1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/ruby/ruby.git synced 2022-11-09 12:17:21 -05:00
ruby--ruby/spec/ruby/core/integer/anybits_spec.rb
Gannon McGibbon 9e0075a3d9 Replace "iff" with "if and only if"
iff means if and only if, but readers without that knowledge might
assume this to be a spelling mistake. To me, this seems like
exclusionary language that is unnecessary. Simply using "if and only if"
instead should suffice.
2021-01-19 12:06:45 -08:00

36 lines
1.4 KiB
Ruby

require_relative '../../spec_helper'
describe "Integer#anybits?" do
it "returns true if and only if all the bits of the argument are set in the receiver" do
42.anybits?(42).should == true
0b1010_1010.anybits?(0b1000_0010).should == true
0b1010_1010.anybits?(0b1000_0001).should == true
0b1000_0010.anybits?(0b0010_1100).should == false
different_bignum = (2 * bignum_value) & (~bignum_value)
(0b1010_1010 | different_bignum).anybits?(0b1000_0010 | bignum_value).should == true
(0b1010_1010 | different_bignum).anybits?(0b0010_1100 | bignum_value).should == true
(0b1000_0010 | different_bignum).anybits?(0b0010_1100 | bignum_value).should == false
end
it "handles negative values using two's complement notation" do
(~42).anybits?(42).should == false
(-42).anybits?(-42).should == true
(~0b100).anybits?(~0b1).should == true
(~(0b100 | bignum_value)).anybits?(~(0b1 | bignum_value)).should == true
end
it "coerces the rhs using to_int" do
obj = mock("the int 0b10")
obj.should_receive(:to_int).and_return(0b10)
0b110.anybits?(obj).should == true
end
it "raises a TypeError when given a non-Integer" do
-> {
(obj = mock('10')).should_receive(:coerce).any_number_of_times.and_return([42,10])
13.anybits?(obj)
}.should raise_error(TypeError)
-> { 13.anybits?("10") }.should raise_error(TypeError)
-> { 13.anybits?(:symbol) }.should raise_error(TypeError)
end
end