Remove label examples from headings
Better make it clearer under each section what the labels are rather than listing a subset of them in the section title
This commit is contained in:
parent
02c007bda5
commit
a18c79fe32
1 changed files with 48 additions and 34 deletions
|
@ -27,25 +27,26 @@ _This notice should stay as the first item in the CONTRIBUTING.md file._
|
|||
- [Helping others](#helping-others)
|
||||
- [I want to contribute!](#i-want-to-contribute)
|
||||
- [Workflow labels](#workflow-labels)
|
||||
- [Type labels (~"feature proposal", ~bug, ~customer, etc.)](#type-labels-feature-proposal-bug-customer-etc)
|
||||
- [Subject labels (~wiki, ~"container registry", ~ldap, ~api, etc.)](#subject-labels-wiki-container-registry-ldap-api-etc)
|
||||
- [Team labels (~"CI/CD", ~Discussion, ~Quality, ~Platform, etc.)](#team-labels-cicd-discussion-quality-platform-etc)
|
||||
- [Milestone labels (~Deliverable, ~Stretch, ~"Next Patch Release")](#milestone-labels-deliverable-stretch-next-patch-release)
|
||||
- [Priority labels (~P1, ~P2, ~P3 , ~P4)](#bug-priority-labels-p1-p2-p3-p4)
|
||||
- [Severity labels (~S1, ~S2, ~S3 , ~S4)](#bug-severity-labels-s1-s2-s3-s4)
|
||||
- [Label for community contributors (~"Accepting Merge Requests")](#label-for-community-contributors-accepting-merge-requests)
|
||||
- [Implement design & UI elements](#implement-design--ui-elements)
|
||||
- [Type labels](#type-labels)
|
||||
- [Subject labels](#subject-labels)
|
||||
- [Team labels](#team-labels)
|
||||
- [Milestone labels](#milestone-labels)
|
||||
- [Bug Priority labels](#bug-priority-labels)
|
||||
- [Bug Severity labels](#bug-severity-labels)
|
||||
- [Severity impact guidance](#severity-impact-guidance)
|
||||
- [Label for community contributors](#label-for-community-contributors)
|
||||
- [Implement design & UI elements](#implement-design-ui-elements)
|
||||
- [Issue tracker](#issue-tracker)
|
||||
- [Issue triaging](#issue-triaging)
|
||||
- [Feature proposals](#feature-proposals)
|
||||
- [Issue tracker guidelines](#issue-tracker-guidelines)
|
||||
- [Issue weight](#issue-weight)
|
||||
- [Regression issues](#regression-issues)
|
||||
- [Technical and UX debt](#technical-and-ux-debt)
|
||||
- [Stewardship](#stewardship)
|
||||
- [Issue triaging](#issue-triaging)
|
||||
- [Feature proposals](#feature-proposals)
|
||||
- [Issue tracker guidelines](#issue-tracker-guidelines)
|
||||
- [Issue weight](#issue-weight)
|
||||
- [Regression issues](#regression-issues)
|
||||
- [Technical and UX debt](#technical-and-ux-debt)
|
||||
- [Stewardship](#stewardship)
|
||||
- [Merge requests](#merge-requests)
|
||||
- [Merge request guidelines](#merge-request-guidelines)
|
||||
- [Contribution acceptance criteria](#contribution-acceptance-criteria)
|
||||
- [Merge request guidelines](#merge-request-guidelines)
|
||||
- [Contribution acceptance criteria](#contribution-acceptance-criteria)
|
||||
- [Definition of done](#definition-of-done)
|
||||
- [Style guides](#style-guides)
|
||||
- [Code of conduct](#code-of-conduct)
|
||||
|
@ -145,7 +146,7 @@ labels, you can _always_ add the team and type, and often also the subject.
|
|||
[milestones-page]: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/milestones
|
||||
[labels-page]: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/labels
|
||||
|
||||
### Type labels (~"feature proposal", ~bug, ~customer, etc.)
|
||||
### Type labels
|
||||
|
||||
Type labels are very important. They define what kind of issue this is. Every
|
||||
issue should have one or more.
|
||||
|
@ -161,28 +162,41 @@ already reserved for subject labels).
|
|||
|
||||
The descriptions on the [labels page][labels-page] explain what falls under each type label.
|
||||
|
||||
### Subject labels (~wiki, ~"container registry", ~ldap, ~api, etc.)
|
||||
### Subject labels
|
||||
|
||||
Subject labels are labels that define what area or feature of GitLab this issue
|
||||
hits. They are not always necessary, but very convenient.
|
||||
|
||||
Examples of subject labels are ~wiki, ~ldap, ~api,
|
||||
~issues, ~"merge requests", ~labels, and ~"container registry".
|
||||
|
||||
If you are an expert in a particular area, it makes it easier to find issues to
|
||||
work on. You can also subscribe to those labels to receive an email each time an
|
||||
issue is labeled with a subject label corresponding to your expertise.
|
||||
|
||||
Examples of subject labels are ~wiki, ~"container registry", ~ldap, ~api,
|
||||
~issues, ~"merge requests", ~labels, and ~"container registry".
|
||||
|
||||
Subject labels are always all-lowercase.
|
||||
|
||||
### Team labels (~"CI/CD", ~Discussion, ~Quality, ~Platform, etc.)
|
||||
### Team labels
|
||||
|
||||
Team labels specify what team is responsible for this issue.
|
||||
Assigning a team label makes sure issues get the attention of the appropriate
|
||||
people.
|
||||
|
||||
The current team labels are ~Distribution, ~"CI/CD", ~Discussion, ~Documentation, ~Quality,
|
||||
~Geo, ~Gitaly, ~Monitoring, ~Platform, ~Release, ~"Security Products", ~"Configuration", and ~"UX".
|
||||
The current team labels are:
|
||||
|
||||
- ~Configuration
|
||||
- ~"CI/CD"
|
||||
- ~Discussion
|
||||
- ~Distribution
|
||||
- ~Documentation
|
||||
- ~Geo
|
||||
- ~Gitaly
|
||||
- ~Monitoring
|
||||
- ~Platform
|
||||
- ~Quality
|
||||
- ~Release
|
||||
- ~"Security Products"
|
||||
- ~UX
|
||||
|
||||
The descriptions on the [labels page][labels-page] explain what falls under the
|
||||
responsibility of each team.
|
||||
|
@ -193,7 +207,7 @@ indicate if an issue needs backend work, frontend work, or both.
|
|||
Team labels are always capitalized so that they show up as the first label for
|
||||
any issue.
|
||||
|
||||
### Milestone labels (~Deliverable, ~Stretch, ~"Next Patch Release")
|
||||
### Milestone labels
|
||||
|
||||
Milestone labels help us clearly communicate expectations of the work for the
|
||||
release. There are three levels of Milestone labels:
|
||||
|
@ -211,9 +225,9 @@ Each issue scheduled for the current milestone should be labeled ~Deliverable
|
|||
or ~"Stretch". Any open issue for a previous milestone should be labeled
|
||||
~"Next Patch Release", or otherwise rescheduled to a different milestone.
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug Priority labels (~P1, ~P2, ~P3, ~P4)
|
||||
### Bug Priority labels
|
||||
|
||||
Bug Priority labels help us define the time a ~bug fix should be completed. Priority determines how quickly the defect turnaround time must be.
|
||||
Bug Priority labels help us define the time a ~bug fix should be completed. Priority determines how quickly the defect turnaround time must be.
|
||||
If there are multiple defects, the priority decides which defect has to be fixed immediately versus later.
|
||||
This label documents the planned timeline & urgency which is used to measure against our actual SLA on delivering ~bug fixes.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -224,7 +238,7 @@ This label documents the planned timeline & urgency which is used to measure aga
|
|||
| ~P3 | Medium Priority | Within the next 3 releases (approx one quarter) | |
|
||||
| ~P4 | Low Priority | Anything outside the next 3 releases (approx beyond one quarter) | The issue is prominent but does not impact user workflow and a workaround is documented |
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug Severity labels (~S1, ~S2, ~S3, ~S4)
|
||||
### Bug Severity labels
|
||||
|
||||
Severity labels help us clearly communicate the impact of a ~bug on users.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -240,11 +254,11 @@ Severity labels help us clearly communicate the impact of a ~bug on users.
|
|||
| Label | Security Impact | Availability / Performance Impact |
|
||||
|-------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|
|
||||
| ~S1 | >50% users impacted (possible company extinction level event) | |
|
||||
| ~S2 | Many users or multiple paid customers impacted (but not apocalyptic)| The issue is (almost) guaranteed to occur in the near future |
|
||||
| ~S2 | Many users or multiple paid customers impacted (but not apocalyptic)| The issue is (almost) guaranteed to occur in the near future |
|
||||
| ~S3 | A few users or a single paid customer impacted | The issue is likely to occur in the near future |
|
||||
| ~S4 | No paid users/customer impacted, or expected impact within 30 days | The issue _may_ occur but it's not likely |
|
||||
|
||||
### Label for community contributors (~"Accepting Merge Requests")
|
||||
### Label for community contributors
|
||||
|
||||
Issues that are beneficial to our users, 'nice to haves', that we currently do
|
||||
not have the capacity for or want to give the priority to, are labeled as
|
||||
|
@ -300,14 +314,14 @@ For guidance on UX implementation at GitLab, please refer to our [Design System]
|
|||
|
||||
The UX team uses labels to manage their workflow.
|
||||
|
||||
The ~"UX" label on an issue is a signal to the UX team that it will need UX attention.
|
||||
The ~"UX" label on an issue is a signal to the UX team that it will need UX attention.
|
||||
To better understand the priority by which UX tackles issues, see the [UX section](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/ux) of the handbook.
|
||||
|
||||
Once an issue has been worked on and is ready for development, a UXer removes the ~"UX" label and applies the ~"UX ready" label to that issue.
|
||||
|
||||
The UX team has a special type label called ~"design artifact". This label indicates that the final output
|
||||
The UX team has a special type label called ~"design artifact". This label indicates that the final output
|
||||
for an issue is a UX solution/design. The solution will be developed by frontend and/or backend in a subsequent milestone.
|
||||
Any issue labeled ~"design artifact" should not also be labeled ~"frontend" or ~"backend" since no development is
|
||||
Any issue labeled ~"design artifact" should not also be labeled ~"frontend" or ~"backend" since no development is
|
||||
needed until the solution has been decided.
|
||||
|
||||
~"design artifact" issues are like any other issue and should contain a milestone label, ~"Deliverable" or ~"Stretch", when scheduled in the current milestone.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue