mirror of
https://github.com/ruby/ruby.git
synced 2022-11-09 12:17:21 -05:00
3e92b635fb
When you change this to true, you may need to add more tests. git-svn-id: svn+ssh://ci.ruby-lang.org/ruby/trunk@53141 b2dd03c8-39d4-4d8f-98ff-823fe69b080e
715 lines
17 KiB
Ruby
715 lines
17 KiB
Ruby
# frozen_string_literal: false
|
|
require 'rubygems/test_case'
|
|
|
|
class TestGemResolver < Gem::TestCase
|
|
|
|
def setup
|
|
super
|
|
|
|
@DR = Gem::Resolver
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def make_dep(name, *req)
|
|
Gem::Dependency.new(name, *req)
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def set(*specs)
|
|
source = Gem::Source.new URI @gem_repo
|
|
|
|
specs = specs.map do |spec|
|
|
Gem::Resolver::SpecSpecification.new nil, spec, source
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
StaticSet.new(specs)
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def assert_resolves_to expected, resolver
|
|
actual = resolver.resolve
|
|
|
|
exp = expected.sort_by { |s| s.full_name }
|
|
act = actual.map { |a| a.spec.spec }.sort_by { |s| s.full_name }
|
|
|
|
msg = "Set of gems was not the same: #{exp.map { |x| x.full_name}.inspect} != #{act.map { |x| x.full_name}.inspect}"
|
|
|
|
assert_equal exp, act, msg
|
|
rescue Gem::DependencyResolutionError => e
|
|
flunk e.message
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def test_self_compatibility
|
|
assert_same Gem::Resolver, Gem::DependencyResolver
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def test_self_compose_sets_best_set
|
|
best_set = @DR::BestSet.new
|
|
|
|
composed = @DR.compose_sets best_set
|
|
|
|
assert_equal best_set, composed
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def test_self_compose_sets_multiple
|
|
index_set = @DR::IndexSet.new
|
|
vendor_set = @DR::VendorSet.new
|
|
|
|
composed = @DR.compose_sets index_set, vendor_set
|
|
|
|
assert_kind_of Gem::Resolver::ComposedSet, composed
|
|
|
|
assert_equal [index_set, vendor_set], composed.sets
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def test_self_compose_sets_nest
|
|
index_set = @DR::IndexSet.new
|
|
vendor_set = @DR::VendorSet.new
|
|
|
|
inner = @DR.compose_sets index_set, vendor_set
|
|
|
|
current_set = @DR::CurrentSet.new
|
|
|
|
composed = @DR.compose_sets inner, current_set
|
|
|
|
assert_kind_of Gem::Resolver::ComposedSet, composed
|
|
|
|
assert_equal [index_set, vendor_set, current_set], composed.sets
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def test_self_compose_sets_nil
|
|
index_set = @DR::IndexSet.new
|
|
|
|
composed = @DR.compose_sets index_set, nil
|
|
|
|
assert_same index_set, composed
|
|
|
|
e = assert_raises ArgumentError do
|
|
@DR.compose_sets nil
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
assert_equal 'one set in the composition must be non-nil', e.message
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def test_self_compose_sets_single
|
|
index_set = @DR::IndexSet.new
|
|
|
|
composed = @DR.compose_sets index_set
|
|
|
|
assert_same index_set, composed
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def test_requests
|
|
a1 = util_spec 'a', 1, 'b' => 2
|
|
|
|
r1 = Gem::Resolver::DependencyRequest.new dep('a', '= 1'), nil
|
|
|
|
act = Gem::Resolver::ActivationRequest.new a1, r1, false
|
|
|
|
res = Gem::Resolver.new [a1]
|
|
|
|
reqs = []
|
|
|
|
res.requests a1, act, reqs
|
|
|
|
assert_equal ['b (= 2)'], reqs.map { |req| req.to_s }
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def test_requests_development
|
|
a1 = util_spec 'a', 1, 'b' => 2
|
|
|
|
spec = Gem::Resolver::SpecSpecification.new nil, a1
|
|
def spec.fetch_development_dependencies
|
|
@called = true
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
r1 = Gem::Resolver::DependencyRequest.new dep('a', '= 1'), nil
|
|
|
|
act = Gem::Resolver::ActivationRequest.new spec, r1, false
|
|
|
|
res = Gem::Resolver.new [act]
|
|
res.development = true
|
|
|
|
reqs = []
|
|
|
|
res.requests spec, act, reqs
|
|
|
|
assert_equal ['b (= 2)'], reqs.map { |req| req.to_s }
|
|
|
|
assert spec.instance_variable_defined? :@called
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def test_requests_ignore_dependencies
|
|
a1 = util_spec 'a', 1, 'b' => 2
|
|
|
|
r1 = Gem::Resolver::DependencyRequest.new dep('a', '= 1'), nil
|
|
|
|
act = Gem::Resolver::ActivationRequest.new a1, r1, false
|
|
|
|
res = Gem::Resolver.new [a1]
|
|
res.ignore_dependencies = true
|
|
|
|
reqs = []
|
|
|
|
res.requests a1, act, reqs
|
|
|
|
assert_empty reqs
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def test_resolve_conservative
|
|
a1_spec = util_spec 'a', 1
|
|
a2_spec = util_spec 'a', 2 do |s|
|
|
s.add_dependency 'b', 2
|
|
s.add_dependency 'c'
|
|
end
|
|
b1_spec = util_spec 'b', 1
|
|
b2_spec = util_spec 'b', 2
|
|
c1_spec = util_spec 'c', 1 do |s| s.add_dependency 'd', 2 end
|
|
c2_spec = util_spec 'c', 2 do |s| s.add_dependency 'd', 2 end
|
|
d1_spec = util_spec 'd', 1 do |s| s.add_dependency 'e' end
|
|
d2_spec = util_spec 'd', 2 do |s| s.add_dependency 'e' end
|
|
e1_spec = util_spec 'e', 1
|
|
e2_spec = util_spec 'e', 2
|
|
|
|
a_dep = make_dep 'a', '= 2'
|
|
e_dep = make_dep 'e'
|
|
|
|
# When requesting to install:
|
|
# a-2, e
|
|
deps = [a_dep, e_dep]
|
|
|
|
s = set a1_spec, a2_spec, b1_spec, b2_spec, c1_spec, c2_spec, d1_spec, d2_spec, e1_spec, e2_spec
|
|
|
|
res = Gem::Resolver.new deps, s
|
|
|
|
# With the following gems already installed:
|
|
# a-1, b-1, c-1, e-1
|
|
res.skip_gems = {'a'=>[a1_spec], 'b'=>[b1_spec], 'c'=>[c1_spec], 'e'=>[e1_spec]}
|
|
|
|
# Make sure the following gems end up getting used/installed/upgraded:
|
|
# a-2 (upgraded)
|
|
# b-2 (upgraded), specific dependency from a-2
|
|
# c-1 (used, not upgraded), open dependency from a-2
|
|
# d-2 (installed), specific dependency from c-2
|
|
# e-1 (used, not upgraded), open dependency from request
|
|
assert_resolves_to [a2_spec, b2_spec, c1_spec, d2_spec, e1_spec], res
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def test_resolve_development
|
|
a_spec = util_spec 'a', 1 do |s| s.add_development_dependency 'b' end
|
|
b_spec = util_spec 'b', 1 do |s| s.add_development_dependency 'c' end
|
|
c_spec = util_spec 'c', 1
|
|
|
|
a_dep = make_dep 'a', '= 1'
|
|
|
|
deps = [a_dep]
|
|
|
|
s = set a_spec, b_spec, c_spec
|
|
|
|
res = Gem::Resolver.new deps, s
|
|
|
|
res.development = true
|
|
|
|
assert_resolves_to [a_spec, b_spec, c_spec], res
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def test_resolve_development_shallow
|
|
a_spec = util_spec 'a', 1 do |s|
|
|
s.add_development_dependency 'b'
|
|
s.add_runtime_dependency 'd'
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
b_spec = util_spec 'b', 1 do |s| s.add_development_dependency 'c' end
|
|
c_spec = util_spec 'c', 1
|
|
|
|
d_spec = util_spec 'd', 1 do |s| s.add_development_dependency 'e' end
|
|
e_spec = util_spec 'e', 1
|
|
|
|
a_dep = make_dep 'a', '= 1'
|
|
|
|
deps = [a_dep]
|
|
|
|
s = set a_spec, b_spec, c_spec, d_spec, e_spec
|
|
|
|
res = Gem::Resolver.new deps, s
|
|
|
|
res.development = true
|
|
res.development_shallow = true
|
|
|
|
assert_resolves_to [a_spec, b_spec, d_spec], res
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def test_resolve_remote_missing_dependency
|
|
@fetcher = Gem::FakeFetcher.new
|
|
Gem::RemoteFetcher.fetcher = @fetcher
|
|
|
|
a_dep = make_dep 'a', '= 1'
|
|
|
|
res = Gem::Resolver.new [a_dep], Gem::Resolver::IndexSet.new
|
|
|
|
e = assert_raises Gem::UnsatisfiableDepedencyError do
|
|
res.resolve
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
refute_empty e.errors
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def test_no_overlap_specificly
|
|
a = util_spec "a", '1'
|
|
b = util_spec "b", "1"
|
|
|
|
ad = make_dep "a", "= 1"
|
|
bd = make_dep "b", "= 1"
|
|
|
|
deps = [ad, bd]
|
|
|
|
s = set(a, b)
|
|
|
|
res = Gem::Resolver.new(deps, s)
|
|
|
|
assert_resolves_to [a, b], res
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def test_pulls_in_dependencies
|
|
a = util_spec "a", '1'
|
|
b = util_spec "b", "1", "c" => "= 1"
|
|
c = util_spec "c", "1"
|
|
|
|
ad = make_dep "a", "= 1"
|
|
bd = make_dep "b", "= 1"
|
|
|
|
deps = [ad, bd]
|
|
|
|
s = set(a, b, c)
|
|
|
|
res = Gem::Resolver.new(deps, s)
|
|
|
|
assert_resolves_to [a, b, c], res
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def test_picks_highest_version
|
|
a1 = util_spec "a", '1'
|
|
a2 = util_spec "a", '2'
|
|
|
|
s = set(a1, a2)
|
|
|
|
ad = make_dep "a"
|
|
|
|
res = Gem::Resolver.new([ad], s)
|
|
|
|
assert_resolves_to [a2], res
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def test_picks_best_platform
|
|
is = Gem::Resolver::IndexSpecification
|
|
unknown = Gem::Platform.new 'unknown'
|
|
a2_p1 = a3_p2 = nil
|
|
|
|
spec_fetcher do |fetcher|
|
|
fetcher.spec 'a', 2
|
|
a2_p1 = fetcher.spec 'a', 2 do |s| s.platform = Gem::Platform.local end
|
|
a3_p2 = fetcher.spec 'a', 3 do |s| s.platform = unknown end
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
v2 = v(2)
|
|
v3 = v(3)
|
|
source = Gem::Source.new @gem_repo
|
|
|
|
s = set
|
|
|
|
a2 = is.new s, 'a', v2, source, Gem::Platform::RUBY
|
|
a2_p1 = is.new s, 'a', v2, source, Gem::Platform.local.to_s
|
|
a3_p2 = is.new s, 'a', v3, source, unknown
|
|
|
|
s.add a3_p2
|
|
s.add a2_p1
|
|
s.add a2
|
|
|
|
ad = make_dep "a"
|
|
|
|
res = Gem::Resolver.new([ad], s)
|
|
|
|
assert_resolves_to [a2_p1.spec], res
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def test_only_returns_spec_once
|
|
a1 = util_spec "a", "1", "c" => "= 1"
|
|
b1 = util_spec "b", "1", "c" => "= 1"
|
|
|
|
c1 = util_spec "c", "1"
|
|
|
|
ad = make_dep "a"
|
|
bd = make_dep "b"
|
|
|
|
s = set(a1, b1, c1)
|
|
|
|
res = Gem::Resolver.new([ad, bd], s)
|
|
|
|
assert_resolves_to [a1, b1, c1], res
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def test_picks_lower_version_when_needed
|
|
a1 = util_spec "a", "1", "c" => ">= 1"
|
|
b1 = util_spec "b", "1", "c" => "= 1"
|
|
|
|
c1 = util_spec "c", "1"
|
|
c2 = util_spec "c", "2"
|
|
|
|
