Add latest changes from gitlab-org/gitlab@master

This commit is contained in:
GitLab Bot 2019-09-13 15:06:04 +00:00
parent b7dfe2ae40
commit 5939b09fd3
4 changed files with 22 additions and 6 deletions

View file

@ -87,9 +87,9 @@ Before assigning a merge request to a maintainer for approval and merge, they
should be confident that it actually solves the problem it was meant to solve,
that it does so in the most appropriate way, that it satisfies all requirements,
and that there are no remaining bugs, logical problems, uncovered edge cases,
or known vulnerabilities. The merge request should also have a completed task
list in its description and a passing CI pipeline to avoid unnecessary back and
forth.
or known vulnerabilities. The best way to do this, and to avoid unnecessary
back-and-forth with reviewers, is to perform a self-review of your own merge
request, following the [Code Review](#reviewing-code) guidelines.
To reach the required level of confidence in their solution, an author is expected
to involve other people in the investigation and implementation processes as
@ -127,6 +127,17 @@ through Slack). If you can't assign a merge request, `@` mentioning a maintainer
This
[saves reviewers time and helps authors catch mistakes earlier](https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rational/library/11-proven-practices-for-peer-review/index.html#__RefHeading__97_174136755).
### The responsibility of the reviewer
[Review the merge request](#reviewing-code) thoroughly. When you are confident
that it meets all requirements, you should:
- Click the Approve button.
- Advise the author their merge request has been reviewed and approved.
- Assign the merge request to a maintainer. [Reviewer roulette](#reviewer-roulette)
should have made a suggestion, but feel free to override if someone else is a
better choice.
### The responsibility of the maintainer
Maintainers are responsible for the overall health, quality, and consistency of
@ -284,6 +295,14 @@ experience, refactors the existing code). Then:
- Assign the merge request to the author if changes are required following your
review.
- Set the milestone before merging a merge request.
- Ensure the target branch is not too far behind master. If
[master is red](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/workflow/#broken-master),
it should be no more than 100 commits behind.
- Consider warnings and errors from danger bot, codequality, and other reports.
Unless a strong case can be made for the violation, these should be resolved
before merge.
- Ensure a passing CI pipeline or if [master is broken](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/workflow/#broken-master), post a comment mentioning the failure happens in master with a
link to the ~"master:broken" issue.
- Avoid accepting a merge request before the job succeeds. Of course, "Merge
When Pipeline Succeeds" (MWPS) is fine.
- If you set the MR to "Merge When Pipeline Succeeds", you should take over

View file

@ -1321,9 +1321,6 @@ msgstr ""
msgid "Alternate support URL for help page and help dropdown"
msgstr ""
msgid "Alternatively, you can use a %{personal_access_token_link}. When you create your Personal Access Token, you will need to select the <code>repo</code> scope, so we can display a list of your public and private repositories which are available to connect."
msgstr ""
msgid "Amount of time (in hours) that users are allowed to skip forced configuration of two-factor authentication"
msgstr ""

0
vendor/gitignore/C++.gitignore vendored Normal file → Executable file
View file

0
vendor/gitignore/Java.gitignore vendored Normal file → Executable file
View file