2013-01-23 19:40:49 -05:00
|
|
|
= Refinements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to Ruby's open classes you can redefine or add functionality to existing
|
|
|
|
classes. This is called a "monkey patch". Unfortunately the scope of such
|
|
|
|
changes is global. All users of the monkey-patched class see the same
|
|
|
|
changes. This can cause unintended side-effects or breakage of programs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refinements are designed to reduce the impact of monkey patching on other
|
|
|
|
users of the monkey-patched class. Refinements provide a way to extend a
|
|
|
|
class locally.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refinements are an experimental feature in Ruby 2.0. At the time of writing,
|
|
|
|
refinements are expected to exist in future versions of Ruby but the
|
|
|
|
specification of refinements may change. You will receive a warning the first
|
|
|
|
time you define or activate a refinement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here is a basic refinement:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class C
|
|
|
|
def foo
|
2013-05-05 07:49:53 -04:00
|
|
|
puts "C#foo"
|
2013-01-23 19:40:49 -05:00
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
module M
|
|
|
|
refine C do
|
|
|
|
def foo
|
|
|
|
puts "C#foo in M"
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First, a class +C+ is defined. Next a refinement for +C+ is created using
|
|
|
|
Module#refine. Refinements only modify classes, not modules so the argument
|
|
|
|
must be a class.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Module#refine creates an anonymous module that contains the changes or
|
|
|
|
refinements to the class (+C+ in the example). +self+ in the refine block is
|
|
|
|
this anonymous module similar to Module#module_eval.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activate the refinement with #using:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
using M
|
|
|
|
|
2014-01-21 07:00:08 -05:00
|
|
|
c = C.new
|
2013-01-23 19:40:49 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
c.foo # prints "C#foo in M"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Scope
|
|
|
|
|
2013-08-01 20:14:58 -04:00
|
|
|
You may only activate refinements at top-level, not inside any class, module
|
|
|
|
or method scope. You may activate refinements in a string passed to
|
2013-08-02 15:24:14 -04:00
|
|
|
Kernel#eval that is evaluated at top-level. Refinements are active until the
|
|
|
|
end of the file or the end of the eval string, respectively.
|
2013-01-23 19:40:49 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refinements are lexical in scope. When control is transferred outside the
|
|
|
|
scope the refinement is deactivated. This means that if you require or load a
|
|
|
|
file or call a method that is defined outside the current scope the refinement
|
|
|
|
will be deactivated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class C
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
module M
|
|
|
|
refine C do
|
|
|
|
def foo
|
|
|
|
puts "C#foo in M"
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def call_foo(x)
|
|
|
|
x.foo
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
using M
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x = C.new
|
|
|
|
x.foo # prints "C#foo in M"
|
|
|
|
call_foo(x) #=> raises NoMethodError
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If a method is defined in a scope where a refinement is active the refinement
|
|
|
|
will be active when the method is called. This example spans multiple files:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
c.rb:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class C
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
m.rb:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
require "c"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
module M
|
|
|
|
refine C do
|
|
|
|
def foo
|
|
|
|
puts "C#foo in M"
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
m_user.rb:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
require "m"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
using M
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class MUser
|
|
|
|
def call_foo(x)
|
|
|
|
x.foo
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
main.rb:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
require "m_user"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x = C.new
|
|
|
|
m_user = MUser.new
|
|
|
|
m_user.call_foo(x) # prints "C#foo in M"
|
|
|
|
x.foo #=> raises NoMethodError
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since the refinement +M+ is active in <code>m_user.rb</code> where
|
|
|
|
<code>MUser#call_foo</code> is defined it is also active when
|
|
|
|
<code>main.rb</code> calls +call_foo+.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since #using is a method, refinements are only active when it is called. Here
|
|
|
|
are examples of where a refinement +M+ is and is not active.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In a file:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# not activated here
|
|
|
|
using M
|
|
|
|
# activated here
|
|
|
|
class Foo
|
|
|
|
# activated here
|
|
|
|
def foo
|
|
|
|
# activated here
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
# activated here
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
# activated here
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In eval:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# not activated here
|
|
|
|
eval <<EOF
|
|
|
|
# not activated here
|
|
|
|
using M
|
|
|
|
# activated here
|
|
|
|
EOF
|
|
|
|
# not activated here
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When not evaluated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# not activated here
|
|
|
|
if false
|
|
|
|
using M
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
# not activated here
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When defining multiple refinements in the same module, inside a refine block
|
|
|
|
all refinements from the same module are active when a refined method is
|
|
|
|
called:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
module ToJSON
|
|
|
|
refine Integer do
|
|
|
|
def to_json
|
|
|
|
to_s
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
refine Array do
|
|
|
|
def to_json
|
|
|
|
"[" + map { |i| i.to_json }.join(",") + "]"
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
refine Hash do
|
|
|
|
def to_json
|
|
|
|
"{" + map { |k, v| k.to_s.dump + ":" + v.to_json }.join(",") + "}"
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
using ToJSON
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
p [{1=>2}, {3=>4}].to_json # prints "[{\"1\":2},{\"3\":4}]"
|
|
|
|
|
2013-07-02 04:24:26 -04:00
|
|
|
You may also activate refinements in a class or module definition, in which
|
|
|
|
case the refinements are activated from the point where using is called to
|
|
|
|
the end of the class or module definition:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# not activated here
|
|
|
|
class Foo
|
|
|
|
# not activated here
|
|
|
|
using M
|
|
|
|
# activated here
|
|
|
|
def foo
|
|
|
|
# activated here
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
# activated here
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
# not activated here
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note that the refinements in M are not activated automatically even if the class
|
|
|
|
Foo is reopened later.
|
|
|
|
|
2013-01-23 19:40:49 -05:00
|
|
|
== Method Lookup
|
|
|
|
|
2013-01-24 02:54:45 -05:00
|
|
|
When looking up a method for an instance of class +C+ Ruby checks:
|
2013-01-23 19:40:49 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* If refinements are active for +C+, in the reverse order they were activated:
|
|
|
|
* The prepended modules from the refinement for +C+
|
|
|
|
* The refinement for +C+
|
|
|
|
* The included modules from the refinement for +C+
|
|
|
|
* The prepended modules of +C+
|
|
|
|
* +C+
|
|
|
|
* The included modules of +C+
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If no method was found at any point this repeats with the superclass of +C+.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note that methods in a subclass have priority over refinements in a
|
|
|
|
superclass. For example, if the method <code>/</code> is defined in a
|
|
|
|
refinement for Integer <code>1 / 2</code> invokes the original Fixnum#/
|
|
|
|
because Fixnum is a subclass of Integer and is searched before the refinements
|
|
|
|
for the superclass Integer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If a method +foo+ is defined on Integer in a refinement, <code>1.foo</code>
|
|
|
|
invokes that method since +foo+ does not exist on Fixnum.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== +super+
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When +super+ is invoked method lookup checks:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* The included modules of the current class. Note that the current class may
|
|
|
|
be a refinement.
|
|
|
|
* If the current class is a refinement, the method lookup proceeds as in the
|
|
|
|
Method Lookup section above.
|
|
|
|
* If the current class has a direct superclass, the method proceeds as in the
|
|
|
|
Method Lookup section above using the superclass.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note that +super+ in a method of a refinement invokes the method in the
|
|
|
|
refined class even if there is another refinement which has been activated in
|
|
|
|
the same context.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Indirect Method Calls
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When using indirect method access such as Kernel#send, Kernel#method or
|
|
|
|
Kernel#respond_to? refinements are not honored for the caller context during
|
|
|
|
method lookup.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This behavior may be changed in the future.
|
|
|
|
|
2013-07-02 04:24:26 -04:00
|
|
|
== Refinements and module inclusion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refinements are inherited by module inclusion. That is, using activates all
|
|
|
|
refinements in the ancestors of the specified module. Refinements in a
|
|
|
|
descendant have priority over refinements in an ancestor.
|
|
|
|
|
2013-01-23 19:40:49 -05:00
|
|
|
== Further Reading
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/projects/ruby-trunk/wiki/RefinementsSpec for the
|
|
|
|
current specification for implementing refinements. The specification also
|
|
|
|
contains more details.
|
|
|
|
|