# Pundit [![Build Status](https://secure.travis-ci.org/elabs/pundit.png?branch=master)](https://travis-ci.org/elabs/pundit) [![Code Climate](https://codeclimate.com/github/elabs/pundit.png)](https://codeclimate.com/github/elabs/pundit) Pundit provides a set of helpers which guide you in leveraging regular Ruby classes and object oriented design patterns to build a simple, robust and scaleable authorization system. ## Installation ``` ruby gem "pundit" ``` Include Pundit in your application controller: ``` ruby class ApplicationController < ActionController::Base include Pundit protect_from_forgery end ``` Optionally, you can run the generator, which will set up an application policy with some useful defaults for you: ``` sh rails g pundit:install ``` After generating your application policy, restart the Rails server so that Rails can pick up any classes in the new `app/policies/` directory. ## Policies Pundit is focused around the notion of policy classes. We suggest that you put these classes in `app/policies`. This is a simple example: ``` ruby class PostPolicy attr_reader :user, :post def initialize(user, post) @user = user @post = post end def create? user.admin? or not post.published? end end ``` As you can see, this is just a plain Ruby class. As a convenience, we can inherit from Struct: ``` ruby PostPolicy = Struct.new(:user, :post) do def create? user.admin? or not post.published? end end ``` Pundit makes the following assumptions about this class: - The class has the same name as some kind of model class, only suffixed with the word "Policy". - The first argument is a user. In your controller, Pundit will call the `current_user` method to retrieve what to send into this argument - The second argument is some kind of model object, whose authorization you want to check. This does not need to be an ActiveRecord or even an ActiveModel object, it can be anything really. - The class implements some kind of query method, in this case `create?`. Usually, this will map to the name of a particular controller action. That's it really. Supposing that you have an instance of class `Post`, Pundit now lets you do this in your controller: ``` ruby def create @post = Post.new(params[:post]) authorize @post if @post.save redirect_to @post else render :new end end ``` The authorize method automatically infers that `Post` will have a matching `PostPolicy` class, and instantiates this class, handing in the current user and the given record. It then infers from the action name, that it should call `create?` on this instance of the policy. In this case, you can imagine that `authorize` would have done something like this: ``` ruby raise "not authorized" unless PostPolicy.new(current_user, @post).create? ``` You can pass a second argument to `authorize` if the name of the permission you want to check doesn't match the action name. For example: ``` ruby def publish @post = Post.find(params[:id]) authorize @post, :update? @post.publish! redirect_to @post end ``` You can easily get a hold of an instance of the policy through the `policy` method in both the view and controller. This is especially useful for conditionally showing links or buttons in the view: ``` erb <% if policy(@post).create? %> <%= link_to "New post", new_post_path %> <% end %> ``` ## Ensuring policies are used Pundit adds a method called `verify_authorized` to your controllers. This method will raise an exception if `authorize` has not yet been called. You should run this method in an `after_filter` to ensure that you haven't forgotten to authorize the action. For example: ``` ruby class ApplicationController < ActionController::Base after_filter :verify_authorized, :except => :index end ``` Likewise, pundit also adds `verify_policy_scoped` to your controller. This will raise an exception in the vein of `verify_authorized`. However it tracks if `policy_scoped` is used instead of `authorize`. This is mostly useful for controller actions like `index` which find collections with a scope and don't authorize individual instances. ``` ruby class ApplicationController < ActionController::Base after_filter :verify_policy_scoped, :only => :index end ``` ## Scopes Often, you will want to have some kind of view listing records which a particular user has access to. When using Pundit, you are expected to define a class called a policy scope. It can look something like this: ``` ruby PostPolicy = Struct.new(:user, :post) do self::Scope = Struct.new(:user, :scope) do def resolve if user.admin? scope.all else scope.where(:published => true) end end end def create? user.admin? or not post.published? end end ``` Pundit makes the following assumptions about this class: - The class has the name `Scope` and is nested under the policy class. - The first argument is a user. In your controller, Pundit will call the `current_user` method to retrieve what to send into this argument. - The second argument is a scope of some kind on which to perform some kind of query. It will usually be an ActiveRecord class or a `ActiveRecord::Relation`, but it could be something else entirely. - Instances of this class respond to the method `resolve`, which should return some kind of result which can be iterated over. For ActiveRecord classes, this would usually be an `ActiveRecord::Relation`. You can now use this class from your controller via the `policy_scope` method: ``` ruby def index @posts = policy_scope(Post) end ``` Just as with your policy, this will automatically infer that you want to use the `PostPolicy::Scope` class, it will instantiate this class and call `resolve` on the instance. In this case it is a shortcut for doing: ``` ruby def index @posts = PostPolicy::Scope.new(current_user, Post).resolve end ``` You can, and are encouraged to, use this method in views: ``` erb <% policy_scope(@user.posts).each do |post| %>

<% link_to post.title, post_path(post) %>

<% end %> ``` ## Manually specifying policy classes Sometimes you might want to explicitly declare which policy to use for a given class, instead of letting Pundit infer it. This can be done like so: ``` ruby class Post def self.policy_class PostablePolicyClass end end ``` ## Just plain old Ruby As you can see, Pundit doesn't do anything you couldn't have easily done yourself. It's a very small library, it just provides a few neat helpers. Together these give you the power of building a well structured, fully working authorization system without using any special DSLs or funky syntax or anything. Remember that all of the policy and scope classes are just plain Ruby classes, which means you can use the same mechanisms you always use to DRY things up. Encapsulate a set of permissions into a module and include them in multiple policies. Use `alias_method` to make some permissions behave the same as others. Inherit from a base set of permissions. Use metaprogramming if you really have to. ## Generator Use the supplied generator to generate policies: ``` sh rails g pundit:policy post ``` ## Closed systems In many applications, only logged in users are really able to do anything. If you're building such a system, it can be kind of cumbersome to check that the user in a policy isn't `nil` for every single permission. We suggest that you define a filter that redirects unauthenticated users to the login page. As a secondary defence, if you've defined an ApplicationPolicy, it might be a good idea to raise an exception if somehow an unauthenticated user got through. This way you can fail more gracefully. ``` ruby class ApplicationPolicy def initialize(user, record) raise Pundit::NotAuthorizedError, "must be logged in" unless user @user = user @record = record end end ``` ## Rescuing a denied Authorization in Rails Pundit raises a `Pundit::NotAuthorizedError` you can [rescue_from](http://guides.rubyonrails.org/action_controller_overview.html#rescue-from) in your `ApplicationController`. You can customize the `user_not_authorized` method in every controller. ```ruby class ApplicationController < ActionController::Base protect_from_forgery include Pundit rescue_from Pundit::NotAuthorizedError, with: :user_not_authorized private def user_not_authorized flash[:error] = "You are not authorized to perform this action." redirect_to request.headers["Referer"] || root_path end end ``` ## Manually retrieving policies and scopes Sometimes you want to retrieve a policy for a record outside the controller or view. For example when you delegate permissions from one policy to another. You can easily retrieve policies and scopes like this: ``` ruby Pundit.policy!(user, post) Pundit.policy(user, post) Pundit.policy_scope!(user, Post) Pundit.policy_scope(user, Post) ``` The bang methods will raise an exception if the policy does not exist, whereas those without the bang will return nil. ## Customize pundit user In some cases your controller might not have access to `current_user`, or your `current_user` is not the method one that should be invoked by pundit. Simply define a method in your controller called `pundit_user`. ```ruby def pundit_user User.find_by_other_means end ``` ## Strong parameters In Rails 4 (or Rails 3.2 with the [strong_parameters](https://github.com/rails/strong_parameters) gem), mass-assignment protection is handled in the controller. Pundit helps you permit different users to set different attributes. ```ruby # app/policies/post_policy.rb class PostPolicy < ApplicationPolicy def permitted_attributes if user.admin? || user.owner_of?(post) [:title, :body, :tag_list] else [:tag_list] end end end # app/controllers/posts_controller.rb class PostsController < ApplicationController def update @post = Post.find(params[:id]) if @post.update(post_params) redirect_to @post else render :edit end end private def post_params params.require(:post).permit(*policy(@post).permitted_attributes) end end ``` ## RSpec ### Policy Specs Pundit includes a mini-DSL for writing expressive tests for your policies in RSpec. Require `pundit/rspec` in your `spec_helper.rb`: ``` ruby require "pundit/rspec" ``` Then put your policy specs in `spec/policies`, and make them look somewhat like this: ``` ruby describe PostPolicy do subject { PostPolicy } permissions :create? do it "denies access if post is published" do should_not permit(User.new(:admin => false), Post.new(:published => true)) end it "grants access if post is published and user is an admin" do should permit(User.new(:admin => true), Post.new(:published => true)) end it "grants access if post is unpublished" do should permit(User.new(:admin => false), Post.new(:published => false)) end end end ``` An alternative approach to Pundit policy specs is scoping them to a user context as outlined in this [excellent post](http://thunderboltlabs.com/blog/2013/03/27/testing-pundit-policies-with-rspec/). ### View Specs When writing view specs, you'll notice that the policy helper is not available and views under test that use it will fail. Thankfully, it's very easy to stub out the policy to have it return whatever is appropriate for the spec. ``` ruby describe "users/show" do before(:each) do user = assign(:user, build_stubbed(:user)) controller.stub(:current_user).and_return user end it "renders the destroy action" do allow(view).to receive(:policy).and_return double(edit?: false, destroy?: true) render expect(rendered).to match 'Destroy' end end ``` This technique enables easy unit testing of tricky conditionaly view logic based on what is or is not authorized. # External Resources - [Migrating to Pundit from CanCan](http://blog.carbonfive.com/2013/10/21/migrating-to-pundit-from-cancan/) - [Testing Pundit Policies with RSpec](http://thunderboltlabs.com/blog/2013/03/27/testing-pundit-policies-with-rspec/) # License Licensed under the MIT license, see the separate LICENSE.txt file.