf83bfcf
In response_test.rb, we haven't had a test to make sure that 1) these responses don't have a message-body as described in RFC7231[1] 2) 1xx and 204 responses must not have a Content-Length header field as described in RFC7230-section3.3.2[2] [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7231 [2] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7230#section-3.3.2 Even though our implementation doesn't allow users to send a Content-Length header field in a 304 response, sending the header field is valid as mentioned in RFC7230-section3.3.2[2]. So I've decided not to test whether or not a 304 response has the header. The citation from the section is as follows; ``` A server MAY send a Content-Length header field in a 304 (Not Modified) response to a conditional GET request (Section 4.1 of [RFC7232]); a server MUST NOT send Content-Length in such a response unless its field-value equals the decimal number of octets that would have been sent in the payload body of a 200 (OK) response to the same request. ``` |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| abstract | ||
| assertions | ||
| controller | ||
| dispatch | ||
| fixtures | ||
| journey | ||
| lib/controller | ||
| routing | ||
| tmp | ||
| abstract_unit.rb | ||