gitlab-org--gitlab-foss/app/finders/issuable_finder.rb

586 lines
15 KiB
Ruby
Raw Normal View History

# frozen_string_literal: true
# IssuableFinder
#
# Used to filter Issues and MergeRequests collections by set of params
#
# Arguments:
# klass - actual class like Issue or MergeRequest
# current_user - which user use
# params:
# scope: 'created_by_me' or 'assigned_to_me' or 'all'
2018-06-26 19:30:29 +00:00
# state: 'opened' or 'closed' or 'locked' or 'all'
# group_id: integer
# project_id: integer
# milestone_title: string
# author_id: integer
2018-11-09 14:29:45 +00:00
# author_username: string
# assignee_id: integer or 'None' or 'Any'
2018-11-09 14:29:45 +00:00
# assignee_username: string
# search: string
2019-02-05 08:32:27 +00:00
# in: 'title', 'description', or a string joining them with comma
# label_name: string
# sort: string
# non_archived: boolean
2017-02-17 18:28:32 +00:00
# iids: integer[]
2017-08-30 07:48:55 +00:00
# my_reaction_emoji: string
# created_after: datetime
# created_before: datetime
# updated_after: datetime
# updated_before: datetime
# attempt_group_search_optimizations: boolean
# attempt_project_search_optimizations: boolean
#
class IssuableFinder
prepend FinderWithCrossProjectAccess
include FinderMethods
include CreatedAtFilter
include Gitlab::Utils::StrongMemoize
requires_cross_project_access unless: -> { project? }
# This is used as a common filter for None / Any
2018-10-26 02:47:14 +00:00
FILTER_NONE = 'none'.freeze
FILTER_ANY = 'any'.freeze
# This is accepted as a deprecated filter and is also used in unassigning users
2017-02-21 23:32:18 +00:00
NONE = '0'.freeze
2015-03-27 01:56:42 +00:00
attr_accessor :current_user, :params
def self.scalar_params
@scalar_params ||= %i[
assignee_id
assignee_username
author_id
author_username
label_name
milestone_title
my_reaction_emoji
search
in
]
end
def self.array_params
2018-11-09 14:29:45 +00:00
@array_params ||= { label_name: [], assignee_username: [] }
end
def self.valid_params
@valid_params ||= scalar_params + [array_params]
end
Merge branch 'jej-use-issuable-finder-instead-of-access-check' into 'security' Replace issue access checks with use of IssuableFinder Split from !2024 to partially solve https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/23867 ## Which fixes are in this MR? :warning: - Potentially untested :bomb: - No test coverage :traffic_light: - Test coverage of some sort exists (a test failed when error raised) :vertical_traffic_light: - Test coverage of return value (a test failed when nil used) :white_check_mark: - Permissions check tested ### Issue lookup with access check Using `visible_to_user` likely makes these security issues too. See [Code smells](#code-smells). - [x] :vertical_traffic_light: app/finders/notes_finder.rb:15 [`visible_to_user`] - [x] :traffic_light: app/views/layouts/nav/_project.html.haml:73 [`visible_to_user`] [`.count`] - [x] :white_check_mark: app/services/merge_requests/build_service.rb:84 [`issue.try(:confidential?)`] - [x] :white_check_mark: lib/api/issues.rb:112 [`visible_to_user`] - CHANGELOG: Prevented API returning issues set to 'Only team members' to everyone - [x] :white_check_mark: lib/api/helpers.rb:126 [`can?(current_user, :read_issue, issue)`] Maybe here too? - [x] :white_check_mark: lib/gitlab/search_results.rb:53 [`visible_to_user`] ### Previous discussions - [ ] https://dev.gitlab.org/gitlab/gitlabhq/merge_requests/2024/diffs#b2ff264eddf9819d7693c14ae213d941494fe2b3_128_126 - [ ] https://dev.gitlab.org/gitlab/gitlabhq/merge_requests/2024/diffs#7b6375270d22f880bdcb085e47b519b426a5c6c7_87_87 See merge request !2031
2016-11-22 10:25:04 +00:00
def initialize(current_user, params = {})
@current_user = current_user
@params = params
end
def execute
2014-02-03 15:02:44 +00:00
items = init_collection
items = filter_items(items)
# This has to be last as we use a CTE as an optimization fence
# for counts by passing the force_cte param and enabling the
# attempt_group_search_optimizations feature flag
# https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/queries-with.html
items = by_search(items)
Extend CTE search optimisation to projects When we use the `search` param on an `IssuableFinder`, we can run into issues. We have trigram indexes to support these searches. On GitLab.com, we often see Postgres's optimiser prioritise the (global) trigram indexes over the index on `project_id`. For group and project searches, we know that it will be quicker to filter by `project_id` first, as it returns fewer rows in most cases. For group issues search, we ran into this issue previously, and went through the following iterations: 1. Use a CTE on the project IDs as an optimisation fence. This prevents the planner from disregarding the index on `project_id`. Unfortunately it breaks some types of sorting, like priority and popularity, as they sort on a joined table. 2. Use a subquery for listing issues, and a CTE for counts. The subquery - in the case of group lists - didn't help as much as the CTE, but was faster than not including it. We can safely use a CTE for counts as they don't have sorting. Now, however, we're seeing the same issue in a project context. The subquery doesn't help at all there (it would only return one row, after all). In an attempt to keep total code complexity under control, this commit removes the subquery optimisation and applies the CTE optimisation only for sorts we know that are safe. This means that for more complicated sorts (like priority and popularity), the search will continue to be very slow. If this is a high-priority issue, we can consider introducing further optimisations, but this finder is already very complicated and additional complexity has a cost. The group CTE optimisation is controlled by the same feature flag as before, `attempt_group_search_optimizations`, which is enabled by default. The new project CTE optimisation is controlled by a new feature flag, `attempt_project_search_optimizations`, which is disabled by default.
2019-04-03 09:46:13 +00:00
items = sort(items)
items
end
def filter_items(items)
items = by_project(items)
items = by_group(items)
2014-02-03 15:02:44 +00:00
items = by_scope(items)
items = by_created_at(items)
items = by_updated_at(items)
items = by_closed_at(items)
items = by_state(items)
items = by_group(items)
items = by_assignee(items)
items = by_author(items)
items = by_non_archived(items)
2017-02-17 18:28:32 +00:00
items = by_iids(items)
2017-02-07 13:15:07 +00:00
items = by_milestone(items)
items = by_label(items)
by_my_reaction_emoji(items)
end
def row_count
Gitlab::IssuablesCountForState.new(self).for_state_or_opened(params[:state])
end
# We often get counts for each state by running a query per state, and
# counting those results. This is typically slower than running one query
# (even if that query is slower than any of the individual state queries) and
# grouping and counting within that query.
#
# rubocop: disable CodeReuse/ActiveRecord
def count_by_state
count_params = params.merge(state: nil, sort: nil, force_cte: true)
finder = self.class.new(current_user, count_params)
counts = Hash.new(0)
# Searching by label includes a GROUP BY in the query, but ours will be last
# because it is added last. Searching by multiple labels also includes a row
# per issuable, so we have to count those in Ruby - which is bad, but still
# better than performing multiple queries.
#
# This does not apply when we are using a CTE for the search, as the labels
# GROUP BY is inside the subquery in that case, so we set labels_count to 1.
#
Extend CTE search optimisation to projects When we use the `search` param on an `IssuableFinder`, we can run into issues. We have trigram indexes to support these searches. On GitLab.com, we often see Postgres's optimiser prioritise the (global) trigram indexes over the index on `project_id`. For group and project searches, we know that it will be quicker to filter by `project_id` first, as it returns fewer rows in most cases. For group issues search, we ran into this issue previously, and went through the following iterations: 1. Use a CTE on the project IDs as an optimisation fence. This prevents the planner from disregarding the index on `project_id`. Unfortunately it breaks some types of sorting, like priority and popularity, as they sort on a joined table. 2. Use a subquery for listing issues, and a CTE for counts. The subquery - in the case of group lists - didn't help as much as the CTE, but was faster than not including it. We can safely use a CTE for counts as they don't have sorting. Now, however, we're seeing the same issue in a project context. The subquery doesn't help at all there (it would only return one row, after all). In an attempt to keep total code complexity under control, this commit removes the subquery optimisation and applies the CTE optimisation only for sorts we know that are safe. This means that for more complicated sorts (like priority and popularity), the search will continue to be very slow. If this is a high-priority issue, we can consider introducing further optimisations, but this finder is already very complicated and additional complexity has a cost. The group CTE optimisation is controlled by the same feature flag as before, `attempt_group_search_optimizations`, which is enabled by default. The new project CTE optimisation is controlled by a new feature flag, `attempt_project_search_optimizations`, which is disabled by default.
2019-04-03 09:46:13 +00:00
# Groups and projects have separate feature flags to suggest the use
# of a CTE. The CTE will not be used if the sort doesn't support it,
# but will always be used for the counts here as we ignore sorting
# anyway.
labels_count = label_names.any? ? label_names.count : 1
Extend CTE search optimisation to projects When we use the `search` param on an `IssuableFinder`, we can run into issues. We have trigram indexes to support these searches. On GitLab.com, we often see Postgres's optimiser prioritise the (global) trigram indexes over the index on `project_id`. For group and project searches, we know that it will be quicker to filter by `project_id` first, as it returns fewer rows in most cases. For group issues search, we ran into this issue previously, and went through the following iterations: 1. Use a CTE on the project IDs as an optimisation fence. This prevents the planner from disregarding the index on `project_id`. Unfortunately it breaks some types of sorting, like priority and popularity, as they sort on a joined table. 2. Use a subquery for listing issues, and a CTE for counts. The subquery - in the case of group lists - didn't help as much as the CTE, but was faster than not including it. We can safely use a CTE for counts as they don't have sorting. Now, however, we're seeing the same issue in a project context. The subquery doesn't help at all there (it would only return one row, after all). In an attempt to keep total code complexity under control, this commit removes the subquery optimisation and applies the CTE optimisation only for sorts we know that are safe. This means that for more complicated sorts (like priority and popularity), the search will continue to be very slow. If this is a high-priority issue, we can consider introducing further optimisations, but this finder is already very complicated and additional complexity has a cost. The group CTE optimisation is controlled by the same feature flag as before, `attempt_group_search_optimizations`, which is enabled by default. The new project CTE optimisation is controlled by a new feature flag, `attempt_project_search_optimizations`, which is disabled by default.
2019-04-03 09:46:13 +00:00
labels_count = 1 if use_cte_for_search?
finder.execute.reorder(nil).group(:state).count.each do |key, value|
2018-10-01 11:45:15 +00:00
counts[count_key(key)] += value / labels_count
end
counts[:all] = counts.values.sum
counts.with_indifferent_access
end
# rubocop: enable CodeReuse/ActiveRecord
def group
return @group if defined?(@group)
@group =
if params[:group_id].present?
Group.find(params[:group_id])
else
nil
end
end
def related_groups
if project? && project && project.group && Ability.allowed?(current_user, :read_group, project.group)
project.group.self_and_ancestors
elsif group
[group]
elsif current_user
Gitlab::ObjectHierarchy.new(current_user.authorized_groups, current_user.groups).all_objects
else
[]
end
end
def project?
params[:project_id].present?
end
def project
return @project if defined?(@project)
project = Project.find(params[:project_id])
project = nil unless Ability.allowed?(current_user, :"read_#{klass.to_ability_name}", project)
@project = project
end
def projects
return @projects if defined?(@projects)
return @projects = [project] if project?
projects =
if current_user && params[:authorized_only].presence && !current_user_related?
current_user.authorized_projects(min_access_level)
elsif group
find_group_projects
else
Project.public_or_visible_to_user(current_user, min_access_level)
end
@projects = projects.with_feature_available_for_user(klass, current_user).reorder(nil) # rubocop: disable CodeReuse/ActiveRecord
end
def find_group_projects
return Project.none unless group
if params[:include_subgroups]
Project.where(namespace_id: group.self_and_descendants) # rubocop: disable CodeReuse/ActiveRecord
else
group.projects
end.public_or_visible_to_user(current_user, min_access_level)
end
def search
params[:search].presence
end
def milestones?
params[:milestone_title].present?
end
def milestones
return @milestones if defined?(@milestones)
@milestones =
if milestones?
2017-07-07 15:08:49 +00:00
if project?
group_id = project.group&.id
project_id = project.id
end
group_id = group.id if group
2015-10-14 10:20:48 +00:00
2017-07-07 15:08:49 +00:00
search_params =
{ title: params[:milestone_title], project_ids: project_id, group_ids: group_id }
MilestonesFinder.new(search_params).execute # rubocop: disable CodeReuse/Finder
else
Milestone.none
end
end
def labels?
params[:label_name].present?
end
2015-10-19 09:46:22 +00:00
def filter_by_no_label?
downcased = label_names.map(&:downcase)
# Label::NONE is deprecated and should be removed in 12.0
downcased.include?(FILTER_NONE) || downcased.include?(Label::NONE)
end
def filter_by_any_label?
label_names.map(&:downcase).include?(FILTER_ANY)
end
2016-02-19 05:27:41 +00:00
def labels
return @labels if defined?(@labels)
@labels =
if labels? && !filter_by_no_label?
LabelsFinder.new(current_user, project_ids: projects, title: label_names).execute(skip_authorization: true) # rubocop: disable CodeReuse/Finder
else
Label.none
2016-02-19 05:27:41 +00:00
end
end
def assignee_id?
params[:assignee_id].present?
end
def assignee_username?
params[:assignee_username].present?
end
# rubocop: disable CodeReuse/ActiveRecord
def assignee
return @assignee if defined?(@assignee)
@assignee =
if assignee_id?
User.find_by(id: params[:assignee_id])
elsif assignee_username?
User.find_by_username(params[:assignee_username])
else
nil
end
end
# rubocop: enable CodeReuse/ActiveRecord
def author_id?
params[:author_id].present? && params[:author_id] != NONE
end
def author_username?
params[:author_username].present? && params[:author_username] != NONE
end
def no_author?
2017-01-11 01:51:57 +00:00
# author_id takes precedence over author_username
params[:author_id] == NONE || params[:author_username] == NONE
end
# rubocop: disable CodeReuse/ActiveRecord
def author
return @author if defined?(@author)
@author =
if author_id?
User.find_by(id: params[:author_id])
elsif author_username?
User.find_by_username(params[:author_username])
else
nil
end
end
# rubocop: enable CodeReuse/ActiveRecord
Extend CTE search optimisation to projects When we use the `search` param on an `IssuableFinder`, we can run into issues. We have trigram indexes to support these searches. On GitLab.com, we often see Postgres's optimiser prioritise the (global) trigram indexes over the index on `project_id`. For group and project searches, we know that it will be quicker to filter by `project_id` first, as it returns fewer rows in most cases. For group issues search, we ran into this issue previously, and went through the following iterations: 1. Use a CTE on the project IDs as an optimisation fence. This prevents the planner from disregarding the index on `project_id`. Unfortunately it breaks some types of sorting, like priority and popularity, as they sort on a joined table. 2. Use a subquery for listing issues, and a CTE for counts. The subquery - in the case of group lists - didn't help as much as the CTE, but was faster than not including it. We can safely use a CTE for counts as they don't have sorting. Now, however, we're seeing the same issue in a project context. The subquery doesn't help at all there (it would only return one row, after all). In an attempt to keep total code complexity under control, this commit removes the subquery optimisation and applies the CTE optimisation only for sorts we know that are safe. This means that for more complicated sorts (like priority and popularity), the search will continue to be very slow. If this is a high-priority issue, we can consider introducing further optimisations, but this finder is already very complicated and additional complexity has a cost. The group CTE optimisation is controlled by the same feature flag as before, `attempt_group_search_optimizations`, which is enabled by default. The new project CTE optimisation is controlled by a new feature flag, `attempt_project_search_optimizations`, which is disabled by default.
2019-04-03 09:46:13 +00:00
def use_cte_for_search?
strong_memoize(:use_cte_for_search) do
next false unless search
next false unless Gitlab::Database.postgresql?
# Only simple unsorted & simple sorts can use CTE
next false if params[:sort].present? && !params[:sort].in?(klass.simple_sorts.keys)
Extend CTE search optimisation to projects When we use the `search` param on an `IssuableFinder`, we can run into issues. We have trigram indexes to support these searches. On GitLab.com, we often see Postgres's optimiser prioritise the (global) trigram indexes over the index on `project_id`. For group and project searches, we know that it will be quicker to filter by `project_id` first, as it returns fewer rows in most cases. For group issues search, we ran into this issue previously, and went through the following iterations: 1. Use a CTE on the project IDs as an optimisation fence. This prevents the planner from disregarding the index on `project_id`. Unfortunately it breaks some types of sorting, like priority and popularity, as they sort on a joined table. 2. Use a subquery for listing issues, and a CTE for counts. The subquery - in the case of group lists - didn't help as much as the CTE, but was faster than not including it. We can safely use a CTE for counts as they don't have sorting. Now, however, we're seeing the same issue in a project context. The subquery doesn't help at all there (it would only return one row, after all). In an attempt to keep total code complexity under control, this commit removes the subquery optimisation and applies the CTE optimisation only for sorts we know that are safe. This means that for more complicated sorts (like priority and popularity), the search will continue to be very slow. If this is a high-priority issue, we can consider introducing further optimisations, but this finder is already very complicated and additional complexity has a cost. The group CTE optimisation is controlled by the same feature flag as before, `attempt_group_search_optimizations`, which is enabled by default. The new project CTE optimisation is controlled by a new feature flag, `attempt_project_search_optimizations`, which is disabled by default.
2019-04-03 09:46:13 +00:00
attempt_group_search_optimizations? || attempt_project_search_optimizations?
end
end
private
def force_cte?
!!params[:force_cte]
end
2014-02-03 15:02:44 +00:00
def init_collection
klass.all
2014-02-03 15:02:44 +00:00
end
def attempt_group_search_optimizations?
Extend CTE search optimisation to projects When we use the `search` param on an `IssuableFinder`, we can run into issues. We have trigram indexes to support these searches. On GitLab.com, we often see Postgres's optimiser prioritise the (global) trigram indexes over the index on `project_id`. For group and project searches, we know that it will be quicker to filter by `project_id` first, as it returns fewer rows in most cases. For group issues search, we ran into this issue previously, and went through the following iterations: 1. Use a CTE on the project IDs as an optimisation fence. This prevents the planner from disregarding the index on `project_id`. Unfortunately it breaks some types of sorting, like priority and popularity, as they sort on a joined table. 2. Use a subquery for listing issues, and a CTE for counts. The subquery - in the case of group lists - didn't help as much as the CTE, but was faster than not including it. We can safely use a CTE for counts as they don't have sorting. Now, however, we're seeing the same issue in a project context. The subquery doesn't help at all there (it would only return one row, after all). In an attempt to keep total code complexity under control, this commit removes the subquery optimisation and applies the CTE optimisation only for sorts we know that are safe. This means that for more complicated sorts (like priority and popularity), the search will continue to be very slow. If this is a high-priority issue, we can consider introducing further optimisations, but this finder is already very complicated and additional complexity has a cost. The group CTE optimisation is controlled by the same feature flag as before, `attempt_group_search_optimizations`, which is enabled by default. The new project CTE optimisation is controlled by a new feature flag, `attempt_project_search_optimizations`, which is disabled by default.
2019-04-03 09:46:13 +00:00
params[:attempt_group_search_optimizations] &&
Feature.enabled?(:attempt_group_search_optimizations, default_enabled: true)
end
Extend CTE search optimisation to projects When we use the `search` param on an `IssuableFinder`, we can run into issues. We have trigram indexes to support these searches. On GitLab.com, we often see Postgres's optimiser prioritise the (global) trigram indexes over the index on `project_id`. For group and project searches, we know that it will be quicker to filter by `project_id` first, as it returns fewer rows in most cases. For group issues search, we ran into this issue previously, and went through the following iterations: 1. Use a CTE on the project IDs as an optimisation fence. This prevents the planner from disregarding the index on `project_id`. Unfortunately it breaks some types of sorting, like priority and popularity, as they sort on a joined table. 2. Use a subquery for listing issues, and a CTE for counts. The subquery - in the case of group lists - didn't help as much as the CTE, but was faster than not including it. We can safely use a CTE for counts as they don't have sorting. Now, however, we're seeing the same issue in a project context. The subquery doesn't help at all there (it would only return one row, after all). In an attempt to keep total code complexity under control, this commit removes the subquery optimisation and applies the CTE optimisation only for sorts we know that are safe. This means that for more complicated sorts (like priority and popularity), the search will continue to be very slow. If this is a high-priority issue, we can consider introducing further optimisations, but this finder is already very complicated and additional complexity has a cost. The group CTE optimisation is controlled by the same feature flag as before, `attempt_group_search_optimizations`, which is enabled by default. The new project CTE optimisation is controlled by a new feature flag, `attempt_project_search_optimizations`, which is disabled by default.
2019-04-03 09:46:13 +00:00
def attempt_project_search_optimizations?
params[:attempt_project_search_optimizations] &&
Feature.enabled?(:attempt_project_search_optimizations)
end
2018-10-01 11:45:15 +00:00
def count_key(value)
Array(value).last.to_sym
end
# rubocop: disable CodeReuse/ActiveRecord
2014-02-03 15:02:44 +00:00
def by_scope(items)
return items.none if current_user_related? && !current_user
2016-03-21 23:09:20 +00:00
case params[:scope]
when 'created_by_me', 'authored'
items.where(author_id: current_user.id)
when 'assigned_to_me'
items.assigned_to(current_user)
else
2016-03-21 23:09:20 +00:00
items
end
end
# rubocop: enable CodeReuse/ActiveRecord
def by_updated_at(items)
items = items.updated_after(params[:updated_after]) if params[:updated_after].present?
items = items.updated_before(params[:updated_before]) if params[:updated_before].present?
items
end
def by_closed_at(items)
items = items.closed_after(params[:closed_after]) if params[:closed_after].present?
items = items.closed_before(params[:closed_before]) if params[:closed_before].present?
items
end
# rubocop: disable CodeReuse/ActiveRecord
def by_state(items)
case params[:state].to_s
when 'closed'
items.closed
when 'merged'
items.respond_to?(:merged) ? items.merged : items.closed
when 'opened'
items.opened
2018-06-26 19:30:29 +00:00
when 'locked'
items.where(state: 'locked')
else
items
end
end
# rubocop: enable CodeReuse/ActiveRecord
def by_group(items)
# Selection by group is already covered by `by_project` and `projects`
items
end
# rubocop: disable CodeReuse/ActiveRecord
def by_project(items)
items =
if project?
items.of_projects(projects).references_project
elsif projects
items.merge(projects.reorder(nil)).join_project
else
items.none
end
items
end
# rubocop: enable CodeReuse/ActiveRecord
# rubocop: disable CodeReuse/ActiveRecord
def by_search(items)
return items unless search
Extend CTE search optimisation to projects When we use the `search` param on an `IssuableFinder`, we can run into issues. We have trigram indexes to support these searches. On GitLab.com, we often see Postgres's optimiser prioritise the (global) trigram indexes over the index on `project_id`. For group and project searches, we know that it will be quicker to filter by `project_id` first, as it returns fewer rows in most cases. For group issues search, we ran into this issue previously, and went through the following iterations: 1. Use a CTE on the project IDs as an optimisation fence. This prevents the planner from disregarding the index on `project_id`. Unfortunately it breaks some types of sorting, like priority and popularity, as they sort on a joined table. 2. Use a subquery for listing issues, and a CTE for counts. The subquery - in the case of group lists - didn't help as much as the CTE, but was faster than not including it. We can safely use a CTE for counts as they don't have sorting. Now, however, we're seeing the same issue in a project context. The subquery doesn't help at all there (it would only return one row, after all). In an attempt to keep total code complexity under control, this commit removes the subquery optimisation and applies the CTE optimisation only for sorts we know that are safe. This means that for more complicated sorts (like priority and popularity), the search will continue to be very slow. If this is a high-priority issue, we can consider introducing further optimisations, but this finder is already very complicated and additional complexity has a cost. The group CTE optimisation is controlled by the same feature flag as before, `attempt_group_search_optimizations`, which is enabled by default. The new project CTE optimisation is controlled by a new feature flag, `attempt_project_search_optimizations`, which is disabled by default.
2019-04-03 09:46:13 +00:00
if use_cte_for_search?
cte = Gitlab::SQL::RecursiveCTE.new(klass.table_name)
cte << items
items = klass.with(cte.to_arel).from(klass.table_name)
end
items.full_search(search, matched_columns: params[:in])
2017-02-17 18:28:32 +00:00
end
# rubocop: enable CodeReuse/ActiveRecord
# rubocop: disable CodeReuse/ActiveRecord
2017-02-17 18:28:32 +00:00
def by_iids(items)
params[:iids].present? ? items.where(iid: params[:iids]) : items
end
# rubocop: enable CodeReuse/ActiveRecord
# rubocop: disable CodeReuse/ActiveRecord
def sort(items)
# Ensure we always have an explicit sort order (instead of inheriting
# multiple orders when combining ActiveRecord::Relation objects).
params[:sort] ? items.sort_by_attribute(params[:sort], excluded_labels: label_names) : items.reorder(id: :desc)
end
# rubocop: enable CodeReuse/ActiveRecord
def filter_by_no_assignee?
# Assignee_id takes precedence over assignee_username
[NONE, FILTER_NONE].include?(params[:assignee_id].to_s.downcase) || params[:assignee_username].to_s == NONE
end
def filter_by_any_assignee?
params[:assignee_id].to_s.downcase == FILTER_ANY
end
# rubocop: disable CodeReuse/ActiveRecord
def by_author(items)
if author
items = items.where(author_id: author.id)
elsif no_author?
items = items.where(author_id: nil)
elsif author_id? || author_username? # author not found
items = items.none
end
items
end
# rubocop: enable CodeReuse/ActiveRecord
def by_assignee(items)
if filter_by_no_assignee?
items.unassigned
elsif filter_by_any_assignee?
items.assigned
elsif assignee
items.assigned_to(assignee)
elsif assignee_id? || assignee_username? # assignee not found
items.none
else
items
end
end
# rubocop: disable CodeReuse/ActiveRecord
def by_milestone(items)
if milestones?
2015-10-19 09:46:22 +00:00
if filter_by_no_milestone?
items = items.left_joins_milestones.where(milestone_id: [-1, nil])
elsif filter_by_any_milestone?
items = items.any_milestone
2016-03-13 12:19:27 +00:00
elsif filter_by_upcoming_milestone?
upcoming_ids = Milestone.upcoming_ids(projects, related_groups)
items = items.left_joins_milestones.where(milestone_id: upcoming_ids)
elsif filter_by_started_milestone?
items = items.left_joins_milestones.merge(Milestone.started)
else
items = items.with_milestone(params[:milestone_title])
end
end
items
end
# rubocop: enable CodeReuse/ActiveRecord
2018-10-27 02:54:05 +00:00
def filter_by_no_milestone?
# Accepts `No Milestone` for compatibility
params[:milestone_title].to_s.downcase == FILTER_NONE || params[:milestone_title] == Milestone::None.title
end
def filter_by_any_milestone?
# Accepts `Any Milestone` for compatibility
params[:milestone_title].to_s.downcase == FILTER_ANY || params[:milestone_title] == Milestone::Any.title
end
def filter_by_upcoming_milestone?
params[:milestone_title] == Milestone::Upcoming.name
end
def filter_by_started_milestone?
params[:milestone_title] == Milestone::Started.name
end
def by_label(items)
return items unless labels?
items =
2015-10-19 09:46:22 +00:00
if filter_by_no_label?
items.without_label
elsif filter_by_any_label?
items.any_label
else
items.with_label(label_names, params[:sort])
end
items
end
2017-08-30 07:48:55 +00:00
def by_my_reaction_emoji(items)
if params[:my_reaction_emoji].present? && current_user
2018-10-27 15:52:26 +00:00
items =
if filter_by_no_reaction?
items.not_awarded(current_user)
elsif filter_by_any_reaction?
items.awarded(current_user)
else
items.awarded(current_user, params[:my_reaction_emoji])
end
2017-08-30 07:48:55 +00:00
end
items
end
def filter_by_no_reaction?
params[:my_reaction_emoji].to_s.downcase == FILTER_NONE
end
def filter_by_any_reaction?
params[:my_reaction_emoji].to_s.downcase == FILTER_ANY
end
2016-02-19 05:27:41 +00:00
def label_names
if labels?
params[:label_name].is_a?(String) ? params[:label_name].split(',') : params[:label_name]
else
[]
end
2016-02-19 05:27:41 +00:00
end
def by_non_archived(items)
params[:non_archived].present? ? items.non_archived : items
end
def current_user_related?
scope = params[:scope]
scope == 'created_by_me' || scope == 'authored' || scope == 'assigned_to_me'
end
def min_access_level
ProjectFeature.required_minimum_access_level(klass)
end
end