30 Thread 0x7fe5fbd63700 (LWP 26060) 0x0000003f7cadf113 in poll () from /lib64/libc.so.6
29 Thread 0x7fe5f2b3b700 (LWP 26533) 0x0000003f7ce0b68c in pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
28 Thread 0x7fe5f2a3a700 (LWP 26534) 0x0000003f7ce0ba5e in pthread_cond_timedwait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
27 Thread 0x7fe5f2939700 (LWP 26535) 0x0000003f7ce0b68c in pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
26 Thread 0x7fe5f2838700 (LWP 26537) 0x0000003f7ce0b68c in pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
25 Thread 0x7fe5f2737700 (LWP 26538) 0x0000003f7ce0b68c in pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
24 Thread 0x7fe5f2535700 (LWP 26540) 0x0000003f7ce0b68c in pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
23 Thread 0x7fe5f2434700 (LWP 26541) 0x0000003f7ce0b68c in pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
22 Thread 0x7fe5f2232700 (LWP 26543) 0x0000003f7ce0b68c in pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
21 Thread 0x7fe5f2131700 (LWP 26544) 0x00007fe5f7b570f0 in xmlXPathNodeSetMergeAndClear ()
from /opt/gitlab/embedded/service/gem/ruby/2.1.0/gems/nokogiri-1.6.7.2/lib/nokogiri/nokogiri.so
...
```
If you see a suspicious thread, like the Nokogiri one above, you may want
to get more information:
```
thread 21
bt
# Example output
#0 0x00007ff0d6afe111 in xmlXPathNodeSetMergeAndClear () from /opt/gitlab/embedded/service/gem/ruby/2.1.0/gems/nokogiri-1.6.7.2/lib/nokogiri/nokogiri.so
#1 0x00007ff0d6b0b836 in xmlXPathNodeCollectAndTest () from /opt/gitlab/embedded/service/gem/ruby/2.1.0/gems/nokogiri-1.6.7.2/lib/nokogiri/nokogiri.so
#2 0x00007ff0d6b09037 in xmlXPathCompOpEval () from /opt/gitlab/embedded/service/gem/ruby/2.1.0/gems/nokogiri-1.6.7.2/lib/nokogiri/nokogiri.so
#3 0x00007ff0d6b09017 in xmlXPathCompOpEval () from /opt/gitlab/embedded/service/gem/ruby/2.1.0/gems/nokogiri-1.6.7.2/lib/nokogiri/nokogiri.so
#4 0x00007ff0d6b092e0 in xmlXPathCompOpEval () from /opt/gitlab/embedded/service/gem/ruby/2.1.0/gems/nokogiri-1.6.7.2/lib/nokogiri/nokogiri.so
#5 0x00007ff0d6b0bc37 in xmlXPathRunEval () from /opt/gitlab/embedded/service/gem/ruby/2.1.0/gems/nokogiri-1.6.7.2/lib/nokogiri/nokogiri.so
#6 0x00007ff0d6b0be5f in xmlXPathEvalExpression () from /opt/gitlab/embedded/service/gem/ruby/2.1.0/gems/nokogiri-1.6.7.2/lib/nokogiri/nokogiri.so
#7 0x00007ff0d6a97dc3 in evaluate (argc=2, argv=0x1022d058, self=<value optimized out>) at xml_xpath_context.c:221
#8 0x00007ff0daeab0ea in vm_call_cfunc_with_frame (th=0x1022a4f0, reg_cfp=0x1032b810, ci=<value optimized out>) at vm_insnhelper.c:1510
### Remove sidekiq jobs for given parameters (destructive)
```ruby
# for jobs like this:
# RepositoryImportWorker.new.perform_async(100)
id_list = [100]
queue = Sidekiq::Queue.new('repository_import')
queue.each do |job|
job.delete if id_list.include?(job.args[0])
end
```
### Remove specific job ID (destructive)
```ruby
queue = Sidekiq::Queue.new('repository_import')
queue.each do |job|
job.delete if job.jid == 'my-job-id'
end
```
## Canceling running jobs (destructive)
> Introduced in GitLab 12.3.
This is highly risky operation and use it as last resort.
Doing that might result in data corruption, as the job
is interrupted mid-execution and it is not guaranteed
that proper rollback of transactions is implemented.
```ruby
Gitlab::SidekiqMonitor.cancel_job('job-id')
```
> This requires the Sidekiq to be run with `SIDEKIQ_MONITOR_WORKER=1`
> environment variable.
To perform of the interrupt we use `Thread.raise` which
has number of drawbacks, as mentioned in [Why Ruby’s Timeout is dangerous (and Thread.raise is terrifying)](https://jvns.ca/blog/2015/11/27/why-rubys-timeout-is-dangerous-and-thread-dot-raise-is-terrifying/):
> This is where the implications get interesting, and terrifying. This means that an exception can get raised:
> Nobody writes code to defend against an exception being raised on literally any line. That’s not even possible. So Thread.raise is basically like a sneak attack on your code that could result in almost anything. It would probably be okay if it were pure-functional code that did not modify any state. But this is Ruby, so that’s unlikely :)