ad = make_dep "a"
|
|
bd = make_dep "b"
|
|
|
|
s = set(a1, b1, c1, c2)
|
|
|
|
res = Gem::Resolver.new([ad, bd], s)
|
|
|
|
assert_resolves_to [a1, b1, c1], res
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def test_conflict_resolution_only_effects_correct_spec
|
|
a1 = util_spec "a", "1", "c" => ">= 1"
|
|
b1 = util_spec "b", "1", "d" => ">= 1"
|
|
|
|
d3 = util_spec "d", "3", "c" => "= 1"
|
|
d4 = util_spec "d", "4", "c" => "= 1"
|
|
|
|
c1 = util_spec "c", "1"
|
|
c2 = util_spec "c", "2"
|
|
|
|
ad = make_dep "a"
|
|
bd = make_dep "b"
|
|
|
|
s = set(a1, b1, d3, d4, c1, c2)
|
|
|
|
res = Gem::Resolver.new([ad, bd], s)
|
|
|
|
assert_resolves_to [a1, b1, c1, d4], res
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def test_backoff_higher_version_to_satisfy_dep
|
|
t3 = util_spec "railties", "3.2"
|
|
t4 = util_spec "railties", "4.0"
|
|
|
|
r3 = util_spec "rails", "3.2", "railties" => "= 3.2"
|
|
r4 = util_spec "rails", "4.0", "railties" => "= 4.0"
|
|
|
|
rd = make_dep "rails", "3.2"
|
|
|
|
c3 = util_spec "coffee", "3.0", "railties" => "~> 3.0"
|
|
c4 = util_spec "coffee", "4.0", "railties" => "~> 4.0"
|
|
|
|
cd = make_dep "coffee"
|
|
|
|
s = set(t3, t4, r3, r4, c3, c4)
|
|
|
|
res = Gem::Resolver.new([rd, cd], s)
|
|
|
|
assert_resolves_to [r3, t3, c3], res
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def test_raises_dependency_error
|
|
a1 = util_spec "a", "1", "c" => "= 1"
|
|
b1 = util_spec "b", "1", "c" => "= 2"
|
|
|
|
c1 = util_spec "c", "1"
|
|
c2 = util_spec "c", "2"
|
|
|
|
ad = make_dep "a"
|
|
bd = make_dep "b"
|
|
|
|
s = set(a1, b1, c1, c2)
|
|
|
|
r = Gem::Resolver.new([ad, bd], s)
|
|
|
|
e = assert_raises Gem::DependencyResolutionError do
|
|
r.resolve
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
deps = [make_dep("c", "= 2"), make_dep("c", "= 1")]
|
|
assert_equal deps, e.conflicting_dependencies
|
|
|
|
con = e.conflict
|
|
|
|
act = con.activated
|
|
assert_equal "c-1", act.spec.full_name
|
|
|
|
parent = act.parent
|
|
assert_equal "a-1", parent.spec.full_name
|
|
|
|
act = con.requester
|
|
assert_equal "b-1", act.spec.full_name
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def test_raises_when_a_gem_is_missing
|
|
ad = make_dep "a"
|
|
|
|
r = Gem::Resolver.new([ad], set)
|
|
|
|
e = assert_raises Gem::UnsatisfiableDepedencyError do
|
|
r.resolve
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
assert_equal "Unable to resolve dependency: user requested 'a (>= 0)'",
|
|
e.message
|
|
|
|
assert_equal "a (>= 0)", e.dependency.to_s
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def test_raises_when_a_gem_version_is_missing
|
|
a1 = util_spec "a", "1"
|
|
|
|
ad = make_dep "a", "= 3"
|
|
|
|
r = Gem::Resolver.new([ad], set(a1))
|
|
|
|
e = assert_raises Gem::UnsatisfiableDepedencyError do
|
|
r.resolve
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
assert_equal "a (= 3)", e.dependency.to_s
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def test_raises_and_reports_a_toplevel_request_properly
|
|
a1 = util_spec "a", "1"
|
|
ad = make_dep "a", "= 3"
|
|
|
|
r = Gem::Resolver.new([ad], set(a1))
|
|
|
|
e = assert_raises Gem::UnsatisfiableDepedencyError do
|
|
r.resolve
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
assert_equal "Unable to resolve dependency: user requested 'a (= 3)'",
|
|
e.message
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def test_raises_and_reports_an_implicit_request_properly
|
|
a1 = util_spec "a", "1" do |s|
|
|
s.add_runtime_dependency 'b', '= 2'
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
ad = make_dep "a", "= 1"
|
|
|
|
r = Gem::Resolver.new([ad], set(a1))
|
|
|
|
e = assert_raises Gem::UnsatisfiableDepedencyError do
|
|
r.resolve
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
assert_equal "Unable to resolve dependency: 'a (= 1)' requires 'b (= 2)'",
|
|
e.message
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def test_raises_when_possibles_are_exhausted
|
|
a1 = util_spec "a", "1", "c" => ">= 2"
|
|
b1 = util_spec "b", "1", "c" => "= 1"
|
|
|
|
c1 = util_spec "c", "1"
|
|
c2 = util_spec "c", "2"
|
|
c3 = util_spec "c", "3"
|
|
|
|
s = set(a1, b1, c1, c2, c3)
|
|
|
|
ad = make_dep "a"
|
|
bd = make_dep "b"
|
|
|
|
r = Gem::Resolver.new([ad, bd], s)
|
|
|
|
e = assert_raises Gem::DependencyResolutionError do
|
|
r.resolve
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
dependency = e.conflict.dependency
|
|
|
|
assert_includes %w(a b), dependency.name
|
|
assert_equal req('>= 0'), dependency.requirement
|
|
|
|
activated = e.conflict.activated
|
|
assert_equal 'c-2', activated.full_name
|
|
|
|
assert_equal dep('c', '>= 2'), activated.request.dependency
|
|
|
|
assert_equal [dep('c', '= 1'), dep('c', '>= 2')],
|
|
e.conflict.conflicting_dependencies
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def test_keeps_resolving_after_seeing_satisfied_dep
|
|
a1 = util_spec "a", "1", "b" => "= 1", "c" => "= 1"
|
|
b1 = util_spec "b", "1"
|
|
c1 = util_spec "c", "1"
|
|
|
|
ad = make_dep "a"
|
|
bd = make_dep "b"
|
|
|
|
s = set(a1, b1, c1)
|
|
|
|
r = Gem::Resolver.new([ad, bd], s)
|
|
|
|
assert_resolves_to [a1, b1, c1], r
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def test_common_rack_activation_scenario
|
|
rack100 = util_spec "rack", "1.0.0"
|
|
rack101 = util_spec "rack", "1.0.1"
|
|
|
|
lib1 = util_spec "lib", "1", "rack" => ">= 1.0.1"
|
|
|
|
rails = util_spec "rails", "3", "actionpack" => "= 3"
|
|
ap = util_spec "actionpack", "3", "rack" => ">= 1.0.0"
|
|
|
|
d1 = make_dep "rails"
|
|
d2 = make_dep "lib"
|
|
|
|
s = set(lib1, rails, ap, rack100, rack101)
|
|
|
|
r = Gem::Resolver.new([d1, d2], s)
|
|
|
|
assert_resolves_to [rails, ap, rack101, lib1], r
|
|
|
|
# check it with the deps reverse too
|
|
|
|
r = Gem::Resolver.new([d2, d1], s)
|
|
|
|
assert_resolves_to [lib1, rack101, rails, ap], r
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def test_backtracks_to_the_first_conflict
|
|
a1 = util_spec "a", "1"
|
|
a2 = util_spec "a", "2"
|
|
a3 = util_spec "a", "3"
|
|
a4 = util_spec "a", "4"
|
|
|
|
d1 = make_dep "a"
|
|
d2 = make_dep "a", ">= 2"
|
|
d3 = make_dep "a", "= 1"
|
|
|
|
s = set(a1, a2, a3, a4)
|
|
|
|
r = Gem::Resolver.new([d1, d2, d3], s)
|
|
|
|
assert_raises Gem::DependencyResolutionError do
|
|
r.resolve
|
|
end
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def test_resolve_conflict
|
|
a1 = util_spec 'a', 1
|
|
a2 = util_spec 'a', 2
|
|
|
|
b2 = util_spec 'b', 2, 'a' => '~> 2.0'
|
|
|
|
s = set a1, a2, b2
|
|
|
|
a_dep = dep 'a', '~> 1.0'
|
|
b_dep = dep 'b'
|
|
|
|
r = Gem::Resolver.new [a_dep, b_dep], s
|
|
|
|
assert_raises Gem::DependencyResolutionError do
|
|
r.resolve
|
|
end
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def test_resolve_bug_699
|
|
a1 = util_spec 'a', '1', 'b' => '= 2',
|
|
'c' => '~> 1.0.3'
|
|
|
|
b1 = util_spec 'b', '2', 'c' => '~> 1.0'
|
|
|
|
c1 = util_spec 'c', '1.0.9'
|
|
c2 = util_spec 'c', '1.1.0'
|
|
c3 = util_spec 'c', '1.2.0'
|
|
|
|
s = set a1, b1, c1, c2, c3
|
|
|
|
a_dep = dep 'a', '= 1'
|
|
|
|
r = Gem::Resolver.new [a_dep], s
|
|
|
|
assert_resolves_to [a1, b1, c1], r
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def test_resolve_rollback
|
|
a1 = util_spec 'a', 1
|
|
a2 = util_spec 'a', 2
|
|
|
|
b1 = util_spec 'b', 1, 'a' => '~> 1.0'
|
|
b2 = util_spec 'b', 2, 'a' => '~> 2.0'
|
|
|
|
s = set a1, a2, b1, b2
|
|
|
|
a_dep = dep 'a', '~> 1.0'
|
|
b_dep = dep 'b'
|
|
|
|
r = Gem::Resolver.new [a_dep, b_dep], s
|
|
|
|
assert_resolves_to [a1, b1], r
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
# actionmailer 2.3.4
|
|
# activemerchant 1.5.0
|
|
# activesupport 2.3.5, 2.3.4
|
|
# Activemerchant needs activesupport >= 2.3.2. When you require activemerchant, it will activate the latest version that meets that requirement which is 2.3.5. Actionmailer on the other hand needs activesupport = 2.3.4. When rubygems tries to activate activesupport 2.3.4, it will raise an error.
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_simple_activesupport_problem
|
|
sup1 = util_spec "activesupport", "2.3.4"
|
|
sup2 = util_spec "activesupport", "2.3.5"
|
|
|
|
merch = util_spec "activemerchant", "1.5.0", "activesupport" => ">= 2.3.2"
|
|
mail = util_spec "actionmailer", "2.3.4", "activesupport" => "= 2.3.4"
|
|
|
|
s = set(mail, merch, sup1, sup2)
|
|
|
|
d1 = make_dep "activemerchant"
|
|
d2 = make_dep "actionmailer"
|
|
|
|
r = Gem::Resolver.new([d1, d2], s)
|
|
|
|
assert_resolves_to [merch, mail, sup1], r
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def test_second_level_backout
|
|
b1 = new_spec "b", "1", { "c" => ">= 1" }, "lib/b.rb"
|
|
b2 = new_spec "b", "2", { "c" => ">= 2" }, "lib/b.rb"
|
|
c1 = new_spec "c", "1"
|
|
c2 = new_spec "c", "2"
|
|
d1 = new_spec "d", "1", { "c" => "< 2" }, "lib/d.rb"
|
|
d2 = new_spec "d", "2", { "c" => "< 2" }, "lib/d.rb"
|
|
|
|
s = set(b1, b2, c1, c2, d1, d2)
|
|
|
|
p1 = make_dep "b", "> 0"
|
|
p2 = make_dep "d", "> 0"
|
|
|
|
r = Gem::Resolver.new([p1, p2], s)
|
|
|
|
assert_resolves_to [b1, c1, d2], r
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def test_select_local_platforms
|
|
r = Gem::Resolver.new nil, nil
|
|
|
|
a1 = util_spec 'a', 1
|
|
a1_p1 = util_spec 'a', 1 do |s| s.platform = Gem::Platform.local end
|
|
a1_p2 = util_spec 'a', 1 do |s| s.platform = 'unknown' end
|
|
|
|
selected = r.select_local_platforms [a1, a1_p1, a1_p2]
|
|
|
|
assert_equal [a1, a1_p1], selected
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def test_raises_and_explains_when_platform_prevents_install
|
|
a1 = util_spec "a", "1" do |s|
|
|
s.platform = Gem::Platform.new %w[c p 1]
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
ad = make_dep "a", "= 1"
|
|
|
|
r = Gem::Resolver.new([ad], set(a1))
|
|
|
|
e = assert_raises Gem::UnsatisfiableDepedencyError do
|
|
r.resolve
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
assert_match "No match for 'a (= 1)' on this platform. Found: c-p-1",
|
|
e.message
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|