2020-12-09 13:09:48 -05:00
---
stage: Configure
group: Configure
info: To determine the technical writer assigned to the Stage/Group associated with this page, see https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/ux/technical-writing/#designated-technical-writers
---
2021-01-28 07:09:54 -05:00
# GitOps with the Kubernetes Agent **(PREMIUM SELF)**
2020-12-09 13:09:48 -05:00
The [GitLab Kubernetes Agent ](../../user/clusters/agent/index.md ) supports the
[pull-based version ](https://www.gitops.tech/#pull-based-deployments ) of
[GitOps ](https://www.gitops.tech/ ). To be useful, the feature must be able to perform these tasks:
- Connect one or more Kubernetes clusters to a GitLab project or group.
- Synchronize cluster-wide state from a Git repository.
- Synchronize namespace-scoped state from a Git repository.
- Control the following settings:
- The kinds of objects an agent can manage.
- Enabling the namespaced mode of operation for managing objects only in a specific namespace.
- Enabling the non-namespaced mode of operation for managing objects in any namespace, and
managing non-namespaced objects.
- Synchronize state from one or more Git repositories into a cluster.
- Configure multiple agents running in different clusters to synchronize state
from the same repository.
## GitOps architecture
In this architecture, the Kubernetes cluster (`agentk`) periodically fetches
configuration from (`kas`), spawning a goroutine for each configured GitOps
repository. Each goroutine makes a streaming `GetObjectsToSynchronize()` gRPC call.
`kas` accepts these requests, then checks if this agent is authorized to access
this GitLab repository. If authorized, `kas` polls Gitaly for repository updates
and sends the latest manifests to the agent.
Before each poll, `kas` verifies with GitLab that the agent's token is still valid.
When `agentk` receives an updated manifest, it performs a synchronization using
[`gitops-engine` ](https://github.com/argoproj/gitops-engine ).
If a repository is removed from the list, `agentk` stops the `GetObjectsToSynchronize()`
calls to that repository.
```mermaid
graph TB
agentk -- fetch configuration --> kas
agentk -- fetch GitOps manifests --> kas
subgraph "GitLab"
kas[kas]
GitLabRoR[GitLab RoR]
Gitaly[Gitaly]
kas -- poll GitOps repositories --> Gitaly
kas -- authZ for agentk --> GitLabRoR
kas -- fetch configuration --> Gitaly
end
subgraph "Kubernetes cluster"
agentk[agentk]
end
```
## Architecture considered but not implemented
As part of the implementation process, this architecture was considered, but ultimately
not implemented.
In this architecture, `agentk` periodically fetches configuration from `kas` . For each
configured GitOps repository, it spawns a goroutine. Each goroutine then spawns a
copy of [`git-sync` ](https://github.com/kubernetes/git-sync ). It polls a particular
repository and invokes a corresponding webhook on `agentk` when it changes. When that
happens, `agentk` performs a synchronization using
[`gitops-engine` ](https://github.com/argoproj/gitops-engine ).
For repositories no longer in the list, `agentk` stops corresponding goroutines
and `git-sync` copies, also deleting their cloned repositories from disk:
```mermaid
graph TB
agentk -- fetch configuration --> kas
git-sync -- poll GitOps repositories --> GitLabRoR
subgraph "GitLab"
kas[kas]
GitLabRoR[GitLab RoR]
kas -- authZ for agentk --> GitLabRoR
kas -- fetch configuration --> Gitaly[Gitaly]
end
subgraph "Kubernetes cluster"
agentk[agentk]
git-sync[git-sync]
agentk -- control --> git-sync
git-sync -- notify about changes --> agentk
end
```
## Comparing implemented and non-implemented architectures
Both architectures attempt to answer the same question: how to grant an agent
access to a non-public repository?
In the **implemented** architecture:
- Favorable: Fewer moving parts, as `git-sync` and `git` are not used, making this
design more reliable.
- Favorable: Uses existing connectivity and authentication mechanisms are used (gRPC + `agentk` token).
- Favorable: No polling through external infrastructure. Saves traffic and avoids
noise in access logs.
In the **unimplemented** architecture:
- Favorable: `agentk` uses `git-sync` to access repositories with standard protocols
(either HTTPS, or SSH and Git) with accepted authentication and authorization methods.
- Unfavorable: The user must put credentials into a `secret` . GitLab doesn't have
a mechanism for per-repository tokens for robots.
- Unfavorable: Rotating all credentials is more work than rotating a single `agentk` token.
- Unfavorable: A dependency on an external component (`git-sync`) that can be avoided.
- Unfavorable: More network traffic and connections than the implemented design
### Ideas considered for the unimplemented design
As part of the design process, these ideas were considered, and discarded:
- Running `git-sync` and `gitops-engine` as part of `kas` .
- Favorable: More code and infrastructure under our control for GitLab.com
- Unfavorable: Running an arbitrary number of `git-sync` processes would require
an unbounded amount of RAM and disk space.
- Unfavorable: Unclear which `kas` replica is responsible for which agent and
repository synchronization. If done as part of `agentk` , leader election can be
done using [client-go ](https://pkg.go.dev/k8s.io/client-go/tools/leaderelection?tab=doc ).
- Running `git-sync` and a "`gitops-engine` driver" helper program as a separate
Kubernetes `Deployment` .
- Favorable: Better isolation and higher resiliency. For example, if the node
with `agentk` dies, not all synchronization stops.
- Favorable: Each deployment has its own memory and disk limits.
- Favorable: Per-repository synchronization identity (distinct `ServiceAccount` )
can be implemented.
- Unfavorable: Time consuming to implement properly:
- Each `Deployment` needs CRUD (create, update, and delete) permissions.
- Users may want to customize a `Deployment` , or add and remove satellite objects
like `PodDisruptionBudget` , `HorizontalPodAutoscaler` , and `PodSecurityPolicy` .
- Metrics, monitoring, logs for the `Deployment` .