gitlab-org--gitlab-foss/spec/models/commit_spec.rb

418 lines
14 KiB
Ruby
Raw Normal View History

require 'spec_helper'
describe Commit do
let(:project) { create(:project, :public, :repository) }
let(:commit) { project.commit }
describe 'modules' do
subject { described_class }
it { is_expected.to include_module(Mentionable) }
it { is_expected.to include_module(Participable) }
it { is_expected.to include_module(Referable) }
it { is_expected.to include_module(StaticModel) }
end
2016-07-27 19:42:38 -04:00
describe '#author' do
it 'looks up the author in a case-insensitive way' do
user = create(:user, email: commit.author_email.upcase)
expect(commit.author).to eq(user)
end
it 'caches the author', :request_store do
2016-07-27 19:42:38 -04:00
user = create(:user, email: commit.author_email)
expect(User).to receive(:find_by_any_email).and_call_original
2016-07-27 19:42:38 -04:00
expect(commit.author).to eq(user)
key = "Commit:author:#{commit.author_email.downcase}"
2016-07-27 19:42:38 -04:00
expect(RequestStore.store[key]).to eq(user)
expect(commit.author).to eq(user)
end
end
describe '#to_reference' do
let(:project) { create(:project, :repository, path: 'sample-project') }
let(:commit) { project.commit }
it 'returns a String reference to the object' do
expect(commit.to_reference).to eq commit.id
end
it 'supports a cross-project reference' do
another_project = build(:project, :repository, name: 'another-project', namespace: project.namespace)
expect(commit.to_reference(another_project)).to eq "sample-project@#{commit.id}"
end
end
describe '#reference_link_text' do
let(:project) { create(:project, :repository, path: 'sample-project') }
let(:commit) { project.commit }
it 'returns a String reference to the object' do
expect(commit.reference_link_text).to eq commit.short_id
end
it 'supports a cross-project reference' do
another_project = build(:project, :repository, name: 'another-project', namespace: project.namespace)
expect(commit.reference_link_text(another_project)).to eq "sample-project@#{commit.short_id}"
end
end
describe '#title' do
it "returns no_commit_message when safe_message is blank" do
allow(commit).to receive(:safe_message).and_return('')
expect(commit.title).to eq("--no commit message")
end
2017-04-21 11:31:18 -04:00
it 'truncates a message without a newline at natural break to 80 characters' do
message = 'Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Donec sodales id felis id blandit. Vivamus egestas lacinia lacus, sed rutrum mauris.'
allow(commit).to receive(:safe_message).and_return(message)
2017-04-21 11:31:18 -04:00
expect(commit.title).to eq('Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Donec sodales id felis…')
end
it "truncates a message with a newline before 80 characters at the newline" do
message = commit.safe_message.split(" ").first
allow(commit).to receive(:safe_message).and_return(message + "\n" + message)
expect(commit.title).to eq(message)
end
it "does not truncates a message with a newline after 80 but less 100 characters" do
message = <<eos
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Donec sodales id felis id blandit.
Vivamus egestas lacinia lacus, sed rutrum mauris.
eos
allow(commit).to receive(:safe_message).and_return(message)
expect(commit.title).to eq(message.split("\n").first)
end
end
describe '#full_title' do
it "returns no_commit_message when safe_message is blank" do
allow(commit).to receive(:safe_message).and_return('')
expect(commit.full_title).to eq("--no commit message")
end
it "returns entire message if there is no newline" do
message = 'Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Donec sodales id felis id blandit. Vivamus egestas lacinia lacus, sed rutrum mauris.'
allow(commit).to receive(:safe_message).and_return(message)
expect(commit.full_title).to eq(message)
end
it "returns first line of message if there is a newLine" do
message = commit.safe_message.split(" ").first
allow(commit).to receive(:safe_message).and_return(message + "\n" + message)
expect(commit.full_title).to eq(message)
end
end
2017-04-21 11:31:18 -04:00
describe 'description' do
it 'returns description of commit message if title less than 100 characters' do
message = <<eos
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Donec sodales id felis id blandit.
Vivamus egestas lacinia lacus, sed rutrum mauris.
eos
allow(commit).to receive(:safe_message).and_return(message)
expect(commit.description).to eq('Vivamus egestas lacinia lacus, sed rutrum mauris.')
end
it 'returns full commit message if commit title more than 100 characters' do
message = <<eos
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Donec sodales id felis id blandit. Vivamus egestas lacinia lacus, sed rutrum mauris.
Vivamus egestas lacinia lacus, sed rutrum mauris.
eos
allow(commit).to receive(:safe_message).and_return(message)
expect(commit.description).to eq(message)
end
end
describe "delegation" do
subject { commit }
it { is_expected.to respond_to(:message) }
it { is_expected.to respond_to(:authored_date) }
it { is_expected.to respond_to(:committed_date) }
it { is_expected.to respond_to(:committer_email) }
it { is_expected.to respond_to(:author_email) }
it { is_expected.to respond_to(:parents) }
it { is_expected.to respond_to(:date) }
it { is_expected.to respond_to(:diffs) }
it { is_expected.to respond_to(:tree) }
it { is_expected.to respond_to(:id) }
it { is_expected.to respond_to(:to_patch) }
end
describe '#closes_issues' do
let(:issue) { create :issue, project: project }
let(:other_project) { create(:empty_project, :public) }
let(:other_issue) { create :issue, project: other_project }
let(:commiter) { create :user }
before do
project.team << [commiter, :developer]
other_project.team << [commiter, :developer]
end
it 'detects issues that this commit is marked as closing' do
ext_ref = "#{other_project.path_with_namespace}##{other_issue.iid}"
allow(commit).to receive_messages(
safe_message: "Fixes ##{issue.iid} and #{ext_ref}",
committer_email: commiter.email
)
2015-11-30 16:43:54 -05:00
expect(commit.closes_issues).to include(issue)
expect(commit.closes_issues).to include(other_issue)
end
end
it_behaves_like 'a mentionable' do
subject { create(:project, :repository).commit }
2015-04-16 16:25:25 -04:00
2015-10-12 10:23:15 -04:00
let(:author) { create(:user, email: subject.author_email) }
let(:backref_text) { "commit #{subject.id}" }
2015-05-21 17:49:06 -04:00
let(:set_mentionable_text) do
->(txt) { allow(subject).to receive(:safe_message).and_return(txt) }
end
# Include the subject in the repository stub.
let(:extra_commits) { [subject] }
end
describe '#hook_attrs' do
2015-12-07 08:13:06 -05:00
let(:data) { commit.hook_attrs(with_changed_files: true) }
it { expect(data).to be_a(Hash) }
it { expect(data[:message]).to include('adds bar folder and branch-test text file to check Repository merged_to_root_ref method') }
it { expect(data[:timestamp]).to eq('2016-09-27T14:37:46+00:00') }
it { expect(data[:added]).to eq(["bar/branch-test.txt"]) }
it { expect(data[:modified]).to eq([]) }
it { expect(data[:removed]).to eq([]) }
end
describe '#reverts_commit?' do
let(:another_commit) { double(:commit, revert_description: "This reverts commit #{commit.sha}") }
Merge branch 'jej-23867-use-mr-finder-instead-of-access-check' into 'security' Replace MR access checks with use of MergeRequestsFinder Split from !2024 to partially solve https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/23867 :warning: - Potentially untested :bomb: - No test coverage :traffic_light: - Test coverage of some sort exists (a test failed when error raised) :vertical_traffic_light: - Test coverage of return value (a test failed when nil used) :white_check_mark: - Permissions check tested - [x] :bomb: app/finders/notes_finder.rb:17 - [x] :warning: app/views/layouts/nav/_project.html.haml:80 [`.count`] - [x] :bomb: app/controllers/concerns/creates_commit.rb:84 - [x] :traffic_light: app/controllers/projects/commits_controller.rb:24 - [x] :traffic_light: app/controllers/projects/compare_controller.rb:56 - [x] :vertical_traffic_light: app/controllers/projects/discussions_controller.rb:29 - [x] :white_check_mark: app/controllers/projects/todos_controller.rb:27 - [x] :vertical_traffic_light: app/models/commit.rb:268 - [x] :white_check_mark: lib/gitlab/search_results.rb:71 - [x] https://dev.gitlab.org/gitlab/gitlabhq/merge_requests/2024/diffs#d1c10892daedb4d4dd3d4b12b6d071091eea83df_267_266 Memoize ` merged_merge_request(current_user)` - [x] https://dev.gitlab.org/gitlab/gitlabhq/merge_requests/2024/diffs#d1c10892daedb4d4dd3d4b12b6d071091eea83df_248_247 Expected side effect for `merged_merge_request!`, consider `skip_authorization: true`. - [x] https://dev.gitlab.org/gitlab/gitlabhq/merge_requests/2024/diffs#d1c10892daedb4d4dd3d4b12b6d071091eea83df_269_269 Scary use of unchecked `merged_merge_request?` See merge request !2033
2016-11-29 08:47:43 -05:00
let(:user) { commit.author }
Merge branch 'jej-23867-use-mr-finder-instead-of-access-check' into 'security' Replace MR access checks with use of MergeRequestsFinder Split from !2024 to partially solve https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/23867 :warning: - Potentially untested :bomb: - No test coverage :traffic_light: - Test coverage of some sort exists (a test failed when error raised) :vertical_traffic_light: - Test coverage of return value (a test failed when nil used) :white_check_mark: - Permissions check tested - [x] :bomb: app/finders/notes_finder.rb:17 - [x] :warning: app/views/layouts/nav/_project.html.haml:80 [`.count`] - [x] :bomb: app/controllers/concerns/creates_commit.rb:84 - [x] :traffic_light: app/controllers/projects/commits_controller.rb:24 - [x] :traffic_light: app/controllers/projects/compare_controller.rb:56 - [x] :vertical_traffic_light: app/controllers/projects/discussions_controller.rb:29 - [x] :white_check_mark: app/controllers/projects/todos_controller.rb:27 - [x] :vertical_traffic_light: app/models/commit.rb:268 - [x] :white_check_mark: lib/gitlab/search_results.rb:71 - [x] https://dev.gitlab.org/gitlab/gitlabhq/merge_requests/2024/diffs#d1c10892daedb4d4dd3d4b12b6d071091eea83df_267_266 Memoize ` merged_merge_request(current_user)` - [x] https://dev.gitlab.org/gitlab/gitlabhq/merge_requests/2024/diffs#d1c10892daedb4d4dd3d4b12b6d071091eea83df_248_247 Expected side effect for `merged_merge_request!`, consider `skip_authorization: true`. - [x] https://dev.gitlab.org/gitlab/gitlabhq/merge_requests/2024/diffs#d1c10892daedb4d4dd3d4b12b6d071091eea83df_269_269 Scary use of unchecked `merged_merge_request?` See merge request !2033
2016-11-29 08:47:43 -05:00
it { expect(commit.reverts_commit?(another_commit, user)).to be_falsy }
context 'commit has no description' do
before do
allow(commit).to receive(:description?).and_return(false)
end
Merge branch 'jej-23867-use-mr-finder-instead-of-access-check' into 'security' Replace MR access checks with use of MergeRequestsFinder Split from !2024 to partially solve https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/23867 :warning: - Potentially untested :bomb: - No test coverage :traffic_light: - Test coverage of some sort exists (a test failed when error raised) :vertical_traffic_light: - Test coverage of return value (a test failed when nil used) :white_check_mark: - Permissions check tested - [x] :bomb: app/finders/notes_finder.rb:17 - [x] :warning: app/views/layouts/nav/_project.html.haml:80 [`.count`] - [x] :bomb: app/controllers/concerns/creates_commit.rb:84 - [x] :traffic_light: app/controllers/projects/commits_controller.rb:24 - [x] :traffic_light: app/controllers/projects/compare_controller.rb:56 - [x] :vertical_traffic_light: app/controllers/projects/discussions_controller.rb:29 - [x] :white_check_mark: app/controllers/projects/todos_controller.rb:27 - [x] :vertical_traffic_light: app/models/commit.rb:268 - [x] :white_check_mark: lib/gitlab/search_results.rb:71 - [x] https://dev.gitlab.org/gitlab/gitlabhq/merge_requests/2024/diffs#d1c10892daedb4d4dd3d4b12b6d071091eea83df_267_266 Memoize ` merged_merge_request(current_user)` - [x] https://dev.gitlab.org/gitlab/gitlabhq/merge_requests/2024/diffs#d1c10892daedb4d4dd3d4b12b6d071091eea83df_248_247 Expected side effect for `merged_merge_request!