2019-03-30 03:23:56 -04:00
|
|
|
# frozen_string_literal: true
|
|
|
|
|
2011-10-16 17:07:10 -04:00
|
|
|
require 'spec_helper'
|
|
|
|
|
2020-06-24 02:09:01 -04:00
|
|
|
RSpec.describe Snippet do
|
2015-05-02 23:11:21 -04:00
|
|
|
describe 'modules' do
|
|
|
|
subject { described_class }
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it { is_expected.to include_module(Gitlab::VisibilityLevel) }
|
|
|
|
it { is_expected.to include_module(Participable) }
|
|
|
|
it { is_expected.to include_module(Referable) }
|
|
|
|
it { is_expected.to include_module(Sortable) }
|
2016-06-03 05:44:04 -04:00
|
|
|
it { is_expected.to include_module(Awardable) }
|
2015-05-02 23:11:21 -04:00
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
describe 'associations' do
|
2015-02-12 13:17:35 -05:00
|
|
|
it { is_expected.to belong_to(:author).class_name('User') }
|
2015-05-02 23:14:31 -04:00
|
|
|
it { is_expected.to belong_to(:project) }
|
2015-02-12 13:17:35 -05:00
|
|
|
it { is_expected.to have_many(:notes).dependent(:destroy) }
|
2016-06-03 05:44:04 -04:00
|
|
|
it { is_expected.to have_many(:award_emoji).dependent(:destroy) }
|
2019-12-10 10:07:52 -05:00
|
|
|
it { is_expected.to have_many(:user_mentions).class_name("SnippetUserMention") }
|
2020-02-13 10:08:52 -05:00
|
|
|
it { is_expected.to have_one(:snippet_repository) }
|
2020-07-08 05:09:17 -04:00
|
|
|
it { is_expected.to have_one(:statistics).class_name('SnippetStatistics').dependent(:destroy) }
|
2021-02-23 07:10:56 -05:00
|
|
|
it { is_expected.to have_many(:repository_storage_moves).class_name('Snippets::RepositoryStorageMove').inverse_of(:container) }
|
2011-10-16 17:07:10 -04:00
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
2015-05-02 23:14:31 -04:00
|
|
|
describe 'validation' do
|
2015-02-12 13:17:35 -05:00
|
|
|
it { is_expected.to validate_presence_of(:author) }
|
2012-08-29 11:36:02 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2015-02-12 13:17:35 -05:00
|
|
|
it { is_expected.to validate_presence_of(:title) }
|
2016-12-02 07:54:57 -05:00
|
|
|
it { is_expected.to validate_length_of(:title).is_at_most(255) }
|
2012-08-29 11:36:02 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2016-12-02 07:54:57 -05:00
|
|
|
it { is_expected.to validate_length_of(:file_name).is_at_most(255) }
|
2012-08-29 11:36:02 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2015-02-12 13:17:35 -05:00
|
|
|
it { is_expected.to validate_presence_of(:content) }
|
2015-05-02 23:14:31 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it { is_expected.to validate_inclusion_of(:visibility_level).in_array(Gitlab::VisibilityLevel.values) }
|
2019-12-02 07:06:45 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it do
|
|
|
|
allow(Gitlab::CurrentSettings).to receive(:snippet_size_limit).and_return(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
is_expected
|
|
|
|
.to validate_length_of(:content)
|
|
|
|
.is_at_most(Gitlab::CurrentSettings.snippet_size_limit)
|
|
|
|
.with_message("is too long (2 Bytes). The maximum size is 1 Byte.")
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
context 'content validations' do
|
|
|
|
context 'with existing snippets' do
|
|
|
|
let(:snippet) { create(:personal_snippet, content: 'This is a valid content at the time of creation') }
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
before do
|
|
|
|
expect(snippet).to be_valid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
stub_application_setting(snippet_size_limit: 2)
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it 'does not raise a validation error if the content is not changed' do
|
|
|
|
snippet.title = 'new title'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expect(snippet).to be_valid
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it 'raises and error if the content is changed and the size is bigger than limit' do
|
|
|
|
snippet.content = snippet.content + "test"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expect(snippet).not_to be_valid
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
context 'with new snippets' do
|
|
|
|
let(:limit) { 15 }
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
before do
|
|
|
|
stub_application_setting(snippet_size_limit: limit)
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it 'is valid when content is smaller than the limit' do
|
|
|
|
snippet = build(:personal_snippet, content: 'Valid Content')
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expect(snippet).to be_valid
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it 'raises error when content is bigger than setting limit' do
|
|
|
|
snippet = build(:personal_snippet, content: 'This is an invalid content')
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
aggregate_failures do
|
|
|
|
expect(snippet).not_to be_valid
|
|
|
|
expect(snippet.errors[:content]).to include("is too long (#{snippet.content.size} Bytes). The maximum size is #{limit} Bytes.")
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
2011-10-16 17:07:10 -04:00
|
|
|
end
|
2015-05-02 23:11:21 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2020-06-23 11:08:41 -04:00
|
|
|
describe 'callbacks' do
|
|
|
|
it 'creates snippet statistics when the snippet is created' do
|
|
|
|
snippet = build(:snippet)
|
|
|
|
expect(snippet.statistics).to be_nil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
snippet.save
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expect(snippet.statistics).to be_persisted
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
2015-05-02 23:11:21 -04:00
|
|
|
describe '#to_reference' do
|
2016-11-02 19:49:13 -04:00
|
|
|
context 'when snippet belongs to a project' do
|
2017-08-02 15:55:11 -04:00
|
|
|
let(:project) { build(:project, name: 'sample-project') }
|
2016-11-02 19:49:13 -04:00
|
|
|
let(:snippet) { build(:snippet, id: 1, project: project) }
|
2015-05-02 23:11:21 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2016-11-02 19:49:13 -04:00
|
|
|
it 'returns a String reference to the object' do
|
|
|
|
expect(snippet.to_reference).to eq "$1"
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it 'supports a cross-project reference' do
|
2017-08-02 15:55:11 -04:00
|
|
|
another_project = build(:project, name: 'another-project', namespace: project.namespace)
|
2016-11-02 19:49:13 -04:00
|
|
|
expect(snippet.to_reference(another_project)).to eq "sample-project$1"
|
|
|
|
end
|
2015-05-02 23:11:21 -04:00
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
2016-11-02 19:49:13 -04:00
|
|
|
context 'when snippet does not belong to a project' do
|
|
|
|
let(:snippet) { build(:snippet, id: 1, project: nil) }
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it 'returns a String reference to the object' do
|
|
|
|
expect(snippet.to_reference).to eq "$1"
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it 'still returns shortest reference when project arg present' do
|
2017-08-02 15:55:11 -04:00
|
|
|
another_project = build(:project, name: 'another-project')
|
2016-11-02 19:49:13 -04:00
|
|
|
expect(snippet.to_reference(another_project)).to eq "$1"
|
|
|
|
end
|
2015-05-02 23:11:21 -04:00
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
2016-03-01 06:51:01 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2016-12-02 07:54:57 -05:00
|
|
|
describe '#file_name' do
|
2020-09-11 11:08:30 -04:00
|
|
|
let(:snippet) { build(:snippet, file_name: file_name) }
|
2016-12-02 07:54:57 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
context 'file_name is nil' do
|
2020-09-11 11:08:30 -04:00
|
|
|
let(:file_name) { nil }
|
2016-12-02 07:54:57 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it 'returns an empty string' do
|
|
|
|
expect(snippet.file_name).to eq ''
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
context 'file_name is not nil' do
|
2020-09-11 11:08:30 -04:00
|
|
|
let(:file_name) { 'foo.txt' }
|
2016-12-02 07:54:57 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it 'returns the file_name' do
|
2020-09-11 11:08:30 -04:00
|
|
|
expect(snippet.file_name).to eq file_name
|
2016-12-02 07:54:57 -05:00
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
2016-10-06 17:17:11 -04:00
|
|
|
describe "#content_html_invalidated?" do
|
|
|
|
let(:snippet) { create(:snippet, content: "md", content_html: "html", file_name: "foo.md") }
|
2019-12-18 19:08:01 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2016-10-06 17:17:11 -04:00
|
|
|
it "invalidates the HTML cache of content when the filename changes" do
|
|
|
|
expect { snippet.file_name = "foo.rb" }.to change { snippet.content_html_invalidated? }.from(false).to(true)
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
2016-03-01 06:51:01 -05:00
|
|
|
describe '.search' do
|
2020-09-11 11:08:30 -04:00
|
|
|
let_it_be(:snippet) { create(:snippet, title: 'test snippet', description: 'description') }
|
2016-03-01 06:51:01 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it 'returns snippets with a matching title' do
|
|
|
|
expect(described_class.search(snippet.title)).to eq([snippet])
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it 'returns snippets with a partially matching title' do
|
|
|
|
expect(described_class.search(snippet.title[0..2])).to eq([snippet])
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it 'returns snippets with a matching title regardless of the casing' do
|
|
|
|
expect(described_class.search(snippet.title.upcase)).to eq([snippet])
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it 'returns snippets with a matching file name' do
|
|
|
|
expect(described_class.search(snippet.file_name)).to eq([snippet])
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it 'returns snippets with a partially matching file name' do
|
|
|
|
expect(described_class.search(snippet.file_name[0..2])).to eq([snippet])
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it 'returns snippets with a matching file name regardless of the casing' do
|
|
|
|
expect(described_class.search(snippet.file_name.upcase)).to eq([snippet])
|
|
|
|
end
|
2020-03-11 14:09:23 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it 'returns snippets with a matching description' do
|
|
|
|
expect(described_class.search(snippet.description)).to eq([snippet])
|
|
|
|
end
|
Rewrite SnippetsFinder to improve performance
This completely rewrites the SnippetsFinder class from the ground up in
order to improve its performance. The old code was beyond salvaging. It
was complex, included various Rails 5 workarounds, comments that
shouldn't be necessary, and most important of all: it produced a really
poorly performing database query.
As a result, I opted for rewriting the finder from scratch, instead of
trying to patch the existing code. Instead of trying to reuse as many
existing methods as possible, I opted for defining new methods
specifically meant for the SnippetsFinder. This requires some extra code
here and there, but allows us to have much more control over the
resulting SQL queries. It is these changes that then allow us to produce
a _much_ more efficient query.
To illustrate how bad the old query was, we will use my own snippets as
an example. Currently I have 52 snippets, most of which are global ones.
To retrieve these, you would run the following Ruby code:
user = User.find_by(username: 'yorickpeterse')
SnippetsFinder.new(user, author: user).execute
On GitLab.com the resulting query will take between 10 and 15 seconds to
run, producing the query plan found at
https://explain.depesz.com/s/Y5IX. Apart from the long execution time,
the total number of buffers (the sum of all shared hits) is around 185
GB, though the real number is probably (hopefully) much lower as I doubt
simply summing these numbers produces the true total number of buffers
used.
The new query's plan can be found at https://explain.depesz.com/s/wHdN,
and this query takes between 10 and 100-ish milliseconds to run. The
total number of buffers used is only about 30 MB.
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/52639
2018-10-25 11:35:31 -04:00
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
2019-10-16 20:07:27 -04:00
|
|
|
describe 'when default snippet visibility set to internal' do
|
|
|
|
using RSpec::Parameterized::TableSyntax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
before do
|
|
|
|
stub_application_setting(default_snippet_visibility: Gitlab::VisibilityLevel::INTERNAL)
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
where(:attribute_name, :value) do
|
|
|
|
:visibility | 'private'
|
|
|
|
:visibility_level | Gitlab::VisibilityLevel::PRIVATE
|
|
|
|
'visibility' | 'private'
|
|
|
|
'visibility_level' | Gitlab::VisibilityLevel::PRIVATE
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with_them do
|
|
|
|
it 'sets the visibility level' do
|
|
|
|
snippet = described_class.new(attribute_name => value, title: 'test', file_name: 'test.rb', content: 'test data')
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expect(snippet.visibility_level).to eq(Gitlab::VisibilityLevel::PRIVATE)
|
|
|
|
expect(snippet.title).to eq('test')
|
|
|
|
expect(snippet.file_name).to eq('test.rb')
|
|
|
|
expect(snippet.content).to eq('test data')
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
Rewrite SnippetsFinder to improve performance
This completely rewrites the SnippetsFinder class from the ground up in
order to improve its performance. The old code was beyond salvaging. It
was complex, included various Rails 5 workarounds, comments that
shouldn't be necessary, and most important of all: it produced a really
poorly performing database query.
As a result, I opted for rewriting the finder from scratch, instead of
trying to patch the existing code. Instead of trying to reuse as many
existing methods as possible, I opted for defining new methods
specifically meant for the SnippetsFinder. This requires some extra code
here and there, but allows us to have much more control over the
resulting SQL queries. It is these changes that then allow us to produce
a _much_ more efficient query.
To illustrate how bad the old query was, we will use my own snippets as
an example. Currently I have 52 snippets, most of which are global ones.
To retrieve these, you would run the following Ruby code:
user = User.find_by(username: 'yorickpeterse')
SnippetsFinder.new(user, author: user).execute
On GitLab.com the resulting query will take between 10 and 15 seconds to
run, producing the query plan found at
https://explain.depesz.com/s/Y5IX. Apart from the long execution time,
the total number of buffers (the sum of all shared hits) is around 185
GB, though the real number is probably (hopefully) much lower as I doubt
simply summing these numbers produces the true total number of buffers
used.
The new query's plan can be found at https://explain.depesz.com/s/wHdN,
and this query takes between 10 and 100-ish milliseconds to run. The
total number of buffers used is only about 30 MB.
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/52639
2018-10-25 11:35:31 -04:00
|
|
|
describe '.with_optional_visibility' do
|
2020-09-11 11:08:30 -04:00
|
|
|
let_it_be(:public_snippet) { create(:snippet, :public) }
|
|
|
|
let_it_be(:private_snippet) { create(:snippet, :private) }
|
|
|
|
|
Rewrite SnippetsFinder to improve performance
This completely rewrites the SnippetsFinder class from the ground up in
order to improve its performance. The old code was beyond salvaging. It
was complex, included various Rails 5 workarounds, comments that
shouldn't be necessary, and most important of all: it produced a really
poorly performing database query.
As a result, I opted for rewriting the finder from scratch, instead of
trying to patch the existing code. Instead of trying to reuse as many
existing methods as possible, I opted for defining new methods
specifically meant for the SnippetsFinder. This requires some extra code
here and there, but allows us to have much more control over the
resulting SQL queries. It is these changes that then allow us to produce
a _much_ more efficient query.
To illustrate how bad the old query was, we will use my own snippets as
an example. Currently I have 52 snippets, most of which are global ones.
To retrieve these, you would run the following Ruby code:
user = User.find_by(username: 'yorickpeterse')
SnippetsFinder.new(user, author: user).execute
On GitLab.com the resulting query will take between 10 and 15 seconds to
run, producing the query plan found at
https://explain.depesz.com/s/Y5IX. Apart from the long execution time,
the total number of buffers (the sum of all shared hits) is around 185
GB, though the real number is probably (hopefully) much lower as I doubt
simply summing these numbers produces the true total number of buffers
used.
The new query's plan can be found at https://explain.depesz.com/s/wHdN,
and this query takes between 10 and 100-ish milliseconds to run. The
total number of buffers used is only about 30 MB.
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/52639
2018-10-25 11:35:31 -04:00
|
|
|
context 'when a visibility level is provided' do
|
|
|
|
it 'returns snippets with the given visibility' do
|
|
|
|
snippets = described_class
|
|
|
|
.with_optional_visibility(Gitlab::VisibilityLevel::PUBLIC)
|
|
|
|
|
2020-09-11 11:08:30 -04:00
|
|
|
expect(snippets).to eq([public_snippet])
|
Rewrite SnippetsFinder to improve performance
This completely rewrites the SnippetsFinder class from the ground up in
order to improve its performance. The old code was beyond salvaging. It
was complex, included various Rails 5 workarounds, comments that
shouldn't be necessary, and most important of all: it produced a really
poorly performing database query.
As a result, I opted for rewriting the finder from scratch, instead of
trying to patch the existing code. Instead of trying to reuse as many
existing methods as possible, I opted for defining new methods
specifically meant for the SnippetsFinder. This requires some extra code
here and there, but allows us to have much more control over the
resulting SQL queries. It is these changes that then allow us to produce
a _much_ more efficient query.
To illustrate how bad the old query was, we will use my own snippets as
an example. Currently I have 52 snippets, most of which are global ones.
To retrieve these, you would run the following Ruby code:
user = User.find_by(username: 'yorickpeterse')
SnippetsFinder.new(user, author: user).execute
On GitLab.com the resulting query will take between 10 and 15 seconds to
run, producing the query plan found at
https://explain.depesz.com/s/Y5IX. Apart from the long execution time,
the total number of buffers (the sum of all shared hits) is around 185
GB, though the real number is probably (hopefully) much lower as I doubt
simply summing these numbers produces the true total number of buffers
used.
The new query's plan can be found at https://explain.depesz.com/s/wHdN,
and this query takes between 10 and 100-ish milliseconds to run. The
total number of buffers used is only about 30 MB.
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/52639
2018-10-25 11:35:31 -04:00
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
context 'when a visibility level is not provided' do
|
|
|
|
it 'returns all snippets' do
|
|
|
|
snippets = described_class.with_optional_visibility
|
|
|
|
|
2020-09-11 11:08:30 -04:00
|
|
|
expect(snippets).to include(public_snippet, private_snippet)
|
Rewrite SnippetsFinder to improve performance
This completely rewrites the SnippetsFinder class from the ground up in
order to improve its performance. The old code was beyond salvaging. It
was complex, included various Rails 5 workarounds, comments that
shouldn't be necessary, and most important of all: it produced a really
poorly performing database query.
As a result, I opted for rewriting the finder from scratch, instead of
trying to patch the existing code. Instead of trying to reuse as many
existing methods as possible, I opted for defining new methods
specifically meant for the SnippetsFinder. This requires some extra code
here and there, but allows us to have much more control over the
resulting SQL queries. It is these changes that then allow us to produce
a _much_ more efficient query.
To illustrate how bad the old query was, we will use my own snippets as
an example. Currently I have 52 snippets, most of which are global ones.
To retrieve these, you would run the following Ruby code:
user = User.find_by(username: 'yorickpeterse')
SnippetsFinder.new(user, author: user).execute
On GitLab.com the resulting query will take between 10 and 15 seconds to
run, producing the query plan found at
https://explain.depesz.com/s/Y5IX. Apart from the long execution time,
the total number of buffers (the sum of all shared hits) is around 185
GB, though the real number is probably (hopefully) much lower as I doubt
simply summing these numbers produces the true total number of buffers
used.
The new query's plan can be found at https://explain.depesz.com/s/wHdN,
and this query takes between 10 and 100-ish milliseconds to run. The
total number of buffers used is only about 30 MB.
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/52639
2018-10-25 11:35:31 -04:00
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
2019-10-18 14:06:21 -04:00
|
|
|
describe '.only_personal_snippets' do
|
Rewrite SnippetsFinder to improve performance
This completely rewrites the SnippetsFinder class from the ground up in
order to improve its performance. The old code was beyond salvaging. It
was complex, included various Rails 5 workarounds, comments that
shouldn't be necessary, and most important of all: it produced a really
poorly performing database query.
As a result, I opted for rewriting the finder from scratch, instead of
trying to patch the existing code. Instead of trying to reuse as many
existing methods as possible, I opted for defining new methods
specifically meant for the SnippetsFinder. This requires some extra code
here and there, but allows us to have much more control over the
resulting SQL queries. It is these changes that then allow us to produce
a _much_ more efficient query.
To illustrate how bad the old query was, we will use my own snippets as
an example. Currently I have 52 snippets, most of which are global ones.
To retrieve these, you would run the following Ruby code:
user = User.find_by(username: 'yorickpeterse')
SnippetsFinder.new(user, author: user).execute
On GitLab.com the resulting query will take between 10 and 15 seconds to
run, producing the query plan found at
https://explain.depesz.com/s/Y5IX. Apart from the long execution time,
the total number of buffers (the sum of all shared hits) is around 185
GB, though the real number is probably (hopefully) much lower as I doubt
simply summing these numbers produces the true total number of buffers
used.
The new query's plan can be found at https://explain.depesz.com/s/wHdN,
and this query takes between 10 and 100-ish milliseconds to run. The
total number of buffers used is only about 30 MB.
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/52639
2018-10-25 11:35:31 -04:00
|
|
|
it 'returns snippets not associated with any projects' do
|
|
|
|
create(:project_snippet)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
snippet = create(:snippet)
|
2019-10-18 14:06:21 -04:00
|
|
|
snippets = described_class.only_personal_snippets
|
Rewrite SnippetsFinder to improve performance
This completely rewrites the SnippetsFinder class from the ground up in
order to improve its performance. The old code was beyond salvaging. It
was complex, included various Rails 5 workarounds, comments that
shouldn't be necessary, and most important of all: it produced a really
poorly performing database query.
As a result, I opted for rewriting the finder from scratch, instead of
trying to patch the existing code. Instead of trying to reuse as many
existing methods as possible, I opted for defining new methods
specifically meant for the SnippetsFinder. This requires some extra code
here and there, but allows us to have much more control over the
resulting SQL queries. It is these changes that then allow us to produce
a _much_ more efficient query.
To illustrate how bad the old query was, we will use my own snippets as
an example. Currently I have 52 snippets, most of which are global ones.
To retrieve these, you would run the following Ruby code:
user = User.find_by(username: 'yorickpeterse')
SnippetsFinder.new(user, author: user).execute
On GitLab.com the resulting query will take between 10 and 15 seconds to
run, producing the query plan found at
https://explain.depesz.com/s/Y5IX. Apart from the long execution time,
the total number of buffers (the sum of all shared hits) is around 185
GB, though the real number is probably (hopefully) much lower as I doubt
simply summing these numbers produces the true total number of buffers
used.
The new query's plan can be found at https://explain.depesz.com/s/wHdN,
and this query takes between 10 and 100-ish milliseconds to run. The
total number of buffers used is only about 30 MB.
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/52639
2018-10-25 11:35:31 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expect(snippets).to eq([snippet])
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
describe '.only_include_projects_visible_to' do
|
2020-09-11 11:08:30 -04:00
|
|
|
let_it_be(:author) { create(:user) }
|
|
|
|
let_it_be(:project1) { create(:project_empty_repo, :public, namespace: author.namespace) }
|
|
|
|
let_it_be(:project2) { create(:project_empty_repo, :internal, namespace: author.namespace) }
|
|
|
|
let_it_be(:project3) { create(:project_empty_repo, :private, namespace: author.namespace) }
|
|
|
|
let_it_be(:snippet1) { create(:project_snippet, project: project1, author: author) }
|
|
|
|
let_it_be(:snippet2) { create(:project_snippet, project: project2, author: author) }
|
|
|
|
let_it_be(:snippet3) { create(:project_snippet, project: project3, author: author) }
|
Rewrite SnippetsFinder to improve performance
This completely rewrites the SnippetsFinder class from the ground up in
order to improve its performance. The old code was beyond salvaging. It
was complex, included various Rails 5 workarounds, comments that
shouldn't be necessary, and most important of all: it produced a really
poorly performing database query.
As a result, I opted for rewriting the finder from scratch, instead of
trying to patch the existing code. Instead of trying to reuse as many
existing methods as possible, I opted for defining new methods
specifically meant for the SnippetsFinder. This requires some extra code
here and there, but allows us to have much more control over the
resulting SQL queries. It is these changes that then allow us to produce
a _much_ more efficient query.
To illustrate how bad the old query was, we will use my own snippets as
an example. Currently I have 52 snippets, most of which are global ones.
To retrieve these, you would run the following Ruby code:
user = User.find_by(username: 'yorickpeterse')
SnippetsFinder.new(user, author: user).execute
On GitLab.com the resulting query will take between 10 and 15 seconds to
run, producing the query plan found at
https://explain.depesz.com/s/Y5IX. Apart from the long execution time,
the total number of buffers (the sum of all shared hits) is around 185
GB, though the real number is probably (hopefully) much lower as I doubt
simply summing these numbers produces the true total number of buffers
used.
The new query's plan can be found at https://explain.depesz.com/s/wHdN,
and this query takes between 10 and 100-ish milliseconds to run. The
total number of buffers used is only about 30 MB.
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/52639
2018-10-25 11:35:31 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
context 'when a user is provided' do
|
|
|
|
it 'returns snippets visible to the user' do
|
|
|
|
user = create(:user)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
snippets = described_class.only_include_projects_visible_to(user)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expect(snippets).to include(snippet1, snippet2)
|
|
|
|
expect(snippets).not_to include(snippet3)
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
context 'when a user is not provided' do
|
|
|
|
it 'returns snippets visible to anonymous users' do
|
|
|
|
snippets = described_class.only_include_projects_visible_to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expect(snippets).to include(snippet1)
|
|
|
|
expect(snippets).not_to include(snippet2, snippet3)
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
describe 'only_include_projects_with_snippets_enabled' do
|
2020-09-11 11:08:30 -04:00
|
|
|
let_it_be(:project, reload: true) { create(:project_empty_repo) }
|
|
|
|
let_it_be(:snippet) { create(:project_snippet, project: project) }
|
Rewrite SnippetsFinder to improve performance
This completely rewrites the SnippetsFinder class from the ground up in
order to improve its performance. The old code was beyond salvaging. It
was complex, included various Rails 5 workarounds, comments that
shouldn't be necessary, and most important of all: it produced a really
poorly performing database query.
As a result, I opted for rewriting the finder from scratch, instead of
trying to patch the existing code. Instead of trying to reuse as many
existing methods as possible, I opted for defining new methods
specifically meant for the SnippetsFinder. This requires some extra code
here and there, but allows us to have much more control over the
resulting SQL queries. It is these changes that then allow us to produce
a _much_ more efficient query.
To illustrate how bad the old query was, we will use my own snippets as
an example. Currently I have 52 snippets, most of which are global ones.
To retrieve these, you would run the following Ruby code:
user = User.find_by(username: 'yorickpeterse')
SnippetsFinder.new(user, author: user).execute
On GitLab.com the resulting query will take between 10 and 15 seconds to
run, producing the query plan found at
https://explain.depesz.com/s/Y5IX. Apart from the long execution time,
the total number of buffers (the sum of all shared hits) is around 185
GB, though the real number is probably (hopefully) much lower as I doubt
simply summing these numbers produces the true total number of buffers
used.
The new query's plan can be found at https://explain.depesz.com/s/wHdN,
and this query takes between 10 and 100-ish milliseconds to run. The
total number of buffers used is only about 30 MB.
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/52639
2018-10-25 11:35:31 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2020-09-11 11:08:30 -04:00
|
|
|
let(:access_level) { ProjectFeature::ENABLED }
|
Rewrite SnippetsFinder to improve performance
This completely rewrites the SnippetsFinder class from the ground up in
order to improve its performance. The old code was beyond salvaging. It
was complex, included various Rails 5 workarounds, comments that
shouldn't be necessary, and most important of all: it produced a really
poorly performing database query.
As a result, I opted for rewriting the finder from scratch, instead of
trying to patch the existing code. Instead of trying to reuse as many
existing methods as possible, I opted for defining new methods
specifically meant for the SnippetsFinder. This requires some extra code
here and there, but allows us to have much more control over the
resulting SQL queries. It is these changes that then allow us to produce
a _much_ more efficient query.
To illustrate how bad the old query was, we will use my own snippets as
an example. Currently I have 52 snippets, most of which are global ones.
To retrieve these, you would run the following Ruby code:
user = User.find_by(username: 'yorickpeterse')
SnippetsFinder.new(user, author: user).execute
On GitLab.com the resulting query will take between 10 and 15 seconds to
run, producing the query plan found at
https://explain.depesz.com/s/Y5IX. Apart from the long execution time,
the total number of buffers (the sum of all shared hits) is around 185
GB, though the real number is probably (hopefully) much lower as I doubt
simply summing these numbers produces the true total number of buffers
used.
The new query's plan can be found at https://explain.depesz.com/s/wHdN,
and this query takes between 10 and 100-ish milliseconds to run. The
total number of buffers used is only about 30 MB.
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/52639
2018-10-25 11:35:31 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2020-09-11 11:08:30 -04:00
|
|
|
before do
|
|
|
|
project.project_feature.update(snippets_access_level: access_level)
|
Rewrite SnippetsFinder to improve performance
This completely rewrites the SnippetsFinder class from the ground up in
order to improve its performance. The old code was beyond salvaging. It
was complex, included various Rails 5 workarounds, comments that
shouldn't be necessary, and most important of all: it produced a really
poorly performing database query.
As a result, I opted for rewriting the finder from scratch, instead of
trying to patch the existing code. Instead of trying to reuse as many
existing methods as possible, I opted for defining new methods
specifically meant for the SnippetsFinder. This requires some extra code
here and there, but allows us to have much more control over the
resulting SQL queries. It is these changes that then allow us to produce
a _much_ more efficient query.
To illustrate how bad the old query was, we will use my own snippets as
an example. Currently I have 52 snippets, most of which are global ones.
To retrieve these, you would run the following Ruby code:
user = User.find_by(username: 'yorickpeterse')
SnippetsFinder.new(user, author: user).execute
On GitLab.com the resulting query will take between 10 and 15 seconds to
run, producing the query plan found at
https://explain.depesz.com/s/Y5IX. Apart from the long execution time,
the total number of buffers (the sum of all shared hits) is around 185
GB, though the real number is probably (hopefully) much lower as I doubt
simply summing these numbers produces the true total number of buffers
used.
The new query's plan can be found at https://explain.depesz.com/s/wHdN,
and this query takes between 10 and 100-ish milliseconds to run. The
total number of buffers used is only about 30 MB.
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/52639
2018-10-25 11:35:31 -04:00
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
2020-09-11 11:08:30 -04:00
|
|
|
it 'includes snippets for projects with snippets enabled' do
|
|
|
|
snippets = described_class.only_include_projects_with_snippets_enabled
|
Rewrite SnippetsFinder to improve performance
This completely rewrites the SnippetsFinder class from the ground up in
order to improve its performance. The old code was beyond salvaging. It
was complex, included various Rails 5 workarounds, comments that
shouldn't be necessary, and most important of all: it produced a really
poorly performing database query.
As a result, I opted for rewriting the finder from scratch, instead of
trying to patch the existing code. Instead of trying to reuse as many
existing methods as possible, I opted for defining new methods
specifically meant for the SnippetsFinder. This requires some extra code
here and there, but allows us to have much more control over the
resulting SQL queries. It is these changes that then allow us to produce
a _much_ more efficient query.
To illustrate how bad the old query was, we will use my own snippets as
an example. Currently I have 52 snippets, most of which are global ones.
To retrieve these, you would run the following Ruby code:
user = User.find_by(username: 'yorickpeterse')
SnippetsFinder.new(user, author: user).execute
On GitLab.com the resulting query will take between 10 and 15 seconds to
run, producing the query plan found at
https://explain.depesz.com/s/Y5IX. Apart from the long execution time,
the total number of buffers (the sum of all shared hits) is around 185
GB, though the real number is probably (hopefully) much lower as I doubt
simply summing these numbers produces the true total number of buffers
used.
The new query's plan can be found at https://explain.depesz.com/s/wHdN,
and this query takes between 10 and 100-ish milliseconds to run. The
total number of buffers used is only about 30 MB.
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/52639
2018-10-25 11:35:31 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2020-09-11 11:08:30 -04:00
|
|
|
expect(snippets).to eq([snippet])
|
|
|
|
end
|
Rewrite SnippetsFinder to improve performance
This completely rewrites the SnippetsFinder class from the ground up in
order to improve its performance. The old code was beyond salvaging. It
was complex, included various Rails 5 workarounds, comments that
shouldn't be necessary, and most important of all: it produced a really
poorly performing database query.
As a result, I opted for rewriting the finder from scratch, instead of
trying to patch the existing code. Instead of trying to reuse as many
existing methods as possible, I opted for defining new methods
specifically meant for the SnippetsFinder. This requires some extra code
here and there, but allows us to have much more control over the
resulting SQL queries. It is these changes that then allow us to produce
a _much_ more efficient query.
To illustrate how bad the old query was, we will use my own snippets as
an example. Currently I have 52 snippets, most of which are global ones.
To retrieve these, you would run the following Ruby code:
user = User.find_by(username: 'yorickpeterse')
SnippetsFinder.new(user, author: user).execute
On GitLab.com the resulting query will take between 10 and 15 seconds to
run, producing the query plan found at
https://explain.depesz.com/s/Y5IX. Apart from the long execution time,
the total number of buffers (the sum of all shared hits) is around 185
GB, though the real number is probably (hopefully) much lower as I doubt
simply summing these numbers produces the true total number of buffers
used.
The new query's plan can be found at https://explain.depesz.com/s/wHdN,
and this query takes between 10 and 100-ish milliseconds to run. The
total number of buffers used is only about 30 MB.
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/52639
2018-10-25 11:35:31 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2020-09-11 11:08:30 -04:00
|
|
|
context 'when snippet_access_level is private' do
|
|
|
|
let(:access_level) { ProjectFeature::PRIVATE }
|
Rewrite SnippetsFinder to improve performance
This completely rewrites the SnippetsFinder class from the ground up in
order to improve its performance. The old code was beyond salvaging. It
was complex, included various Rails 5 workarounds, comments that
shouldn't be necessary, and most important of all: it produced a really
poorly performing database query.
As a result, I opted for rewriting the finder from scratch, instead of
trying to patch the existing code. Instead of trying to reuse as many
existing methods as possible, I opted for defining new methods
specifically meant for the SnippetsFinder. This requires some extra code
here and there, but allows us to have much more control over the
resulting SQL queries. It is these changes that then allow us to produce
a _much_ more efficient query.
To illustrate how bad the old query was, we will use my own snippets as
an example. Currently I have 52 snippets, most of which are global ones.
To retrieve these, you would run the following Ruby code:
user = User.find_by(username: 'yorickpeterse')
SnippetsFinder.new(user, author: user).execute
On GitLab.com the resulting query will take between 10 and 15 seconds to
run, producing the query plan found at
https://explain.depesz.com/s/Y5IX. Apart from the long execution time,
the total number of buffers (the sum of all shared hits) is around 185
GB, though the real number is probably (hopefully) much lower as I doubt
simply summing these numbers produces the true total number of buffers
used.
The new query's plan can be found at https://explain.depesz.com/s/wHdN,
and this query takes between 10 and 100-ish milliseconds to run. The
total number of buffers used is only about 30 MB.
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/52639
2018-10-25 11:35:31 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2020-09-11 11:08:30 -04:00
|
|
|
context 'when the include_private option is enabled' do
|
|
|
|
it 'includes snippets for projects with snippets set to private' do
|
|
|
|
snippets = described_class.only_include_projects_with_snippets_enabled(include_private: true)
|
Rewrite SnippetsFinder to improve performance
This completely rewrites the SnippetsFinder class from the ground up in
order to improve its performance. The old code was beyond salvaging. It
was complex, included various Rails 5 workarounds, comments that
shouldn't be necessary, and most important of all: it produced a really
poorly performing database query.
As a result, I opted for rewriting the finder from scratch, instead of
trying to patch the existing code. Instead of trying to reuse as many
existing methods as possible, I opted for defining new methods
specifically meant for the SnippetsFinder. This requires some extra code
here and there, but allows us to have much more control over the
resulting SQL queries. It is these changes that then allow us to produce
a _much_ more efficient query.
To illustrate how bad the old query was, we will use my own snippets as
an example. Currently I have 52 snippets, most of which are global ones.
To retrieve these, you would run the following Ruby code:
user = User.find_by(username: 'yorickpeterse')
SnippetsFinder.new(user, author: user).execute
On GitLab.com the resulting query will take between 10 and 15 seconds to
run, producing the query plan found at
https://explain.depesz.com/s/Y5IX. Apart from the long execution time,
the total number of buffers (the sum of all shared hits) is around 185
GB, though the real number is probably (hopefully) much lower as I doubt
simply summing these numbers produces the true total number of buffers
used.
The new query's plan can be found at https://explain.depesz.com/s/wHdN,
and this query takes between 10 and 100-ish milliseconds to run. The
total number of buffers used is only about 30 MB.
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/52639
2018-10-25 11:35:31 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2020-09-11 11:08:30 -04:00
|
|
|
expect(snippets).to eq([snippet])
|
|
|
|
end
|
Rewrite SnippetsFinder to improve performance
This completely rewrites the SnippetsFinder class from the ground up in
order to improve its performance. The old code was beyond salvaging. It
was complex, included various Rails 5 workarounds, comments that
shouldn't be necessary, and most important of all: it produced a really
poorly performing database query.
As a result, I opted for rewriting the finder from scratch, instead of
trying to patch the existing code. Instead of trying to reuse as many
existing methods as possible, I opted for defining new methods
specifically meant for the SnippetsFinder. This requires some extra code
here and there, but allows us to have much more control over the
resulting SQL queries. It is these changes that then allow us to produce
a _much_ more efficient query.
To illustrate how bad the old query was, we will use my own snippets as
an example. Currently I have 52 snippets, most of which are global ones.
To retrieve these, you would run the following Ruby code:
user = User.find_by(username: 'yorickpeterse')
SnippetsFinder.new(user, author: user).execute
On GitLab.com the resulting query will take between 10 and 15 seconds to
run, producing the query plan found at
https://explain.depesz.com/s/Y5IX. Apart from the long execution time,
the total number of buffers (the sum of all shared hits) is around 185
GB, though the real number is probably (hopefully) much lower as I doubt
simply summing these numbers produces the true total number of buffers
used.
The new query's plan can be found at https://explain.depesz.com/s/wHdN,
and this query takes between 10 and 100-ish milliseconds to run. The
total number of buffers used is only about 30 MB.
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/52639
2018-10-25 11:35:31 -04:00
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
2020-09-11 11:08:30 -04:00
|
|
|
context 'when the include_private option is not enabled' do
|
|
|
|
it 'does not include snippets for projects that have snippets set to private' do
|
|
|
|
snippets = described_class.only_include_projects_with_snippets_enabled
|
Rewrite SnippetsFinder to improve performance
This completely rewrites the SnippetsFinder class from the ground up in
order to improve its performance. The old code was beyond salvaging. It
was complex, included various Rails 5 workarounds, comments that
shouldn't be necessary, and most important of all: it produced a really
poorly performing database query.
As a result, I opted for rewriting the finder from scratch, instead of
trying to patch the existing code. Instead of trying to reuse as many
existing methods as possible, I opted for defining new methods
specifically meant for the SnippetsFinder. This requires some extra code
here and there, but allows us to have much more control over the
resulting SQL queries. It is these changes that then allow us to produce
a _much_ more efficient query.
To illustrate how bad the old query was, we will use my own snippets as
an example. Currently I have 52 snippets, most of which are global ones.
To retrieve these, you would run the following Ruby code:
user = User.find_by(username: 'yorickpeterse')
SnippetsFinder.new(user, author: user).execute
On GitLab.com the resulting query will take between 10 and 15 seconds to
run, producing the query plan found at
https://explain.depesz.com/s/Y5IX. Apart from the long execution time,
the total number of buffers (the sum of all shared hits) is around 185
GB, though the real number is probably (hopefully) much lower as I doubt
simply summing these numbers produces the true total number of buffers
used.
The new query's plan can be found at https://explain.depesz.com/s/wHdN,
and this query takes between 10 and 100-ish milliseconds to run. The
total number of buffers used is only about 30 MB.
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/52639
2018-10-25 11:35:31 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2020-09-11 11:08:30 -04:00
|
|
|
expect(snippets).to be_empty
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
Rewrite SnippetsFinder to improve performance
This completely rewrites the SnippetsFinder class from the ground up in
order to improve its performance. The old code was beyond salvaging. It
was complex, included various Rails 5 workarounds, comments that
shouldn't be necessary, and most important of all: it produced a really
poorly performing database query.
As a result, I opted for rewriting the finder from scratch, instead of
trying to patch the existing code. Instead of trying to reuse as many
existing methods as possible, I opted for defining new methods
specifically meant for the SnippetsFinder. This requires some extra code
here and there, but allows us to have much more control over the
resulting SQL queries. It is these changes that then allow us to produce
a _much_ more efficient query.
To illustrate how bad the old query was, we will use my own snippets as
an example. Currently I have 52 snippets, most of which are global ones.
To retrieve these, you would run the following Ruby code:
user = User.find_by(username: 'yorickpeterse')
SnippetsFinder.new(user, author: user).execute
On GitLab.com the resulting query will take between 10 and 15 seconds to
run, producing the query plan found at
https://explain.depesz.com/s/Y5IX. Apart from the long execution time,
the total number of buffers (the sum of all shared hits) is around 185
GB, though the real number is probably (hopefully) much lower as I doubt
simply summing these numbers produces the true total number of buffers
used.
The new query's plan can be found at https://explain.depesz.com/s/wHdN,
and this query takes between 10 and 100-ish milliseconds to run. The
total number of buffers used is only about 30 MB.
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/52639
2018-10-25 11:35:31 -04:00
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
describe '.only_include_authorized_projects' do
|
|
|
|
it 'only includes snippets for projects the user is authorized to see' do
|
|
|
|
user = create(:user)
|
2020-09-11 11:08:30 -04:00
|
|
|
project1 = create(:project_empty_repo, :private)
|
|
|
|
project2 = create(:project_empty_repo, :private)
|
Rewrite SnippetsFinder to improve performance
This completely rewrites the SnippetsFinder class from the ground up in
order to improve its performance. The old code was beyond salvaging. It
was complex, included various Rails 5 workarounds, comments that
shouldn't be necessary, and most important of all: it produced a really
poorly performing database query.
As a result, I opted for rewriting the finder from scratch, instead of
trying to patch the existing code. Instead of trying to reuse as many
existing methods as possible, I opted for defining new methods
specifically meant for the SnippetsFinder. This requires some extra code
here and there, but allows us to have much more control over the
resulting SQL queries. It is these changes that then allow us to produce
a _much_ more efficient query.
To illustrate how bad the old query was, we will use my own snippets as
an example. Currently I have 52 snippets, most of which are global ones.
To retrieve these, you would run the following Ruby code:
user = User.find_by(username: 'yorickpeterse')
SnippetsFinder.new(user, author: user).execute
On GitLab.com the resulting query will take between 10 and 15 seconds to
run, producing the query plan found at
https://explain.depesz.com/s/Y5IX. Apart from the long execution time,
the total number of buffers (the sum of all shared hits) is around 185
GB, though the real number is probably (hopefully) much lower as I doubt
simply summing these numbers produces the true total number of buffers
used.
The new query's plan can be found at https://explain.depesz.com/s/wHdN,
and this query takes between 10 and 100-ish milliseconds to run. The
total number of buffers used is only about 30 MB.
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/52639
2018-10-25 11:35:31 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
project1.team.add_developer(user)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
create(:project_snippet, project: project2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
snippet = create(:project_snippet, project: project1)
|
|
|
|
snippets = described_class.only_include_authorized_projects(user)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expect(snippets).to eq([snippet])
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
describe '.for_project_with_user' do
|
2020-09-11 11:08:30 -04:00
|
|
|
let_it_be(:public_project) { create(:project_empty_repo, :public) }
|
|
|
|
let_it_be(:private_project) { create(:project_empty_repo, :private) }
|
Rewrite SnippetsFinder to improve performance
This completely rewrites the SnippetsFinder class from the ground up in
order to improve its performance. The old code was beyond salvaging. It
was complex, included various Rails 5 workarounds, comments that
shouldn't be necessary, and most important of all: it produced a really
poorly performing database query.
As a result, I opted for rewriting the finder from scratch, instead of
trying to patch the existing code. Instead of trying to reuse as many
existing methods as possible, I opted for defining new methods
specifically meant for the SnippetsFinder. This requires some extra code
here and there, but allows us to have much more control over the
resulting SQL queries. It is these changes that then allow us to produce
a _much_ more efficient query.
To illustrate how bad the old query was, we will use my own snippets as
an example. Currently I have 52 snippets, most of which are global ones.
To retrieve these, you would run the following Ruby code:
user = User.find_by(username: 'yorickpeterse')
SnippetsFinder.new(user, author: user).execute
On GitLab.com the resulting query will take between 10 and 15 seconds to
run, producing the query plan found at
https://explain.depesz.com/s/Y5IX. Apart from the long execution time,
the total number of buffers (the sum of all shared hits) is around 185
GB, though the real number is probably (hopefully) much lower as I doubt
simply summing these numbers produces the true total number of buffers
used.
The new query's plan can be found at https://explain.depesz.com/s/wHdN,
and this query takes between 10 and 100-ish milliseconds to run. The
total number of buffers used is only about 30 MB.
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/52639
2018-10-25 11:35:31 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2020-09-11 11:08:30 -04:00
|
|
|
context 'when a user is provided' do
|
|
|
|
let_it_be(:user) { create(:user) }
|
Rewrite SnippetsFinder to improve performance
This completely rewrites the SnippetsFinder class from the ground up in
order to improve its performance. The old code was beyond salvaging. It
was complex, included various Rails 5 workarounds, comments that
shouldn't be necessary, and most important of all: it produced a really
poorly performing database query.
As a result, I opted for rewriting the finder from scratch, instead of
trying to patch the existing code. Instead of trying to reuse as many
existing methods as possible, I opted for defining new methods
specifically meant for the SnippetsFinder. This requires some extra code
here and there, but allows us to have much more control over the
resulting SQL queries. It is these changes that then allow us to produce
a _much_ more efficient query.
To illustrate how bad the old query was, we will use my own snippets as
an example. Currently I have 52 snippets, most of which are global ones.
To retrieve these, you would run the following Ruby code:
user = User.find_by(username: 'yorickpeterse')
SnippetsFinder.new(user, author: user).execute
On GitLab.com the resulting query will take between 10 and 15 seconds to
run, producing the query plan found at
https://explain.depesz.com/s/Y5IX. Apart from the long execution time,
the total number of buffers (the sum of all shared hits) is around 185
GB, though the real number is probably (hopefully) much lower as I doubt
simply summing these numbers produces the true total number of buffers
used.
The new query's plan can be found at https://explain.depesz.com/s/wHdN,
and this query takes between 10 and 100-ish milliseconds to run. The
total number of buffers used is only about 30 MB.
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/52639
2018-10-25 11:35:31 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2020-09-11 11:08:30 -04:00
|
|
|
it 'returns an empty collection if the user can not view the snippets' do
|
|
|
|
create(:project_snippet, :public, project: private_project)
|
Rewrite SnippetsFinder to improve performance
This completely rewrites the SnippetsFinder class from the ground up in
order to improve its performance. The old code was beyond salvaging. It
was complex, included various Rails 5 workarounds, comments that
shouldn't be necessary, and most important of all: it produced a really
poorly performing database query.
As a result, I opted for rewriting the finder from scratch, instead of
trying to patch the existing code. Instead of trying to reuse as many
existing methods as possible, I opted for defining new methods
specifically meant for the SnippetsFinder. This requires some extra code
here and there, but allows us to have much more control over the
resulting SQL queries. It is these changes that then allow us to produce
a _much_ more efficient query.
To illustrate how bad the old query was, we will use my own snippets as
an example. Currently I have 52 snippets, most of which are global ones.
To retrieve these, you would run the following Ruby code:
user = User.find_by(username: 'yorickpeterse')
SnippetsFinder.new(user, author: user).execute
On GitLab.com the resulting query will take between 10 and 15 seconds to
run, producing the query plan found at
https://explain.depesz.com/s/Y5IX. Apart from the long execution time,
the total number of buffers (the sum of all shared hits) is around 185
GB, though the real number is probably (hopefully) much lower as I doubt
simply summing these numbers produces the true total number of buffers
used.
The new query's plan can be found at https://explain.depesz.com/s/wHdN,
and this query takes between 10 and 100-ish milliseconds to run. The
total number of buffers used is only about 30 MB.
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/52639
2018-10-25 11:35:31 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2020-09-11 11:08:30 -04:00
|
|
|
expect(described_class.for_project_with_user(private_project, user)).to be_empty
|
Rewrite SnippetsFinder to improve performance
This completely rewrites the SnippetsFinder class from the ground up in
order to improve its performance. The old code was beyond salvaging. It
was complex, included various Rails 5 workarounds, comments that
shouldn't be necessary, and most important of all: it produced a really
poorly performing database query.
As a result, I opted for rewriting the finder from scratch, instead of
trying to patch the existing code. Instead of trying to reuse as many
existing methods as possible, I opted for defining new methods
specifically meant for the SnippetsFinder. This requires some extra code
here and there, but allows us to have much more control over the
resulting SQL queries. It is these changes that then allow us to produce
a _much_ more efficient query.
To illustrate how bad the old query was, we will use my own snippets as
an example. Currently I have 52 snippets, most of which are global ones.
To retrieve these, you would run the following Ruby code:
user = User.find_by(username: 'yorickpeterse')
SnippetsFinder.new(user, author: user).execute
On GitLab.com the resulting query will take between 10 and 15 seconds to
run, producing the query plan found at
https://explain.depesz.com/s/Y5IX. Apart from the long execution time,
the total number of buffers (the sum of all shared hits) is around 185
GB, though the real number is probably (hopefully) much lower as I doubt
simply summing these numbers produces the true total number of buffers
used.
The new query's plan can be found at https://explain.depesz.com/s/wHdN,
and this query takes between 10 and 100-ish milliseconds to run. The
total number of buffers used is only about 30 MB.
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/52639
2018-10-25 11:35:31 -04:00
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it 'returns the snippets if the user is a member of the project' do
|
2020-09-11 11:08:30 -04:00
|
|
|
snippet = create(:project_snippet, project: private_project)
|
Rewrite SnippetsFinder to improve performance
This completely rewrites the SnippetsFinder class from the ground up in
order to improve its performance. The old code was beyond salvaging. It
was complex, included various Rails 5 workarounds, comments that
shouldn't be necessary, and most important of all: it produced a really
poorly performing database query.
As a result, I opted for rewriting the finder from scratch, instead of
trying to patch the existing code. Instead of trying to reuse as many
existing methods as possible, I opted for defining new methods
specifically meant for the SnippetsFinder. This requires some extra code
here and there, but allows us to have much more control over the
resulting SQL queries. It is these changes that then allow us to produce
a _much_ more efficient query.
To illustrate how bad the old query was, we will use my own snippets as
an example. Currently I have 52 snippets, most of which are global ones.
To retrieve these, you would run the following Ruby code:
user = User.find_by(username: 'yorickpeterse')
SnippetsFinder.new(user, author: user).execute
On GitLab.com the resulting query will take between 10 and 15 seconds to
run, producing the query plan found at
https://explain.depesz.com/s/Y5IX. Apart from the long execution time,
the total number of buffers (the sum of all shared hits) is around 185
GB, though the real number is probably (hopefully) much lower as I doubt
simply summing these numbers produces the true total number of buffers
used.
The new query's plan can be found at https://explain.depesz.com/s/wHdN,
and this query takes between 10 and 100-ish milliseconds to run. The
total number of buffers used is only about 30 MB.
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/52639
2018-10-25 11:35:31 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2020-09-11 11:08:30 -04:00
|
|
|
private_project.team.add_developer(user)
|
Rewrite SnippetsFinder to improve performance
This completely rewrites the SnippetsFinder class from the ground up in
order to improve its performance. The old code was beyond salvaging. It
was complex, included various Rails 5 workarounds, comments that
shouldn't be necessary, and most important of all: it produced a really
poorly performing database query.
As a result, I opted for rewriting the finder from scratch, instead of
trying to patch the existing code. Instead of trying to reuse as many
existing methods as possible, I opted for defining new methods
specifically meant for the SnippetsFinder. This requires some extra code
here and there, but allows us to have much more control over the
resulting SQL queries. It is these changes that then allow us to produce
a _much_ more efficient query.
To illustrate how bad the old query was, we will use my own snippets as
an example. Currently I have 52 snippets, most of which are global ones.
To retrieve these, you would run the following Ruby code:
user = User.find_by(username: 'yorickpeterse')
SnippetsFinder.new(user, author: user).execute
On GitLab.com the resulting query will take between 10 and 15 seconds to
run, producing the query plan found at
https://explain.depesz.com/s/Y5IX. Apart from the long execution time,
the total number of buffers (the sum of all shared hits) is around 185
GB, though the real number is probably (hopefully) much lower as I doubt
simply summing these numbers produces the true total number of buffers
used.
The new query's plan can be found at https://explain.depesz.com/s/wHdN,
and this query takes between 10 and 100-ish milliseconds to run. The
total number of buffers used is only about 30 MB.
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/52639
2018-10-25 11:35:31 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2020-09-11 11:08:30 -04:00
|
|
|
snippets = described_class.for_project_with_user(private_project, user)
|
Rewrite SnippetsFinder to improve performance
This completely rewrites the SnippetsFinder class from the ground up in
order to improve its performance. The old code was beyond salvaging. It
was complex, included various Rails 5 workarounds, comments that
shouldn't be necessary, and most important of all: it produced a really
poorly performing database query.
As a result, I opted for rewriting the finder from scratch, instead of
trying to patch the existing code. Instead of trying to reuse as many
existing methods as possible, I opted for defining new methods
specifically meant for the SnippetsFinder. This requires some extra code
here and there, but allows us to have much more control over the
resulting SQL queries. It is these changes that then allow us to produce
a _much_ more efficient query.
To illustrate how bad the old query was, we will use my own snippets as
an example. Currently I have 52 snippets, most of which are global ones.
To retrieve these, you would run the following Ruby code:
user = User.find_by(username: 'yorickpeterse')
SnippetsFinder.new(user, author: user).execute
On GitLab.com the resulting query will take between 10 and 15 seconds to
run, producing the query plan found at
https://explain.depesz.com/s/Y5IX. Apart from the long execution time,
the total number of buffers (the sum of all shared hits) is around 185
GB, though the real number is probably (hopefully) much lower as I doubt
simply summing these numbers produces the true total number of buffers
used.
The new query's plan can be found at https://explain.depesz.com/s/wHdN,
and this query takes between 10 and 100-ish milliseconds to run. The
total number of buffers used is only about 30 MB.
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/52639
2018-10-25 11:35:31 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expect(snippets).to eq([snippet])
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it 'returns public snippets for a public project the user is not a member of' do
|
2020-09-11 11:08:30 -04:00
|
|
|
snippet = create(:project_snippet, :public, project: public_project)
|
Rewrite SnippetsFinder to improve performance
This completely rewrites the SnippetsFinder class from the ground up in
order to improve its performance. The old code was beyond salvaging. It
was complex, included various Rails 5 workarounds, comments that
shouldn't be necessary, and most important of all: it produced a really
poorly performing database query.
As a result, I opted for rewriting the finder from scratch, instead of
trying to patch the existing code. Instead of trying to reuse as many
existing methods as possible, I opted for defining new methods
specifically meant for the SnippetsFinder. This requires some extra code
here and there, but allows us to have much more control over the
resulting SQL queries. It is these changes that then allow us to produce
a _much_ more efficient query.
To illustrate how bad the old query was, we will use my own snippets as
an example. Currently I have 52 snippets, most of which are global ones.
To retrieve these, you would run the following Ruby code:
user = User.find_by(username: 'yorickpeterse')
SnippetsFinder.new(user, author: user).execute
On GitLab.com the resulting query will take between 10 and 15 seconds to
run, producing the query plan found at
https://explain.depesz.com/s/Y5IX. Apart from the long execution time,
the total number of buffers (the sum of all shared hits) is around 185
GB, though the real number is probably (hopefully) much lower as I doubt
simply summing these numbers produces the true total number of buffers
used.
The new query's plan can be found at https://explain.depesz.com/s/wHdN,
and this query takes between 10 and 100-ish milliseconds to run. The
total number of buffers used is only about 30 MB.
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/52639
2018-10-25 11:35:31 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2020-09-11 11:08:30 -04:00
|
|
|
create(:project_snippet, :private, project: public_project)
|
Rewrite SnippetsFinder to improve performance
This completely rewrites the SnippetsFinder class from the ground up in
order to improve its performance. The old code was beyond salvaging. It
was complex, included various Rails 5 workarounds, comments that
shouldn't be necessary, and most important of all: it produced a really
poorly performing database query.
As a result, I opted for rewriting the finder from scratch, instead of
trying to patch the existing code. Instead of trying to reuse as many
existing methods as possible, I opted for defining new methods
specifically meant for the SnippetsFinder. This requires some extra code
here and there, but allows us to have much more control over the
resulting SQL queries. It is these changes that then allow us to produce
a _much_ more efficient query.
To illustrate how bad the old query was, we will use my own snippets as
an example. Currently I have 52 snippets, most of which are global ones.
To retrieve these, you would run the following Ruby code:
user = User.find_by(username: 'yorickpeterse')
SnippetsFinder.new(user, author: user).execute
On GitLab.com the resulting query will take between 10 and 15 seconds to
run, producing the query plan found at
https://explain.depesz.com/s/Y5IX. Apart from the long execution time,
the total number of buffers (the sum of all shared hits) is around 185
GB, though the real number is probably (hopefully) much lower as I doubt
simply summing these numbers produces the true total number of buffers
used.
The new query's plan can be found at https://explain.depesz.com/s/wHdN,
and this query takes between 10 and 100-ish milliseconds to run. The
total number of buffers used is only about 30 MB.
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/52639
2018-10-25 11:35:31 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2020-09-11 11:08:30 -04:00
|
|
|
snippets = described_class.for_project_with_user(public_project, user)
|
Rewrite SnippetsFinder to improve performance
This completely rewrites the SnippetsFinder class from the ground up in
order to improve its performance. The old code was beyond salvaging. It
was complex, included various Rails 5 workarounds, comments that
shouldn't be necessary, and most important of all: it produced a really
poorly performing database query.
As a result, I opted for rewriting the finder from scratch, instead of
trying to patch the existing code. Instead of trying to reuse as many
existing methods as possible, I opted for defining new methods
specifically meant for the SnippetsFinder. This requires some extra code
here and there, but allows us to have much more control over the
resulting SQL queries. It is these changes that then allow us to produce
a _much_ more efficient query.
To illustrate how bad the old query was, we will use my own snippets as
an example. Currently I have 52 snippets, most of which are global ones.
To retrieve these, you would run the following Ruby code:
user = User.find_by(username: 'yorickpeterse')
SnippetsFinder.new(user, author: user).execute
On GitLab.com the resulting query will take between 10 and 15 seconds to
run, producing the query plan found at
https://explain.depesz.com/s/Y5IX. Apart from the long execution time,
the total number of buffers (the sum of all shared hits) is around 185
GB, though the real number is probably (hopefully) much lower as I doubt
simply summing these numbers produces the true total number of buffers
used.
The new query's plan can be found at https://explain.depesz.com/s/wHdN,
and this query takes between 10 and 100-ish milliseconds to run. The
total number of buffers used is only about 30 MB.
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/52639
2018-10-25 11:35:31 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expect(snippets).to eq([snippet])
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
context 'when a user is not provided' do
|
|
|
|
it 'returns an empty collection for a private project' do
|
2020-09-11 11:08:30 -04:00
|
|
|
create(:project_snippet, :public, project: private_project)
|
Rewrite SnippetsFinder to improve performance
This completely rewrites the SnippetsFinder class from the ground up in
order to improve its performance. The old code was beyond salvaging. It
was complex, included various Rails 5 workarounds, comments that
shouldn't be necessary, and most important of all: it produced a really
poorly performing database query.
As a result, I opted for rewriting the finder from scratch, instead of
trying to patch the existing code. Instead of trying to reuse as many
existing methods as possible, I opted for defining new methods
specifically meant for the SnippetsFinder. This requires some extra code
here and there, but allows us to have much more control over the
resulting SQL queries. It is these changes that then allow us to produce
a _much_ more efficient query.
To illustrate how bad the old query was, we will use my own snippets as
an example. Currently I have 52 snippets, most of which are global ones.
To retrieve these, you would run the following Ruby code:
user = User.find_by(username: 'yorickpeterse')
SnippetsFinder.new(user, author: user).execute
On GitLab.com the resulting query will take between 10 and 15 seconds to
run, producing the query plan found at
https://explain.depesz.com/s/Y5IX. Apart from the long execution time,
the total number of buffers (the sum of all shared hits) is around 185
GB, though the real number is probably (hopefully) much lower as I doubt
simply summing these numbers produces the true total number of buffers
used.
The new query's plan can be found at https://explain.depesz.com/s/wHdN,
and this query takes between 10 and 100-ish milliseconds to run. The
total number of buffers used is only about 30 MB.
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/52639
2018-10-25 11:35:31 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2020-09-11 11:08:30 -04:00
|
|
|
expect(described_class.for_project_with_user(private_project)).to be_empty
|
Rewrite SnippetsFinder to improve performance
This completely rewrites the SnippetsFinder class from the ground up in
order to improve its performance. The old code was beyond salvaging. It
was complex, included various Rails 5 workarounds, comments that
shouldn't be necessary, and most important of all: it produced a really
poorly performing database query.
As a result, I opted for rewriting the finder from scratch, instead of
trying to patch the existing code. Instead of trying to reuse as many
existing methods as possible, I opted for defining new methods
specifically meant for the SnippetsFinder. This requires some extra code
here and there, but allows us to have much more control over the
resulting SQL queries. It is these changes that then allow us to produce
a _much_ more efficient query.
To illustrate how bad the old query was, we will use my own snippets as
an example. Currently I have 52 snippets, most of which are global ones.
To retrieve these, you would run the following Ruby code:
user = User.find_by(username: 'yorickpeterse')
SnippetsFinder.new(user, author: user).execute
On GitLab.com the resulting query will take between 10 and 15 seconds to
run, producing the query plan found at
https://explain.depesz.com/s/Y5IX. Apart from the long execution time,
the total number of buffers (the sum of all shared hits) is around 185
GB, though the real number is probably (hopefully) much lower as I doubt
simply summing these numbers produces the true total number of buffers
used.
The new query's plan can be found at https://explain.depesz.com/s/wHdN,
and this query takes between 10 and 100-ish milliseconds to run. The
total number of buffers used is only about 30 MB.
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/52639
2018-10-25 11:35:31 -04:00
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it 'returns public snippets for a public project' do
|
2020-09-11 11:08:30 -04:00
|
|
|
snippet = create(:project_snippet, :public, project: public_project)
|
Rewrite SnippetsFinder to improve performance
This completely rewrites the SnippetsFinder class from the ground up in
order to improve its performance. The old code was beyond salvaging. It
was complex, included various Rails 5 workarounds, comments that
shouldn't be necessary, and most important of all: it produced a really
poorly performing database query.
As a result, I opted for rewriting the finder from scratch, instead of
trying to patch the existing code. Instead of trying to reuse as many
existing methods as possible, I opted for defining new methods
specifically meant for the SnippetsFinder. This requires some extra code
here and there, but allows us to have much more control over the
resulting SQL queries. It is these changes that then allow us to produce
a _much_ more efficient query.
To illustrate how bad the old query was, we will use my own snippets as
an example. Currently I have 52 snippets, most of which are global ones.
To retrieve these, you would run the following Ruby code:
user = User.find_by(username: 'yorickpeterse')
SnippetsFinder.new(user, author: user).execute
On GitLab.com the resulting query will take between 10 and 15 seconds to
run, producing the query plan found at
https://explain.depesz.com/s/Y5IX. Apart from the long execution time,
the total number of buffers (the sum of all shared hits) is around 185
GB, though the real number is probably (hopefully) much lower as I doubt
simply summing these numbers produces the true total number of buffers
used.
The new query's plan can be found at https://explain.depesz.com/s/wHdN,
and this query takes between 10 and 100-ish milliseconds to run. The
total number of buffers used is only about 30 MB.
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/52639
2018-10-25 11:35:31 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2020-09-11 11:08:30 -04:00
|
|
|
create(:project_snippet, :private, project: public_project)
|
Rewrite SnippetsFinder to improve performance
This completely rewrites the SnippetsFinder class from the ground up in
order to improve its performance. The old code was beyond salvaging. It
was complex, included various Rails 5 workarounds, comments that
shouldn't be necessary, and most important of all: it produced a really
poorly performing database query.
As a result, I opted for rewriting the finder from scratch, instead of
trying to patch the existing code. Instead of trying to reuse as many
existing methods as possible, I opted for defining new methods
specifically meant for the SnippetsFinder. This requires some extra code
here and there, but allows us to have much more control over the
resulting SQL queries. It is these changes that then allow us to produce
a _much_ more efficient query.
To illustrate how bad the old query was, we will use my own snippets as
an example. Currently I have 52 snippets, most of which are global ones.
To retrieve these, you would run the following Ruby code:
user = User.find_by(username: 'yorickpeterse')
SnippetsFinder.new(user, author: user).execute
On GitLab.com the resulting query will take between 10 and 15 seconds to
run, producing the query plan found at
https://explain.depesz.com/s/Y5IX. Apart from the long execution time,
the total number of buffers (the sum of all shared hits) is around 185
GB, though the real number is probably (hopefully) much lower as I doubt
simply summing these numbers produces the true total number of buffers
used.
The new query's plan can be found at https://explain.depesz.com/s/wHdN,
and this query takes between 10 and 100-ish milliseconds to run. The
total number of buffers used is only about 30 MB.
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/52639
2018-10-25 11:35:31 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2020-09-11 11:08:30 -04:00
|
|
|
snippets = described_class.for_project_with_user(public_project)
|
Rewrite SnippetsFinder to improve performance
This completely rewrites the SnippetsFinder class from the ground up in
order to improve its performance. The old code was beyond salvaging. It
was complex, included various Rails 5 workarounds, comments that
shouldn't be necessary, and most important of all: it produced a really
poorly performing database query.
As a result, I opted for rewriting the finder from scratch, instead of
trying to patch the existing code. Instead of trying to reuse as many
existing methods as possible, I opted for defining new methods
specifically meant for the SnippetsFinder. This requires some extra code
here and there, but allows us to have much more control over the
resulting SQL queries. It is these changes that then allow us to produce
a _much_ more efficient query.
To illustrate how bad the old query was, we will use my own snippets as
an example. Currently I have 52 snippets, most of which are global ones.
To retrieve these, you would run the following Ruby code:
user = User.find_by(username: 'yorickpeterse')
SnippetsFinder.new(user, author: user).execute
On GitLab.com the resulting query will take between 10 and 15 seconds to
run, producing the query plan found at
https://explain.depesz.com/s/Y5IX. Apart from the long execution time,
the total number of buffers (the sum of all shared hits) is around 185
GB, though the real number is probably (hopefully) much lower as I doubt
simply summing these numbers produces the true total number of buffers
used.
The new query's plan can be found at https://explain.depesz.com/s/wHdN,
and this query takes between 10 and 100-ish milliseconds to run. The
total number of buffers used is only about 30 MB.
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/52639
2018-10-25 11:35:31 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expect(snippets).to eq([snippet])
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
describe '.visible_to_or_authored_by' do
|
|
|
|
it 'returns snippets visible to the user' do
|
|
|
|
user = create(:user)
|
|
|
|
snippet1 = create(:snippet, :public)
|
|
|
|
snippet2 = create(:snippet, :private, author: user)
|
|
|
|
snippet3 = create(:snippet, :private)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
snippets = described_class.visible_to_or_authored_by(user)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expect(snippets).to include(snippet1, snippet2)
|
|
|
|
expect(snippets).not_to include(snippet3)
|
|
|
|
end
|
2016-03-01 06:51:01 -05:00
|
|
|
end
|
2016-06-22 16:44:24 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2016-05-26 07:38:28 -04:00
|
|
|
describe '#participants' do
|
2020-09-11 11:08:30 -04:00
|
|
|
let_it_be(:project) { create(:project, :public) }
|
|
|
|
let_it_be(:snippet) { create(:snippet, content: 'foo', project: project) }
|
2016-05-26 07:38:28 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2020-09-11 11:08:30 -04:00
|
|
|
let_it_be(:note1) do
|
2016-05-26 07:38:28 -04:00
|
|
|
create(:note_on_project_snippet,
|
|
|
|
noteable: snippet,
|
|
|
|
project: project,
|
|
|
|
note: 'a')
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
2020-09-11 11:08:30 -04:00
|
|
|
let_it_be(:note2) do
|
2016-05-26 07:38:28 -04:00
|
|
|
create(:note_on_project_snippet,
|
|
|
|
noteable: snippet,
|
|
|
|
project: project,
|
|
|
|
note: 'b')
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
2020-09-11 11:08:30 -04:00
|
|
|
it 'includes the snippet author and note authors' do
|
|
|
|
expect(snippet.participants).to include(snippet.author, note1.author, note2.author)
|
2016-05-26 07:38:28 -04:00
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
2017-03-20 22:37:29 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
describe '#check_for_spam' do
|
2020-09-11 11:08:30 -04:00
|
|
|
let(:snippet) { create(:snippet, visibility_level: visibility_level) }
|
2017-03-20 22:37:29 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
subject do
|
|
|
|
snippet.assign_attributes(title: title)
|
|
|
|
snippet.check_for_spam?
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
context 'when public and spammable attributes changed' do
|
|
|
|
let(:visibility_level) { Snippet::PUBLIC }
|
|
|
|
let(:title) { 'woo' }
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it 'returns true' do
|
|
|
|
is_expected.to be_truthy
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
context 'when private' do
|
|
|
|
let(:visibility_level) { Snippet::PRIVATE }
|
|
|
|
let(:title) { snippet.title }
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it 'returns false' do
|
|
|
|
is_expected.to be_falsey
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it 'returns true when switching to public' do
|
|
|
|
snippet.save!
|
|
|
|
snippet.visibility_level = Snippet::PUBLIC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expect(snippet.check_for_spam?).to be_truthy
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
context 'when spammable attributes have not changed' do
|
|
|
|
let(:visibility_level) { Snippet::PUBLIC }
|
|
|
|
let(:title) { snippet.title }
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it 'returns false' do
|
|
|
|
is_expected.to be_falsey
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
2017-04-13 12:47:28 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
describe '#blob' do
|
2020-09-11 11:08:30 -04:00
|
|
|
let(:snippet) { build(:snippet) }
|
2017-04-13 12:47:28 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it 'returns a blob representing the snippet data' do
|
|
|
|
blob = snippet.blob
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expect(blob).to be_a(Blob)
|
|
|
|
expect(blob.path).to eq(snippet.file_name)
|
|
|
|
expect(blob.data).to eq(snippet.content)
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
2019-11-19 01:06:07 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-06 10:08:05 -05:00
|
|
|
describe '#blobs' do
|
|
|
|
context 'when repository does not exist' do
|
2020-11-18 13:09:08 -05:00
|
|
|
let(:snippet) { create(:snippet) }
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-06 10:08:05 -05:00
|
|
|
it 'returns empty array' do
|
|
|
|
expect(snippet.blobs).to be_empty
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
context 'when repository exists' do
|
|
|
|
let(:snippet) { create(:snippet, :repository) }
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it 'returns array of blobs' do
|
|
|
|
expect(snippet.blobs).to all(be_a(Blob))
|
|
|
|
end
|
2021-02-22 04:10:46 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
context 'when file does not exist' do
|
|
|
|
it 'removes nil values from the blobs array' do
|
|
|
|
allow(snippet).to receive(:list_files).and_return(%w(LICENSE non_existent_snippet_file))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
blobs = snippet.blobs
|
|
|
|
expect(blobs.count).to eq 1
|
|
|
|
expect(blobs.first.name).to eq 'LICENSE'
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
2020-03-06 10:08:05 -05:00
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
2019-11-19 01:06:07 -05:00
|
|
|
describe '#to_json' do
|
|
|
|
let(:snippet) { build(:snippet) }
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it 'excludes secret_token from generated json' do
|
2020-04-30 14:09:38 -04:00
|
|
|
expect(Gitlab::Json.parse(to_json).keys).not_to include("secret_token")
|
2019-11-19 01:06:07 -05:00
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it 'does not override existing exclude option value' do
|
2020-04-30 14:09:38 -04:00
|
|
|
expect(Gitlab::Json.parse(to_json(except: [:id])).keys).not_to include("secret_token", "id")
|
2019-11-19 01:06:07 -05:00
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def to_json(params = {})
|
|
|
|
snippet.to_json(params)
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
2020-02-13 10:08:52 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
describe '#storage' do
|
2020-09-11 11:08:30 -04:00
|
|
|
let(:snippet) { build(:snippet, id: 1) }
|
2020-02-13 10:08:52 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it "stores snippet in #{Storage::Hashed::SNIPPET_REPOSITORY_PATH_PREFIX} dir" do
|
|
|
|
expect(snippet.storage.disk_path).to start_with Storage::Hashed::SNIPPET_REPOSITORY_PATH_PREFIX
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
describe '#track_snippet_repository' do
|
2020-02-27 19:09:08 -05:00
|
|
|
let(:snippet) { create(:snippet) }
|
2020-03-25 08:08:19 -04:00
|
|
|
let(:shard_name) { 'foo' }
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
subject { snippet.track_snippet_repository(shard_name) }
|
2020-02-13 10:08:52 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
context 'when a snippet repository entry does not exist' do
|
|
|
|
it 'creates a new entry' do
|
2020-03-25 08:08:19 -04:00
|
|
|
expect { subject }.to change(snippet, :snippet_repository)
|
2020-02-13 10:08:52 -05:00
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it 'tracks the snippet storage location' do
|
2020-03-25 08:08:19 -04:00
|
|
|
subject
|
2020-02-13 10:08:52 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expect(snippet.snippet_repository).to have_attributes(
|
|
|
|
disk_path: snippet.disk_path,
|
2020-03-25 08:08:19 -04:00
|
|
|
shard_name: shard_name
|
2020-02-13 10:08:52 -05:00
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
context 'when a tracking entry exists' do
|
2020-02-27 19:09:08 -05:00
|
|
|
let!(:snippet) { create(:snippet, :repository) }
|
|
|
|
let(:snippet_repository) { snippet.snippet_repository }
|
2020-03-25 08:08:19 -04:00
|
|
|
let(:shard_name) { 'bar' }
|
2020-02-13 10:08:52 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it 'does not create a new entry in the database' do
|
2020-03-25 08:08:19 -04:00
|
|
|
expect { subject }.not_to change(snippet, :snippet_repository)
|
2020-02-13 10:08:52 -05:00
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it 'updates the snippet storage location' do
|
|
|
|
allow(snippet).to receive(:disk_path).and_return('fancy/new/path')
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-25 08:08:19 -04:00
|
|
|
subject
|
2020-02-13 10:08:52 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expect(snippet.snippet_repository).to have_attributes(
|
|
|
|
disk_path: 'fancy/new/path',
|
2020-03-25 08:08:19 -04:00
|
|
|
shard_name: shard_name
|
2020-02-13 10:08:52 -05:00
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
describe '#create_repository' do
|
|
|
|
let(:snippet) { create(:snippet) }
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-25 08:08:19 -04:00
|
|
|
subject { snippet.create_repository }
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-13 10:08:52 -05:00
|
|
|
it 'creates the repository' do
|
|
|
|
expect(snippet.repository).to receive(:after_create).and_call_original
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-25 08:08:19 -04:00
|
|
|
expect(subject).to be_truthy
|
2020-02-13 10:08:52 -05:00
|
|
|
expect(snippet.repository.exists?).to be_truthy
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it 'tracks snippet repository' do
|
|
|
|
expect do
|
2020-03-25 08:08:19 -04:00
|
|
|
subject
|
2020-02-13 10:08:52 -05:00
|
|
|
end.to change(SnippetRepository, :count).by(1)
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-25 08:08:19 -04:00
|
|
|
it 'sets same shard in snippet repository as in the repository storage' do
|
|
|
|
expect(snippet).to receive(:repository_storage).and_return('picked')
|
|
|
|
expect(snippet).to receive(:repository_exists?).and_return(false)
|
|
|
|
expect(snippet.repository).to receive(:create_if_not_exists)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
subject
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expect(snippet.snippet_repository.shard_name).to eq 'picked'
