2016-10-21 12:13:41 -04:00
|
|
|
# Sidekiq Style Guide
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This document outlines various guidelines that should be followed when adding or
|
|
|
|
modifying Sidekiq workers.
|
|
|
|
|
2017-11-30 10:28:09 -05:00
|
|
|
## ApplicationWorker
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All workers should include `ApplicationWorker` instead of `Sidekiq::Worker`,
|
|
|
|
which adds some convenience methods and automatically sets the queue based on
|
|
|
|
the worker's name.
|
|
|
|
|
2017-12-12 09:19:20 -05:00
|
|
|
## Dedicated Queues
|
2016-10-21 12:13:41 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2017-12-12 09:19:20 -05:00
|
|
|
All workers should use their own queue, which is automatically set based on the
|
|
|
|
worker class name. For a worker named `ProcessSomethingWorker`, the queue name
|
|
|
|
would be `process_something`. If you're not sure what queue a worker uses,
|
|
|
|
you can find it using `SomeWorker.queue`. There is almost never a reason to
|
|
|
|
manually override the queue name using `sidekiq_options queue: :some_queue`.
|
2016-10-21 12:13:41 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2018-11-19 16:29:19 -05:00
|
|
|
You must always add any new queues to `app/workers/all_queues.yml` or `ee/app/workers/all_queues.yml`
|
|
|
|
otherwise your worker will not run.
|
2018-02-13 00:08:02 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2017-12-12 09:19:20 -05:00
|
|
|
## Queue Namespaces
|
2016-10-21 12:13:41 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2017-12-12 09:19:20 -05:00
|
|
|
While different workers cannot share a queue, they can share a queue namespace.
|
2016-10-21 12:13:41 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2017-12-12 09:19:20 -05:00
|
|
|
Defining a queue namespace for a worker makes it possible to start a Sidekiq
|
|
|
|
process that automatically handles jobs for all workers in that namespace,
|
|
|
|
without needing to explicitly list all their queue names. If, for example, all
|
2019-10-11 02:06:27 -04:00
|
|
|
workers that are managed by `sidekiq-cron` use the `cronjob` queue namespace, we
|
2017-12-12 09:19:20 -05:00
|
|
|
can spin up a Sidekiq process specifically for these kinds of scheduled jobs.
|
|
|
|
If a new worker using the `cronjob` namespace is added later on, the Sidekiq
|
|
|
|
process will automatically pick up jobs for that worker too (after having been
|
|
|
|
restarted), without the need to change any configuration.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A queue namespace can be set using the `queue_namespace` DSL class method:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```ruby
|
|
|
|
class SomeScheduledTaskWorker
|
|
|
|
include ApplicationWorker
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
queue_namespace :cronjob
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# ...
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Behind the scenes, this will set `SomeScheduledTaskWorker.queue` to
|
|
|
|
`cronjob:some_scheduled_task`. Commonly used namespaces will have their own
|
|
|
|
concern module that can easily be included into the worker class, and that may
|
|
|
|
set other Sidekiq options besides the queue namespace. `CronjobQueue`, for
|
|
|
|
example, sets the namespace, but also disables retries.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
`bundle exec sidekiq` is namespace-aware, and will automatically listen on all
|
|
|
|
queues in a namespace (technically: all queues prefixed with the namespace name)
|
|
|
|
when a namespace is provided instead of a simple queue name in the `--queue`
|
|
|
|
(`-q`) option, or in the `:queues:` section in `config/sidekiq_queues.yml`.
|
2016-10-21 12:13:41 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2017-12-12 09:19:20 -05:00
|
|
|
Note that adding a worker to an existing namespace should be done with care, as
|
|
|
|
the extra jobs will take resources away from jobs from workers that were already
|
|
|
|
there, if the resources available to the Sidekiq process handling the namespace
|
|
|
|
are not adjusted appropriately.
|
2016-10-21 12:13:41 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2019-10-30 11:14:17 -04:00
|
|
|
## Latency Sensitive Jobs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If a large number of background jobs get scheduled at once, queueing of jobs may
|
|
|
|
occur while jobs wait for a worker node to be become available. This is normal
|
|
|
|
and gives the system resilience by allowing it to gracefully handle spikes in
|
|
|
|
traffic. Some jobs, however, are more sensitive to latency than others. Examples
|
|
|
|
of these jobs include:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. A job which updates a merge request following a push to a branch.
|
|
|
|
1. A job which invalidates a cache of known branches for a project after a push
|
|
|
|
to the branch.
|
|
|
|
1. A job which recalculates the groups and projects a user can see after a
|
|
|
|
change in permissions.
|
|
|
|
1. A job which updates the status of a CI pipeline after a state change to a job
|
|
|
|
in the pipeline.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When these jobs are delayed, the user may perceive the delay as a bug: for
|
|
|
|
example, they may push a branch and then attempt to create a merge request for
|
|
|
|
that branch, but be told in the UI that the branch does not exist. We deem these
|
|
|
|
jobs to be `latency_sensitive`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Extra effort is made to ensure that these jobs are started within a very short
|
|
|
|
period of time after being scheduled. However, in order to ensure throughput,
|
|
|
|
these jobs also have very strict execution duration requirements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. The median job execution time should be less than 1 second.
|
|
|
|
1. 99% of jobs should complete within 10 seconds.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If a worker cannot meet these expectations, then it cannot be treated as a
|
|
|
|
`latency_sensitive` worker: consider redesigning the worker, or splitting the
|
|
|
|
work between two different workers, one with `latency_sensitive` code that
|
|
|
|
executes quickly, and the other with non-`latency_sensitive`, which has no
|
|
|
|
execution latency requirements (but also has lower scheduling targets).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This can be summed up in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| **Latency Sensitivity** | **Queue Scheduling Target** | **Execution Latency Requirement** |
|
|
|
|
|-------------------------|-----------------------------|-------------------------------------|
|
|
|
|
| Not `latency_sensitive` | 1 minute | Maximum run time of 1 hour |
|
|
|
|
| `latency_sensitive` | 100 milliseconds | p50 of 1 second, p99 of 10 seconds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To mark a worker as being `latency_sensitive`, use the
|
|
|
|
`latency_sensitive_worker!` attribute, as shown in this example:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```ruby
|
|
|
|
class LatencySensitiveWorker
|
|
|
|
include ApplicationWorker
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
latency_sensitive_worker!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# ...
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Jobs with External Dependencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Most background jobs in the GitLab application communicate with other GitLab
|
|
|
|
services, eg Postgres, Redis, Gitaly and Object Storage. These are considered
|
|
|
|
to be "internal" dependencies for a job.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
However, some jobs will be dependent on external services in order to complete
|
|
|
|
successfully. Some examples include:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Jobs which call web-hooks configured by a user.
|
|
|
|
1. Jobs which deploy an application to a k8s cluster configured by a user.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These jobs have "external dependencies". This is important for the operation of
|
|
|
|
the background processing cluster in several ways:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Most external dependencies (such as web-hooks) do not provide SLOs, and
|
|
|
|
therefore we cannot guarantee the execution latencies on these jobs. Since we
|
|
|
|
cannot guarantee execution latency, we cannot ensure throughput and
|
|
|
|
therefore, in high-traffic environments, we need to ensure that jobs with
|
|
|
|
external dependencies are separated from `latency_sensitive` jobs, to ensure
|
|
|
|
throughput on those queues.
|
|
|
|
1. Errors in jobs with external dependencies have higher alerting thresholds as
|
|
|
|
there is a likelihood that the cause of the error is external.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```ruby
|
|
|
|
class ExternalDependencyWorker
|
|
|
|
include ApplicationWorker
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Declares that this worker depends on
|
|
|
|
# third-party, external services in order
|
|
|
|
# to complete successfully
|
|
|
|
worker_has_external_dependencies!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# ...
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE: **Note:** Note that a job cannot be both latency sensitive and have
|
|
|
|
external dependencies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## CPU-bound and Memory-bound Workers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Workers that are constrained by CPU or memory resource limitations should be
|
|
|
|
annotated with the `worker_resource_boundary` method.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Most workers tend to spend most of their time blocked, wait on network responses
|
|
|
|
from other services such as Redis, Postgres and Gitaly. Since Sidekiq is a
|
|
|
|
multithreaded environment, these jobs can be scheduled with high concurrency.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Some workers, however, spend large amounts of time _on-cpu_ running logic in
|
|
|
|
Ruby. Ruby MRI does not support true multithreading - it relies on the
|
|
|
|
[GIL](https://thoughtbot.com/blog/untangling-ruby-threads#the-global-interpreter-lock)
|
|
|
|
to greatly simplify application development by only allowing one section of Ruby
|
|
|
|
code in a process to run at a time, no matter how many cores the machine
|
|
|
|
hosting the process has. For IO bound workers, this is not a problem, since most
|
|
|
|
of the threads are blocked in underlying libraries (which are outside of the
|
|
|
|
GIL).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If many threads are attempting to run Ruby code simultaneously, this will lead
|
|
|
|
to contention on the GIL which will have the affect of slowing down all
|
|
|
|
processes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In high-traffic environments, knowing that a worker is CPU-bound allows us to
|
|
|
|
run it on a different fleet with lower concurrency. This ensures optimal
|
|
|
|
performance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Likewise, if a worker uses large amounts of memory, we can run these on a
|
|
|
|
bespoke low concurrency, high memory fleet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note that Memory-bound workers create heavy GC workloads, with pauses of
|
|
|
|
10-50ms. This will have an impact on the latency requirements for the
|
|
|
|
worker. For this reason, `memory` bound, `latency_sensitive` jobs are not
|
|
|
|
permitted and will fail CI. In general, `memory` bound workers are
|
|
|
|
discouraged, and alternative approaches to processing the work should be
|
|
|
|
considered.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Declaring a Job as CPU-bound
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This example shows how to declare a job as being CPU-bound.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```ruby
|
|
|
|
class CPUIntensiveWorker
|
|
|
|
include ApplicationWorker
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Declares that this worker will perform a lot of
|
|
|
|
# calculations on-CPU.
|
|
|
|
worker_resource_boundary :cpu
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# ...
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Determining whether a worker is CPU-bound
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We use the following approach to determine whether a worker is CPU-bound:
|
|
|
|
|
2019-11-27 01:06:40 -05:00
|
|
|
- In the Sidekiq structured JSON logs, aggregate the worker `duration` and
|
2019-10-30 11:14:17 -04:00
|
|
|
`cpu_s` fields.
|
|
|
|
- `duration` refers to the total job execution duration, in seconds
|
|
|
|
- `cpu_s` is derived from the
|
|
|
|
[`Process::CLOCK_THREAD_CPUTIME_ID`](https://www.rubydoc.info/stdlib/core/Process:clock_gettime)
|
|
|
|
counter, and is a measure of time spent by the job on-CPU.
|
|
|
|
- Divide `cpu_s` by `duration` to get the percentage time spend on-CPU.
|
|
|
|
- If this ratio exceeds 33%, the worker is considered CPU-bound and should be
|
|
|
|
annotated as such.
|
|
|
|
- Note that these values should not be used over small sample sizes, but
|
|
|
|
rather over fairly large aggregates.
|
|
|
|
|
2019-10-18 07:11:44 -04:00
|
|
|
## Feature Categorization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each Sidekiq worker, or one of its ancestor classes, must declare a
|
|
|
|
`feature_category` attribute. This attribute maps each worker to a feature
|
|
|
|
category. This is done for error budgeting, alert routing, and team attribution
|
|
|
|
for Sidekiq workers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The declaration uses the `feature_category` class method, as shown below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```ruby
|
|
|
|
class SomeScheduledTaskWorker
|
|
|
|
include ApplicationWorker
|
|
|
|
|
2019-10-30 11:14:17 -04:00
|
|
|
# Declares that this worker is part of the
|
2019-10-18 07:11:44 -04:00
|
|
|
# `continuous_integration` feature category
|
|
|
|
feature_category :continuous_integration
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# ...
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The list of value values can be found in the file `config/feature_categories.yml`.
|
|
|
|
This file is, in turn generated from the [`stages.yml` from the GitLab Company Handbook
|
|
|
|
source](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/blob/master/data/stages.yml).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Updating `config/feature_categories.yml`
|
|
|
|
|
2019-10-30 11:14:17 -04:00
|
|
|
Occasionally new features will be added to GitLab stages. When this occurs, you
|
2019-10-18 07:11:44 -04:00
|
|
|
can automatically update `config/feature_categories.yml` by running
|
|
|
|
`scripts/update-feature-categories`. This script will fetch and parse
|
|
|
|
[`stages.yml`](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/blob/master/data/stages.yml)
|
2019-10-30 11:14:17 -04:00
|
|
|
and generate a new version of the file, which needs to be checked into source control.
|
2019-10-18 07:11:44 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Excluding Sidekiq workers from feature categorization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A few Sidekiq workers, that are used across all features, cannot be mapped to a
|
|
|
|
single category. These should be declared as such using the `feature_category_not_owned!`
|
|
|
|
declaration, as shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```ruby
|
|
|
|
class SomeCrossCuttingConcernWorker
|
|
|
|
include ApplicationWorker
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Declares that this worker does not map to a feature category
|
|
|
|
feature_category_not_owned!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# ...
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
2016-10-21 12:13:41 -04:00
|
|
|
## Tests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each Sidekiq worker must be tested using RSpec, just like any other class. These
|
|
|
|
tests should be placed in `spec/workers`.
|
2017-07-21 03:20:35 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2019-10-30 11:14:17 -04:00
|
|
|
## Sidekiq Compatibility across Updates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Keep in mind that the arguments for a Sidekiq job are stored in a queue while it
|
|
|
|
is scheduled for execution. During a online update, this could lead to several
|
|
|
|
possible situations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. An older version of the application publishes a job, which is executed by an
|
|
|
|
upgraded Sidekiq node.
|
|
|
|
1. A job is queued before an upgrade, but executed after an upgrade.
|
|
|
|
1. A job is queued by a node running the newer version of the application, but
|
|
|
|
executed on a node running an older version of the application.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Changing the arguments for a worker
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jobs need to be backwards- and forwards-compatible between consecutive versions
|
|
|
|
of the application.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This can be done by following this process:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. **Do not remove arguments from the `perform` function.**. Instead, use the
|
|
|
|
following approach
|
|
|
|
1. Provide a default value (usually `nil`) and use a comment to mark the
|
|
|
|
argument as deprecated
|
|
|
|
1. Stop using the argument in `perform_async`.
|
|
|
|
1. Ignore the value in the worker class, but do not remove it until the next
|
|
|
|
major release.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Removing workers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Try to avoid removing workers and their queues in minor and patch
|
|
|
|
releases.
|
2017-07-21 03:20:35 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2017-11-30 10:28:09 -05:00
|
|
|
During online update instance can have pending jobs and removing the queue can
|
|
|
|
lead to those jobs being stuck forever. If you can't write migration for those
|
2019-10-30 11:14:17 -04:00
|
|
|
Sidekiq jobs, please consider removing the worker in a major release only.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Renaming queues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the same reasons that removing workers is dangerous, care should be taken
|
|
|
|
when renaming queues.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When renaming queues, use the `sidekiq_queue_migrate` helper migration method,
|
|
|
|
as show in this example:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```ruby
|
|
|
|
class MigrateTheRenamedSidekiqQueue < ActiveRecord::Migration[5.0]
|
|
|
|
include Gitlab::Database::MigrationHelpers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DOWNTIME = false
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def up
|
|
|
|
sidekiq_queue_migrate 'old_queue_name', to: 'new_queue_name'
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def down
|
|
|
|
sidekiq_queue_migrate 'new_queue_name', to: 'old_queue_name'
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```
|