lib | ||
.gitignore | ||
Gemfile | ||
LICENSE.txt | ||
pundit.gemspec | ||
Rakefile | ||
README.md |
Pundit
Pundit isn't really a library, as much as a set of helpers which simplify writing authorization systems for Ruby on Rails according to a pattern of using pure Ruby classes and object oriented design patterns.
Installation
gem "pundit"
Policies
Pundit is focused around the notion of policy classes. We suggest that you put
these classes in app/policies
. This is a simple example:
class PostPolicy
attr_reader :user, :post
def initialize(user, post)
@user = user
@post = post
end
def create?
user.admin? or not post.published?
end
end
As you can see, this is just a plain Ruby class. As a convenience, we can inherit from Struct:
class PostPolicy < Struct.new(:user, :post)
def create?
user.admin? or not post.published?
end
end
Pundit makes the following assumptions about this class:
- The class has the same name as some kind of model class, only suffixed with the word "Policy".
- The first argument is a user. In your controller, Pundit will call the
current_user
method to retrieve what to send into this argument - The second argument is some kind of model object, whose authorization you want to check. This does not need to be an ActiveRecord or even an ActiveModel object, it can be anything really.
- The class implements some kind of query method, in this case
create?
. Usually, this will map to the name of a particular controller action.
That's it really.
Supposing that you have an instance of class Post
, Pundit now lets you do
this in your controller:
def create
@post = Post.new(params[:post])
authorize @post
if @post.save
redirect_to @post
else
render :new
end
end
The authorize method automatically infers that Post
will have a matching
PostPolicy
class, and instantiates this class, handing in the current user
and the given record. It then infers from the action name, that it should call
create?
on this instance of the policy. In this case, you can imagine that
authorize
would have done something like this:
raise "not authorized" unless PostPolicy.new(current_user, @post).create?
You can easily get a hold of an instance of the policy through the policy
method in both the view and controller. This is especially useful for
conditionally showing links or buttons in the view:
<% if policy(@post).create? %>
<%= link_to "New post", new_post_path %>
<% end %>
Ensuring policies are used
Pundit adds a method called verify_authorized
to your controllers. This
method will raise an exception if authorize
has not yet been called. You
should run this method in an after_filter
to ensure that you haven't
forgotten to authorize the action. For example:
class ApplicationController < ActionController::Base
after_filter :verify_authorized, :except => :index
end
Scopes
Often, you will want to have some kind of view listing records which a particular user has access to. When using Pundit, you are expected to define a class called a policy scope. It can look something like this:
class PostPolicy < Struct.new(:user, :post)
class Scope < Struct.new(:user, :scope)
def resolve
if user.admin?
scope
else
scope.where(:published => true)
end
end
end
def create?
user.admin? or not post.published?
end
end
Pundit makes the following assumptions about this class:
- The class has the name
Scope
and is nested under the policy class. - The first argument is a user. In your controller, Pundit will call the
current_user
method to retrieve what to send into this argument. - The second argument is a scope of some kind on which to perform some kind of
query. It will usually be an ActiveRecord class or a
ActiveRecord::Relation
, but it could be something else entirely. - Instances of this class respond to the method
resolve
, which should return some kind of result which can be iterated over. For ActiveRecord classes, this would usually be anActiveRecord::Relation
.
You can now use this class from your controller via the policy_scope
method:
def index
@posts = policy_scope(Post)
end
Just as with your policy, this will automatically infer that you want to use
the PostPolicy::Scope
class, it will instantiate this class and call
resolve
on the instance. In this case it is a shortcut for doing:
def index
@posts = PostPolicy::Scope.new(current_user, Post).resolve
end
You can, and are encouraged to, use this method in views:
<% policy_scope(@user.posts).each do |post| %>
<p><% link_to @post.title, post_path(post) %></p>
<% end %>
Conclusion
As you can see, Pundit doesn't do anything you couldn't have easily done yourself. It's a very small library, it just provides a few neat helpers. Together these give you the power of building a well structured, fully working authorization system without using any special DSLs or funky syntax or anything.
The base classes
Pundit ships with base classes for both scopes and policies. It's important that you understand that these don't do anything special. They are just regular Ruby classes, and you're free not to use them if you don't want to. That said, they provide a good set of defaults and starting points for working with Pundit.
Pundit::Policy
This class provides a constructor function, in which the first argument is
called user
and the second argument is called record
. Our above example
could have been written like this:
class PostPolicy < Pundit::Policy
def create?
user.admin? or not record.published?
end
end
The abstraction of always calling the second argument record
, allows us to do
a neat trick. The Pundit::Policy
class has an instance method called scope
,
which as you might guess, return an instance of the corresponding scope class.
We use this to provide a default for the show?
permission, which just checks
whether the record can be found in the scope. This way, any record which is not
found in the scope will be automatically denied access on the show page as
well.
This allows gives you the same power you get in more advanced authorization systems, like cancan, whereby you can define your permissions just once, through the scope, and they will work for both finding collections of records and for displaying individual records.
Pundit::Policy
also implements new?
and edit?
as aliases to create?
and
update?
respectively, so simply implementing update?
will also define
edit?
at the same time.
We encourage you to create an ApplicationPolicy
from which all your other
policies inherit. It's up to you whether you want your application policy to
inherit from Pundit::Policy
. This way you can define your own rules for
defaults.
Pundit::Scope
This class really doesn't do anything. It just provides a constructor. It's mostly there for symmetry. You could have used it like this:
class PostPolicy < Pundit::Policy
class Scope < Pundit::Scope
def resolve
if user.admin?
scope
else
scope.where(:published => true)
end
end
end
def create?
user.admin? or not post.published?
end
end
Just plain old Ruby
Remember that all of the policy and scope classes are just plain Ruby classes,
which means you can use the same mechanisms you always use to DRY things up.
Encapsulate a set of permissions into a module and include them in multiple
policies. Use alias_method
to make some permissions behave the same as
others. Inherit from a base set of permissions. Use metaprogramming if you
really have to. The options are endless.
Closed systems
In many applications, only logged in users are really able to do anything. If
you're building such a system, it can be kind of cumbersome to check that the
user in a policy isn't nil
for every single permission.
We suggest that you define a filter that redirects unauthenticated users to the login page. As a secondary defence, if you've defined an ApplicationPolicy, it might be a good idea to raise an exception if somehow an unauthenticated user got through. This way you can fail more gracefully.
class ApplicationPolicy < Pundit::Policy
def initialize(user, record)
raise Pundit::NotAuthorized, "must be logged in" unless user
super
end
end