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-13 10:08:52 -05:00
|
|
|
context 'when repository exists' do
|
2020-02-27 19:09:08 -05:00
|
|
|
let!(:snippet) { create(:snippet, :repository) }
|
2020-02-13 10:08:52 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it 'does not try to create repository' do
|
|
|
|
expect(snippet.repository).not_to receive(:after_create)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expect(snippet.create_repository).to be_nil
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-04 10:08:09 -05:00
|
|
|
context 'when snippet_repository exists' do
|
|
|
|
it 'does not create a new snippet repository' do
|
|
|
|
expect do
|
|
|
|
snippet.create_repository
|
|
|
|
end.not_to change(SnippetRepository, :count)
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
context 'when snippet_repository does not exist' do
|
|
|
|
it 'creates a snippet_repository' do
|
|
|
|
snippet.snippet_repository.destroy
|
|
|
|
snippet.reload
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expect do
|
|
|
|
snippet.create_repository
|
|
|
|
end.to change(SnippetRepository, :count).by(1)
|
|
|
|
end
|
2020-02-13 10:08:52 -05:00
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
describe '#repository_storage' do
|
|
|
|
let(:snippet) { create(:snippet) }
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-24 20:08:11 -04:00
|
|
|
subject { snippet.repository_storage }
|
2020-02-13 10:08:52 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-24 20:08:11 -04:00
|
|
|
before do
|
2021-01-25 10:09:00 -05:00
|
|
|
expect(Repository).to receive(:pick_storage_shard).and_return('picked')
|
2020-03-24 20:08:11 -04:00
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it 'returns repository storage from ApplicationSetting' do
|
|
|
|
expect(subject).to eq 'picked'
|
2020-02-13 10:08:52 -05:00
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
context 'when snippet_project is already created' do
|
|
|
|
let!(:snippet_repository) { create(:snippet_repository, snippet: snippet) }
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
before do
|
|
|
|
allow(snippet_repository).to receive(:shard_name).and_return('foo')
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it 'returns repository_storage from snippet_project' do
|
2020-03-24 20:08:11 -04:00
|
|
|
expect(subject).to eq 'foo'
|
2020-02-13 10:08:52 -05:00
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
2020-02-28 16:09:15 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2020-04-06 20:09:33 -04:00
|
|
|
describe '#repository_size_checker' do
|
|
|
|
subject { build(:personal_snippet) }
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let(:checker) { subject.repository_size_checker }
|
|
|
|
let(:current_size) { 60 }
|
2020-10-19 08:09:20 -04:00
|
|
|
let(:namespace) { nil }
|
2020-04-06 20:09:33 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
before do
|
2020-04-09 11:09:29 -04:00
|
|
|
allow(subject.repository).to receive(:size).and_return(current_size)
|
2020-04-06 20:09:33 -04:00
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
2020-10-12 14:08:31 -04:00
|
|
|
include_examples 'size checker for snippet'
|
2020-04-06 20:09:33 -04:00
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-28 16:09:15 -05:00
|
|
|
describe '#can_cache_field?' do
|
|
|
|
using RSpec::Parameterized::TableSyntax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let(:snippet) { create(:snippet, file_name: file_name) }
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
subject { snippet.can_cache_field?(field) }
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
where(:field, :file_name, :result) do
|
|
|
|
:title | nil | true
|
|
|
|
:title | 'foo.bar' | true
|
|
|
|
:description | nil | true
|
|
|
|
:description | 'foo.bar' | true
|
|
|
|
:content | nil | false
|
|
|
|
:content | 'bar.foo' | false
|
|
|
|
:content | 'markdown.md' | true
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with_them do
|
|
|
|
it { is_expected.to eq result }
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
2020-03-17 08:09:52 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2020-04-23 14:09:46 -04:00
|
|
|
describe '#url_to_repo' do
|
|
|
|
subject { snippet.url_to_repo }
|
2020-03-19 05:09:27 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2020-04-23 14:09:46 -04:00
|
|
|
context 'with personal snippet' do
|
|
|
|
let(:snippet) { create(:personal_snippet) }
|
2020-03-19 05:09:27 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2020-04-23 14:09:46 -04:00
|
|
|
it { is_expected.to eq(Gitlab.config.gitlab_shell.ssh_path_prefix + "snippets/#{snippet.id}.git") }
|
2020-03-19 05:09:27 -04:00
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
2020-04-23 14:09:46 -04:00
|
|
|
context 'with project snippet' do
|
|
|
|
let(:snippet) { create(:project_snippet) }
|
2020-03-19 05:09:27 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2020-04-23 14:09:46 -04:00
|
|
|
it { is_expected.to eq(Gitlab.config.gitlab_shell.ssh_path_prefix + "#{snippet.project.full_path}/snippets/#{snippet.id}.git") }
|
2020-03-19 05:09:27 -04:00
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
2020-05-19 08:08:21 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
describe '.max_file_limit' do
|
2020-10-06 14:08:49 -04:00
|
|
|
subject { described_class.max_file_limit }
|
2020-05-19 08:08:21 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it "returns #{Snippet::MAX_FILE_COUNT}" do
|
|
|
|
expect(subject).to eq Snippet::MAX_FILE_COUNT
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
2020-07-01 11:08:45 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
describe '#list_files' do
|
|
|
|
let_it_be(:snippet) { create(:snippet, :repository) }
|
|
|
|
let(:ref) { 'test-ref' }
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
subject { snippet.list_files(ref) }
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
context 'when snippet has a repository' do
|
|
|
|
it 'lists files from the repository with the ref' do
|
|
|
|
expect(snippet.repository).to receive(:ls_files).with(ref)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
subject
|
|
|
|
end
|
2020-09-16 08:10:15 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
context 'when ref is nil' do
|
|
|
|
let(:ref) { nil }
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it 'lists files from the repository from the deafult_branch' do
|
|
|
|
expect(snippet.repository).to receive(:ls_files).with(snippet.default_branch)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
subject
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
2020-07-01 11:08:45 -04:00
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
context 'when snippet does not have a repository' do
|
|
|
|
before do
|
|
|
|
allow(snippet.repository).to receive(:empty?).and_return(true)
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it 'returns an empty array' do
|
|
|
|
expect(subject).to eq []
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
2020-09-02 05:10:23 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
describe '#multiple_files?' do
|
|
|
|
subject { snippet.multiple_files? }
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
context 'when snippet has multiple files' do
|
|
|
|
let(:snippet) { create(:snippet, :repository) }
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it { is_expected.to be_truthy }
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
context 'when snippet does not have multiple files' do
|
|
|
|
let(:snippet) { create(:snippet, :empty_repo) }
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it { is_expected.to be_falsey }
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
context 'when the snippet does not have a repository' do
|
|
|
|
let(:snippet) { build(:snippet) }
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it { is_expected.to be_falsey }
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
2020-12-14 13:09:48 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
describe '#git_transfer_in_progress?' do
|
|
|
|
let(:snippet) { build(:snippet) }
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
subject { snippet.git_transfer_in_progress? }
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it 'returns true when there are git transfers' do
|
|
|
|
allow(snippet).to receive(:reference_counter).with(type: Gitlab::GlRepository::SNIPPET) do
|
|
|
|
double(:reference_counter, value: 2)
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expect(subject).to eq true
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it 'returns false when there are not git transfers' do
|
|
|
|
allow(snippet).to receive(:reference_counter).with(type: Gitlab::GlRepository::SNIPPET) do
|
|
|
|
double(:reference_counter, value: 0)
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expect(subject).to eq false
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it_behaves_like 'can move repository storage' do
|
|
|
|
let_it_be(:container) { create(:snippet, :repository) }
|
|
|
|
end
|
2020-12-23 04:10:13 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
describe '#change_head_to_default_branch' do
|
|
|
|
let(:head_path) { Rails.root.join(TestEnv.repos_path, "#{snippet.disk_path}.git", 'HEAD') }
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
subject { snippet.change_head_to_default_branch }
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
context 'when repository does not exist' do
|
|
|
|
let(:snippet) { create(:snippet) }
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it 'does nothing' do
|
|
|
|
expect(snippet.repository_exists?).to eq false
|
|
|
|
expect(snippet.repository.raw_repository).not_to receive(:write_ref)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
subject
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
context 'when repository is empty' do
|
|
|
|
let(:snippet) { create(:snippet, :empty_repo) }
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
before do
|
|
|
|
allow(Gitlab::CurrentSettings).to receive(:default_branch_name).and_return(default_branch)
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
context 'when default branch in settings is "master"' do
|
|
|
|
let(:default_branch) { 'master' }
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it 'does nothing' do
|
|
|
|
expect(File.read(head_path).squish).to eq 'ref: refs/heads/master'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expect(snippet.repository.raw_repository).not_to receive(:write_ref)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
subject
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
context 'when default branch in settings is different from "master"' do
|
|
|
|
let(:default_branch) { 'main' }
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it 'changes the HEAD reference to the default branch' do
|
|
|
|
expect(File.read(head_path).squish).to eq 'ref: refs/heads/master'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
subject
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expect(File.read(head_path).squish).to eq "ref: refs/heads/#{default_branch}"
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
context 'when repository is not empty' do
|
|
|
|
let(:snippet) { create(:snippet, :empty_repo) }
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
before do
|
|
|
|
populate_snippet_repo
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
context 'when HEAD branch is empty' do
|
|
|
|
it 'changes HEAD to default branch' do
|
|
|
|
File.write(head_path, 'ref: refs/heads/non_existen_branch')
|
|
|
|
expect(File.read(head_path).squish).to eq 'ref: refs/heads/non_existen_branch'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
subject
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expect(File.read(head_path).squish).to eq 'ref: refs/heads/main'
|
|
|
|
expect(snippet.list_files('HEAD')).not_to be_empty
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
context 'when HEAD branch is not empty' do
|
|
|
|
it 'does nothing' do
|
|
|
|
File.write(head_path, 'ref: refs/heads/main')
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expect(snippet.repository.raw_repository).not_to receive(:write_ref)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
subject
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def populate_snippet_repo
|
|
|
|
allow(Gitlab::CurrentSettings).to receive(:default_branch_name).and_return('main')
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
data = [{ file_path: 'new_file_test', content: 'bar' }]
|
|
|
|
snippet.snippet_repository.multi_files_action(snippet.author, data, branch_name: 'main', message: 'foo')
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
2011-10-16 17:07:10 -04:00
|
|
|
end
|