Merge branch '36192-change-ha-docs-to-update-using-efs-as-nfs' into 'master'
Resolve "Change HA docs to update using EFS as NFS" Closes #36192 See merge request !13400
This commit is contained in:
commit
18de34bd69
|
@ -42,6 +42,10 @@ GitLab does not recommend using EFS with GitLab.
|
|||
are allocated. For smaller volumes, users may experience decent performance
|
||||
for a period of time due to 'Burst Credits'. Over a period of weeks to months
|
||||
credits may run out and performance will bottom out.
|
||||
- To keep "Burst Credits" available, it may be necessary to provision more space
|
||||
with 'dummy data'. However, this may get expensive.
|
||||
- Another option to maintain "Burst Credits" is to use FS Cache on the server so
|
||||
that AWS doesn't always have to go into EFS to access files.
|
||||
- For larger volumes, allocated IOPS may not be the problem. Workloads where
|
||||
many small files are written in a serialized manner are not well-suited for EFS.
|
||||
EBS with an NFS server on top will perform much better.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue