info: To determine the technical writer assigned to the Stage/Group associated with this page, see https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/ux/technical-writing/#assignments
Every foreign key must define an `ON DELETE` clause, and in 99% of the cases
this should be set to `CASCADE`.
## Indexes
When adding a foreign key in PostgreSQL the column is not indexed automatically,
thus you must also add a concurrent index. Not doing so results in cascading
deletes being very slow.
## Naming foreign keys
By default Ruby on Rails uses the `_id` suffix for foreign keys. So we should
only use this suffix for associations between two tables. If you want to
reference an ID on a third party platform the `_xid` suffix is recommended.
The spec `spec/db/schema_spec.rb` tests if all columns with the `_id` suffix
have a foreign key constraint. So if that spec fails, don't add the column to
`IGNORED_FK_COLUMNS`, but instead add the FK constraint, or consider naming it
differently.
## Dependent Removals
Don't define options such as `dependent: :destroy` or `dependent: :delete` when
defining an association. Defining these options means Rails handles the
removal of data, instead of letting the database handle this in the most
efficient way possible.
In other words, this is bad and should be avoided at all costs:
```ruby
class User <ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :posts, dependent: :destroy
end
```
Should you truly have a need for this it should be approved by a database
specialist first.
You should also not define any `before_destroy` or `after_destroy` callbacks on
your models _unless_ absolutely required and only when approved by database
specialists. For example, if each row in a table has a corresponding file on a
file system it may be tempting to add a `after_destroy` hook. This however
introduces non database logic to a model, and means we can no longer rely on
foreign keys to remove the data as this would result in the file system data
being left behind. In such a case you should use a service class instead that
takes care of removing non database data.
In cases where the relation spans multiple databases you have even
further problems using `dependent: :destroy` or the above hooks. You can
read more about alternatives at
[Avoid `dependent: :nullify` and `dependent: :destroy` across databases](multiple_databases.md#avoid-dependent-nullify-and-dependent-destroy-across-databases).
## Alternative primary keys with `has_one` associations
Sometimes a `has_one` association is used to create a one-to-one relationship:
```ruby
class User <ActiveRecord::Base
has_one :user_config
end
class UserConfig <ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :user
end
```
In these cases, there may be an opportunity to remove the unnecessary `id`
column on the associated table, `user_config.id` in this example. Instead,
the originating table ID can be used as the primary key for the associated