1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/ruby/ruby.git synced 2022-11-09 12:17:21 -05:00
ruby--ruby/spec
David Rodríguez d0bf31e6cf [rubygems/rubygems] Don't on gemspecs with invalid require_paths, just warn
These gemspecs already work most of the times. When they are installed
normally, the require_paths in the gemspec stub line becomes actually
correct, and the incorrect value in the real gemspec is ignored. It only
becomes an issue in standalone mode.

In Ruby 3.2, `Kernel#=~` has been removed, and that means that it
becomes harder for us to gracefully deal with this error in standalone
mode, because it now happens earlier due to calling `Array#=~` for this
invalid gemspec (since require_paths is incorrectly an array of arrays).

The easiest way to fix this is to actually make this just work instead
by automatically fixing the issue when reading the packaged gemspec.

https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/d3f2fe6d26
2022-06-12 02:02:20 +09:00
..
bundler [rubygems/rubygems] Don't on gemspecs with invalid require_paths, just warn 2022-06-12 02:02:20 +09:00
mspec Update to ruby/mspec@215497e 2022-04-25 14:53:51 +02:00
ruby Update rubyspec for stringio bug fix 2022-05-29 21:25:05 -07:00
default.mspec sitelibdir makes no sense in ruby itself 2022-03-04 15:56:03 +09:00
README.md Resolve several markedown warnings 2022-04-19 08:32:37 +09:00

spec/bundler

spec/bundler is rspec examples for bundler library (lib/bundler.rb, lib/bundler/*).

Running spec/bundler

To run rspec for bundler:

make test-bundler

spec/ruby

ruby/spec (https://github.com/ruby/spec/) is a test suite for the Ruby language.

Once a month, @eregon merges the in-tree copy under spec/ruby with the upstream repository, preserving the commits and history. The same happens for other implementations such as JRuby and TruffleRuby.

Feel welcome to modify the in-tree spec/ruby. This is the purpose of the in-tree copy, to facilitate contributions to ruby/spec for MRI developers.

New features, additional tests for existing features and regressions tests are all welcome in ruby/spec. There is very little behavior that is implementation-specific, as in the end user programs tend to rely on every behavior MRI exhibits. In other words: If adding a spec might reveal a bug in another implementation, then it is worth adding it. Currently, the only module which is MRI-specific is RubyVM.

Changing behavior and versions guards

Version guards (ruby_version_is) must be added for new features or features which change behavior or are removed. This is necessary for other Ruby implementations to still be able to run the specs and contribute new specs.

For example, change:

describe "Some spec" do
  it "some example" do
    # Old behavior for Ruby < 2.7
  end
end

to:

describe "Some spec" do
  ruby_version_is ""..."2.7" do
    it "some example" do
      # Old behavior for Ruby < 2.7
    end
  end

  ruby_version_is "2.7" do
    it "some example" do
      # New behavior for Ruby >= 2.7
    end
  end
end

See spec/ruby/CONTRIBUTING.md for more documentation about guards.

To verify specs are compatible with older Ruby versions:

cd spec/ruby
$RUBY_MANAGER use 2.4.9
../mspec/bin/mspec -j

Running ruby/spec

To run all specs:

make test-spec

Extra arguments can be added via MSPECOPT. For instance, to show the help:

make test-spec MSPECOPT=-h

You can also run the specs in parallel, which is currently experimental. It takes around 10s instead of 60s on a quad-core laptop.

make test-spec MSPECOPT=-j

To run a specific test, add its path to the command:

make test-spec MSPECOPT=spec/ruby/language/for_spec.rb

If ruby trunk is your current ruby in $PATH, you can also run mspec directly:

# change ruby to trunk
ruby -v # => trunk
spec/mspec/bin/mspec spec/ruby/language/for_spec.rb

ruby/spec and test/

The main difference between a "spec" under spec/ruby/ and a test under test/ is that specs are documenting what they test. This is extremely valuable when reading these tests, as it helps to quickly understand what specific behavior is tested, and how a method should behave. Basic English is fine for spec descriptions. Specs also tend to have few expectations (assertions) per spec, as they specify one aspect of the behavior and not everything at once. Beyond that, the syntax is slightly different but it does the same thing: assert_equal 3, 1+2 is just (1+2).should == 3.

Example:

describe "The for expression" do
  it "iterates over an Enumerable passing each element to the block" do
    j = 0
    for i in 1..3
      j += i
    end
    j.should == 6
  end
end

For more details, see spec/ruby/CONTRIBUTING.md.