`, consider `skip_authorization: true`. - [x] https://dev.gitlab.org/gitlab/gitlabhq/merge_requests/2024/diffs#d1c10892daedb4d4dd3d4b12b6d071091eea83df_269_269 Scary use of unchecked `merged_merge_request?` See merge request !2033
2016-11-29 08:47:43 -05:00
it { expect(commit.reverts_commit?(another_commit, user)).to be_falsy }
end
context "another_commit's description does not revert commit" do
before do
allow(commit).to receive(:description).and_return("Foo Bar")
end
Merge branch 'jej-23867-use-mr-finder-instead-of-access-check' into 'security' Replace MR access checks with use of MergeRequestsFinder Split from !2024 to partially solve https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/23867 :warning: - Potentially untested :bomb: - No test coverage :traffic_light: - Test coverage of some sort exists (a test failed when error raised) :vertical_traffic_light: - Test coverage of return value (a test failed when nil used) :white_check_mark: - Permissions check tested - [x] :bomb: app/finders/notes_finder.rb:17 - [x] :warning: app/views/layouts/nav/_project.html.haml:80 [`.count`] - [x] :bomb: app/controllers/concerns/creates_commit.rb:84 - [x] :traffic_light: app/controllers/projects/commits_controller.rb:24 - [x] :traffic_light: app/controllers/projects/compare_controller.rb:56 - [x] :vertical_traffic_light: app/controllers/projects/discussions_controller.rb:29 - [x] :white_check_mark: app/controllers/projects/todos_controller.rb:27 - [x] :vertical_traffic_light: app/models/commit.rb:268 - [x] :white_check_mark: lib/gitlab/search_results.rb:71 - [x] https://dev.gitlab.org/gitlab/gitlabhq/merge_requests/2024/diffs#d1c10892daedb4d4dd3d4b12b6d071091eea83df_267_266 Memoize ` merged_merge_request(current_user)` - [x] https://dev.gitlab.org/gitlab/gitlabhq/merge_requests/2024/diffs#d1c10892daedb4d4dd3d4b12b6d071091eea83df_248_247 Expected side effect for `merged_merge_request!`, consider `skip_authorization: true`. - [x] https://dev.gitlab.org/gitlab/gitlabhq/merge_requests/2024/diffs#d1c10892daedb4d4dd3d4b12b6d071091eea83df_269_269 Scary use of unchecked `merged_merge_request?` See merge request !2033
2016-11-29 08:47:43 -05:00
it { expect(commit.reverts_commit?(another_commit, user)).to be_falsy }
end
context "another_commit's description reverts commit" do
before do
allow(commit).to receive(:description).and_return("Foo #{another_commit.revert_description} Bar")
end
Merge branch 'jej-23867-use-mr-finder-instead-of-access-check' into 'security' Replace MR access checks with use of MergeRequestsFinder Split from !2024 to partially solve https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/23867 :warning: - Potentially untested :bomb: - No test coverage :traffic_light: - Test coverage of some sort exists (a test failed when error raised) :vertical_traffic_light: - Test coverage of return value (a test failed when nil used) :white_check_mark: - Permissions check tested - [x] :bomb: app/finders/notes_finder.rb:17 - [x] :warning: app/views/layouts/nav/_project.html.haml:80 [`.count`] - [x] :bomb: app/controllers/concerns/creates_commit.rb:84 - [x] :traffic_light: app/controllers/projects/commits_controller.rb:24 - [x] :traffic_light: app/controllers/projects/compare_controller.rb:56 - [x] :vertical_traffic_light: app/controllers/projects/discussions_controller.rb:29 - [x] :white_check_mark: app/controllers/projects/todos_controller.rb:27 - [x] :vertical_traffic_light: app/models/commit.rb:268 - [x] :white_check_mark: lib/gitlab/search_results.rb:71 - [x] https://dev.gitlab.org/gitlab/gitlabhq/merge_requests/2024/diffs#d1c10892daedb4d4dd3d4b12b6d071091eea83df_267_266 Memoize ` merged_merge_request(current_user)` - [x] https://dev.gitlab.org/gitlab/gitlabhq/merge_requests/2024/diffs#d1c10892daedb4d4dd3d4b12b6d071091eea83df_248_247 Expected side effect for `merged_merge_request!`, consider `skip_authorization: true`. - [x] https://dev.gitlab.org/gitlab/gitlabhq/merge_requests/2024/diffs#d1c10892daedb4d4dd3d4b12b6d071091eea83df_269_269 Scary use of unchecked `merged_merge_request?` See merge request !2033
2016-11-29 08:47:43 -05:00
it { expect(commit.reverts_commit?(another_commit, user)).to be_truthy }
end
context "another_commit's description reverts merged merge request" do
before do
revert_description = "This reverts merge request !foo123"
allow(another_commit).to receive(:revert_description).and_return(revert_description)
allow(commit).to receive(:description).and_return("Foo #{another_commit.revert_description} Bar")
end
Merge branch 'jej-23867-use-mr-finder-instead-of-access-check' into 'security' Replace MR access checks with use of MergeRequestsFinder Split from !2024 to partially solve https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/23867 :warning: - Potentially untested :bomb: - No test coverage :traffic_light: - Test coverage of some sort exists (a test failed when error raised) :vertical_traffic_light: - Test coverage of return value (a test failed when nil used) :white_check_mark: - Permissions check tested - [x] :bomb: app/finders/notes_finder.rb:17 - [x] :warning: app/views/layouts/nav/_project.html.haml:80 [`.count`] - [x] :bomb: app/controllers/concerns/creates_commit.rb:84 - [x] :traffic_light: app/controllers/projects/commits_controller.rb:24 - [x] :traffic_light: app/controllers/projects/compare_controller.rb:56 - [x] :vertical_traffic_light: app/controllers/projects/discussions_controller.rb:29 - [x] :white_check_mark: app/controllers/projects/todos_controller.rb:27 - [x] :vertical_traffic_light: app/models/commit.rb:268 - [x] :white_check_mark: lib/gitlab/search_results.rb:71 - [x] https://dev.gitlab.org/gitlab/gitlabhq/merge_requests/2024/diffs#d1c10892daedb4d4dd3d4b12b6d071091eea83df_267_266 Memoize ` merged_merge_request(current_user)` - [x] https://dev.gitlab.org/gitlab/gitlabhq/merge_requests/2024/diffs#d1c10892daedb4d4dd3d4b12b6d071091eea83df_248_247 Expected side effect for `merged_merge_request!`, consider `skip_authorization: true`. - [x] https://dev.gitlab.org/gitlab/gitlabhq/merge_requests/2024/diffs#d1c10892daedb4d4dd3d4b12b6d071091eea83df_269_269 Scary use of unchecked `merged_merge_request?` See merge request !2033
2016-11-29 08:47:43 -05:00
it { expect(commit.reverts_commit?(another_commit, user)).to be_truthy }
end
end
2016-04-16 15:46:26 -04:00
describe '#last_pipeline' do
let!(:first_pipeline) do
create(:ci_empty_pipeline,
project: project,
sha: commit.sha,
status: 'success')
end
let!(:second_pipeline) do
create(:ci_empty_pipeline,
project: project,
sha: commit.sha,
status: 'success')
end
it 'returns last pipeline' do
expect(commit.last_pipeline).to eq second_pipeline
end
end
2016-04-16 15:46:26 -04:00
describe '#status' do
context 'without ref argument' do
before do
%w[success failed created pending].each do |status|
create(:ci_empty_pipeline,
project: project,
sha: commit.sha,
status: status)
end
end
it 'gives compound status from latest pipelines' do
expect(commit.status).to eq(Ci::Pipeline.latest_status)
expect(commit.status).to eq('pending')
end
end
context 'when a particular ref is specified' do
let!(:pipeline_from_master) do
create(:ci_empty_pipeline,
project: project,
sha: commit.sha,
ref: 'master',
status: 'failed')
end
let!(:pipeline_from_fix) do
create(:ci_empty_pipeline,
project: project,
sha: commit.sha,
ref: 'fix',
status: 'success')
end
it 'gives pipelines from a particular branch' do
expect(commit.status('master')).to eq(pipeline_from_master.status)
expect(commit.status('fix')).to eq(pipeline_from_fix.status)
end
it 'gives compound status from latest pipelines if ref is nil' do
expect(commit.status(nil)).to eq(Ci::Pipeline.latest_status)
expect(commit.status(nil)).to eq('failed')
end
end
2016-04-16 15:46:26 -04:00
end
describe '#participants' do
let(:user1) { build(:user) }
let(:user2) { build(:user) }
let!(:note1) do
create(:note_on_commit,
commit_id: commit.id,
project: project,
note: 'foo')
end
let!(:note2) do
create(:note_on_commit,
commit_id: commit.id,
project: project,
note: 'bar')
end
before do
allow(commit).to receive(:author).and_return(user1)
allow(commit).to receive(:committer).and_return(user2)
end
it 'includes the commit author' do
expect(commit.participants).to include(commit.author)
end
it 'includes the committer' do
expect(commit.participants).to include(commit.committer)
end
it 'includes the authors of the commit notes' do
expect(commit.participants).to include(note1.author, note2.author)
end
end
describe '#uri_type' do
it 'returns the URI type at the given path' do
expect(commit.uri_type('files/html')).to be(:tree)
expect(commit.uri_type('files/images/logo-black.png')).to be(:raw)
expect(project.commit('video').uri_type('files/videos/intro.mp4')).to be(:raw)
expect(commit.uri_type('files/js/application.js')).to be(:blob)
end
it "returns nil if the path doesn't exists" do
expect(commit.uri_type('this/path/doesnt/exist')).to be_nil
end
end
describe '.from_hash' do
let(:new_commit) { described_class.from_hash(commit.to_hash, project) }
it 'returns a Commit' do
expect(new_commit).to be_an_instance_of(described_class)
end
it 'wraps a Gitlab::Git::Commit' do
expect(new_commit.raw).to be_an_instance_of(Gitlab::Git::Commit)
end
it 'stores the correct commit fields' do
expect(new_commit.id).to eq(commit.id)
expect(new_commit.message).to eq(commit.message)
end
end
describe '#work_in_progress?' do
['squash! ', 'fixup! ', 'wip: ', 'WIP: ', '[WIP] '].each do |wip_prefix|
it "detects the '#{wip_prefix}' prefix" do
commit.message = "#{wip_prefix}#{commit.message}"
expect(commit).to be_work_in_progress
end
end
it "detects WIP for a commit just saying 'wip'" do
commit.message = "wip"
expect(commit).to be_work_in_progress
end
it "doesn't detect WIP for a commit that begins with 'FIXUP! '" do
commit.message = "FIXUP! #{commit.message}"
expect(commit).not_to be_work_in_progress
end
it "doesn't detect WIP for words starting with WIP" do
commit.message = "Wipout #{commit.message}"
expect(commit).not_to be_work_in_progress
end
end
describe '.valid_hash?' do
it 'checks hash contents' do
expect(described_class.valid_hash?('abcdef01239ABCDEF')).to be true
expect(described_class.valid_hash?("abcdef01239ABCD\nEF")).to be false
expect(described_class.valid_hash?(' abcdef01239ABCDEF ')).to be false
expect(described_class.valid_hash?('Gabcdef01239ABCDEF')).to be false
expect(described_class.valid_hash?('gabcdef01239ABCDEF')).to be false
expect(described_class.valid_hash?('-abcdef01239ABCDEF')).to be false
end
it 'checks hash length' do
expect(described_class.valid_hash?('a' * 6)).to be false
expect(described_class.valid_hash?('a' * 7)).to be true
expect(described_class.valid_hash?('a' * 40)).to be true
expect(described_class.valid_hash?('a' * 41)).to be false
end
end
end