Clarify what rules we should follow for naming
This commit is contained in:
parent
378d0c49e8
commit
77d1f73ec1
1 changed files with 3 additions and 2 deletions
|
@ -357,7 +357,8 @@ and for each different [Grape](https://github.com/ruby-grape/grape) feature,
|
|||
we might need different strategies to extend it. To apply different strategies
|
||||
easily, we would use `extend ActiveSupport::Concern` in the EE module.
|
||||
|
||||
Put the EE module files following the same rule with other EE modules.
|
||||
Put the EE module files following
|
||||
[EE features based on CE features](#ee-features-based-on-ce-features).
|
||||
|
||||
#### EE API routes
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -387,7 +388,7 @@ constants.
|
|||
|
||||
#### EE params
|
||||
|
||||
We can define `params` and utilize `use` in another `params` definition to
|
||||
We can define `params` and utilize `use` in another `params` definition to
|
||||
include params defined in EE. However, we need to define the "interface" first
|
||||
in CE in order for EE to override it. We don't have to do this in other places
|
||||
due to `prepend`, but Grape is complex internally and we couldn't easily do
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue