Clarrify use of regression label
This commit is contained in:
parent
13ea4b387d
commit
8680038c9f
1 changed files with 6 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -244,6 +244,12 @@ ping the Engineering Manager or the Product Manager for the relative area to
|
|||
make them aware of the issue earlier. They will analyze the priority and change
|
||||
it if needed.
|
||||
|
||||
A ~regression label implies that a regress in functionality happened, a functionality which worked previously but no longer works currently.
|
||||
The ~regression label is not removed as part of the "Rescheduling" process. If an issue is indeed a regression, it should carry such context forward until it's fully resolved.
|
||||
A ~regression label on a ~bug tells us that something worked before and it needs extra attention from Engineering and Product Managers to schedule/reschedule.
|
||||
|
||||
The milestone of a ~regression is used to schedule when the fix will be delivered. The creation time of a ~regression tells us which release it was found in.
|
||||
|
||||
## Release retrospective and kickoff
|
||||
|
||||
- [Retrospective](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/workflow/#retrospective)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue